Manufacturers, merchant wholesalers, and retailers have been facing an extremely challenging economic and financial environment over the past few years. Key among their concerns: an unexpected decline in sales combined with an increase in the inventories-to-sales ratio. While this situation is typical during a recession, the nature of both of these conditions was qualitatively different than it was for previous post-World War II recessions.
An unexpected sales decline in combination with an increase in the inventories-to-sales ratio typically implies an unexpected inventory accumulation and a reduction in demand. This stems from the inability of businesses to adjust inventory levels and prices. ("Unexpected" sales or inventories-to-sales ratios are defined as the difference between the forecast and the actual.)
It's important to note that different types of companies have different capacities for dealing with unexpected inventory accumulations. Wholesalers and retailers usually are better able to manage them because they can initiate the cancellation of orders, implement price discounting, and get better and faster feedback from their customers. Manufacturers, on the other hand, have to be concerned about production cycles and assembly lines and therefore manage two different types of inventories: input inventories (work-in-progress, raw materials, and intermediate goods) and finished goods.
A different kind of recession
By examining the inventory and sales levels over the past 14 years, we can see how the two most recent recessions (2001 and 2007) differed from one another in terms of which types of business were affected as well as the severity of the downturn.
The 2001 recession (March 2001 through November 2001), also known as the "Dot-Com Recession," was driven by a downturn in business spending rather than by a drop in housing or consumer spending. Business investment adjusted for inflation suffered significant declines, however housing starts hardly moved and personal spending and retail sales, when adjusted for inflation, actually increased.
In the months leading into the 2001 recession, retail sales growth slowed and wholesale sales fell a bit, but manufacturing sales saw a relatively sharp decline as shown in Figure 1. This decline caused greater inventory accumulation (Figure 2) and a sudden rise in the inventoriesto- sales ratios (Figure 3). While manufacturing sales adjusted for inflation just barely surpassed its pre-2001 recession peak, wholesale sales, retail sales, and imports from China kept chugging along.
In contrast, the "Great Recession" (December 2007 through June 2009) and the subsequent anemic recovery have dramatically affected almost every aspect of the U.S. economy. This past recession was much more severe and qualitatively different than the previous post-World War II recessions. The impact on manufacturers was devastating, causing an almost 20-percent decline in real sales and an unprecedented spike in the inventories-to-sales ratio, as seen in Figures 1 and 3, respectively. While retailers and wholesalers fared relatively "better" leading up to and during the Great Recession, they did experience an approximate 12- percent decline in sales from peak to trough (see Figure 1). But they managed to reduce their inventory holdings through heavy price discounting and canceling orders of Chinese imports.
How strong a recovery?
Since the official end of the Great Recession in June 2009, the economic recovery has been relatively anemic by historical standards, with significant weaknesses in such key sectors of the economy as housing and household net worth. It has taken three years for retail sales and personal spending adjusted for inflation to finally surpass their previous peaks. Real wholesale sales are still slightly below their pre-Great Recession peak, while the manufacturing sector is struggling to make a full recovery.
The manufacturing recovery would be even weaker if not for a substantial increase in U.S. exports due to relatively strong growth in some emerging markets— namely China, India, and Brazil—and a weak U.S. dollar. In addition, business capital equipment and software spending has accelerated during the recovery period as businesses with healthy balance sheets focused on improving both productivity and inventory management without increasing payrolls.
What does all this mean for the near future? Currently inventories are lean, and as a result, we expect to see them increase. There should be a big bounce-back in automobile inventories—and therefore manufacturing—once the supply chain disruptions caused by the mid-March earthquake in Japan abate. We expect manufacturing inventory levels to surpass their Quarter 1, 2008 peak by early 2012.
Wholesale inventories will benefit from the same type of drivers as manufacturing inventories: exports, business equipment formation (capacity expansion), and replenishment. However, a significant portion of wholesale sales and inventory is targeted to the retail side of the economy, which has been showing considerable weakness recently.
The consumer side of the U.S. economy has softened considerably in the first half of 2011, with weakening retail sales growth and depressed levels of consumer confidence. Retail inventories are ultra-thin, and we expect the inventories-to-sales ratio to continue on its downward path due to technological innovations that help companies better match supply with demand together with increased efficiency in inventory management. The outlook for retail inventories remains relatively flat for the next couple of quarters with a slight pickup thereafter. We do not expect retail inventories to surpass their pre-Great Recession peak anytime soon since consumer spending has been very lackluster and the recent payroll numbers are not very promising.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”