The annual “State of Logistics Report” shows that a chaotic and unpredictable 2020 led to logistics costs dropping by 4%. This trend of constant change has supply chain professionals wondering what’s next on the horizon.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
The past few years have been turbulent ones for the logistics industry, leaving many supply chain professionals asking themselves, “Whatever happened to predictability?”
In particular, 2020 was a chaotic year of sudden stops, stuttering starts, dips, drips, and explosive rises—all while trying to reroute assets on the fly. As a result of this unpredictable, pandemic-driven year, U.S. business logistics costs fell 4.0% to $1.56 trillion, or 7.4% of 2020’s $20.94 trillion U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), according to the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals’ (CSCMP’s) 32nd Annual “State of Logistics Report.” (See Figure 1.)
[Figure 1] U.S. business logistics costs as a percent of nominal GDP Enlarge this image
The main driver of that drop was the decrease in inventory carrying costs, which plunged 15%, due to the sudden decline in manufacturing and commerce early in the year caused by pandemic shutdowns.
This meant transportation volumes also fell. However, costs for many transportation and warehousing services rose, as networks dealt with capacity shortages, port congestion, and major shifts in consumer demand as well as assets that could not be deployed or redeployed efficiently. According to the report, 2020 exposed logistics systems that were optimized for cost and efficiency but were fragile and lacking resiliency in the face of disruptions.
“The 2020 upheaval of supply chains created chaos that placed gigantic demand on logistics, resulting in higher prices for logistics services despite a shrinking economy,” said Michael Zimmerman, one of the authors of the report and a partner with the consulting company Kearney at a press conference. “At the same time, due to halted economic activities during lockdowns and decreases in financial costs, logistics costs account for a lower percentage of GDP at 7.4% compared to the 7.6% in 2019.”
Sector-by-sector breakdown
Some segments of the market did better than others in riding out the storm. Figure 2 and the summaries below provide a quick look at how some of the key modes and segments fared. (For more in-depth analysis, see the report itself, which can be downloaded from cscmp.org.)
Motor carrier freight: Trucking costs, the biggest segment of U.S. logistics spend, fell by 1.6% year over year. A strong fourth quarter and a continuing economic recovery, however, indicate that rates will remain high through 2021. One silver lining of the pandemic is that the need to avoid “touch” processes drove many trucking firms to finally embrace digitization. New digital technologies, such as online freight booking and digital bill of materials, should lead to improved services levels in the future, predicts the report.
Parcel: Homebound consumers caused e-commerce to explode in 2020, growing by 33% to $792 billion, or 14% of all retail sales. This rapid rise fueled a 24.3% year-over-year increase in parcel shipping spend, which totaled $118.6 billion, but it also had shippers scrambling to adjust their delivery offerings and solutions.
Rail: Volumes and revenue were down overall for the rail industry, with spend dropping 11% year-over-year to $74.3 billion. This drop was due to reduced volumes in industrial products and coal. Intermodal, however, saw smaller declines as high trucking prices pushed some shippers to switch modes.
Air freight: Air cargo costs totaled $96.5 billion in 2020, a 9% increase over 2019. Rates remain “shockingly high” even in mid-2021, as most airlines have not recovered from the cancellation of passenger flights in 2020. The authors expect that demand will continue to exceed supply in 2021.
Water: Logistics costs associated with on-the-water shipping dropped 28.6% year over year, in part due to a one-time reclassification in the report’s methodology. However, the decrease in exports and in traffic on domestic waterways would have kept costs down substantially regardless of the recalculation. Rates and volumes, however, soared in late 2020 as retailers restocked and have remained high ever since.
Pipeline: The COVID-19 pandemic brought about a sharp and unforeseen bust in the oil industry. However, the gas industry was one of the few areas that remained relatively unaffected by the pandemic. As a result, pipeline logistics costs rose by 1.7% year over year.
Warehousing: The e-commerce boom spurred high demand for warehousing space especially in urban locations. At the same time, warehouse flows have become more complicated and labor conditions remain tight, leading more warehouses to turn to automation.
Freight forwarding: While volumes declined in this segment, higher rates led to higher 2020 revenues. The report predicts that freight forwarding will see fierce competition as more traditional providers face off against new digital startups, carriers seeking to become end-to-end providers, and large monoliths such as Amazon and Maersk. They also predict more mergers and acquisitions ahead.
Third-party logistics providers (3PLs): While many 3PLs saw higher revenue last year, some experienced cost increases, which harmed their profitability. The report authors predict that as supply chain and logistics become more complex, the sector will continue to grow.
[Figure 2] U.S. business logistics costs (in $ billions) Enlarge this image
More change ahead
In spite of the upheaval of the past year, the report authors are hopeful. Logisticians proved themselves capable of quickly abandoning old plans, solving new problems, and handling disruptions. This ability to adapt will serve logistics professionals well in the future, as the report predicts that the pandemic’s aftereffects and “new surprises” will force logistics professionals to continually change their plans.
“There is no relief in sight,” said Zimmerman.
The list of potential future disruptors includes the trend toward “right shoring,” continuing technological advances, and climate-related disasters—to name just a few. Right shoring involves a company creating a mix of offshore and nearshore (or “reshored”) manufacturing operations. The goal with this trend is for a company not to be overly dependent on one supplier or region for its manufacturing operations and for production to be closer to consumption. While the idea on the surface is appealing, moving manufacturing operations out of low-cost countries in Asia is a difficult process and will make logistics needs even more complex.
The pandemic also accelerated interest in technology that improves visibility and automation. For example, Kearney has seen increased interest in control tower technology to improve and centralize companies’ access to critical data. Additionally, the report authors expect to see increased use of distributed sensors to collect that data and artificial intelligence and machine learning to analyze it. Meanwhile the difficulty of finding labor and keeping that labor safe from a contagious disease has fueled interest in automation technology and robotics.
Finally, the effects of climate change and extreme weather are making sustainability an increasing concern for logistics processes and companies. Logisticians are responding by taking a closer look at measures such as electric vehicles and alternative fuels; network redesigns, such as locating warehouses close to inland ports; and more efficient forms of transportation, such as rail.
The report authors also predict that the cost of logistics will rise as the scope of what the field encompasses grows. As an example, they point to last-mile delivery, which used to be a “domestic” activity performed by consumers and is now an increasingly commercial one.
After the stresses of last year, logistics executives are focused on rebuilding their supply chains to be more resilient. “State of Logistics Report” authors don’t expect these changes to be minor. They predict that in 2021 and beyond, executives will be fundamentally rethinking and redesigning their logistics networks. “In 2021, even if conditions prove less volatile, the changes may be more profound,” concludes the report.
The “State of Logistics Report” is authored by the consulting company Kearney for the industry association, the Council for Supply Chain Management Professionals. It is sponsored by Penske Logistics.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.