C. John Langley Jr., Ph.D. (jlangley@psu.edu) is Professor of Supply Chain Management at Penn State University’s Smeal College of Business and the Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems, and Founder of the “Annual Third-Party Logistics Study.”
Sylvie Thompson is a supply chain executive focused on driving revenue, margin, and profitable results by combining emerging technologies with traditional supply chain best practices. She has co-led the Annual Third Party Logistics Study for the past three years.
Considering the attention being directed globally toward the pursuit of sustainability, it is not surprising that supply chains of all types have made highly visible commitments to achieving sustainability goals and objectives.1 For many companies, a key aspect of achieving those goals will be how well they collaborate with their third-party logistics providers (3PLs), fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs), and other logistics service providers. Recognizing the important role of 3PLs, the “2022 26th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study,” to be released at the CSCMP EDGE conference, will focus on investigating this topic.2
A closer look at ESG
Sustainability can be defined in a number of different ways from focusing solely on the environment to encompassing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI); corporate social responsibility (CSR); and the notion of the “circular” economy.
For the purposes of this article (and the “Annual 3PL Study”), the concept of ESG (environmental, social, and governance) will be used to anchor our reporting on how 3PL-customer relationships can impact sustainability in the context of supply chains. The ESG framework provides a well-structured approach for better understanding the progress being made towards environmentally friendly, socially acceptable, and ethically responsible business practices. The three elements of ESG and their connection to supply chain management are outlined in Figure 1 and below.
Environmental. Generally, environmental goals relate to reducing the overuse and destruction of natural resources and threats to all forms of life. Initiatives that are designed to address tactical environment concerns include the development of “carbon-neutral” activities and processes; biodegradability; alternative and renewable energy sources; reverse logistics; and circular supply chain strategies, to name just a few. One opportunity area that is relevant to many 3PL-customer relationships and provides numerous opportunities to enhance environmental sustainability is transportation management. Specific examples in this category would include fuel efficiency, capacity utilization, advances in electric vehicle technology, and improved vehicle scheduling and management.
Social. The social element of ESG focuses on identifying and managing the impacts of organizations and their supply chains, both positive and negative, on people.3 Recent experiences have highlighted the importance of issues such as: diversity, equity, and inclusion; work-life balance; fair labor practices; and human rights in our supply chains. The inclusion of supply chain visibility reflects the importance of preserving these principles throughout supply chains.
Governance. This component of ESG reflects the commitment of an organization to responsible decision-making and execution. Most frequently, this involves actions taken by senior and executive management and boards of directors. Just as “good processes lead to good results,” good governance should promote and foster sustainability both internally within the organization and externally with other supply chain participants and stakeholders. Some examples that relate to how 3PLs and their customers can collaborate on sustainability include improving relationships; increasing data and cybersecurity; and using visibility to help address anticorruption/bribery.
Among respondents in this year’s “Annual 3PL Study,” 85% of 3PL users and 83% of 3PL providers said that ESG is included in their organization’s supply chain and growth strategies. Currently, many supply chains are further along the maturity cycle in the area of environmental progress than social or governance. This is understandable when you consider the attention most organizations have focused on improving the efficiency and sustainability of their internal manufacturing operations and logistics activities. Social and governance areas, however, are receiving significant additional attention as ESG initiatives move forward.
This year’s survey, for example, asked respondents to indicate areas of importance related to ESG criteria. Top focus areas include workforce health and safety, government anticorruption/bribery, diversity and inclusion, sourcing, and visibility throughout the supply chain. Survey responses from 3PL users indicate that the areas of greatest potential include sourcing/procurement, supplier management, manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing.
Collaboration is key
Achieving ESG objectives across participating organizations in the supply chain ecosystem requires meaningful and effective collaboration. As 3PLs and their customers begin to take a serious look at what needs to be done in the areas of sustainability and ESG, the development of an objective and accurate base case is essential. Like all transformational efforts, ESG initiatives need to be enhanced from an “as-is” or current state to a “to-be” or future state. In the case of sustainability, the priority should be to develop a comprehensive and measurable understanding of the current state of sustainability and to assess key areas to be targeted for improvement.
This process can be initiated by either party and may be facilitated by other stakeholders, such as consumers, investors, and corporate partners. We have seen cases where big box retailers and consumer packaged goods companies, for example, will work only with transportation providers that meet specific goals relating to efficiency and sustainability. At the same time, some large providers, such as FedEx and UPS, have announced internal sustainability goals. Among the available resources that encourage businesses to manage logistics in an environmentally responsible way is the Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay program that reduces transportation-related emissions by creating incentives to improve supply chain fuel efficiency.4
Successful sustainability efforts along the end-to-end supply chain require that participating members are aligned along ESG practices while not unnecessarily compromising the progress already made at any individual firm. Customer organizations that have developed effective supplier relationship management strategies with their 3PLs should benefit accordingly.
Collaboration will also be essential for responding to the some of the challenges that supply chains face in implementing effective ESG measures. According to survey findings from the “2022 26th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study,” top challenges include the cost of implementation, changing regulatory requirements, and a lack of tools and technologies to support ESG programs. To address some of these concerns, 3PLs and customers will need to share costs and investments. Addressing these issues ahead of time and assessing each party’s willingness to make investments is crucial to the success of the relationship between a 3PL and its customer.
It is also important to recognize that as supply chain organizations promote and pursue objectives relating to ESG, they need to do so in a way that is economically and financially sustainable. A reasonable expectation is that organizations and their supply chains have the financial well-being to accommodate investments that will yield positive results. While altruism may be a virtue, businesses must be financially viable in order to contribute to the pursuit of sustainability.
A serious business
The focus on ESG in supply chains is serious business. Supply chains are broad, encompassing everything from sourcing and packaging to warehousing and final-mile delivery, and ESG is applicable at every point. Network optimization, reduced-emission equipment, and efficient buildings can reduce carbon and greenhouse gas emissions, while increased supply chain visibility and traceability can provide insight into sustainable sourcing and the importance of respecting and preserving human rights.
As organizations look to make progress in the areas of environment, social, and governance issues, today’s supply chains leaders will need to step up to the task. Making progress in these areas will shape supply chains of the future. A focus by 3PLs and customers on collaboration to achieve these priorities has the potential to create meaningful advances in meeting the goals of sustainability and ESG. At the same time, attention to the ESG process can be a very useful element for building and strengthening the relationship between 3PLs and customers.
Authors’ Note:The authors would like to thank Mindy Long of Mindy Long Freelance LLC for her contributions to this article.
2. C. John Langley Jr., Ph.D. and NTT DATA Inc., 2022 26th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study, forthcoming September 2021. This study is sponsored by NTT DATA, Penske, and Penn State University. Copies will be available for download at https://www.3PLStudy.com.
3. United Nations Global Compact: https://www.unglobalcompact.org. The United Nations Global Compact is a nonbinding U.N. pact to encourage businesses and firms worldwide to adopt sustainable and socially sustainable policies and to report on their implementation.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”