C. John Langley Jr., Ph.D. (jlangley@psu.edu) is Professor of Supply Chain Management at Penn State University’s Smeal College of Business and the Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems, and Founder of the “Annual Third-Party Logistics Study.”
Sylvie Thompson is a supply chain executive focused on driving revenue, margin, and profitable results by combining emerging technologies with traditional supply chain best practices. She has co-led the Annual Third Party Logistics Study for the past three years.
Considering the attention being directed globally toward the pursuit of sustainability, it is not surprising that supply chains of all types have made highly visible commitments to achieving sustainability goals and objectives.1 For many companies, a key aspect of achieving those goals will be how well they collaborate with their third-party logistics providers (3PLs), fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs), and other logistics service providers. Recognizing the important role of 3PLs, the “2022 26th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study,” to be released at the CSCMP EDGE conference, will focus on investigating this topic.2
A closer look at ESG
Sustainability can be defined in a number of different ways from focusing solely on the environment to encompassing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI); corporate social responsibility (CSR); and the notion of the “circular” economy.
For the purposes of this article (and the “Annual 3PL Study”), the concept of ESG (environmental, social, and governance) will be used to anchor our reporting on how 3PL-customer relationships can impact sustainability in the context of supply chains. The ESG framework provides a well-structured approach for better understanding the progress being made towards environmentally friendly, socially acceptable, and ethically responsible business practices. The three elements of ESG and their connection to supply chain management are outlined in Figure 1 and below.
Environmental. Generally, environmental goals relate to reducing the overuse and destruction of natural resources and threats to all forms of life. Initiatives that are designed to address tactical environment concerns include the development of “carbon-neutral” activities and processes; biodegradability; alternative and renewable energy sources; reverse logistics; and circular supply chain strategies, to name just a few. One opportunity area that is relevant to many 3PL-customer relationships and provides numerous opportunities to enhance environmental sustainability is transportation management. Specific examples in this category would include fuel efficiency, capacity utilization, advances in electric vehicle technology, and improved vehicle scheduling and management.
Social. The social element of ESG focuses on identifying and managing the impacts of organizations and their supply chains, both positive and negative, on people.3 Recent experiences have highlighted the importance of issues such as: diversity, equity, and inclusion; work-life balance; fair labor practices; and human rights in our supply chains. The inclusion of supply chain visibility reflects the importance of preserving these principles throughout supply chains.
Governance. This component of ESG reflects the commitment of an organization to responsible decision-making and execution. Most frequently, this involves actions taken by senior and executive management and boards of directors. Just as “good processes lead to good results,” good governance should promote and foster sustainability both internally within the organization and externally with other supply chain participants and stakeholders. Some examples that relate to how 3PLs and their customers can collaborate on sustainability include improving relationships; increasing data and cybersecurity; and using visibility to help address anticorruption/bribery.
Among respondents in this year’s “Annual 3PL Study,” 85% of 3PL users and 83% of 3PL providers said that ESG is included in their organization’s supply chain and growth strategies. Currently, many supply chains are further along the maturity cycle in the area of environmental progress than social or governance. This is understandable when you consider the attention most organizations have focused on improving the efficiency and sustainability of their internal manufacturing operations and logistics activities. Social and governance areas, however, are receiving significant additional attention as ESG initiatives move forward.
This year’s survey, for example, asked respondents to indicate areas of importance related to ESG criteria. Top focus areas include workforce health and safety, government anticorruption/bribery, diversity and inclusion, sourcing, and visibility throughout the supply chain. Survey responses from 3PL users indicate that the areas of greatest potential include sourcing/procurement, supplier management, manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing.
Collaboration is key
Achieving ESG objectives across participating organizations in the supply chain ecosystem requires meaningful and effective collaboration. As 3PLs and their customers begin to take a serious look at what needs to be done in the areas of sustainability and ESG, the development of an objective and accurate base case is essential. Like all transformational efforts, ESG initiatives need to be enhanced from an “as-is” or current state to a “to-be” or future state. In the case of sustainability, the priority should be to develop a comprehensive and measurable understanding of the current state of sustainability and to assess key areas to be targeted for improvement.
This process can be initiated by either party and may be facilitated by other stakeholders, such as consumers, investors, and corporate partners. We have seen cases where big box retailers and consumer packaged goods companies, for example, will work only with transportation providers that meet specific goals relating to efficiency and sustainability. At the same time, some large providers, such as FedEx and UPS, have announced internal sustainability goals. Among the available resources that encourage businesses to manage logistics in an environmentally responsible way is the Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay program that reduces transportation-related emissions by creating incentives to improve supply chain fuel efficiency.4
Successful sustainability efforts along the end-to-end supply chain require that participating members are aligned along ESG practices while not unnecessarily compromising the progress already made at any individual firm. Customer organizations that have developed effective supplier relationship management strategies with their 3PLs should benefit accordingly.
Collaboration will also be essential for responding to the some of the challenges that supply chains face in implementing effective ESG measures. According to survey findings from the “2022 26th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study,” top challenges include the cost of implementation, changing regulatory requirements, and a lack of tools and technologies to support ESG programs. To address some of these concerns, 3PLs and customers will need to share costs and investments. Addressing these issues ahead of time and assessing each party’s willingness to make investments is crucial to the success of the relationship between a 3PL and its customer.
It is also important to recognize that as supply chain organizations promote and pursue objectives relating to ESG, they need to do so in a way that is economically and financially sustainable. A reasonable expectation is that organizations and their supply chains have the financial well-being to accommodate investments that will yield positive results. While altruism may be a virtue, businesses must be financially viable in order to contribute to the pursuit of sustainability.
A serious business
The focus on ESG in supply chains is serious business. Supply chains are broad, encompassing everything from sourcing and packaging to warehousing and final-mile delivery, and ESG is applicable at every point. Network optimization, reduced-emission equipment, and efficient buildings can reduce carbon and greenhouse gas emissions, while increased supply chain visibility and traceability can provide insight into sustainable sourcing and the importance of respecting and preserving human rights.
As organizations look to make progress in the areas of environment, social, and governance issues, today’s supply chains leaders will need to step up to the task. Making progress in these areas will shape supply chains of the future. A focus by 3PLs and customers on collaboration to achieve these priorities has the potential to create meaningful advances in meeting the goals of sustainability and ESG. At the same time, attention to the ESG process can be a very useful element for building and strengthening the relationship between 3PLs and customers.
Authors’ Note:The authors would like to thank Mindy Long of Mindy Long Freelance LLC for her contributions to this article.
2. C. John Langley Jr., Ph.D. and NTT DATA Inc., 2022 26th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study, forthcoming September 2021. This study is sponsored by NTT DATA, Penske, and Penn State University. Copies will be available for download at https://www.3PLStudy.com.
3. United Nations Global Compact: https://www.unglobalcompact.org. The United Nations Global Compact is a nonbinding U.N. pact to encourage businesses and firms worldwide to adopt sustainable and socially sustainable policies and to report on their implementation.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.