In the past, fear of change kept many companies from pursuing a digital transformation effort. Now, after the pandemic wreaked 20 months of unplanned change on their supply chains, more companies are embracing new technologies.
What’s the biggest obstacle to any major initiative such as digitally transforming your supply chain operations? In many cases, it’s the fear of change. Consider: In late 2019, ToolsGroup conducted a global survey looking at the state of companies’ digital transformation efforts in supply chain planning. How far along were they in implementing technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, the internet of things (IoT), and digital assistants to the planning process? At that time, we found that 30% of respondents believed that the fear of change was holding back their efforts.1
Since then, the most ruthless unplanned change imaginable swept the globe, decimating some industries while creating unprecedented opportunities in others. Supply chain disruptions happened from difficulty procuring raw material on one end to radically changing customer behaviors on the other. Most organizations had to adapt, and fast. While some were threatened by declining business, others stood to lose out by failing to capitalize on demand spikes and other big changes in consumer behavior.
So, what happens when the planned change of a digital supply chain transformation effort meets the unplanned change of a global pandemic? To find out, we decided to revisit our study. In collaboration with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), we launched a new version of the global survey called “Digital Transformation in Supply Chain Planning: 2021.”
We sent it out in January 2021 to 289 supply chain executives, managers, and planners/practitioners from manufacturing, retail, consumer packaged goods, aftermarket parts, wholesale-distribution, and third-party logistics services (3PL) firms, as well as consulting organizations. We received back 211 usable responses. Of those we surveyed, 74% said that changes wrought by the COVID crisis had influenced their digital supply chain planning transformations.
Our research led us to conclude that many organizations this past year were driven to quickly implement digital supply chain solutions by necessity, rather than invention. The unplanned change of the pandemic helped push many companies past their fear of leading a planned digital change effort.
Jump start the revolution
Most survey respondents said that the pandemic affected their business to some extent. This was primarily by exposing process vulnerabilities (49%), causing supplier instability (45%), and increasing demand for their products and services (45%). Declining demand (31%) and staffing shortages (30%) also affected many firms. Only 3% of respondents said the pandemic has had no effect on their business.
In many cases, the pressures that COVID put on their supply chains prompted companies to reprioritize their investments in digitization. Forty-two percent of respondents said that the pandemic accelerated their supply chains’ digital transformation, while 17% said the pandemic shifted their organizations’ digitization priorities in some way. (See Figure 1.)
[Figure 1] How has the COVID-19 pandemic influenced your supply chain digitization strategy Enlarge this image
In our original survey in 2019, we found that a full two-thirds of the respondents had not yet executed a digital transformation of their supply chain planning process. They were either not yet pursuing a digital strategy or were only in the early stages of the transformation effort—exploring and evaluating technologies and trying to gain organizational support. (See the sidebar for more information on the different stages of a digital transformation.) Only 7% of respondents said they were reaping the benefits of a digital transformation. This time around, however, a higher percentage of organizations (12%) reported that they were already reaping the benefits of digital transformation. (See Figure 2.)
[Figure 2] What stage of the supply chain planning digital transformation journey would you say your organization is in? Enlarge this image
One key factor that seems to correlate to how far along companies are in their transformation efforts is executive involvement. Half of the firms in the “reaping the benefits” stage say their transformation is being led by their CEO. In contrast, the majority of those not pursuing a strategy say their digitization efforts are being led by line-of-business managers.
Digital defense
Unsurprisingly, it’s the more mature, digitally transformed supply chains that have weathered the storm of the pandemic most successfully. Fifty-four percent of the companies in the “reaping the benefits” group said that they were managing COVID-related demand and supplier uncertainty “very well.” In comparison only 13% of those in the “evaluating” and “not pursuing” stages reported handling this area “very well.” This finding suggests that digital technologies and processes can help companies better manage disruptions.
Through our customers and partners, we’ve been able to see firsthand how much more resilient digitally mature companies were during the pandemic. For example, during the first COVID spike, an alcoholic beverage distributor was concerned that sales would plummet because consumers would no longer be able to drink in bars and restaurants. Fortunately, this company had been using advanced planning software to sense demand day-by-day at the stock-keeping unit (SKU) and point-of-sale level. By the start of March 2020, the system sensed a major shift in demand from “out-of-home” channels (restaurants and bars) to retail channels (supermarkets and corner shops). This was essentially a shift from business-to-business (B2B) to business-to-consumer (B2C) channels. Having sensed this change, the system started revising its March–June projections accordingly.
At first the planners were skeptical as the forecast looked almost too good to believe. However, the forecasts produced by the system for July–November were nearly perfect, increasing the team’s trust not only in the system but also the data model.
Obstacles to transformation
While the COVID-19 pandemic provided a strong impetus for companies to embrace new technologies, obstacles to digital transformation still remain. The biggest one this year has been that companies lack the skills needed to implement a digital transformation. This is understandable as digital transformations require advanced skills such as change management, negotiation, and decision-making, along with the traditional technical planning skills.
This awareness of a skills deficit has grown greatly since 2019. This year, 41% of respondents said that a skills deficit stood in the way of their company implementing its digital transformation plans; in 2019, that number was 23%. Part of that jump may be due to where companies are in the transformation journey. Skills deficits often rank as the highest obstacle for those in the early phases of transformation as companies are just beginning to assess the skills they will need to execute and reap the benefits of improvement. Given that 60% of organizations are still at pre-execution (not pursuing, exploring, evaluating, or gaining organizational support) stages of maturity, it seems likely that the skills deficit is a problem that is only going to get worse before it gets better.
Additionally, more respondents this year said that data quality/lack of data was a big obstacle to their transformation efforts than in the last survey: 34% in 2021 versus 25% in 2019. This figure’s growth is likely because more organizations have accelerated their transformation programs and have been forced to confront their data issues.
Different stages, different challenges
Our research also revealed that organizations face different types of challenges depending on where they are on their digital transformation journey:
Companies not pursuing a transformation strategy are most likely to cite fear of change, lack of data, or a lack of investment as issues that are holding them back.
Companies in the “exploring” phase are most likely to cite skills deficits as they struggle to develop a transformation strategy.
Companies in the “evaluating” phase list three key challenges: risk aversion, lack of data, and skills deficits.
Companies in the “gaining support” phase say fear of change is a top issue, as is the fear that they can’t prove a business case for transformation.
Companies in the “executing” phase cite a lack of data as a key obstacle to moving forward. This makes sense because it is at this stage when data hygiene issues become most apparent and troublesome.
For sure, digital transformation isn’t easy and there are many roadblocks along the way. However, as we mentioned, our survey showed a clear correlation between digital transformation maturity and the ability to manage COVID-related demand and supply uncertainty and disruptions. Unfortunately for 16% of respondents, the pandemic caused them to either delay their transformation plans or put them on hold.
We would urge every organization whose digital transformation efforts are stalled to redouble their efforts to get them back on track. The COVID effect may be waning, but more disruptions are inevitable. The results of our two surveys so far, along with countless anecdotes from our customers and partners around the world, leads us to one stark conclusion: You can either be the architect of change in your organization or a victim of it.
Notes:
1. Caroline Proctor and Gregory Fowler, “Digital Transformation in Supply Chain—On Pace or At Risk?” Supply and Demand Chain Executive (December 2019) pp. 10–15.
The six stages of a digital transformation
As part of the survey, we asked respondents to characterize where their company was in its digital transformation efforts. We divided the transformation effort into six stages:
Not pursuing: In this stage, the company is currently not investigating the use of digital technologies for supply chain planning.
Exploring: This stage involves establishing the catalyst for change and ranking ideas by how well they fit existing business and supply chain strategies, organizational capabilities, and the needs of the customer.
Evaluating: These companies are actively evaluating digital solutions, sometimes in a hands-on way.
Gaining broad organizational support: This stage involves getting funding for a transformation effort and securing broad support from the supply chain organization. Organizational work is also being done such as setting up steering committees.
Executing: At this stage, the company is implementing and deploying technology and trying to get people to adopt the required processes and tools.
Reaping the benefits: Here the company has shifted to continuous improvement projects to scale and capture the full benefits of the digital transformation.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.