In the past, fear of change kept many companies from pursuing a digital transformation effort. Now, after the pandemic wreaked 20 months of unplanned change on their supply chains, more companies are embracing new technologies.
What’s the biggest obstacle to any major initiative such as digitally transforming your supply chain operations? In many cases, it’s the fear of change. Consider: In late 2019, ToolsGroup conducted a global survey looking at the state of companies’ digital transformation efforts in supply chain planning. How far along were they in implementing technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, the internet of things (IoT), and digital assistants to the planning process? At that time, we found that 30% of respondents believed that the fear of change was holding back their efforts.1
Since then, the most ruthless unplanned change imaginable swept the globe, decimating some industries while creating unprecedented opportunities in others. Supply chain disruptions happened from difficulty procuring raw material on one end to radically changing customer behaviors on the other. Most organizations had to adapt, and fast. While some were threatened by declining business, others stood to lose out by failing to capitalize on demand spikes and other big changes in consumer behavior.
So, what happens when the planned change of a digital supply chain transformation effort meets the unplanned change of a global pandemic? To find out, we decided to revisit our study. In collaboration with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), we launched a new version of the global survey called “Digital Transformation in Supply Chain Planning: 2021.”
We sent it out in January 2021 to 289 supply chain executives, managers, and planners/practitioners from manufacturing, retail, consumer packaged goods, aftermarket parts, wholesale-distribution, and third-party logistics services (3PL) firms, as well as consulting organizations. We received back 211 usable responses. Of those we surveyed, 74% said that changes wrought by the COVID crisis had influenced their digital supply chain planning transformations.
Our research led us to conclude that many organizations this past year were driven to quickly implement digital supply chain solutions by necessity, rather than invention. The unplanned change of the pandemic helped push many companies past their fear of leading a planned digital change effort.
Jump start the revolution
Most survey respondents said that the pandemic affected their business to some extent. This was primarily by exposing process vulnerabilities (49%), causing supplier instability (45%), and increasing demand for their products and services (45%). Declining demand (31%) and staffing shortages (30%) also affected many firms. Only 3% of respondents said the pandemic has had no effect on their business.
In many cases, the pressures that COVID put on their supply chains prompted companies to reprioritize their investments in digitization. Forty-two percent of respondents said that the pandemic accelerated their supply chains’ digital transformation, while 17% said the pandemic shifted their organizations’ digitization priorities in some way. (See Figure 1.)
[Figure 1] How has the COVID-19 pandemic influenced your supply chain digitization strategy Enlarge this image
In our original survey in 2019, we found that a full two-thirds of the respondents had not yet executed a digital transformation of their supply chain planning process. They were either not yet pursuing a digital strategy or were only in the early stages of the transformation effort—exploring and evaluating technologies and trying to gain organizational support. (See the sidebar for more information on the different stages of a digital transformation.) Only 7% of respondents said they were reaping the benefits of a digital transformation. This time around, however, a higher percentage of organizations (12%) reported that they were already reaping the benefits of digital transformation. (See Figure 2.)
[Figure 2] What stage of the supply chain planning digital transformation journey would you say your organization is in? Enlarge this image
One key factor that seems to correlate to how far along companies are in their transformation efforts is executive involvement. Half of the firms in the “reaping the benefits” stage say their transformation is being led by their CEO. In contrast, the majority of those not pursuing a strategy say their digitization efforts are being led by line-of-business managers.
Digital defense
Unsurprisingly, it’s the more mature, digitally transformed supply chains that have weathered the storm of the pandemic most successfully. Fifty-four percent of the companies in the “reaping the benefits” group said that they were managing COVID-related demand and supplier uncertainty “very well.” In comparison only 13% of those in the “evaluating” and “not pursuing” stages reported handling this area “very well.” This finding suggests that digital technologies and processes can help companies better manage disruptions.
Through our customers and partners, we’ve been able to see firsthand how much more resilient digitally mature companies were during the pandemic. For example, during the first COVID spike, an alcoholic beverage distributor was concerned that sales would plummet because consumers would no longer be able to drink in bars and restaurants. Fortunately, this company had been using advanced planning software to sense demand day-by-day at the stock-keeping unit (SKU) and point-of-sale level. By the start of March 2020, the system sensed a major shift in demand from “out-of-home” channels (restaurants and bars) to retail channels (supermarkets and corner shops). This was essentially a shift from business-to-business (B2B) to business-to-consumer (B2C) channels. Having sensed this change, the system started revising its March–June projections accordingly.
At first the planners were skeptical as the forecast looked almost too good to believe. However, the forecasts produced by the system for July–November were nearly perfect, increasing the team’s trust not only in the system but also the data model.
Obstacles to transformation
While the COVID-19 pandemic provided a strong impetus for companies to embrace new technologies, obstacles to digital transformation still remain. The biggest one this year has been that companies lack the skills needed to implement a digital transformation. This is understandable as digital transformations require advanced skills such as change management, negotiation, and decision-making, along with the traditional technical planning skills.
This awareness of a skills deficit has grown greatly since 2019. This year, 41% of respondents said that a skills deficit stood in the way of their company implementing its digital transformation plans; in 2019, that number was 23%. Part of that jump may be due to where companies are in the transformation journey. Skills deficits often rank as the highest obstacle for those in the early phases of transformation as companies are just beginning to assess the skills they will need to execute and reap the benefits of improvement. Given that 60% of organizations are still at pre-execution (not pursuing, exploring, evaluating, or gaining organizational support) stages of maturity, it seems likely that the skills deficit is a problem that is only going to get worse before it gets better.
Additionally, more respondents this year said that data quality/lack of data was a big obstacle to their transformation efforts than in the last survey: 34% in 2021 versus 25% in 2019. This figure’s growth is likely because more organizations have accelerated their transformation programs and have been forced to confront their data issues.
Different stages, different challenges
Our research also revealed that organizations face different types of challenges depending on where they are on their digital transformation journey:
Companies not pursuing a transformation strategy are most likely to cite fear of change, lack of data, or a lack of investment as issues that are holding them back.
Companies in the “exploring” phase are most likely to cite skills deficits as they struggle to develop a transformation strategy.
Companies in the “evaluating” phase list three key challenges: risk aversion, lack of data, and skills deficits.
Companies in the “gaining support” phase say fear of change is a top issue, as is the fear that they can’t prove a business case for transformation.
Companies in the “executing” phase cite a lack of data as a key obstacle to moving forward. This makes sense because it is at this stage when data hygiene issues become most apparent and troublesome.
For sure, digital transformation isn’t easy and there are many roadblocks along the way. However, as we mentioned, our survey showed a clear correlation between digital transformation maturity and the ability to manage COVID-related demand and supply uncertainty and disruptions. Unfortunately for 16% of respondents, the pandemic caused them to either delay their transformation plans or put them on hold.
We would urge every organization whose digital transformation efforts are stalled to redouble their efforts to get them back on track. The COVID effect may be waning, but more disruptions are inevitable. The results of our two surveys so far, along with countless anecdotes from our customers and partners around the world, leads us to one stark conclusion: You can either be the architect of change in your organization or a victim of it.
Notes:
1. Caroline Proctor and Gregory Fowler, “Digital Transformation in Supply Chain—On Pace or At Risk?” Supply and Demand Chain Executive (December 2019) pp. 10–15.
The six stages of a digital transformation
As part of the survey, we asked respondents to characterize where their company was in its digital transformation efforts. We divided the transformation effort into six stages:
Not pursuing: In this stage, the company is currently not investigating the use of digital technologies for supply chain planning.
Exploring: This stage involves establishing the catalyst for change and ranking ideas by how well they fit existing business and supply chain strategies, organizational capabilities, and the needs of the customer.
Evaluating: These companies are actively evaluating digital solutions, sometimes in a hands-on way.
Gaining broad organizational support: This stage involves getting funding for a transformation effort and securing broad support from the supply chain organization. Organizational work is also being done such as setting up steering committees.
Executing: At this stage, the company is implementing and deploying technology and trying to get people to adopt the required processes and tools.
Reaping the benefits: Here the company has shifted to continuous improvement projects to scale and capture the full benefits of the digital transformation.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.