His long career as teacher, author, editor, and mentor of future supply chain professionals earned Dr. James R. Stock CSCMP's 2011 Distinguished Service Award.
The supply chain profession has many college and university educators who put heart and soul into teaching. Even among such a committed group, Dr. James R. Stock stands out. And that, in large part, is why the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) bestowed its 46th Distinguished Service Award on the University of South Florida professor. In handing out the award, CSCMP President Rick Blasgen said, "The accomplishments he has achieved through teaching, authoring textbooks, conducting research, editing journals, and educating supply chain professionals have left and will continue to leave an indelible mark on the supply chain profession."
Stock began his teaching career at the University of Notre Dame in 1975, long before supply chain management had emerged as a distinct discipline. He recognized that teaching traditional distribution management would not be sufficient in itself to prepare students for careers in a global economy, and he foresaw that what would come to be called supply chain management would have to become a part of the university curriculum.
In addition to the Distinguished Service Award, Stock has received the Armitage Medal and Eccles Medal from the International Society of Logistics and a 2006 Rainmaker Award from DC Velocity Magazine. He has published six books and over 150 articles, monographs, and proceedings papers. He has also served as editor of the International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Logistics Spectrum, and CSCMP's Journal of Business Logistics.
In a recent interview with Editor James Cooke, Stock discussed the current state and future of supply chain education.
Name: James R. Stock Title: Frank Harvey Endowed Professor of Marketing Organization: University of South Florida College of Business, Tampa, Florida, USA Education: Bachelor of Science in Biology and Chemistry, University of Miami; Master of Business Administration in Marketing, University of Miami; Doctor of Philosophy in Marketing and Logistics, The Ohio State University—Max M. Fisher College of Business. Work history: Formerly Professor of Marketing and Logistics at Michigan State University, Distinguished Visiting Professor at Air Force Institute of Technology, Associate Professor of Marketing at the University of Oklahoma, and Assistant Professor of Marketing at the University of Notre Dame. CSCMP member: since 1976
How has teaching supply chain management changed in the past decade or so?
One must remember that SCM (supply chain management) as a concept is less than 30 years old, originating in the literature in the mid-1980s. The first SCM courses began appearing in the 1990s, and initially they were slightly expanded logistics management courses. As they developed, they expanded to incorporate many non-logistics components such as manufacturing/production, sourcing, marketing, and many others. Thus, in terms of most businessrelated disciplines, the field is relatively young and, one could say, still immature from a developmental perspective.
Commensurate with the expanded concept of SCM, the teaching of the subject has also expanded to include a variety of topics never covered in traditional logistics classes. Topics such as lean management, Six Sigma, lifecycle assessment, the "perfect order," and others had to be included in a course on SCM. This required that teachers have the knowledge and expertise to include those topics in their classroom lectures and discussions. It also allowed for more collaborative teaching to occur, which meant that faculty from MIS (management information systems), finance, production, operations, and marketing could participate in the presentation of materials from their disciplines as they related to SCM.
How much influence does industry have on what's taught in the classroom today?
In the logistics and supply chain areas, industry has a great deal of influence on what is taught in the classroom. Historically, logistics and SCM faculty members have ongoing relationships with various businesses, which they then weave into their classroom presentations and discussions. Faculty read many of the professional trade journals that are sent to people in the field. Those periodicals include case studies, interviews, and so forth, which are very practitioner-oriented. So, through the reading of those materials, faculty members are able to utilize examples of companies and processes that are relevant to the teaching of logistics or SCM.
Additionally, when companies recruit on university campuses, they meet with faculty about the jobs for which they are interviewing, and they discuss the types of students they want to hire—skill sets, personal characteristics, computer expertise, previous experience. Thus, industry has both direct and indirect influence on what is being taught in today's college classroom.
Are supply chain executives pressing you to teach certain subjects?
In a few instances they are, especially if they have a very specific need for a particular skill set or knowledge. Generally, however, supply chain executives are looking for potential hires who are problem solvers, people who can see the "big picture," and those who possess both specialty and generalist knowledge. Of course, speaking and writing skills will always be in demand, because they never cease to be important elements of a successful career. Recognizing this, faculty members attempt to include topical material and teach pedagogy that will develop these skills in the students that take their classes.
How can the profession attract the best young minds into the field?
There are a number of ways the professionals can influence young people to consider logistics or SCM as career fields. First, they can provide paid summer internships that provide real-world experiences for future supply chain executives. Second, they can be involved in university career days, fairs, and programs where students have the opportunity to hear from the practitioner and can also raise questions and concerns about the logistics or supply chain fields. Third, practitioners can be "guest lecturers" in classes relating to logistics or SCM. Students always love to hear what's happening in businesses, and what better way to hear than to have practitioners share their stories with them? Fourth, logistics and SCM professionals can make their voices heard with college administrators who influence the funding and hiring of faculty members within colleges. It is difficult to graduate students in logistics or SCM if there is no, or insufficient, faculty available to teach those courses. Finally, companies can consider offering scholarships to logistics or SCM students based on scholastic achievement and interest in pursuing careers in the field. Such scholarships do not have to be large—typically $1,000 or less for each scholarship. The best students love to apply for such academic scholarships because of the prestige and status that they bring to their résumés.
What types of companies are recruiting supply chain graduates these days?
We have seen more logistics or supply chain service companies interested in graduates. For example, 3PLs (third-party logistics companies) and 4PLs (fourthparty logistics companies) have consistently been looking for graduates interested in pursuing careers in various areas such as transportation, warehousing, information systems, and consulting. Additionally, depending on the location of the university, recruiters may be looking for students with interests in retailing, manufacturing, or government.
How important is a Master of Business Administration (MBA) degree to a successful career in supply chains today?
MBAs are good to have for middle and senior management positions. For entry-level positions, a bachelor's degree is sufficient for most positions. Business experience continues to be a plus, even if that experience is not in logistics or SCM. A good approach for many students is to obtain the entry-level position, work for a few years, and then obtain the MBA as a part-time student, often taking night or online courses. Many universities are very creative and offer courses online, evenings, Saturdays only, or concentrated into courses lasting one to four weeks, rather than an entire term. In sum, obtaining an MBA is a good idea for almost every logistics or SCM person, but not necessarily right away after obtaining a bachelor's degree.
What advice would you give someone entering the profession today?
While the present economy is a difficult one, it is not really much different from previous periods when economic conditions were better. Just as the attributes of cost and service have been important in the past, and will continue to be important in the future, so too will personal traits such as oral and written communication skills, computer and information technology expertise, the willingness to work hard, being a team player, and having a concern and empathy for the customer and others be important in the hiring and promotion processes of companies now and in the future. I tell my students that if they want a challenging career—one filled with change and new things almost every day—and a desire to be able to significantly influence the well-being of companies and their customers, then logistics or SCM is for them. It is a career that offers personal satisfaction and good financial rewards for those who do their jobs well.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.