Dr. Dale Rogers, professor of supply chain management at Arizona State University, enjoys venturing off the well-worn path and investigating research questions and topics that have received little to no attention from his fellow academics.
Case in point: While everyone else was focusing on forward logistics in the late 1990s and early 2000s, Rogers was looking at reverse logistics, co-writing one of the first books about the subject. In fact, he was so early to the study of the discipline that he has since been dubbed, “the father of reverse logistics.”
Similarly, while many have studied how macroeconomic trends affect logistics, Rogers helped create the Logistics Managers Index, which shows how logistics serves as a leading indicator for the rest of the economy.
Finally, many practitioners and researchers have looked at how to cut costs and improve efficiency in the supply chain. In contrast, Rogers’ most recent book, Supply Chain Financing (co-written with Rudolf Leuschner of Rutgers University and Thomas Choi of Arizona State) discusses how supply chain management can fund the rest of the organization.
While being known as a bit of a maverick, Rogers has always been open about how much he owes to his mentors, especially the late Donald J. Bowersox, legendary logistics professor at Michigan State University. Like Bowersox, Rogers is dedicated to raising up the next generation of supply chain thinkers, including his own son Zachary Rogers who teaches supply chain at Colorado State University.
This sense of curiosity and desire to help educate and advance others is what led to Rogers being presented with supply chain’s highest honor: CSCMP’s Distinguished Service Award.
Rogers took some time to reflect on his career with Supply Chain Quarterly’s Managing Editor Diane Rand a the CSCMP EDGE Conference in September.
NAME: Dale S. Rogers
TITLE: ON Semiconductor Professor of Business at the Supply Chain Management department at Arizona State University
EDUCATION: bachelor’s degree, MBA, and Ph.D. from Michigan State University
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE: Professor of Supply Chain and Logistics Management at Rutgers University; Professor of Supply Chain and Logistics Management, University of Nevada
LEADERSHIP: Director of the Frontier Economies Logistics Lab and the Co-Director of the Internet Edge Supply Chain Lab ASU; Principal Investigator of the $15 million CARISCA Project at Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology in Kumasi, Ghana; Director of Global Projects for ILOS–Instituto de Logística e Supply Chain in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Board Advisor to Flexe, Enterra Solutions, and Droneventory; founding board member of the Global Supply Chain Resiliency Council and Reverse Logistics and Sustainability Council; serves on the board of directors for the Organización Mundial de Ciudades y Plataformas Logísticas
HONORS: CSCMP Distinguished Service Award and International Warehouse and Logistics Association Distinguished Service Award
RESEARCH AREAS: reverse logistics, sustainable supply chain management, supply chain finance, and secondary markets
What first sparked your interest in supply chain management?
I was an MBA student at Michigan State concentrating in finance, and somebody told me, “There is this thing called material and logistics management, and Michigan State is the best in the world at this thing.” I thought, gee, I was a math teacher in the Lansing Public School district, which was in great decline. I would like to be in a profession where I am not at risk of being laid off, so I switched [my concentration]. And I really fell in love with it. Dr. Bowersox, who taught a class I was in, remembered me, and he brought me back home to Lansing a couple of years after I graduated. I worked for his company, and then I got my doctorate under him. That was really the beginning of it.
You were one of many prominent supply chain academics who were taught by Dr. Bowersox. How did he influence your own work?
He actually changed how I think. He was always in a hurry and was always pushing [his students] to be in a hurry with him. He could see the simple truth in a big complex thing, and he sort of taught us how to do that. In that way, he kind of taught us how to be faculty. You know, it was really kind of a thing: All of his Ph.D. students ended up being pretty successful. It is an honor to have gotten to be one of them.
Well, having a wonderful mentor…
It really matters.
It really does matter. So, one of your main areas of focus for many years has been reverse logistics. How has reverse logistics, and the industry’s attention to it, changed over the years?
I think people have begun to see that it is an important strategic variable. Over the last year, we really saw a shift in e-commerce, and returns became a more important part of managing your supply chain. Also, I think people have discovered that returns and overstocks can be quite profitable. The secondary market in the U.S.—think about [the retail stores like] Ross Stores, Marshalls, HomeGoods, and all the factory outlets—those were originally designed to be a drain for stuff that didn’t sell or got returned but those are very profitable businesses. A lot of times you can buy for very low cost, and then you can sell for less.
As an analogy, I always tell people to think back to your college experience, where you probably bought that new science textbook for—well, I am old so I was going to say $75, but it is now probably $200.
It’s like $250. I have a college student.
$250. Then you sell it back for $20, and then the bookstore sells it for $175. For the bookstore, that is a great deal, right?
A wonderful deal.
So, there is a lot of money—a lot of profit—in reverse logistics that is then transformed into the secondary market.
In what ways are we still struggling in terms of reverse logistics?
Well, there is not as many really great reverse logistics [IT] systems. There hasn’t been a lot of digitization in reverse logistics actually.
Maybe now is the time for some good innovation.
I think this is a really great time for some of the startups.
Shifting gears: Last year the book you co-authored on supply chain financing came out. Can you briefly explain what supply chain financing is?
So, the purpose of the supply chain has always been: make, source, deliver, return, and so on. But today, a lot of times, the best source of capital is found within the supply chain, so supply chains are being used to fund the organization and sometimes vice versa. For example, if you think about the Apple model, they’ve got about 10 days’ worth of inventory globally. Do they only have 10 days? No. They’ve probably got more, but they are sticking it at the supplier, so they are using their supply chain to facilitate really good financials for Apple.
How did your interest in this area develop?
Well, I was teaching at Rutgers [University] at the time in New Jersey, and we went over to Midtown Manhattan, and we visited Colgate-Palmolive. They were so nice to us. They had a supply chain finance department, and they had all their people there to talk to the old professor. They kept using an acronym I didn’t understand, “FTG.” I thought maybe that was a financial thing. I didn’t know what it was. I said, “What is that?” And they said, “Oh sorry Dale, it is ‘fund the growth.’” So, Colgate is an old company. Their stock price is not going up a lot or down. You can max out on your debt capital very easily. So, the best capital to fund growth in emerging economies is found in the supply chain. That really piqued my interest.
How are you helping to mentor and influence the next generation of supply chain thinkers?
Well, you know, one of them, [my son Zac Rogers,] grew up in my house. So maybe he is more mentoring me these days. It really is fun because a lot of the young academics have exceptional toolsets, and they can really do stuff that an old man doesn’t know how to do. It is sort of a mutual thing. I really enjoy getting to work with them. There is a lot of really bright young faculty in supply chain that are coming through. This is a really exciting time.
How do you like collaborating with your son?
That is pretty fun most of the days. He is a smart kid. He does the [Logistics Managers Index] with me, and he does more work than me on it. He knows a bunch of stuff I don’t, so it has been really fun. What a gift to get to work with your son.
You have been involved in Executive Education programs all over the world. Why are these international assignments so important to you, and how have you benefited from them?
Truthfully it is a two-way street because whenever you teach in one of those, you usually learn stuff from the class. I really enjoy getting to see the world a little bit as well. It is fun, it is profitable, and it is also a really nice learning tool for me. I have students all over the world.
Lastly, what is one of your proudest career achievements would you say?}
Well, I have to tell you, this Distinguished Service Award is a real gift. But, you know, getting to be one of the early guys on reverse logistics, that’s a cool thing, and getting to be early on supply chain financing, that is also a cool thing. Truthfully the whole deal has been kind of a blast. It is really a great job. Eventually maybe somebody is going to come to my classroom, and say, “Sorry Dale, you’ve got to go home.” But until they do, I am going to keep doing it.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.