Tradeshift’s quarterly Index of Global Trade Health examines business-to-business transactions (purchase orders from buyers and invoices from suppliers) submitted through the Tradeshift platform. This quarter’s report sees the debut of an enhanced index model which tracks quarterly trade volumes against previous years. The Index uses a baseline score of 100; a reading above 100 indicates above-trend growth against medium-term, seasonal trends while below 100 indicates below-trend growth.
Global Data
The Q3 Index data shows cumulative order volume growth fell by 24 points globally compared to the previous quarter. An index score of 85 in Q3 means order volumes are tracking 15 points below the level Tradeshift had forecast for the period before the pandemic.
Tradeshift’s data suggests that suppliers are struggling to fulfil a huge backlog of orders following a prolonged spike in demand as economies have reopened. Global invoice volumes, which indicate how quickly suppliers are able to fulfil orders, climbed by a slower than expected 5 points and remain 31 points below the pre-pandemic forecast range.
US Data
The Q3 Index data shows order volume growth fell by 40 points in the US compared to the previous quarter. An index score of 70 in Q3 means order volumes growth is tracking 30 points below the expected range for the period.
Invoice volumes jumped 12 points in Q3, but remain below the expected range. The relatively modest rise in invoice volumes in Q3 lends further weight to the theory that US suppliers are struggling to fulfil orders at sufficient pace to address the backlog.
“The delta we see between ordering activity and invoicing is indicative of massive fulfilment issues across global supply chains,” said Christian Lanng, co-founder and CEO of Tradeshift. “Buyers are starting to question the wisdom of putting fresh orders into a system that is buckling under an enormous backlog. The longer this situation continues, the more likely we’ll see a more prolonged reversal heading into 2022.”
Tradeshift’s data suggests the current imbalance is beginning to slow the recovery that has been booming across key supply chain hubs. U.S. transaction volume growth dipped to 98, compared to a score of 108.5 in Q2. In China, the transaction index score fell to 96, a drop of 2 points compared to Q2. Activity across Eurozone supply chains rose a modest 0.5 points in Q3, but an index score of 82 suggests there is some way to go before activity normalizes against the pre-pandemic range.
UK supply chains appeared to buck the global trend by moving 4 points closer to pre-pandemic levels in Q3. But this growth is coming from a very low base. An index score of 52 in Q3 leaves UK supply chains firmly at the bottom of the pack in terms of recovery.
“Resilience has become the number one conversation in board rooms, but we need to stop thinking about supply chains as individual fiefdoms and start looking at each supply chain as part of a richer ecosystem,” said Lanng. “Technology that connects buyers and suppliers more dynamically can help alleviate pressure that builds during volatility cycles. Areas where I see huge potential include digitized financing, which unlocks trapped working capital so that suppliers are incentivized to hold more inventory, and online marketplaces capable of intelligently pooling supply chain capacity and matching it to areas of high demand.”
To view the complete Q3 Index of Global Trade Health, visit https://hub.tradeshift.com/research-and-reports/the-tradeshift-index-of-global-trade-health-q3/.
https://www.tradeshift.com
