Emerging consumer markets: the new drivers of global economic growth
Consumption is still largely concentrated in North America and Western Europe, but consumers in emerging markets are stepping onto the world stage in greater numbers.
Erik Johnson covers consumer markets and housing indicators and produces the optimistic scenario of the IHS Global Insight quarterly U.S. macroeconomic forecasting model. He received his undergraduate degree in economics from Colby College.
The American consumer is no longer the primary driver of world economic growth, a fact that holds profound implications for international trade patterns and supply chain dynamics.
For now, consumption is still largely concentrated in North America and Western Europe, but consumers in emerging markets are stepping onto the world stage in greater numbers. These new consumers are making a noticeable impression on multinational corporations, which view them as "low-hanging fruit" compared to their fatigued and frugal counterparts in the developed countries. Indeed, retailers increasingly view the sluggish U.S. and Western European consumer markets as a battleground for market share, whereas they see emerging markets, with their rapidly growing consumer demand, as a more attractive opportunity for growth.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] Domestic consumption to world GDP (percent)Enlarge this image
BRIC consumption accelerates
The U.S. consumer may still reign supreme in total and per-capita spending, but growth in the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) and consumer spending is being eclipsed by that of emerging markets, most notably Brazil, Russia, India, and China (the so-called "BRIC" countries). Since 2007, in fact, the global economy has entered a transitional phase in which Chinese and Indian consumers are exerting increasing influence on international trade.
Consider that since the end of the "Great Recession" in June 2009, U.S. consumer spending growth adjusted for inflation has averaged 2.2 percent. Meanwhile, consumer spending growth adjusted for inflation in India and China has exceeded 7 percent each year since 2006.
Figure 1 illustrates this shift in consumption to emerging markets. U.S. consumption as a percentage of world GDP peaked at approximately 22 percent in 2002, and it has steadily declined since then. Consumer spending in Western Europe reached almost 18 percent of world GDP in 2004 and has since fallen at roughly the same pace.
This trend is expected to continue. IHS Global Insight's Global Scenario and Global Consumer Markets econometric models predict that by 2015, U.S. and Western European consumer spending combined will account for only 26 percent of world GDP, down considerably from a 38.5-percent share in 2002. Compare this to the BRIC countries' consumer spending: after averaging 4.4 percent from 1995?2005, it accounted for 8.1 percent of world GDP in 2010 and is projected to reach nearly 12 percent by 2015.
Demographics, economics drive change
While the Great Recession, the current European debt debacle, and anemic growth in both Europe and the United States may have exacerbated this shift toward emerging market consumption, there are strong, underlying demographic and economic forces driving it.
For example, consumer spending represents approximately 70 percent of the United States' gross domestic product, while Western European consumers account for slightly less than 60 percent of that region's GDP. The developing world is less consistent. China's consumption- to-GDP ratio is low, at 36 percent, but India's is one of the highest in the world—on par with that of Western Europe.
Foreign trade (imports plus exports) has been playing a smaller role in the BRIC countries than in Western Europe and the United States, where governments are trying to promote export growth to enhance their economic outlook in the face of weakening domestic consumer demand. Figure 2 illustrates the growing importance of trade to Western economies even as BRIC's ratio of foreign trade to domestic GDP declines.
In the past, the developed economies maintained their high levels of consumer spending by increasing debt and saving less to spur economic growth. But now some emerging nations want consumption to play a greater role in their economies, too. For instance, the Indian government is trying to stimulate consumption by attempting to open up its domestic market to foreign multibrand retail stores. Another example occurred during the last National People's Congress of China, when Beijing made it very clear that one of its top priorities is to have domestic consumption play a stronger role in China's economy, rather than continue to heavily rely on exports and investment to generate growth.
(This reflects the prevailing global imbalance in which the United States, functioning as the de facto reservecurrency nation, is able to accumulate negative fiscal and trade imbalances while China and other emerging nations essentially "fund" those imbalances via their export markets and the purchase of U.S. debt.)
Moreover, there still are profound differences between the consumption patterns of the developed world versus those of the emerging markets. Spending on food, for example, represents a much larger percentage of outlays in less-developed economies than it does in the United States.
However, the rise of the middle class in China, India, and Brazil is having a clear impact on consumption patterns, providing more opportunities for consumer-oriented multinational corporations to increase their revenues and profitability. As more Chinese and Indian families enter the ranks of the upper-middle class, status-related spending behavior may become more widespread and could further alter the composition of global consumer markets.
This phenomenon was described by the American sociologist-economist Thorstein Veblen in his classic book Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. Veblen demonstrated that once people have achieved a certain level of wealth and availability of leisure time, they want to make an impression by showing their newfound status through conspicuous consumption and leisure activities (a principle known as the "Veblen Effect"). This is readily apparent in China and India today, where buying that first air conditioner, car, or elegant Italian purse has a functional purpose but also provides a social signal that the consumer is a member of the nouveau riche.
Innovation looks eastward
Major U.S. corporations are taking notice of this global rebalancing. In his book Spin-Free Economics, IHS Chief Economist Nariman Behravesh writes, "Most multinational corporations consider the Chinese market—especially the booming middle class—to be a centerpiece of their growth strategies over the next couple of decades." But China is not the only place to look for growth. "In some ways, [India] offers even more promising opportunities than China," Behravesh notes.
Evidence of emerging markets' growing importance to multinationals abounds. Dell, for instance, recently launched its ultra-thin XPS 14Z laptop in China, now the largest market for personal computers, one month before it introduced that model in the United States.
Some American automobile manufacturers have been launching new models in Asia, and others, such as Buick and Chevrolet, are planning to do so in the near future. Even Hollywood has responded to this rebalancing of global consumer spending by releasing several American films in Asian markets prior to their U.S. release.
These changing dynamics on the world economic stage will have domestic implications for Western economies. Not so long ago, new product ideas and designs were created in the developed world, produced in emerging markets, and then marketed primarily in the developed markets. But a new paradigm has emerged. Now, the East is often getting "first dibs" on many Western innovations.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”