Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Forward Thinking

Complexity requires more frequent network redesigns

A new study finds that companies are re-examining their supply chain networks more often, but they're not satisfied with the tools they use to do so.

Complexity requires more frequent network redesigns

The growing complexity of supply chains and the pace of change in business conditions are prompting companies to undertake more frequent network redesigns. That's a key finding in the Network Design Practices Report, a recent study conducted by the Tompkins Supply Chain Consortium. Sixty members of the consortium took part in the study.

In the two years since the group conducted similar research, the average length of time between network design studies has dropped from 24 months to 18 months. The average planning horizon for implementation is 4.6 years, down from the traditional 5?10 years. Redesigns now are more often spurred by an event such as a merger, rather than on the basis of time, as was generally the case in the past.


The study also found that only 10 percent of respondents considered their existing supply chain network to be "optimized." Another 50 percent said that their supply chain was "close to optimized." The remaining survey takers did not believe their network has been optimized, but not all believed change could be justified.

The report noted that companies are less satisfied with the software applications they use to conduct network studies than they were in the past. The previous study found that 31 percent of respondents were satisfied that their design tools met all of their requirements, but only 8 percent of respondents in this year's study felt that way. The report's authors speculated that the increasing complexity of supply chains and the difficulty of analyzing data and making decisions influenced participants' opinions.

Despite that dissatisfaction, 68 percent of respondents said they use some level of automation to perform network analysis. In addition, most of the software they deploy today provides some form of simulation capability.

Labor disruptions topped the list of risks participants consider when conducting a network analysis. That was followed by weak links in the supply chain, capacity shortages, and disruptions to product flow. The study also found that cost minimization remained the number one reason for companies to do a network analysis, followed by improving customer service and reducing capital outlays.

The entire report can be downloaded here.

Recent

More Stories

Just 29% of supply chain organizations are prepared to meet future readiness demands

Just 29% of supply chain organizations are prepared to meet future readiness demands

Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.

Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

screen shot of returns apps on different devices

Optoro: 69% of shoppers admit to “wardrobing” fraud

With returns now a routine part of the shopping journey, technology provider Optoro says a recent survey has identified four trends influencing shopper preferences and retailer priorities.

First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.

Keep ReadingShow less
robots carry goods through a warehouse

Fortna: rethink your distribution strategy for 2025

Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.

But according to the systems integrator Fortna, businesses can remain competitive if they focus on five core areas:

Keep ReadingShow less
shopper uses smartphone in retail store

EY lists five ways to fortify omnichannel retail

In the fallout from the pandemic, the term “omnichannel” seems both out of date and yet more vital than ever, according to a study from consulting firm EY.

That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.

Keep ReadingShow less
artistic image of a building roof

BCG: tariffs would accelerate change in global trade flows

Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).

Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.

Keep ReadingShow less