Warehousing is no longer simply about storing product, says industry guru Kenneth Ackerman. Instead, today's warehouses must focus on supporting the corporate mission and creating value for customers and shareholders.
Author and consultant Kenneth B. Ackerman has a reputation for being a bit of a skeptic. A veteran warehousing man, Ackerman does not easily fall for the latest management fad or technology craze. Instead, his levelheaded advice focuses on time-tested, real-world practices that are grounded in common sense and basic business principles.
Ackerman knows warehousing inside and out. Before becoming a consultant, he was CEO of Distribution Centers Inc., a warehousing company that was later acquired by the third-party logistics service provider Exel. After selling the warehousing business, he joined the management consulting practice of Coopers & Lybrand. A year later, he started his own management advisory service.
Over the course of his long career, Ackerman has often picked up the pen to educate his fellow professionals. He co-wrote his first book on warehousing, Understanding Today's Distribution Center, with R.W. Gardner and Lee P. Thomas back in 1972. Other works include Warehousing Profitably and Fundamentals of Supply Chain Management, co-authored with Art van Bodegraven. He also edits and publishes Warehousing Forum, a subscription-based newsletter. This year, he updated Warehousing Profitably for its third edition.
In a recent interview with Editor James Cooke, Ackerman discussed the current and future role of warehousing in the supply chain.
Name: Kenneth B. Ackerman Title: President Organization: K. B. Ackerman Company Education: Princeton University, Harvard Business School Business experience: CEO of Distribution Centers Inc.; Coopers & Lybrand; Founder, K. B. Ackerman Company CSCMP member: since 1966 Professional affiliations: past president, Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals; founder, Warehousing Education and Research Council; Ohio Warehousemen's Association; International Warehouse Logistics Association; Young Presidents Organization; Opera Columbus
You write in your book Warehousing Profitably that "warehousing is destined to move from a product-centric business to an idea-centric activity." Could you explain what you mean by that statement and give an example of an idea-centric activity?
An idea-centric warehouse manager is one who recognizes ... [that] the role of the warehouse is to support the corporate mission. If that corporation is dedicated to rapid growth, the warehouse must be prepared to support that growth. If the emphasis is on superior service, the warehouse must be managed to achieve zero defects and perfect orders. If the company intends to be a low-price leader, the warehouse must be dedicated to reducing costs.
Has globalization changed how supply chain managers view warehousing?
The warehousing function is not really portable, so globalization has less influence here than it does in manufacturing. However, those supply chain managers who have to establish warehouses overseas must look at how cultural distinctions could change the way the facility is managed. For example, some years ago in Colombia, I saw a rest break where a woman in a starched uniform carried a tray of coffee cups to the workers.
You talk about the information revolution in your book. Would you say it's necessary today for even the smallest warehouse to have warehouse management software in place?
Yes. If you don't have [a warehouse management system], you probably don't have a workable locator system. If you don't have one, you may have US $30-per-hour warehouse workers writing shipping documents with pen and ink. If you don't have directed putaway, decisions about storage location will be made by lift truck drivers rather than by management. So without a WMS, your warehouse would be operating at a higher cost and lower efficiency than it would otherwise, and you will find it more difficult to compete.
Do you expect to see more or fewer warehouses built in North America in the next few years?
It all depends on where you are in North America. In Columbus, Ohio, [USA] the surplus of attractive empty space has pushed pricing down to a point where it is more economical to rent an existing building than to build a new one. This is not true in every city, but unfortunately it is true in many markets.
You note in your book that that many companies today find it difficult to retain warehouse workers. What can companies do to keep their best workers?
The labor situation is not really different for warehousing than for any other job. It starts by picking the right people. Once selected, they must be motivated and receive proper recognition for jobs that are well done. Management should recognize that an order selector in a warehouse has a job that is more rewarding than working on an assembly line or driving a truck. It has more variety, and it requires judgment as well as skill.
You write that the emphasis in warehousing should be on "creating increased value for customers and shareholders." Can you give me an example of how a warehouse can increase value?
Here's one example: A leading apparel retailer has grown its company by providing logistics services that are vastly superior to the competition. When a new fashion is discovered in France, a sample is taken to China, where it is rapidly manufactured, then moved by air to a central distribution center, priced, and reshipped by air to the retail stores. The ability to use superior logistics services has contributed to the value of the retail corporation. Fast-response retail chains combine premium transportation and efficient warehousing with flexible manufacturing. The result is that a buyer can turn a new fashion concept into goods on the store shelves in a matter of weeks while competitors may take months to accomplish the same thing.
Editor's Note:Warehousing Profitably (ISBN# 978-0-9829940-0-9) is available from Ackerman Publications in Columbus, Ohio, USA. For more information or to order, visit the website: www.warehousing-forum.com.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.