As a kid, she aspired to be a nun or U.S. senator. When that didn’t work out, Gail Rutkowski, outgoing head of NASSTRAC, decided to give transportation a try. She never looked back.
When Gail Rutkowski first entered the business, the transportation world was a different place. At the time, everything from routes to rates was heavily regulated by the ICC, the FRA, or the states. Business was conducted via letters and phone calls. And transportation departments—and the professionals who staffed them—were viewed as a cost center and, essentially, a necessary evil.
Today, that’s all changed. The regulatory shackles have been loosened, technology has transformed the way we operate, and the logistics and supply chain profession is finally being accorded the respect it deserves.
Against that backdrop, Rutkowski has forged a unique career path that has included transportation management roles on both the shipper and carrier sides of the fence. Among other positions, she has worked in fleet management for Quaker Oats and Belden Wire and Cable, truckload sales for C.H. Robinson, and transportation management with Thomas & Betts and Medline Industries. She started and ran the logistics services division of AIMS Logistics, before leaving it to launch Wabash Worldwide Logistics. For the past eight years, she has served as executive director of the National Shippers Strategic Transportation Council (NASSTRAC), an education and advocacy group for freight transportation professionals.
Before taking the top job at NASSTRAC, Rutkowski had long been active in the organization, serving a term as president and several years on the group’s executive committee. She was selected member of the year in 2003, 2005, and 2012. She has also served as a member of the Illinois Chamber of Commerce Infrastructure Council and the Chicago Traffic Club, and has been a frequent speaker at industry conferences.
Prior to her retirement this month, she met with her old friend Mitch Mac Donald, DC Velocity’s group editorial director emeritus, to share her thoughts, reflections, and observations as a leading voice for the industry and the profession—one who has experienced logistics from nearly every perspective.
Q: How did you end up working in transportation and logistics?
A: At 17, I started working in the credit department of the gum manufacturer Wrigley Co. The transport department was right across the hall. And with all of the wisdom that 17-year-olds possess, I decided the transport folks were having a lot more fun. So when an opportunity arose to join Quaker Oats in the transportation department, I jumped at the chance, thinking I would have more fun, and I did.
Q: That’s a company that was known for its transportation and logistics prowess back in the day. Two names that come to mind are the logistics legends Cliff Lynch and Sam Flint.
A: Well, I was very lucky. Both were my bosses at Quaker, but not at the same time. Sam was my first boss at Quaker Oats. He hired Cliff, who became my boss later and was a wonderful mentor for me.
Sam also wrote the 1976 Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act. I was the secretary and had a front-row seat to the action, which culminated in the measure’s being signed into law. Sam was also way ahead of the curve in calling for the sunsetting of the Interstate Commerce Commission, which oversaw motor freight pricing before and after the industry was deregulated. He was talking about the need to eliminate the ICC way back in the late 1970s. Of course, it took until 1995 for that to happen, but that gives you an idea of how much of a visionary he was.
Q: As you look back over the past four decades or so, how closely does the career you had match up with whatever career you envisioned as a kid?
A: I had a smile on my face as you asked that question. Given that my initial career plans involved becoming a nun or a U.S. senator, my career was not quite what I originally imagined. However, once I found my place in transportation, I became passionate about the industry and people. Recently, in my position at NASSTRAC, I have been marrying my two passions—transportation and politics. So although I didn’t become a U.S. senator, at least I got to meet a few of them.
Q: What are some of the more positive changes you’ve seen in the freight sector during your career?
A: One would be the way we now view the profession. Logistics was once looked upon as a necessary evil, but that’s no longer the case. Today, we not only see what we now call “supply chain” as an integral part of business, but we also see that integration in action, with the development of holistic approaches to supply chain management. It has all given rise to tremendous improvements in how we serve our customers.
Another would be the digital revolution. The advances in technology cannot be ignored. Technology has really played a lead role in paving the way for those improvements.
Q: What about the other side of the coin. Can you point to any industry developments that have had a not-so-positive effect on the freight sector?
A: Well, as I mentioned, technology is such an important component and certainly a positive. But, on the flip side, I also feel that folks have forgotten that you can’t build a team by going out and securing high-value assets like human beings the same way you buy staplers.
Transportation is a relationship business. You need to establish relationships and then work to sustain them. Today’s technology sometimes seems to overlook that important piece. Those who will prosper are the ones who will develop and maintain those trusted relationships with their transportation provider. You can’t do it via text message.
Q: Are there any basic principles of logistics excellence that have remained the same amid all the changes?
A: I think there’s one principle that’s really the same in any vocation. It is passionate dedication. Without that, the work you do will never be fulfilling, and if it is not fulfilling, what’s the point?
Q: What parts of your personal skill set have served you best throughout your career?
A: I think it is really simple for me. It’s just the pure enjoyment I get from being able to meet the people in our industry. If you enjoy your work, that will come through and color everything you do.
Q: You’ve been heavily involved in a number of industry associations. Why has that been important to you?
A: Once I discovered NASSTRAC as a shipper, I found a resource that I couldn’t find anywhere else. I found shippers who were generous with their knowledge as well as open to talking about problems and sharing solutions.
Today, there is so much information coming at us. How much of it is reliable? How much of it is relevant? NASSTRAC provided that reliable information for me.
Then there’s the professional development side of it. You can only do so much sitting in an office—whether that office is in an industrial park or at home. Unless you look outside for new solutions and new ways of doing things, you are never going to get better. NASSTRAC gave me that opportunity.
Q: You have long championed the cause of gender equity with respect to pay—a battle that continues to this day. What can be done to move this forward that hasn’t already been tried?
A: That is a great question. You know, this is one of those issues that is so easily overlooked by folks when you are not directly impacted by it. For a long time, I thought the issue was being resolved and things were getting better. But it’s clear we’re not there yet. While things are changing, they are changing slowly.
I look around at the many amazing women in our industry today, and most of them are not making the same money their male counterparts do. It is just the way it is. I think it’s the way women are brought up and raised, where we don’t know how to fight for ourselves and blow our own horn. You don’t know how to stand up and be counted.
I think younger women are better at that than we more mature women. It is difficult, and of course you need to do that without coming across as arrogant, overbearing, or emotional. When a woman stands up and is forceful, she is accused of being all kinds of things, whereas with a man, they’re like, ‘Wow, he is a real go-getter.’ That hasn’t gone away. As much as we like to pretend otherwise, it’s still there.
Fortunately, I think the younger women coming up behind me were raised with a different mindset—and that goes for younger men too. Today, men are used to having women as bosses. This younger generation is much more accepting of the idea of gender equality in the workplace. That certainly is going to help, but it is going to take time.
Q: As you noted earlier, logistics was once widely viewed as a necessary cost of doing business. Today, we’ve come to understand that supply chain excellence can be a competitive weapon. What has prompted this change in view?
A: In my mind, logistics has really been the last frontier. Early on in my career, the concentration was always on improving manufacturing. Then there was a focus on marketing, and a big deal was made about that. Then, with the arrival of ERP systems like SAP, the focus shifted to technology and its potential to enhance business operations. Logistics was at the bottom of the list until it became obvious that logistics, to your earlier point, should be viewed not as a cost center, but rather, as a profit center. Improvements in logistics translated immediately to the bottom line.
You can have the best operation on the planet within your four walls, but if you lose control of your supply chain, it doesn’t matter how good you might be.
Q: Any final thoughts?
A: Two. I have had the rare privilege of watching this industry evolve from a behind-the-curtain operation to one that’s now front and center of any company’s strategy. I’ve had the opportunity to meet and interact with some amazing people who make up today’s supply chain, and that will always give me great comfort as I step away.
At the same time, my hope is that after this tumultuous year, we learn to treat each other more kindly, work on developing relationships and increasing the level of trust between parties, and enter into partnerships with a true win-win attitude. We can’t solve today’s problems without working together. If we can achieve that, in my mind, this—not technology—would be the next big thing, and it would be our best hope for moving the industry in a forward direction.
NASSTRAC renames “Shipper of the Year Award” in honor of retiring executive director
2021 Shipper of the Year Award winner Gail Rutkowski
She didn’t know it at the time, but when Gail Rutkowski walked onto the stage at the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals’ (CSCMP) recent Edge Conference in Atlanta, she had a double surprise in store. Not only would she learn she had been chosen to receive NASSTRAC’s prestigious “Shipper of the Year Award,” but she would also find out the award was being renamed the “Gail Rutkowski Transportation Excellence Award” in her honor.
Rutkowski will retire from her post as executive director of NASSTRAC (the National Shippers Strategic Transportation Council) at the end of this year. She has headed up the organization, which is part of CSCMP, since 2014.
Shown here on stage following the surprise announcement are: (L-R) outgoing CSCMP Board Chair Brian Gibson, CSCMP Board Member Todd Bulmash, Gail Rutkowski, and interim CSCMP CEO Mark Baxa.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”