As supply chains grow increasingly complex and data-driven, it can be difficult to sort through the barrage of information to identify the best action to take or decision to make. But what if you had software that could learn to recognize patterns and make suggestions based on past experiences?
Dr. Noel P. Greis, director of the Kenan Institute's Center for Logistics and Digital Strategy at the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, has been working to develop business intelligence software that can do just that.
Greis, who has a background in mathematics and engineering, says her interest in analytical software dates back to her work in graduate school on systems theory and design. Today she continues that work as she researches the use of business intelligence engines in the supply chain. In particular, she has focused on the use of "experience-based" analytics to improve decision making.
In addition to her work in business intelligence, Greis is the co-director of the UNC-Tsinghua Center for Logistics and Enterprise Development in Beijing, a joint venture of Tsinghua University's Department of Industrial Engineering and the Kenan-Flagler Business School at UNC. She was also the co-founder of the Global Logistics Research Initiative (GLORI), a worldwide consortium of 10 universities that conducted collaborative research on intelligent technologies in logistics.
In a recent interview with Editor James Cooke, Greis discussed software developments that could shape supply chain practices in the future.
Name: Noel P. Greis Title: Director, Center for Logistics and Digital Strategy (U.S.), and Co-Director, UNC-Tsinghua Research Center for Logistics and Enterprise Development (joint venture between University of North Carolina and Tsinghua University in China) Organization: Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Education: Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics, Brown University; Master of Arts in Engineering and Master of Science in Engineering, Princeton University; Doctorate in Civil Engineering, Princeton University Work History: Assistant Professor of Operations, Technology, and Innovation Management, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; member of technical staff, Bell Laboratories and Bell Communications Research CSCMP Member: Since 2000
What is meant by the term "experience-based" analytics?
Humans learn by experience. Our brain captures these experiences as sets of associations—for example "stove" and "hot." When faced with a decision, we generally draw upon our past experiences to search for analogues with similarities to the current situation.
Experience-based analytics use a type of pattern-recognition technology to accomplish the same tasks as our brains. We utilize software to capture and represent past "experience" and to help us make decisions in similar situations.
How will experience-based analytics impact supply chain operations?
As supply chains have become more complex and data-rich, humans are encountering limits in the amount of information that they are able to process. Experience-based analytics are able to augment humans' ability to process information in data-intensive applications like the supply chain.
For example, procurement officers in large, multinational organizations and government agencies process thousands of orders daily. These organizations have accumulated large amounts of history about their suppliers and how well they perform. Using experience-based analytics, we can "match" the best supplier with an incoming order based on the company's accumulated experiences about which suppliers have performed well with similar types of orders in the past, as distinguished by size, lead times, and other factors.
One of your research projects involved a battlefield supply chain management solution for Boeing. Can you describe that solution and how it came about?
Mention Boeing and most people think of its commercial aircraft products—the 747 or 787. However, developing large-scale systems that provide logistics support to the U.S. military is a very large part of Boeing's business. As Napoleon learned during his 1812 march on Moscow, the complex logistics of supplying everything from fuel and food to spare parts and ammunition to the battlefield can make or break a war. Success depends on strategic forward positioning of critical assets.
In the mid 2000s, the U.S. government turned to emerging technologies to try to solve these complex supply problems for the Iraq War. For Boeing, we created a system that provides battlefield situational awareness for logistics command-and-control. The key was real-time "sensing" of the operational status of in-theater vehicles and other assets and the fusion of that data with other contextual data. Our analytics "built" resupply missions that assured that the right amount of assets reached forward positions when and where they were needed, as safely as possible. The system was able to initiate resupply missions autonomously or semiautonomously. These experience-based analytics incorporated a technology called associative memory that was developed by Saffron Technology, one of our technology partners. Associative memory is a type of machine learning that captures the relationships between past experiences and present situations.
What can we expect of business intelligence software for supply chain management in the next two years?
A new information-rich environment and smarter analytics are changing the calculus of business decision making. Being able to take control of and respond to changes in the supply chain, especially disruptive events, requires more than visibility. We are starting to take advantage of tools that are better able to respond more quickly and effectively in dynamic environments.
For example, the Internet has matured as a connective technology, bringing with it an explosion of data. Data velocity is increasing and data types are proliferating. The virtual integration of the extended global enterprise is possible, and the availability and low cost of powerful multiprocessor computers and algorithms provide the hardware and software necessary to manipulate large volumes of data in near real time. Cloud computing allows companies to access services and data in real time via the Internet. And new software tools—the "experienced-based analytics" we've been discussing—are being developed that can learn and even make autonomous or semiautonomous decisions. This capability is still several years in the future, but we are building prototypes in our lab right now.
How likely will it be that business intelligence software will be able to predict "supply chain problems" before they occur?
Very likely. We are currently building software tools that are able to anticipate problems in the future. Managing a global supply chain is a complex sequencing act. At each stage of the supply chain, inventories must be kept supplied and in balance. Unlike traditional modeling approaches, we view supply chain coordination as a pattern-recognition problem. At any point in time, the supply chain can be represented by a large set of diverse and disparate data of "experiences," including inventory levels at suppliers, manufacturers, distribution centers, warehouses, and retail outlets; expected customer demands; and other factors that influence demand, such as promotions. Our analytics observe the supply chain over time and "learn" its dynamic behavior as a set of patterns. The tool's learned experience enables us to recognize situations that anticipate stock-outs or other supply chain failures.
Will business intelligence technology revolutionize supply chain practices?
Our appetite for business intelligence tools that help make sense of large volumes of business data will continue to grow. This is especially true because the costs of data acquisition and storage will continue to decline. And although the timeline is uncertain, business intelligence technology can be expected to enable great strides in supply chain practices. Right now we hear a lot about the "Internet of Things," where everything and everyone will be connected and able to communicate through a network enabled by the Internet—in effect merging the cyber and physical worlds. The Internet of Things is not just one technology; rather, it's a portfolio of technologies. Among them, business intelligence technology is an important first step.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”