Top 10 Supply Chain Threats: Marc Palazzolo of Kearney on the threat of the freight capacity crunch
The supply chain is no stranger to freight capacity issues, but the pandemic has exacerbated an already difficult challenge. What can shippers do to ease the risks associated with the capacity crunch in 2022?
For links and show notes, mouse over the player and click the .
Transcript
About this week's guest
Marc Palazzolo is manager of strategic operations at consulting firm Kearney. He has led last-mile delivery strategy for Amazon Prime Now, Fresh, and Whole Foods NYC and has helped many companies revamp their supply chain operations. Palazzolo has more than five years of industry experience in the areas of last-mile delivery strategy, e-commerce fulfillment, supply chain strategy and transformation, distribution excellence, distribution-center four-walls improvement, and logistics sourcing. He is the co-author of CSCMP State of Logistics Report, Parcel / Last Mile.
David Maloney, Editorial Director, CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly00:02
The Covid-19 pandemic showed us just how vulnerable supply chains are. Today we face many threats: shipping delays; a lack of workers; failing infrastructure; transportation rates that are out of control; cybersecurity threats; and of course, a worldwide pandemic that is still very much with us. But with each of these threats comes opportunities. Welcome to this limited podcast series from CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly, the Top 10 Supply Chain Threats.
This podcast is sponsored by AFS Logistics, offering trusted logistics services for parcel, LTL, freight audit and payment, and transportation management. AFS combines a data-driven approach with time-tested skills to help you navigate, find, and optimize the freight capacity you need when you need it. For more information, visit AFS.net.
Today, we focus on the threat of a freight capacity crunch. Here's your moderator for this segment, Supply Chain Quarterly's managing editor, Diane Rand.
Joining us today is Marc Palazzolo. He currently serves as a manager of strategic operations at consulting firm Kearney, and before joining Kearney he worked at Amazon for several years. Thank you for being here today, Marc, to discuss the freight capacity crunch affecting supply chains. Can you summarize some of the main freight capacity issues that we're currently facing?
Marc Palazzolo, Manager, Strategic Operations, Kearney 01:36
Yeah, thank you, Diane and pleasure to be here. So, in terms of freight capacity issues that we're currently facing, there's multiple factors driving, really the crisis that we're all facing and have been facing for about the past 18 months. Based on conversations that I'm having with clients, there's really two key aspects, which I think are most critical. Number one is the rapid acceleration to e-commerce. So, with the pandemic driving more consumers online, this has accelerated e-commerce about five years within a, you know, less than two-year period. This shift is really resulted in a few supply chain challenges that both shippers and carriers weren't in a position to address quickly. For example, with the shift to e-commerce, that results in smaller shipment volume with more replenishment cycles, also results in increased delivery speed expectations, and overall greater shipment volume across all modes. With that drastic rise in e-commerce we've seen, and continue to forecast, that's really a driver of this capacity challenge in the market. Number two is the driver shortage. So, as shipment volumes rise, this has only exacerbated the existing driver shortage. With a generally aging workforce, among other factors, the U.S. driver shortage is expected to be upwards of 100,000 over the next two years, which is further going to impact the capacity issues shippers are facing, unless strategic interventions are made. Those are really the two key aspects or factors that I'm hearing from clients.
And so what are some of the repercussions of those issues if we don't, as a[n] industry, tackle them and get some relief here soon?
Marc Palazzolo, Manager, Strategic Operations, Kearney 03:22
The repercussions if not holistically and strategically addressed, are significant. For my clients, the top-of-mind repercussions are really threefold. Number one is service. The key question executives are asking themselves is, How do I meet current customer expectations as well as deliver on increased demands brought on by this explosion e-commerce? Number two is cost. As we all know, operating costs across all modes have skyrocketed. For example, freight dry-van rates have increased 31% year over year, during an already inflationary period. Parcel and ocean are being impacted on [an] even greater scale. So, executives are asking themselves, How can I combat these significant cost headwinds and not have my EBITDA impacted? And the third, which I think is really important, is shippers are concerned about lost sales due to not having inventory in the right place at the right time, due to this tightened freight capacity. And so with with growth being ever important in today's marketplace, this is really top of mind for clients and executives.
The big question on everyone's mind these days is, when can we expect these freight capacity problems to ease?
Marc Palazzolo, Manager, Strategic Operations, Kearney 04:33
Yeah, in terms of timeline for relief, I believe we're looking at end of 2022, if not into Q1 or Q2 of 2023 for the market to normalize. Unfortunately, many shippers have typically taken a more short-term approach to supply chain resiliency, and therefore organizations are currently unable to adapt and course-correct as fast as they desire. That said, there there are a variety of strategies which supply chain executives and organizations can pursue to combat these current challenges, but I think that journey is going to take us, you know, into next year if not into middle of 2023.
It sounds about right. High capacity in one mode puts more pressure on capacity in another mode, or other modes. Do you see any potential domino effects on the horizon that shippers should be watching?
Marc Palazzolo, Manager, Strategic Operations, Kearney 05:26
There isn't one particular domino effect that I foresee or think that shippers should really be watching for, as the, you know, the problem space is highly interconnected. Rather, I'm of the perspective that shippers should be taking a holistic approach to enhancing resiliency and flexibility of their supply chain to jointly optimize for capacity costs and service. As you said, as you start to lean on one mode versus another, you start to shift that constraint, and so taking a step back and approaching holistically is a strategy to ultimately enhance your resiliency and not move forward with that domino effect.
So beyond taking a holistic approach, is there anything else shippers can do to alleviate some of this strain, or do you think they just have to write it out to a certain extent?
Marc Palazzolo, Manager, Strategic Operations, Kearney 06:16
There are certainly short term levers that shippers can pull to alleviate the current pain that they're feeling. That said, I think a longer-term strategy across three prongs is really what is needed here, and a more surgical approach is needed here to enhance supply chain resiliency and ultimately mitigate future supply chain disruption. Number one is adopting an end-to-end supply chain approach and addressing structural changes. So, one of the first structural changes is thinking about how to strategically diversify your carrier supply base across all modes to minimize disruption. For example, even if a key supplier or key carriers not meeting SLAs duty reduce capacity, or if they're going to increase costs due to disruption in their supply chain, you're able to across modes or even within lanes, shift to other carriers. That's one structural change that clients have been deploying to start mitigating some of the disruption and challenges. A second element here is evaluating the ability to localize components of your supply chain to limit those disruptions on a national or global scale. This localization play also enables a shift from OTR parcel volume to other last-mile carriers such as Shipt, DoorDash, Roadie, [Walmart, local?] etc.—some of those other gig economy players that have more flexibility due to their operating model. So, again, adopting this end-to-end approach and addressing these structural changes is one component that we think is key. The second component is doubling down on investments in advanced technologies, with a particular focus on exception management or [sensitive pivot] technologies, which have predictive analytics. This allows supply chain organizations to be able to proactively identify issues and take action prior to avoid a disruption. Now, there has to be a strategic evaluation of that capex and opex trade off, but that is one—that is an area that leaders are taking to make their supply chains more future proof. The last and third prong of the strategy that we're recommending for clients is optimizing your operating model. From my perspective, as I said previously, many companies are responding to turbulence in the logistics market in a very tactical and reactive way, but to be able to make their supply chain more resilient, having that long-term approach and thinking about their operating model more strategically, is really key. More specifically, these longer-term strategies will focus on enabling real-time shipment visibility, driving flexibility to pivot quickly as exceptions and those choke points arise, and implementing analytics that continually monitor your logistics network to anticipate potential disruptions and assess performance. Those are really the three key things that I think, from a longer-term perspective, shippers can deploy to be able to ride out this turbulence.
Wonderful advice. Thank you so much for being with us today to talk to us about the freight capacity crunch that's affecting our supply chains, and it'll be interesting to see what the next year or so will bring, and how our industry will change and shift and grow, and some of the innovations that will come out of it. Just—it'll be interesting to see how that, how it all shakes out. So, thank you, Marc, for your time today. We really do appreciate you coming on and talking to us.
Marc Palazzolo, Manager, Strategic Operations, Kearney 09:59
Absolutely, Diane, it was a pleasure and really enjoyed the conversation. Thank you.
David Maloney, Editorial Director, CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly10:07
Thank you for joining us for this podcast from CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly, the Top 10 Supply Chain Threats. We encourage you to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.