Top 10 Supply Chain Threats: Zac Rogers from Colorado State University on the threat of spiraling costs
Supply chain and logistics costs are skyrocketing as demand for transportation and warehousing capacity outstrips supply. Is there any relief in sight?
For links and show notes, mouse over the player and click the .
Transcript
About this week's guest
Zachary S. Rogers is an assistant professor of operations and supply chain management at Colorado State University. His primary research interests include the financial impact of supply chain sustainability, emerging logistics technologies, supply chain cyber security and various other emerging purchasing and logistics issues. He is also a researcher and co-author of the monthly Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report. Rogers’ work has appeared in multiple academic journals, corporate white papers, trade publications, and conference proceedings. He is also a frequent speaker at both academic and practitioner-oriented conferences. Rogers earned his B.S. and M.B.A. degrees at the University of Nevada, Reno and his PhD in supply chain management from Arizona State University. Prior to returning to academia, Rogers worked as a purchasing agent for a large hotel-resort and as an operations manager for Quidsi, a subsidiary of Amazon.
David Maloney, Editorial Director, CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly00:02
The Covid-19 pandemic showed us just how vulnerable supply chains are. Today we face many threats: shipping delays, a lack of workers, failing infrastructure, transportation rates that are out of control, cybersecurity threats. and of course, a worldwide pandemic that is still very much with us. But with each of these threats come opportunities. Welcome to this limited podcast series from CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly, the Top 10 Supply Chain Threats.
This podcast is sponsored by Trax, the global leader in transportation spend management. Trax elevates traditional freight audit with a combination of industry-leading cloud based technology and the industry's most global services to deliver enterprisewide value and customer satisfaction. In addition, Trax's invoice payment-automation service, TraxPays Plus, ensures efficient payment management, reduces payment issues, improves carrier loyalty, and increases cash flow. The customers of Trax represent the world's most complex supply chains, and they chose Trax to achieve end-to-end visibility and control of their global transportation costs, improve transportation data quality, and call upon logistics management optimization strategies. Visit Trax at www.traxtech.com.
Today we focus on the threat posed by increasing costs. Here is your moderator for this segment, Supply Chain Quarterly's executive editor, Susan Lacefield.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly01:45
Welcome to the latest episode of Supply Chain Quarterly's podcast on the top 10 threats facing supply chains. Today, we are looking at the risks and challenges associated with rising costs, and to help us unpeel that onion is Zac Rogers, who is an assistant professor at Colorado State University. Zac has a really good read on the costs facing the logistics industry through his work with the monthly Logistics Managers' Index, also known as the LMI. Zac, for those of our listeners who are not familiar with the LMI, can you give us the brief elevator speech of what it is?
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 02:18
Absolutely. So, the LMI is something we started five years ago—this is actually our fifth-year anniversary—we started at CSCMP, yeah, so we're all very excited. And so essentially, the LMI is a change index, where we go and we talk to a few hundred managers every month—usually director level and above, so have a 20,000-foot-view of of the supply chain—and ask them about eight key metrics. We ask them about inventory levels and costs, and then for both warehousing and transportation, we ask them about cost, utilization, and capacity. And I always say is it going up, is it going down, or is it staying the same? And we use those answers, monthly, to create a diffusion index, wherein anything above 50 means growth. anything below 50 means contraction. It's very similar to to the PMI.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly03:04
Right.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 03:04
And actually, the reason we established the LMI is because really, you know, the PMI when they started that in the '60s, it was, it made sense to—let's look at manufacturing, and inventories and things like that, to measure the economy. Well, when we started this in 2016, we thought, we need to look at transportation and service levels, because the economy has really fundamentally shifted. Plus, we really capture both the upstream and downstream parts of the supply chain, so not just the manufacturing industrial side, but consumers as well. So we've been doing it for five years, and it gives us a pretty good read on the direction that the economy is going, because if you think about it, before you can buy something, we had to drive it there, we had to store it somewhere, we had to hold it in inventory. So it's a pretty good economic indicator.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly03:48
So what are the responses to the survey indicating. You know, costs are already high. Are they gonna rise even more?
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 03:56
It seems that way, you know. So, if you look at the overall index, in the most recent report that came out, it was a 73.8.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly04:04
Okay.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 04:05
And if you put the last three months together—so basically summer, June, July, August—the overall average is 74.4, which is the highest three-month moving average that we've ever had in the five months. So, if people listening to this thought, "Man, my supply chain seemed really expensive this summer"—it was! It wasn't just you. And a lot of that is driven by costs. For instance, warehousing prices were at an 88 in August. Now, the scale only goes up to 100, so 88's pretty high.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly04:34
Right.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 04:34
It was also that high in July. And it's the highest level we've ever had. July and August, back-to-back months, we had consecutive highest readings ever for warehousing. Now that's really interesting because warehousing typically is not that volatile, especially if you compare it to something like transportation. Transportation is up, it's down, it's all over the place. We're used to big swings. Warehousing prices, if you go back and look at the last couple of years, it's really been in like a 10- to 15-point band the whole time. It doesn't get too low, doesn't get too high. Well, what's happened is, we've had a capacity crunch now for so long. Warehousing capacity has been in a state of contraction for now 12 consecutive months.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly05:13
Wow.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 05:13
And really, there's only one month of the whole pandemic—of the 18 months of the pandemic, it contracted for 17 months. And it was at a 50.5 in August of 2020. So, just like just barely—someone built five warehouses outside of Atlanta, and it just barely went up.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly05:30
Right.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 05:30
But it's been negative since then, and so what's interesting is, we're starting to see warehousing prices move quickly in a way we'd normally see transportation prices move. And part of the reason for that is really, it's just exhaustion in warehouse networks.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly05:45
Okay.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 05:46
So, it's been contracting and contracting and contracting for a year, and really a year and a half, and we're starting to see the marginal, increase costs of less capacity go up and up. So essentially, for every bit of capacity that we don't have, it's becoming more and more expensive. You know, I kind of compare it to, a supply chain right now is, you know, when you're in college—I'm around college students all the time, I teach them—you know, I can tell, you know, sometimes they're up all night, right? Because studying for one test. And you can stay up all night one night in a row and probably be mostly fine. I mean, I can tell they don't look totally right, but I can tell they're mostly fine. But if you do that for a week, you're not going to be fine.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly06:30
No, you get psychotic.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 06:30
And that's essentially what's happening with supply chains right now.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly06:33
We have pyschotic supply chains.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 06:34
Yeah, we—it's like we've been up all year, essentially, and we're really starting to get tired, and you're seeing that stress on capacity really reflected in prices.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly06:46
Okay, so what can supply chain managers do to mitigate these costs? Is there anything they can do, or are they just got to ride it out?
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 06:53
Well, what do you think about having Christmas in February? Do you think? Skip the lines? No, I think that, really, it's got to be strategies where you play to your strengths, and you know, there's no way to avoid some things, right? Like, okay, we know, the cost of a container right now is $20,000, going from China to the West Coast, which, you know, is about 40% of the value of the goods in the container, where normally it should be 4%, so there's a problem. We know that things are slower. And essentially, we see firms kind of shifting between a couple of different strategies.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly07:33
Okay,
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 07:33
If you look at someone like a Best Buy, Best Buy decided, Well, we're just going to stock up like crazy and carry way more inventory than normal, so that hopefully, we don't miss many orders and we can really fill demand in Q4. You saw Toyota do the same thing. You know, Toyota actually outsold GM in Q2 for the first time ever in the U.S., because they stocked up on—
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly07:55
[Indistinct]
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 07:55
Yes, exactly. The most JIT [just-in-time ] company on the planet decided, Let's not do JIT.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly08:00
Right, that says something.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 08:01
Yeah, it really does. They're always one step ahead of us, those guys at Toyota. And so, some companies have sort of done that, where, "Okay, we'll build up and build up and build up." Other companies have tried the cost-cutting methods. It doesn't seem like that has worked as well, though. Now, is building up inventories, you know, forever sustainable? Probably not. You know, we eventually, you know, we've gone from just-in-time to just-in-case. I think probably we'll settle somewhere in the middle, right?
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly08:31
Right.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 08:32
Right now, we're sort of at the other extreme, the other end of the spectrum, where people are ordering more than they need, because they know, "Okay, well, it's going to be 60 days for it to get over here, it's going to wait for nine days off the, in the San Pedro Bay...
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly08:45
Right.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 08:46
"I'm just gonna place a double order, because who knows when my next order is going to come in?" Eventually, that will, that will slow back down. And really, what we're seeing now is companies experimenting, and really trying to calibrate their strategies for this sort of new reality. You know, we went into the pandemic with really [these] sort of pre-Covid ideas about how things work—about how quickly a ship could get here from China, about the cost of the container, about how quickly a rail car could get across the country and not be stuck in Chicago...
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly09:14
Right.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 09:15
all of these sort of ideas, and so we build our supply chains in these assumptions, and now those assumptions have changed. And so we are, right now, dealing with the post-Covid world with pre-Covid supply chains, and eventually we'll get to the post-Covid supply chain and be calibrated in a way where we can deal with the new realities.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly09:35
Great. This has been a fascinating discussion, Zac. I really appreciate you coming down and talking to us at CSCMP Edge about what's going on in the...
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 09:43
Well, I mean, you guys are strategically located right next to lunch. This is great.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly09:47
Right. Well go enjoy your lunch, and for our listeners out there, go and subscribe to the podcast.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 09:53
Absolutely. Thank you very much. And again, the-dash-L-M-I-dot-com.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly09:58
Okay.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 09:58
All of our reports [are] at the-dash-L-M-I-dot-com, including the old ones that I kind of don't want anybody to look at.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly10:04
Right? It's a good it's a good case, a good look at what's changed.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 10:08
Absolutely, yeah. Thank you.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly10:10
Thank you.
David Maloney, Editorial Director, CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly10:12
Thank you for joining us for this podcast from CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly, the Top 10 Supply Chain Threats. We encourage you to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”