Although there are some bright spots in the air cargo market, generally flat cargo volumes coupled with increasing capacity are keeping things fairly calm for now.
The global heavy airfreight industry has remained in an uneasy stasis in 2012, mirroring the general conditions of the world economy. As is true of any market, the two primary drivers are supply and demand. With the global economy showing alternating flashes of growth and recession, then, the airfreight market will likely drift along for the rest of the year.
Overall demand remains flat
Demand in the passenger market has seen steady growth since bottoming out in 2009, and wide-body jets with significant cargo capacity continue to capture an increasing percentage of that market. Cargo volumes, by contrast, have given up all post-recession gains since growth trends turned downward in 2010. In most markets, cargo volumes are flat or down relative to 2011. One reason is that an increasing number of cargo shippers are relying on ocean freight instead of air freight to ship their goods overseas. As a result, cargo utilization continues to decrease in most markets, and cargo rates have echoed that trend.
Although overall worldwide demand is down, several regions, including Latin America and the Middle East, have shown rapid growth in airfreight volumes over the past year. In addition, while Asia has traditionally been (and continues to be) a source of exports, over the past year international trade has expanded on lanes **italic{into} Asian markets. This has driven increased demand for aircraft space on lanes that traditionally were considered back-hauls.
While yields on these lanes are not high enough to flip the westbound trans-Pacific into a head-haul or induce more freighters into service, the additional revenues are enhancing trans-Pacific carriers' bottom line. Moreover, the airfreight market is experiencing more "demand shocks" caused by sales of blockbuster electronic products like Apple's third-generation iPad. Airfreight rates and service availability will see increased variability as manufacturers continue to rely on event-driven sales as a marketing tactic.
More wide-body capacity
On the supply side, carriers seeking to capture the growth in passenger volumes have been adding new wide-body jets to their fleets at a rapid pace: 65 in the first quarter of 2012 alone, and this January was the busiest for deliveries in over four years. Both Airbus and Boeing are continuing to enlarge their order books, and carriers worldwide currently are awaiting the delivery of almost 4,000 wide-body jets.
Most of that new capacity will be devoted to keeping pace with the growing passenger market, where yields are continuing at pre-recession levels, according to the International Air Transport Association (IATA). Still, the addition of cargo capacity on passenger routes as more wide-bodies come online, together with flat-to-decreasing demand, will keep the pressure on cargo pricing and yields in most markets.
As carrier networks absorb this new capacity, wide-body network coverage continues to expand, with carriers adding or replacing many existing routes. Through April 2012, U.S. carriers added 61 weekly flights spread over destinations in Asia and Europe—more than double the rate of coverage growth experienced in 2011. These new routes have had the positive effect of increasing service options in a down cargo market.
Supply (capacity) and demand are not the only factors influencing pricing. The cost of jet fuel, which has experienced dramatic increases since 2010, continues to be the primary driver of airfreight-rate volatility. In the near term, at least, things may be calmer. While jet fuel prices are up about 9 percent since 2011, the U.S. Energy Information Administration is projecting flat prices through 2013.
A look down the runway
Where does all this leave the air cargo industry? As was the case in 2011, there may be short-term increases in cargo volume and rates that will be driven by market forces that are not yet very clear. Over the longer term, freight rates will be kept within a range—held down by slack capacity on the one hand, and pushed upward by what could be mistaken for an economic recovery led by the United States and developing markets on the other. Fuel costs will continue to be the unpredictable factor driving overall airfreight cost volatility.
One positive note: When robust economic growth begins in earnest, air cargo networks will have excess capacity in place on the major East-West routes to absorb growth without service interruption.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.