Three years after the official end of the Great Recession in June 2009, U.S. companies are still proceeding with caution. The economy's comparatively anemic growth has made them wary of ramping up production or making significant investments, and they're keeping inventory levels lean.
Sales up, but for how long?
This caution remains even though sales in several categories are up (see Figure 1). Retail sales (adjusted for inflation) have surpassed their pre-recession peak, and wholesalers are within striking range of surpassing their own pre-recession mark. Furthermore, while manufacturing sales are still 13 percent below their pre-recession peak, they are well above the low point seen in 2009.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] U.S. sales adjusted for inflation (billions of 2005 chained dollars)Enlarge this image
[Figure 3] U.S. inventory adjusted for inflation (billions of 2005 chained dollars)Enlarge this image
Companies are uncertain about how strong sales growth will continue to be. The manufacturing recovery has been assisted by relatively strong exports to emerging market economies—namely Brazil, India, and China—and a weak dollar. But recent banking and economic problems in the so-called "Club Med" countries (Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain) and their wider implications for the euro zone have temporarily strengthened the U.S. dollar. Additionally, in recent months there has been a noticeable slowdown in the economies of China, India, and Brazil (although growth there is still considered very robust by European and North American standards). Both of these developments could slow the growth in U.S. exports.
On the retail side, meanwhile, several indicators point to considerable weakness over the longer term. For one thing, consumers are not spending like they used to, so many chain stores are fighting for market share via price discounting. For another, consumers are spending at the current levels not because they are earning more money but because they are saving less and are using that money for necessities—a classic indicator of weak sales growth. In addition, online retailers are starting to make a dent in the bricks-and-mortar business model. In the first quarter of 2012, seasonally adjusted e-commerce retail sales as a percentage of total retail trade in the United States hit a new high of 4.9 percent. IHS Global Insight projects U.S. e-commerce retail sales will increase by about 17 percent during 2012 to reach around $230 billion for the year.
Overall consumer demand is unlikely to improve in the short term. Many U.S. households are in a fragile state. Poverty rates and income inequality are up while median household income adjusted for inflation is down. Part of the reason for this is that recent job gains have not been sufficient to substantially reduce the unemployment rate. In essence, the economy is caught in a paradox: Companies won't hire more employees until they are confident that there will be sustained growth in consumer demand, yet demand won't pick up until consumers are confident that job prospects are improving and wages are growing.
It's no surprise, then, that consumers' mood—as measured by both the Conference Board's Consumer Confidence Index and the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan consumer sentiment index—hasn't improved much even though the recession ended three years ago. Likewise, the National Federation of Independent Business' Index of Small Business Optimism is also at a depressed level.
The upshot of all this is that companies are hanging onto the cash they have on hand. Corporate cash holdings are approximately 11.5 percent of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), or $1.7 trillion. This is partly because there is significant uncertainty on the geopolitical, financial, and economic fronts. For that reason, many large corporations are maintaining a wait-and-see approach when it comes to meaningful investments in plants or factory lines.
The news is not all negative, however. One bright spot in recent quarters has been light vehicle sales, due to the release of pent-up demand and the easing of the auto supply chain disruptions caused by the March 2011 earthquake in Japan. During the Great Recession, many U.S. consumers held onto their cars longer, causing demand to build up. Accordingly, IHS Global Insight projects that light vehicle sales will grow steadily to reach just under 16 million units by the end of 2014, about the same as on the eve of the recession.
Impact on inventories
Companies are keeping inventories lean in this current economic environment because they do not want to be left with unsold goods, which would force them to discount even further. The inventory-to-sales ratio for wholesalers has been flat, declining for retailers, and growing for manufacturers (see Figure 2).
The retail inventory-to-sales ratio in particular has been plummeting in recent years because of a combination of increasing consumer imports from China, weak consumer demand, technological advancements, and e-commerce retail sales. Additionally, retailers do not want to hold excessive inventories during a period of uncertainty, so they have been keeping inventories ultra-thin. We expect the retail inventory-to-sales ratio to continue to remain depressed.
Nevertheless, retail inventories overall are expected to continue to trend upward, although growth will look very sluggish if one removes auto dealerships from the picture (see Figure 3). We do not expect retail inventories to surpass their pre-recession peak before 2015.
Manufacturing inventory levels have bounced back as manufacturers recovered in the last half of 2011 from the supply chain disruptions caused by the Japanese earthquake. Wholesale inventories benefit from manufacturing and retail inventories, and therefore have just surpassed their pre-recession peak. However, they should grow at a slower pace in 2012, mirroring conditions in retail and manufacturing. Expectations for manufacturing inventories, meanwhile, are stronger than for wholesalers; however, the recent global slowdown has introduced serious risks to the overall outlook.
In this current economic environment, supply chain managers must be able to respond in a timely manner to sudden shifts in sales. Keeping lean inventories assists on the downside risks, however a surge in demand or supply chain disruptions will create substantial shortages and bottlenecks. In these circumstances a little extra inventory would be beneficial.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.