In a slowly reviving economy, U.S. logistics costs as a percentage of gross domestic product increased as rail and motor carriers raised rates. When the economy bounces back, shipment capacity rather than rates may be the big issue facing logistics managers.
Despite sluggish economic growth, U.S. business logistics costs continued to rise in 2011. Logistics costs last year amounted to $1.28 trillion—an increase of $79 billion, or 6.6 percent, over 2010's total. (All monetary figures in this article are in U.S. dollars.) Costs rose in large part due to increased truck and rail rates along with higher costs for warehousing.
Those were among the findings detailed in the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals' 23rd Annual "State of Logistics Report" presented by Penske Logistics, titled The Long and Winding Recovery. The longest-running study in the field, the "State of Logistics Report" authored by Rosalyn Wilson provides an accepted measure of the size of the U.S. transportation market and the impact of logistics on the U.S. economy. (For more about the report, see the sidebar.)
To determine how efficiently supply chains are moving the United States' output of goods, the report compares logistics costs against the overall economy. In 2011, logistics costs as a percentage of nominal gross domestic product (GDP) rose to 8.5 percent in 2011, up slightly from 8.3 percent in 2010.
In the 1990s, as the nation's supply chain was shaking off the yokes of rail and truck regulation and bringing free-market processes to bear on the marketplace, a ratio in the single digits was hailed as a breakthrough in logistics productivity. Over the past three years, however, a low ratio has come to underscore a significant decline in shipping expenditures and transportation costs as shippers and carriers downshifted in response to a severe decline in economic activity. In fact, the lowest point ever recorded in the past 30 years was a figure of 7.9 percent in 2009 during the recession. (The report was first issued in 1989, but the first edition included data dating back to 1981.) Figure 1 shows logistics costs as a percentage of GDP for the most recent 10-year period.
About the "State of Logistics Report"
For more than two decades, the annual "State of Logistics Report" has quantified the size of the U.S. transportation market and the impact of logistics on the U.S. economy. The late logistics consultant Robert V. Delaney began the study in 1989 as a way to measure logistics efficiency following the deregulation of transportation in the United States. Currently the report is authored by Rosalyn Wilson, a senior business analyst at Delcan Corporation in Vienna, Virginia, USA, under the auspices of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals. This year's report was sponsored by Penske Logistics.
CSCMP members can download the complete 23rd Annual "State of Logistics Report" at no charge from CSCMP's website. Nonmembers can purchase the report for US $395 from CSCMP's online bookstore.
Carrying cost breakdown
The report breaks down overall logistics expenditures into three major components: inventory carrying costs, transportation costs, and administrative costs. Inventory carrying costs rose in 2011 to $418 billion—a 7.6-percent hike from 2010. Carrying costs reflect the amount of interest paid on inventory, the expenses for holding inventory in storage (taxes, obsolescence, depreciation, and insurance), and warehousing costs. (See Figure 2.)
The value of the nation's business inventories (which includes agriculture, mining, construction, services, manufacturing, and wholesale and retail trade) rose to $2.1 trillion last year, resulting in much of the increase in overall carrying costs. In her report, Wilson pointed out that U.S. business inventories increased in all four quarters of 2011 such that "inventory levels are now close to the levels that were experienced at the height of the recession, ending the year at the highest point since the third quarter of 2008." (See Figure 3.)
Although inventory levels went up, the interest rate that companies had to pay on that inventory decreased. To determine interest, the "State of Logistics Report" uses the annualized commercial paper rate, which reflects the interest that businesses pay to borrow short-term capital. The commercial paper rate in 2011 fell to the near-historic low of 0.09 percent from .13 percent in 2010. Hence the interest component of carrying costs totaled only about $3 billion.
Taxes, obsolescence, depreciation, and insurance rose 8.2 percent in 2011 to reach $294 billion. Wilson said the hike there was directly related to the growth in inventories. The final component of inventory carrying costs—warehousing expenses—totaled $120 billion in 2011, up 7.6 percent from 2010. That increase occurred because rents for warehousing space have gone up with the rise in inventory levels.
Although the value of inventory rose, the inventory-to-sales ratio (which measures the percentage of inventories a company currently has on hand to support its current level of sales) remained steady. The inventory-to-sales ratio stood at 1.27 at the end of 2011. This is a marked reduction from the high levels in 2009, when the ratio spiked to 1.48 as final sales dropped dramatically during the recession. (See Figure 4.)
The current ratio underscores retailers' success in keeping their inventories lean and requiring their suppliers only to deliver the product they need at that point in time, according to the report. Wilson said the ratio is likely to remain stable as retailers leverage better processes and increasingly sophisticated information technology to more accurately calibrate inventories with end-consumer demand.
Transportation costs rising
Transportation, the second major component of U.S. logistics costs, rose 6.2 percent in 2011. Transportation costs totaled $806 billion in 2011, up from $786 billion in 2010. Higher rates for motor and rail carriers along with those for forwarders were the contributing factors in the hike. As a result, transportation accounted for 5.8 percent of overall GDP in 2011, although that's still below the historic norm of 6 percent.
Wilson noted that trucking, the largest component in the transportation sector, exerted more control over rates than in past years. According to the report, truck rates increased by 5 to 15 percent in 2011. As the result of these rate increases, intercity motor carriage totaled $431 billion in 2011, compared to $403 billion the previous year, and local motor freight reached $198 billion, up from $189 billion. Overall spending on trucking services in 2011 amounted to $629 billion, a $37 billion increase from the prior year. The increase in spending was driven by the higher rates and not due to an increase in volume; with the exception of December, shipment volumes were flat for most of 2011.
Despite higher rates, the trucking industry struggled to cover its operating costs. Truckers dealt with increased driver pay, rising insurance premiums, high diesel fuel prices, and the need to purchase new equipment.
Railroads also were able to increase rates for their services last year. Rail revenue went from $60 billion in 2010 to $68 billion in 2011. Total carloads for the year increased 2.2 percent from 2010 to reach 15.2 million, while intermodal volume rose 5.4 percent to reach 11.9 million containers and trailers. Wilson noted that intermodal has recovered 84 percent of its 2006 volume, reflecting the strong growth in this area.
As for domestic and international water transportation, revenue dropped slightly from $33 billion in 2010 to $32 billion in 2011. Although rail and motor carriers were able to extract rate increases, ocean carriers were not able to do so, in large part because vessel capacity exceeded shipper demand for water movements. In fact, a decline in ocean freight demand—especially during what turned out to be a nonexistent peak pre-holiday shipping season—led to a relatively small gain in containerized volumes, the report said.
Oil pipelines generated $10 billion, the same amount as in 2010 and 2009. Revenue for the airfreight industry dropped slightly from $33 billion in 2010 to $32 billion in 2011. Wilson noted that extra capacity in the airfreight industry led to a decline in loads and downward pressure on rates. Freight forwarders, which include third-party logistics service providers, generated $35 billion in 2011, up from $32 billion last year.
Aside from inventory carrying and transportation costs, two other factors figure in Wilson's computation of business logistics costs. Shipper-related costs, which include the loading and unloading of transportation equipment as well as traffic department operations, totaled $10 billion in 2011. Administrative expenses—which are computed by a generally accepted formula that takes the sum of inventory and transportation costs and multiplies it by 4 percent—amounted to $49 billion.
Looming capacity problems
As for the future, Wilson said most economists have concluded that the economy will not recover at a faster pace. She expects that GDP will stay below 3 percent this year. When the economy does finally recover, Wilson said, shippers would likely confront reduced shipment capacity from motor carriers. Although railroads will be there with additional capacity to pick up some of the shipment demand, shippers should be prepared for fewer trucks, fewer drivers, and fewer trucking companies in the marketplace. "I urge everyone to begin making contingency plans for the day you cannot get a truck," she said.
This article includes reporting by Senior Editor Mark Solomon.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.