In a slowly reviving economy, U.S. logistics costs as a percentage of gross domestic product increased as rail and motor carriers raised rates. When the economy bounces back, shipment capacity rather than rates may be the big issue facing logistics managers.
Despite sluggish economic growth, U.S. business logistics costs continued to rise in 2011. Logistics costs last year amounted to $1.28 trillion—an increase of $79 billion, or 6.6 percent, over 2010's total. (All monetary figures in this article are in U.S. dollars.) Costs rose in large part due to increased truck and rail rates along with higher costs for warehousing.
Those were among the findings detailed in the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals' 23rd Annual "State of Logistics Report" presented by Penske Logistics, titled The Long and Winding Recovery. The longest-running study in the field, the "State of Logistics Report" authored by Rosalyn Wilson provides an accepted measure of the size of the U.S. transportation market and the impact of logistics on the U.S. economy. (For more about the report, see the sidebar.)
To determine how efficiently supply chains are moving the United States' output of goods, the report compares logistics costs against the overall economy. In 2011, logistics costs as a percentage of nominal gross domestic product (GDP) rose to 8.5 percent in 2011, up slightly from 8.3 percent in 2010.
In the 1990s, as the nation's supply chain was shaking off the yokes of rail and truck regulation and bringing free-market processes to bear on the marketplace, a ratio in the single digits was hailed as a breakthrough in logistics productivity. Over the past three years, however, a low ratio has come to underscore a significant decline in shipping expenditures and transportation costs as shippers and carriers downshifted in response to a severe decline in economic activity. In fact, the lowest point ever recorded in the past 30 years was a figure of 7.9 percent in 2009 during the recession. (The report was first issued in 1989, but the first edition included data dating back to 1981.) Figure 1 shows logistics costs as a percentage of GDP for the most recent 10-year period.
About the "State of Logistics Report"
For more than two decades, the annual "State of Logistics Report" has quantified the size of the U.S. transportation market and the impact of logistics on the U.S. economy. The late logistics consultant Robert V. Delaney began the study in 1989 as a way to measure logistics efficiency following the deregulation of transportation in the United States. Currently the report is authored by Rosalyn Wilson, a senior business analyst at Delcan Corporation in Vienna, Virginia, USA, under the auspices of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals. This year's report was sponsored by Penske Logistics.
CSCMP members can download the complete 23rd Annual "State of Logistics Report" at no charge from CSCMP's website. Nonmembers can purchase the report for US $395 from CSCMP's online bookstore.
Carrying cost breakdown
The report breaks down overall logistics expenditures into three major components: inventory carrying costs, transportation costs, and administrative costs. Inventory carrying costs rose in 2011 to $418 billion—a 7.6-percent hike from 2010. Carrying costs reflect the amount of interest paid on inventory, the expenses for holding inventory in storage (taxes, obsolescence, depreciation, and insurance), and warehousing costs. (See Figure 2.)
The value of the nation's business inventories (which includes agriculture, mining, construction, services, manufacturing, and wholesale and retail trade) rose to $2.1 trillion last year, resulting in much of the increase in overall carrying costs. In her report, Wilson pointed out that U.S. business inventories increased in all four quarters of 2011 such that "inventory levels are now close to the levels that were experienced at the height of the recession, ending the year at the highest point since the third quarter of 2008." (See Figure 3.)
Although inventory levels went up, the interest rate that companies had to pay on that inventory decreased. To determine interest, the "State of Logistics Report" uses the annualized commercial paper rate, which reflects the interest that businesses pay to borrow short-term capital. The commercial paper rate in 2011 fell to the near-historic low of 0.09 percent from .13 percent in 2010. Hence the interest component of carrying costs totaled only about $3 billion.
Taxes, obsolescence, depreciation, and insurance rose 8.2 percent in 2011 to reach $294 billion. Wilson said the hike there was directly related to the growth in inventories. The final component of inventory carrying costs—warehousing expenses—totaled $120 billion in 2011, up 7.6 percent from 2010. That increase occurred because rents for warehousing space have gone up with the rise in inventory levels.
Although the value of inventory rose, the inventory-to-sales ratio (which measures the percentage of inventories a company currently has on hand to support its current level of sales) remained steady. The inventory-to-sales ratio stood at 1.27 at the end of 2011. This is a marked reduction from the high levels in 2009, when the ratio spiked to 1.48 as final sales dropped dramatically during the recession. (See Figure 4.)
The current ratio underscores retailers' success in keeping their inventories lean and requiring their suppliers only to deliver the product they need at that point in time, according to the report. Wilson said the ratio is likely to remain stable as retailers leverage better processes and increasingly sophisticated information technology to more accurately calibrate inventories with end-consumer demand.
Transportation costs rising
Transportation, the second major component of U.S. logistics costs, rose 6.2 percent in 2011. Transportation costs totaled $806 billion in 2011, up from $786 billion in 2010. Higher rates for motor and rail carriers along with those for forwarders were the contributing factors in the hike. As a result, transportation accounted for 5.8 percent of overall GDP in 2011, although that's still below the historic norm of 6 percent.
Wilson noted that trucking, the largest component in the transportation sector, exerted more control over rates than in past years. According to the report, truck rates increased by 5 to 15 percent in 2011. As the result of these rate increases, intercity motor carriage totaled $431 billion in 2011, compared to $403 billion the previous year, and local motor freight reached $198 billion, up from $189 billion. Overall spending on trucking services in 2011 amounted to $629 billion, a $37 billion increase from the prior year. The increase in spending was driven by the higher rates and not due to an increase in volume; with the exception of December, shipment volumes were flat for most of 2011.
Despite higher rates, the trucking industry struggled to cover its operating costs. Truckers dealt with increased driver pay, rising insurance premiums, high diesel fuel prices, and the need to purchase new equipment.
Railroads also were able to increase rates for their services last year. Rail revenue went from $60 billion in 2010 to $68 billion in 2011. Total carloads for the year increased 2.2 percent from 2010 to reach 15.2 million, while intermodal volume rose 5.4 percent to reach 11.9 million containers and trailers. Wilson noted that intermodal has recovered 84 percent of its 2006 volume, reflecting the strong growth in this area.
As for domestic and international water transportation, revenue dropped slightly from $33 billion in 2010 to $32 billion in 2011. Although rail and motor carriers were able to extract rate increases, ocean carriers were not able to do so, in large part because vessel capacity exceeded shipper demand for water movements. In fact, a decline in ocean freight demand—especially during what turned out to be a nonexistent peak pre-holiday shipping season—led to a relatively small gain in containerized volumes, the report said.
Oil pipelines generated $10 billion, the same amount as in 2010 and 2009. Revenue for the airfreight industry dropped slightly from $33 billion in 2010 to $32 billion in 2011. Wilson noted that extra capacity in the airfreight industry led to a decline in loads and downward pressure on rates. Freight forwarders, which include third-party logistics service providers, generated $35 billion in 2011, up from $32 billion last year.
Aside from inventory carrying and transportation costs, two other factors figure in Wilson's computation of business logistics costs. Shipper-related costs, which include the loading and unloading of transportation equipment as well as traffic department operations, totaled $10 billion in 2011. Administrative expenses—which are computed by a generally accepted formula that takes the sum of inventory and transportation costs and multiplies it by 4 percent—amounted to $49 billion.
Looming capacity problems
As for the future, Wilson said most economists have concluded that the economy will not recover at a faster pace. She expects that GDP will stay below 3 percent this year. When the economy does finally recover, Wilson said, shippers would likely confront reduced shipment capacity from motor carriers. Although railroads will be there with additional capacity to pick up some of the shipment demand, shippers should be prepared for fewer trucks, fewer drivers, and fewer trucking companies in the marketplace. "I urge everyone to begin making contingency plans for the day you cannot get a truck," she said.
This article includes reporting by Senior Editor Mark Solomon.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”