When IBM switched from a focus on regional business units to operating as a global organization, it had to create a single, integrated supply chain aligned with the new business model.
In the early 1990s, International Business Machines Corporation, better known as IBM, was changing not just its product line but its entire business model. The technology giant had reached the point where it was selling as much software and services as computers. The problem was that its supply chain had been designed to support local and regional computer sales and delivery. That fragmented approach, moreover, prevented IBM from capitalizing on one of its greatest strengths: the ability to leverage its purchasing power with vendors around the world. What "Big Blue" needed was to restructure its supply chain as a unified, global organization.
But that would require changing more than just the way IBM delivered products and materials. "We had to reinvent the supply chain as a system that moves people and insights and results and motivation," says Timothy E. Carroll, vice president of supply chain operations for IBM's Integrated Supply Chain. That mission set the company on a journey of self-improvement that continues to this day.
Building an integrated organization
Based in Armonk, N.Y., IBM was founded a little more than a century ago, in 1911. The giant company earned more than US $106 billion in worldwide revenue from hardware, software, and services in 2011. Its supply chain management organization works out of 360 locations in 64 countries, tracking more than 1.5 million assets for both IBM and its clients. The organization also deals with about 23,000 suppliers in nearly 100 countries.
IBM's supply chain operation oversees two critical processes for the corporation. The first is the order-to-cash cycle. That process, Carroll says, starts when a customer is ready to do business with IBM. It continues with the placement and then the execution of the order, including manufacturing and delivery. The cycle also encompasses billing and invoicing, accounts receivable, and post-sales support.
The second process is called "procure-to-pay," which encompasses purchasing and payment of suppliers. The procure-to-pay systems enable the integration of the purchasing department with the accounts payable department. In fact, these systems are designed to provide IBM with control and visibility over the entire lifecycle of a transaction—from the way an item is ordered to the manner in which the final invoice is processed. "It's everything that we do with external suppliers," Carroll says. "Our chief procurement officer and his organization have full responsibility for all purchasing on behalf of IBM, whether it's production, administrative, travel, you name it."
Two decades ago, IBM's supply chain picture was very different. It had a supply chain structure suited to supporting regional product sales across 150 countries, with different business units handling sourcing, logistics, and delivery of orders. "We had local procurement, local cash collection, local unique processes, and many units had their own [information] systems," Carroll recalls.
IBM's move toward global delivery of software and services meant that a supply chain strategy focused on local or regional businesses was no longer viable. In 1993 the company began the process of reorganizing its many supply chain organizations into a single global entity. The first step was to transform its procurement and order fulfillment functions, including establishing standards for those activities for all business units in every country.
The following year, IBM established Global Sourcing Councils where procurement executives could exchange knowledge with their counterparts in other countries. These councils also allow professionals with deep sourcing expertise to work together to solve problems and coordinate with other functions. "Our [procurement] professionals worldwide work hand-in-hand with product development in design, manufacture, and delivery of products that not only meet governmental regulations, but also meet voluntary objectives set by IBM, such as lower power consumption," Carroll explains.
Building on those earlier unification initiatives, by 2002 the company was able to formally establish a single, global supply chain organization. "We extracted anything [supply chain-related] that was in a line of business or in other functional entities across IBM and consolidated them into one integrated organization," Carroll says.
The global integration of IBM's supply chain serves as the foundation for two principles, or axes, underpinning the company's service philosophy. The first is what Carroll terms the "pillars of strength." The supply chain organization, he says, provides strength and stability to the company because there are uniform practices at its centers for procurement, manufacturing, and order fulfillment around the globe. For example, all fulfillment centers, regardless of location, follow a standard procedure for taking orders or handling cash collection. "The driving force is to 'do it once, consistently' around the globe," he observes.
Process standardization also allows IBM experts located anywhere in the world to support customers wherever the company does business—at any hour of the day or night. For example, a client in Europe that discovers a need for a critical part late at night doesn't have to wait until normal business hours to place an order, but can instead contact a fulfillment center in another part of the world to process its request. "These centers are supporting 24/7 everything that takes place around the world," Carroll says.
The other axis, dubbed the "pillars of value," relates to effectiveness in serving customers. It refers to the fact that supply chain professionals, located in a center anywhere in the world, can work on developing a specific solution to meet the needs of a particular industry, geography, or group of customers. By applying its expertise to solve a particular problem, IBM is able to increase customer or shareholder value.
Analysis and prevention
A decade after IBM achieved its objective of creating a single, integrated supply chain, the company continues to seek ways to improve on that model. Its latest supply chain initiative involves using predictive and prescriptive analytics to drive operational improvements. The tech giant has begun using a number of analytic software applications that sift through disparate types of information to find patterns or propose solutions to problems. IBM applies analytics to such areas as visibility, risk management, customer insight, cost containment, and sustainability. It also uses the software to model the impact of potential scenarios on its supplier network.
Carroll notes that analytics helped IBM respond in a timely and effective way when natural disasters threatened to disrupt the company's supply chain. For example, when a volcano in Iceland halted flights throughout much of Europe in April of 2010, the analytical software told IBM to focus its response on Asia rather than Europe. Carroll says he and his colleagues were "quizzical" at first about the software's analysis, which indicated that the critical link in IBM's supply chain was Hong Kong. It quickly became clear why. The analysis forecast that if IBM did not take steps to secure sufficient airlift once the volcanic eruption abated and flights resumed, it would encounter a bottleneck in Hong Kong when it tried to quickly move a backlog of components and products from Asian manufacturers to European customers. As a result of that prescriptive analysis, IBM booked space on commercial and charter aircraft from Hong Kong to Europe in plenty of time. "We didn't sit and watch what was going on with the disaster," Carroll says. "We prepared ourselves for what to do once the disaster lifted."
Now, in fact, a team of specialists, part of a dedicated research arm within IBM's supply chain organization, reviews various scenarios to prepare a response to a natural disaster or man-made crisis anywhere in the world. "We are constantly playing out scenarios through business analytics to determine if we have a way of quickly recovering from a situation," Carroll says.
The biggest challenge
As IBM continues to refine its supply chain strategy, analytical tools will play an even greater role. That's because Carroll believes that the biggest challenge facing his company is protecting the enterprise, its clients, and its shareholders from the unknown. "Most supply chain chiefs don't worry about what they know," he says. "They worry about what they don't know."
Predictive tools will enable IBM to foresee problems and take pre-emptive actions to prevent supply chain interruptions anywhere in the world. Its global, integrated supply chain organization will ensure that those actions are carried out quickly, efficiently, and consistently, no matter where or when they're needed.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.