Of all the supply chain technologies on the market today, none arguably is as hot as robotics. Demand for and investment in robotics reach new heights every day. According to the Association for Advancing Automation, orders for workplace robots in the United States were up 40% year-over-year in the first quarter of 2022.”1
Gartner’s research—such as our annual “Supply Chain Technology User Wants and Needs Survey” (UWAN)—supports this finding, and we expect this trend to continue at this pace for at least the next three years.
For 15 years, the Gartner UWAN surveyhas explored various digital and technology topics from a business user’s perspective. Research for this year’s study was conducted in Q4 2021 and had around 350 respondents that spanned geographies, industries, and company sizes.
One question asked in the study was, “Does your organization currently utilize or plan to use cyber-physical automation2 in your manufacturing or warehouse operations?” An astounding 96% of respondents said that they either have automation or plan to use it in the future. While we thought this number would be high, we didn’t expect this level of interest in automation given the respondents’ diversity in terms of geographical location and company size.
This high level of interest was also seen in a separate study focused on robotic buying trends that we conducted with Peerless Research Group on behalf of Modern Materials Handling, Logistics Management, and Supply Chain Management Review. Fifty-two percent of survey respondents said they currently use or plan to use robots.3
In a follow-up question for our UWAN survey, respondents were asked to choose between the following two options for their primary motivation for investing in automation: reducing labor costs or addressing labor–availability issues. Again, we were surprised at the high percentage (66%) of companies that said that labor availability was their primary reason for investing in automation. In Q4 2019, the numbers were reversed, with 53% of respondents saying that labor cost reduction was their primary motivation.
The latest survey findings are affirmed by over a thousand conversations with Gartner clients during 2021 and 2022. Companies say they are struggling to find and keep people even after increasing hourly pay dramatically over the last 18 months. For example, one Latin America–based Gartner client said even though their hourly labor rates are low, they are considering automation because they have such a high annual workforce turnover rate—upwards of 300%.
Exponential growth ahead
For those companies that have already implemented robotics, we wanted to explore their future investment plans. First, we wanted to know if companies planned to increase the size of their existing robotic fleet, and 86% of respondents said yes, they do. Second, we wanted to know if companies were exploring new robotics use cases, and an astonishing 92% of companies said they are exploring new use cases.
One of our customers is a good example of this phenomenon. The customer originally implemented autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) for basic unit-load transport. Looking at their operations, the customer then saw a possible opportunity to use AMRs to replace humans hauling dunnage. They did a simple proof of concept and found that they could repurpose some of their AMRs to take over what was seen as an unproductive use of their valuable and constrained human workforce.
Combined, we believe these trends (see Figure 1) will drive exponential growth in what Gartner refers to as “intralogistics smart robotics” over the next five years. An intralogistics smart robot (ISR) is “the class of smart robots that orchestrate and perform work within the four wallsof a site and can be mobile or stationary, operating autonomously or collaboratively with humans or other robots.” We believe this growth will manifest in four ways:
[Figure 1] Gartner research shows high interest in intralogistics robots Enlarge this image
1. Net new customer growth: As noted above, 96% of companies in our UWAN study are investing or plan to invest in automation. Additionally, nearly 30% of respondents to the robotics study said they plan to invest in robotics for the first time. This is also consistent with the demand we see from Gartner customer inquiries where a very high number of customers are actively looking at or piloting robots for the first time.
2. Robot fleet expansion: The second wave of growth will come from customers expanding their fleets of robots. As mentioned above, over 80% of companies that already have invested in robots plan to expand their fleets. For example, one Gartner customer said it started with a limited deployment of about 10 robots, but now plans to grow its fleet to 1,000 robots over the next 18 to 24 months. This expansion could come in two steps. First, companies might just increase the number of robots needed to perform certain tasks within a single facility. Larger companies will then expand their use of robots across facilities. We see this with several third-party logistics providers (3PLs) that have robust processes for socializing robots across their organization. They start in one site then look to deploy the same robotic solution across multiple sites over time with similar needs.
3. Expanding robotics use cases: As companies mature their use of robotics, they will continue to explore new use cases where robotics can add value. I was on a panel discussing robotics, and one panel member was from a very well-known 3PL. He said the company was working on hundreds of robotics initiatives across its global operations. While use–case expansion could be with a single key supplier, it’s more likely that users will branch out across other types of robots and vendors. Gartner believes that within 10 years the majority of medium to large companies will have heterogenous fleets of robots doing different things. A company might have one type of robot for collaborative picking, another type for heavy payload transport, and maybe another for single-item picking. For example, we have clients that have deployed goods-to-person systems—such as AutoStore or Exotec—and are now exploring “goods-to-robots” where instead of a human doing the picking, a robot picks individual items from a tote leveraging vendors like Righthand Robotics or Berkshire Grey.
4. Recurring revenue growth. Finally, most robotics solutions have a recurring revenue component that typically scales based on the number of robots that a company uses. This recurring revenue stream generally includes the annual cost of the fleet management software plus support, maintenance, and upgrades for the software, as well as robot hardware maintenance and support. Business growth will also be fueled by the compounding effects of this recurring annual revenue stream.
Combined, these factors make robotics a very strong growth market for the next decade. This growth will be good for the robot providers, but it will also be good for robot buyers. Buyers have the need and desire for automation, and their options expand as innovation continues. However, in the end, the most important factor is that our research finds that robotic automation is good for buyers because, compared to other types of automation, it typically has a faster time to value, a quicker return on investment (ROI), shorter payback times, and offers more flexibility, scalability, and lower risk.
2. According to the National Science Foundation, cyber-physical systems or automation involves “integrating sensing, computation, control, and networking into physical objects and infrastructure, connecting them to the Internet and to each other.”
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”