Kimberly-Clark connects its supply chain to the store shelf
In its quest to achieve a demand-driven supply chain, Kimberly-Clark turned to software that generates shipment forecasts based on point-of-sale data. Now the consumer products giant can better serve some of its customers with a lot less inventory.
For the past six years, Kimberly-Clark Corp. has been on a mission to connect its supply chain to the store shelf. The manufacturer of personal-care products wanted to create a demand-driven supply chain that would make and warehouse only the precise amount of inventory needed to replace what consumers actually purchased.
The company had good reason to make this one of its top priorities. "If we align our activities to what's happening on the shelf, we can take a lot of cost, waste, and inventory out of the system," explains Rick Sather, Kimberly-Clark's vice president of customer supply chain for North America consumer products.
That's easier said than done, of course. The roadblock for Kimberly-Clark was that its store shipments were based on historical sales forecasts, which were not very accurate predictors of future sales. To match shipments with actual demand, the company would need to use point-of-sale (POS) data from consumer purchases as the basis for replenishments to grocers and retailers.
Toward that end, the manufacturer began using software that utilizes sales data to generate forecasts that trigger shipments to stores. To date, only three of Kimberly-Clark's largest customers are participating in the program, but the results have been notable. These demand-driven forecasts, which are more accurate than the historical sales forecasts, let the manufacturer better serve those customers but with much less inventory.
Shifting focus
Based in Irving, Texas, a suburb of Dallas, Kimberly-Clark makes such well-known personal-care products as Kleenex facial tissues, Huggies diapers, and Scott's paper towels. Its worldwide sales exceeded $20 billion in 2011.
Back in 2006, company executives decided to refocus Kimberly-Clark's supply chain strategy from supporting manufacturing to serving the specific needs of its retail and grocery customers. As a first step, the company reconfigured its North American distribution network to place its warehouses closer to those customers. Before the reconfiguration, Kimberly-Clark used 120 facilities of various types, and it shipped from 60 to 70 locations to satisfy all customer orders. The shipping location depended on the product mix of the order. As a result, different product mixes resulted in different shipping locations for the same customer, and forecasting and maintaining the proper mix of products at any given DC was difficult.
By 2008, Kimberly-Clark had reduced the number of warehouses it used to 30 multiproduct facilities strategically located near its customers. The reconfiguration involved a combination of opening new, larger facilities—some of which handle Kimberly-Clark's full product line—and repurposing some existing sites. For example, a few of the distribution centers began supporting a smaller group of customers, or they switched to shipping only promotional items. Today, 20 of the 30 warehouses and distribution centers now ship directly to customers.
Because the reconfiguration placed more warehouses and DCs closer to Kimberly-Clark's customers, the company was able to increase order frequency and reduce transit times for many of them. That paid off not just for the customers but for the manufacturer, too. "We realigned our DC network and streamlined it to bring inventory and costs out of the system and make ourselves more responsive to customer needs," says Manager of Supply Chain Analysis Michael Kalinowski. "We used to view our supply chain as ending once we delivered to the customer's door, but now we've extended that to the customer's retail location, and in some cases, right to the shelf."
Becoming one with demand
The ultimate objective of any change in supply chain strategy is to increase company profits. Kimberly-Clark viewed a demand-driven supply chain as being critical to achieving that objective. The Great Recession of 2008-2009 brought additional "energy" to that focus as Kimberly-Clark sought to reduce its inventory holdings to free up working capital, says Director of Supply Chain Strategy Scott DeGroot.
To become a truly demand-driven supply chain, managers knew, Kimberly-Clark would have to incorporate demand-signal data—information about actual consumer purchases—into its plans for resupplying retailers with products. In 2009, the company made some limited use of downstream retail data in its demand-planning software, but it continued to rely for the most part on historical shipment data as the basis for its replenishment forecasts. But forecasts based on historical sales are prone to errors, because they cannot predict spikes in consumer demand. Such errors left Kimberly-Clark with excess safety stock and unsold inventory.
To address that problem and improve forecasting, Kimberly-Clark conducted a pilot program with the software vendor Terra Technology that aimed to incorporate demand signals into its North American operation. The pilot proved successful, and in 2010 the consumer products giant purchased and implemented Terra Technology's multienterprise demand-sensing solution. Initially, Kimberly-Clark only ran the software's forecast engine, using its own internal data. Since 2011, however, it has been using actual retail-sales data to drive both replenishment and manufacturing.
Three retailers, which account for one-third of Kimberly-Clark's consumer products business in North America, currently provide point-of-sale data. That information is fed daily into the solution's engine, which then recalibrates the shipment forecast for each of those retailers. Each day, the software evaluates any new data inputs from the retailers along with open orders and the legacy demand-planning forecast to generate a new shipment forecast. That forecast, in daily buckets, covers the current week plus the next four weeks. Kimberly-Clark then uses that forecast to guide internal deployment decisions and tactical planning.
The software contains algorithms that process data provided by the retailers, such as point-of-sale information, inventory in the distribution channel, shipments from warehouses, and the retailer's own forecast. It reconciles all of that data to create a daily operational forecast. The software also identifies patterns in the historical data to determine which inputs are the most predictive in forecasting shipments from Kimberly-Clark's facilities. The inputs are re-evaluated weekly, and how much influence each input has on the forecast can change. For example, POS might be the best predictor of a shipment forecast on a three-week horizon, but actual orders could be the best predictor for the current week.
By using actual demand—that is, the point-of-sale data—to recalculate its operational forecasts, Kimberly-Clark can better ensure that it has the products consumers want to buy in stores at the right time. Although only three companies at the moment are providing POS data, Kimberly-Clark is also using the Terra solution to create forecasts for its other retail customers. For that customer group, the manufacturer relies on historical shipment data to develop its forecast.
Lower forecast error rates
The incorporation of demand signals into Kimberly-Clark's shipment forecasting has resulted in substantial improvements in several respects. For one thing, the company has been able to develop a more granular metric for forecast errors. In the past, it measured forecasts by product categories; the metric it uses now tracks stock-keeping units (SKUs) and stocking locations. This metric is defined as the absolute difference between shipments and forecast, and it's reported as a percentage of shipments.
Using that particular metric to evaluate its daily forecast, Kimberly-Clark has seen a reduction in forecast errors of as much as 35 percent for a one-week planning horizon and 20 percent for a two-week horizon. "What we've noticed is that as you go farther out in the [planning] horizon, the inputs are less predictive and the amount of forecast-error reduction tends to erode," says Jared Hanson, a demand planning specialist.
Thanks to that reduction in forecast errors, there is less need for safety stock. In fact, Hanson says, more accurate forecasts have allowed Kimberly-Clark to take out one to three days of safety stock, depending on the SKU. "From a dollars or return on investment perspective, that's the most tangible benefit," he says.
More accurate forecasts and the commensurate reductions in safety stock have helped Kimberly-Clark reduce its overall inventory. The company says it has cut finished-goods inventory by 19 percent in the last 18 months.
Equally important, say Kimberly-Clark's supply chain executives, is that this stellar inventory performance has not compromised the quality of service it provides to its customers. "As we sit today," says Rick Sather, "our ability to serve customers with this level of inventory is the best it's been in many years."
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”