The annual “Supply Chain Planning Digital Transformation” report shows that digital supply chain technology can help companies better handle uncertainty and disruptions.
We never could have anticipated how dramatically the world was about to change when we launched our first “Supply Chain Planning Digital Transformation” report in 2019. The study, conducted jointly by ToolsGroup and Spinnaker, surveyed nearly 200 North American supply chain professionals in early 2019. Its goal was to understand and benchmark the drivers, obstacles, technologies, and progress of companies’ digitalization journeys. The results have subsequently provided a timely baseline for comparing the accelerated digitalization instigated by COVID-era disruptions. (An infographic developed for the 2022 Q3 issue of CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly shows some of the results of the most recent report.)
If there’s one big takeaway from the surveys we’ve been running through 2022, it’s the value of “fixing the roof while the sun is shining.” In other words, those companies that had begun to introduce digital technologies to their supply chain planning processes prior to the pandemic fared better during the past few years than those that had not.
But we know that initiating a big change before an urgent business need arises can be a hard sell. It’s not surprising then that in the wake of the past few years of immense disruptions, we are seeing more and more companies looking to digitally transform their supply chain planning operation. And, as we’ll cover later, there can even be some advantages to transforming during a crisis.
Weathering the storm
Unsurprisingly, in our 2021 study (carried out in the throes of the crisis), the leaders with the most mature, digitally transformed supply chains reported weathering the COVID storm most successfully. In 2021, when asked what stage of digital transformation they were in, 12% of respondents said they were reaping the benefits after a successful digital transformation. Fifty-four percent of that group said that they were managing COVID-related demand and supplier uncertainty “very well.” In comparison, only 13% of those companies that were still “evaluating” or “not pursuing” a digital transformation reported handling the uncertainty “very well.”
Although many countries have come through the worst of the pandemic itself, supply chain storms show no sign of abating. Supply Chain Quarterly readers hardly need reminding that disruptions to supply chains and the talent pool are expected to last years, compounded by inflation, the war in Ukraine, and other factors.
It follows that in this year’s digital transformation survey, the biggest concern on leaders’ minds can be categorized as “external factors.” A full 64% of respondents were either very concerned or extremely concerned about “supply delays on supplier order fill rates” and “escalating fulfillment/delivery costs”; 56% were similarly concerned about “accurate demand forecasting.” All this tallies with the massive pendulum swing we’ve seen in supply chain strategy away from lean, just-in-time (JIT) models to ones focused on resilience and characterized by higher inventory buffers and more supply alternatives.
Transformation obstacles
In light of these continuing disruptions, it is not surprising that more and more companies are turning to digital technologies to help. Our 2022 survey with CSCMP reveals that 31% of respondents are now in the “executing” phase, or fully in the throes of a digital transformation effort. That’s four points higher from when we ran the first survey during a relatively “sunny” January 2019.
This jump is high enough to indicate that some companies are indeed reacting to the crises and stepping up transformation efforts. But it’s also small enough to suggest that for some companies, transformation has felt too onerous to get started with.
Indeed, other survey responses give clues to the extent that organizations are struggling with transformation. This year the majority (53%) of respondents cited the peoples/skill deficit as the number one obstacle to implementing supply chain transformation plans. Compare this to January 2019, before the pandemic, when the top reason supply chain leaders gave for delaying transformation was “fear of change” (30%). At that time, only 23% cited the people/skills deficit.
Our second clue is that this year “data quality/lack of data” was reported as the second biggest obstacle to transformation at 41%. Compare this to a much lower 25% in 2019. We know from our own customer experiences how difficult it is to undertake the exacting and laborious data hygiene and modeling work that underpins digital transformation when you’re in the midst of a crisis.
Deprioritize customer experience at your peril
A serious concern from this year’s study is that many organizations appear to have put some aspects of customer experience on the back burner. Our survey revealed that “keeping up with evolving customer behaviors and expectations” has plummeted to fifth on the list of primary objectives for supply chain planning digital transformations—sixth if you count that “better/faster reaction to unplanned disruptions” and “increase supply chain resilience” tied for second place.
Now is a very dangerous time to deprioritize adapting to meet new customer behaviors. The pandemic has radically altered people’s shopping habits. Taking your eyes off the ball now could have very damaging long-term consequences and allow new upstarts to steal market share by offering more competitive prices or appealing to consumers’ increasingly eco-friendly shopping habits.
For example, the cosmetics company Glossier and the apparel company Allbirds are just two of the many new direct-to-consumer brands that cut out the middlemen, offering premium quality products at affordable prices—very compelling during a cost-of-living crisis. Other clothing brands, like Zero Waste Daniel and Ruby Moon, are appealing to eco-conscious shoppers by offering garments made from leftover material and pre-consumer cutting room fabric scraps or postconsumer waste.
Meanwhile older retailers are realizing that if you don’t pivot and adapt to changing consumer expectations, consumers may opt for products that appeal to their wallets and their environmental conscience. As a result, companies like IKEA and Primark, which had long resisted adapting their channel strategies, are now finally pivoting to online sales, click and collect, and garment recycling.
The silver lining: innovation from chaos
There is a silver lining here. Throughout history, the most ground-breaking inventions, new business models, and solutions to enduring problems have arisen from large-scale disasters. The most obvious example is the COVID vaccines, which were developed and tested in record time thanks to an intense global collaboration from the scientific and medical communities. The urgency of the climate crisis has also given rise to some incredible new innovations in biodegradable packaging, water purification, waste management, and earthquake early warning systems—to name just a few.
The catalyst for all these innovations is technology, which has matured at an astonishing pace over the last 50 years while becoming more and more affordable. More companies are deploying advanced technologies for automating the supply chain including artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, analytics, drones, and others.
In fact, 51% of this year’s respondents said their top primary objective for supply chain planning digital transformation was to “increase level of automation to focus staff on higher value activities.” This addresses the talent shortage in two ways: It automates routine, labor intensive, and repetitive tasks, and it paves the way for people to do more interesting “human” work that makes the best use of their business knowledge and relationships.
So, although my opening gambit might have felt dark and ominous, I genuinely believe that the crises we are all battling to overcome will usher in a new era of supply chain solutions and creativity. And if you’re in the tricky situation of having to fix your roof in the current storm, you are likely to be rewarded with strength and resilience for many years to come.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.