Cybercriminals looking for an attractive target are increasingly setting their sights on the logistics sector. Fortunately, there are steps you can take to make your company—and your suppliers and third-party service providers—less vulnerable.
In recent years, the logistics sector has become an increasingly tempting target for cybercriminals for a whole host of reasons. The first is that logistics is one of the most profitable industries worldwide and is an important part of the economy, making it a logical focus for criminals seeking to make a big disruptive impact. Second, although logistics is focused on the physical movement of goods, it also has a big digital footprint. The logistics component of today’s supply chain has come to rely on a significant volume of data processing and information sharing. For example, industry forms that were traditionally paper-based—such as invoices, export compliance certificates, and bills of lading—are now digital. Consequently, fleet operators are now sharing more data digitally with partners and vendors than ever before, which opens them up to more cyber risks. Finally, the cargo supply chain consists of many disparate parties that have varying levels of cybersecurity systems in place. This presents cybercriminals with an opportunity to identify and exploit the weak links in the network.
Given the rapidly evolving nature and the deep sophistication of cyberattacks today, it is vital that transport and logistics firms and their customers stay up to date on the cyberthreat landscape. Doing so will help them better understand and defend against a wide range of existing and emerging cyber risks. Due to the interconnected nature of the supply chain, it is also crucial that they work with key suppliers and partners to ensure that best practices in cybersecurity are implemented throughout the network.
Threats to watch
Some of the major cyber risks that have affected the transportation and logistics sector include: ransomware, phishing, and sensor and industrial technology intercepts.
Ransomware: Ransomware is a malware that prevents users from accessing their system until a ransom is paid. According to Cybersecurity Ventures, a cybersecurity research and publishing company, ransomware is one of the fastest growing types of cybercrime and is expected to attack a business, consumer, or device every two seconds by 2031. The transportation and logistics sector has proven to be an especially attractive target for these attacks. In May 2021, the Colonial Pipeline attack disrupted jet fuel and gasoline supplies to large areas of the southeastern region of the U.S. Whilst the direct financial impact was the payment of a $4.4 million ransom, the indirect financial and socio-economic impacts to the associated supply chain were far greater. Further evidence of the significant financial and disruptive impact of a ransomware breach was shown in this year’s attack on the logistics service provider Expeditors. The crippling attack cost the company $40 million in charges on lost shipping opportunities and a further $20 million in investigation, recovery, and remediation expenses.
Phishing: Logistics and shipping companies are increasingly being targeted by phishing attacks. Phishing involves cybercriminals contacting target organizations by email (phishing), telephone (vishing), or text message (SMSishing), and posing as a legitimate person or organization. The aim of the attack is to lure the recipient into giving up sensitive data and passwords to illicitly access data for financial gain. A very pertinent example was during the pandemic when cybercriminals used phishing techniques to target the COVID-19 cold supply chain. The attack gained access to the low-temperature storage manufacturer Haier Biomedical’s network before using its own email system to distribute further phishing emails to partners involved in transporting the vaccine.
Other examples of phishing attacks specific to the sector are “bill of lading ransom” and “freight forwarding fraud.” In the case of a bill of lading ransom, cybercriminals pose as freight forwarders to negotiate with an unwitting client. Once goods are packed onto a ship or truck from the port of loading, the criminals then deny the release of the bill of lading until a ransom is paid. If the bill of lading is not released, it can cause severe supply chain delays and disruption. It can also cost companies thousands of dollars in losses, especially if goods in transport are no longer of good quality due to disruptions.
Freight forwarding fraud involves cybercriminals impersonating a legitimate freight forwarding company by essentially copying its website. The aim is to steal freight forwarding fees or make off with any cargo that falls into their possession. Such methods can also be referred to as “brandjacking” and are often used to directly tarnish a corporate brand’s reputation.
Sensor data and industrial technology intercepts: Transportation and logistics companies are increasingly relying on sensors and internet of things (IoT) devices to track and monitor cargo. However, many companies don’t treat their operational technology and IoT technology with the same level of care that they do their information technology, creating an opportunity for cybercriminals. For example, cyberthieves may seek to intercept communications between a logistics firm’s sensors and its IT systems, and then either sell the data to a competitor or use it to guide a physical attack on valuable supply chain shipments.
Protecting against such risks can be difficult due to the innate design of IoT devices. IoT devices are designed with ease of use in mind rather than security. For example, many of them leverage default user credentials (such as “admin”), which are easy to hack, creating cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Additionally, it is often easy to download product sheets for many IoT sensors that specify exactly how the sensor is designed and what security they do and do not have.
Furthermore, companies should be aware that malware attacks can spread from a company’s IT systems to its operational technology and IoT technologies. This was seen when the shipping giant Maersk was hit by a vicious malware called NotPetya in 2017. Although the malware attack initially infiltrated the company’s active directory systems, it spread to the operational technology and IoT technologies used at Maersk’s port facilities. As a result, Maersk’s entire logistics system was shut down.
Similarly, many operational technology (OT) systems, such as industrial controls, are often riddled with vulnerabilities. In a typical OT environment, reliability is the primary concern during the design process, and basic information security precautions are often overlooked. Furthermore, many OT systems are older legacy systems that were never designed to be operated remotely or connect to the internet. As a result, cybersecurity measures were not built into the system’s design.
Fighting against the threats
Cyberattacks can leave damaging effects on an organization. It is, therefore, essential for an organization to have protocols in place to mitigate these attacks. No matter how small or established the organization, if bad actors see an opportunity to infiltrate, they will. To mitigate the exposure to major cyber risks, supply chain executives should first make sure that their organizations are taking the following steps internally: educate employees about potential threats and how to protect themselves, update devices and software regularly, and create an effective remediation plan.
Educate employees. It’s helpful to teach employees to look out for specific threats, such as phishing emails or vishing calls, and flag them to the appropriate person. Employees are usually the first target when bad actors are trying to infiltrate a company’s network. Therefore, it is vital that organizations empower and equip their employees with the knowledge to serve as the first line of defense against potential cyberattacks.1
Update devices and software regularly. Most technology providers are constantly testing their products for any weaknesses and release patches or updates when they discover them. It’s essential then that companies update their devices and existing software applications on a regular basis. This ensures that devices and applications are not only better protected from attacks but also are operating efficiently. Operating from an outdated device and/or software application creates vulnerabilities and loopholes for bad actors to slip through and potentially compromise an entire network system. In addition to updating devices on a regular schedule, companies should also regulate what software and applications employees can download onto work devices. Restricting unauthorized software applications can help mitigate exposure to potential attacks.
Create a remediation process. Even the best-prepared organizations with the most robust training programs can experience a cybersecurity breach. For this reason, organizations need to draw up a plan, or remediation process, for how they should respond if a breach occurs or if they detect a weakness or flaw in their information system architecture. Additionally, organizations should periodically reflect on where and how they need to improve their cybersecurity measures.
Addressing third-party supplier risks
In addition to the internal tactics described above, companies should also involve their external suppliers and partners in their cybersecurity programs. Given that so much of the cargo supply chain is outsourced, advancing third-party and supplier cybersecurity programs is paramount to protecting your own cybersecurity. Organizations need to ensure that the security measures that are important to them are also in place at their suppliers’ and providers’ organizations, otherwise they risk having their own security undermined by lax practices at their partners. To create strong, secure practices, companies need to work proactively with their suppliers before a breach occurs and build an open relationship with them to ensure communications are received in the right way.
In order to address third-party supplier risks, companies should:
Evaluate a potential supplier’s cybersecurity risk level. This evaluation needs to be part of the due diligence process that takes place during any third-party selection. Companies need to make sure that their supplier’s internal controls—or their policies and processes for managing external risks—are in line with their own internal controls. For example, if company A has a high standard for internal controls, but receives services and supplies from Company B, which has a low standard for internal controls, then Company A is now exposed to any potential risk because of Company B’s weak point.
Decide how you are going to communicate. You need to have a simple way to communicate with your supplier (and your supplier with you) if an incident happens. This could be a phone call, an email, or an instant reporting mechanism. Whatever mechanism you choose, it needs to work for both parties across the various channels.
Identify who is managing third-party suppliers and supply chains. Many organizations think of cybersecurity as an IT-only issue, but those stakeholders who are dealing with third-party suppliers also play a key role in preventing or mitigating a cyber risk. These stakeholders need to be up to date on possible threats and need to know how strong a supplier’s cybersecurity program is. They also need to know whether their supplier is subcontracting with other suppliers or service providers and what the level of cyber risk those downstream suppliers hold.
Be transparent with your suppliers about your cybersecurity program. This transparency should include educating them about the purpose of your program and updating them as relevant on the purpose and risks being managed.
Define each supplier’s cybersecurity “risk tier” and the degree of care that they require. Many companies are now assigning their suppliers to risk tiers. A risk tier is based both on the criticality of the service or product that the supplier provides and on the supplier’s risk rating (or whether—based on the supplier’s internal cybersecurity controls—they are considered a high risk, a medium risk, or a low risk). That risk tiering then determines how much control or care you extend out to the supplier in terms of cybersecurity. For example, a supplier that provides a noncritical product or service and has a high level of internal cybersecurity controls would be placed in a low-risk tier. Your company would not need to extend its internal controls to the supplier’s external environment. However, if it’s a critical supplier with a low level of risk maturity, you want to either consider looking for a new supplier or extend your own internal control mechanisms out to their operations. The most common mistake that many organizations make when evaluating a supplier’s risk tier is they base it on the value of spend rather than the criticality of the service that's being provided or the sensitivity the data that's being shared. For example, you probably don’t spend a large amount of money on the agency that produces your annual report, but that company has access to very sensitive information and should be using rigorous cybersecurity measures.
Carry out an external cybersecurity “posture scan” of your suppliers. There are tools available that allow you operate like a hacker and probe your suppliers’ systems to see how secure they are. These posture scans or probes help you determine whether your third-party suppliers are following security protocols.
Identify who your supplier’s suppliers are. One weak spot for a supplier can be other contracted organizations within its network. Therefore, it is important for you to review the context of these supply chain relationships and their potential impact on your organization.
Becoming cyber resilient
The past two years have proven the vital role that the transport and logistics industry plays in the overall economy. At the same time, the past two years has also shown the scale of the cyberthreat facing the industry. These two factors mean that taking steps to defend IT systems against cyberattacks is crucially important.
Cybercriminals are becoming craftier as they create more sophisticated ways to infiltrate networks and steal data for financial gain. Therefore, organizations cannot simply focus on the technological aspects of cybersecurity by assessing potential vulnerabilities in IT systems, they must also take steps to address them through best practice security and access controls. The impacts on business processes, products, employees, and customers alike must be understood to preserve the value chain, keep the global supply chain moving, and enable a position of cyber resilience.
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.
The practice consists of 5,000 professionals from Accenture and from Avanade—the consulting firm’s joint venture with Microsoft. They will be supported by Microsoft product specialists who will work closely with the Accenture Center for Advanced AI. Together, that group will collaborate on AI and Copilot agent templates, extensions, plugins, and connectors to help organizations leverage their data and gen AI to reduce costs, improve efficiencies and drive growth, they said on Thursday.
Accenture and Avanade say they have already developed some AI tools for these applications. For example, a supplier discovery and risk agent can deliver real-time market insights, agile supply chain responses, and better vendor selection, which could result in up to 15% cost savings. And a procure-to-pay agent could improve efficiency by up to 40% and enhance vendor relations and satisfaction by addressing urgent payment requirements and avoiding disruptions of key services
Likewise, they have also built solutions for clients using Microsoft 365 Copilot technology. For example, they have created Copilots for a variety of industries and functions including finance, manufacturing, supply chain, retail, and consumer goods and healthcare.
Another part of the new practice will be educating clients how to use the technology, using an “Azure Generative AI Engineer Nanodegree program” to teach users how to design, build, and operationalize AI-driven applications on Azure, Microsoft’s cloud computing platform. The online classes will teach learners how to use AI models to solve real-world problems through automation, data insights, and generative AI solutions, the firms said.
“We are pleased to deepen our collaboration with Accenture to help our mutual customers develop AI-first business processes responsibly and securely, while helping them drive market differentiation,” Judson Althoff, executive vice president and chief commercial officer at Microsoft, said in a release. “By bringing together Copilots and human ambition, paired with the autonomous capabilities of an agent, we can accelerate AI transformation for organizations across industries and help them realize successful business outcomes through pragmatic innovation.”
Census data showed that overall retail sales in October were up 0.4% seasonally adjusted month over month and up 2.8% unadjusted year over year. That compared with increases of 0.8% month over month and 2% year over year in September.
October’s core retail sales as defined by NRF — based on the Census data but excluding automobile dealers, gasoline stations and restaurants — were unchanged seasonally adjusted month over month but up 5.4% unadjusted year over year.
Core sales were up 3.5% year over year for the first 10 months of the year, in line with NRF’s forecast for 2024 retail sales to grow between 2.5% and 3.5% over 2023. NRF is forecasting that 2024 holiday sales during November and December will also increase between 2.5% and 3.5% over the same time last year.
“October’s pickup in retail sales shows a healthy pace of spending as many consumers got an early start on holiday shopping,” NRF Chief Economist Jack Kleinhenz said in a release. “October sales were a good early step forward into the holiday shopping season, which is now fully underway. Falling energy prices have likely provided extra dollars for household spending on retail merchandise.”
Despite that positive trend, market watchers cautioned that retailers still need to offer competitive value propositions and customer experience in order to succeed in the holiday season. “The American consumer has been more resilient than anyone could have expected. But that isn’t a free pass for retailers to under invest in their stores,” Nikki Baird, VP of strategy & product at Aptos, a solutions provider of unified retail technology based out of Alpharetta, Georgia, said in a statement. “They need to make investments in labor, customer experience tech, and digital transformation. It has been too easy to kick the can down the road until you suddenly realize there’s no road left.”
A similar message came from Chip West, a retail and consumer behavior expert at the marketing, packaging, print and supply chain solutions provider RRD. “October’s increase proved to be slightly better than projections and was likely boosted by lower fuel prices. As inflation slowed for a number of months, prices in several categories have stabilized, with some even showing declines, offering further relief to consumers,” West said. “The data also looks to be a positive sign as we kick off the holiday shopping season. Promotions and discounts will play a prominent role in holiday shopping behavior as they are key influencers in consumer’s purchasing decisions.”
Third-party logistics (3PL) providers’ share of large real estate leases across the U.S. rose significantly through the third quarter of 2024 compared to the same time last year, as more retailers and wholesalers have been outsourcing their warehouse and distribution operations to 3PLs, according to a report from real estate firm CBRE.
Specifically, 3PLs’ share of bulk industrial leasing activity—covering leases of 100,000 square feet or more—rose to 34.1% through Q3 of this year from 30.6% through Q3 last year. By raw numbers, 3PLs have accounted for 498 bulk leases so far this year, up by 9% from the 457 at this time last year.
By category, 3PLs’ share of 34.1% ranked above other occupier types such as: general retail and wholesale (26.6), food and beverage (9.0), automobiles, tires, and parts (7.9), manufacturing (6.2), building materials and construction (5.6), e-commerce only (5.6), medical (2.7), and undisclosed (2.3).
On a quarterly basis, bulk leasing by 3PLs has steadily increased this year, reversing the steadily decreasing trend of 2023. CBRE pointed to three main reasons for that resurgence:
Import Flexibility. Labor disruptions, extreme weather patterns, and geopolitical uncertainty have led many companies to diversify their import locations. Using 3PLs allows for more inventory flexibility, a key component to retailer success in times of uncertainty.
Capital Allocation/Preservation. Warehousing and distribution of goods is expensive, draining capital resources for transportation costs, rent, or labor. But outsourcing to 3PLs provides companies with more flexibility to increase or decrease their inventories without any risk of signing their own lease commitments. And using a 3PL also allows companies to switch supply chain costs from capital to operational expenses.
Focus on Core Competency. Outsourcing their logistics operations to 3PLs allows companies to focus on core business competencies that drive revenue, such as product development, sales, and customer service.
Looking into the future, these same trends will continue to drive 3PL warehouse demand, CBRE said. Economic, geopolitical and supply chain uncertainty will remain prevalent in the coming quarters but will not diminish the need to effectively manage inventory levels.
That result came from the company’s “GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index,” an indicator tracking demand conditions, shortages, transportation costs, inventories, and backlogs based on a monthly survey of 27,000 businesses. The October index number was -0.39, which was up only slightly from its level of -0.43 in September.
Researchers found a steep rise in slack across North American supply chains due to declining factory activity in the U.S. In fact, purchasing managers at U.S. manufacturers made their strongest cutbacks to buying volumes in nearly a year and a half, indicating that factories in the world's largest economy are preparing for lower production volumes, GEP said.
Elsewhere, suppliers feeding Asia also reported spare capacity in October, albeit to a lesser degree than seen in Western markets. Europe's industrial plight remained a key feature of the data in October, as vendor capacity was significantly underutilized, reflecting a continuation of subdued demand in key manufacturing hubs across the continent.
"We're in a buyers' market. October is the fourth straight month that suppliers worldwide reported spare capacity, with notable contractions in factory demand across North America and Europe, underscoring the challenging outlook for Western manufacturers," Todd Bremer, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "President-elect Trump inherits U.S. manufacturers with plenty of spare capacity while in contrast, China's modest rebound and strong expansion in India demonstrate greater resilience in Asia."