The hype surrounding emerging markets that was prevalent in the 2000s seems to be winding down, much like Arab oil money in the 1970s, Japanese productivity of the late 1980s, and the "dotcom" bubble of the late 1990s. The claim that emerging markets were somehow destined to catch up to the United States has become questionable as these once booming economies enter the next phase of economic growth.
With the global economy struggling to regain traction, many emerging market economies are learning the hard way that they must deal with their own domestic political and economic obstacles to growth if they are to advance economically. Moreover, given that emerging markets are growing more slowly and are unlikely to reach the level of development of mature markets in the mid-term, supply chain managers will have to rethink their strategies for serving those markets.
The real GDP (gross domestic product) growth rate in the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) has slowed considerably compared to the rate seen in the previous decade. Brazil's real GDP growth rate was just 1 percent in 2012, compared to an annual average of almost 4 percent from 2000 through 2008. According to IHS Global Insight, Russia's real GDP growth rate is likely to be 3.2 percent for the whole of 2013, with Russia's economic well-being more or less tied to the world's volatile oil markets. In the near term, moreover, Brazil and Russia, as well as a few other emerging markets outside of BRIC, are likely to grow at a similarly sluggish pace as the United States. (See Figure 1.)
A major indicator of this situation is that equity markets for emerging economies have trended downward over the past few years because expectations regarding economic growth have not been realized. While the Dow Jones Industrial Average (an index of stock performance among 30 leading U.S. companies) is breaking new records, the eurozone is entering deeper into recession. It is becoming clear that although the U.S. economy is still struggling to regain its growth momentum, it is probably the "prettiest pig at the fair"—in other words, the best of a group of somewhat unattractive options.
A tale of two countries
India and China have long been held up as examples of large, fast-growing economies, yet even they are faltering in some respects. India's real GDP growth rate is likely to be in the 5-percent to 6-percent range this year, after growing between 8 percent and 10 percent from 2003 to 2007. A growth rate of 5 percent will be considered stellar compared to recent U.S. growth rates or the recent performance of European economies. However, India's GDP per capita currently stands at US $1,500; contrast that with GDP per capita of US $49,600 in the United States and US $6,100 in China. India therefore is likely to experience what economists call the "Per Capita Problem": Any slowdown in an emerging market economy with low income or low GDP per capita will feel like a recession.
India's economy has made significant progress over the past couple of decades, yet a certain level of gloom has entered the national mindset since economic growth started to slow. The implication is that India's income per capita will not close the gap with China anytime soon. This could have significant consequences for India's population. Many economists believe that unless a country has a sufficient level of per-capita income before growth rates start slowing to levels approaching those of developed economies, declining growth will hinder the standard of living, especially if population growth is relatively strong.
China's outlook is somewhat stronger. Real GDP growth has averaged about 10 percent per year over the past 30 years, but even the Chinese Communist Party is now predicting slower growth in the range of 7 percent to 8 percent in the coming years. However, Chinese GDP per capita is more than four times that of India. In addition, China does not have India's low urbanization rates, extreme poverty levels, and strong population growth (India is expected to surpass China as the most populous nation by 2021).
Indeed, the People's Republic of China is the one emerging market that still seems promising. Still, certain economic questions loom large. According to several unofficial sources, total Chinese debt is anywhere from 150 percent to 200 percent of GDP; contrast that with the U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio of 300 percent to 350 percent. Additionally, China can no longer depend on getting as much GDP growth from issuing debt as it did 10 years ago.
As many emerging economies look inward for growth opportunities, they are finding that those opportunities are hard to come by. Most economies have a relatively high consumer-spending-to-GDP ratio; with very few exceptions, that ratio is expected to either be flat or decline over the next eight years. For BRIC as a whole it is expected to decline from 45 percent to 44 percent, while Chinese consumer spending is expected to gain share in GDP, up from 33 percent in 2010 to 37 percent in 2020. China can therefore look to its domestic consumers to help maintain GDP growth.
U.S. economy: Not so bad after all?
As the emerging market boom starts winding down and the eurozone digs deeper into recession territory, an interesting idea has emerged: In terms of economic performance, the United States is looking better than expected. The U.S. economy has its problems, but the country also has many positives that separate it from the economic and demographic woes of Japan and Europe.
Europe and Japan are losing their shares of global GDP. Emerging markets are losing steam, with most of the emerging market growth expected to come from China. What is surprising is that the United States has maintained and is expected to hold onto its share of global GDP. The underlying economic and demographic fundamentals of the U.S. economy are expected to continue to sustain that country's lead in the key areas of research and development as well as technological advances and their commercialization, and thus provide for a productive economy that can sustain continued economic growth.
For supply chain managers, the implications of these shifting growth patterns are significant. As the growth rate in emerging markets continues to slow, companies will have to readjust their supply chains from "growth" mode to "maintenance." It's likely, therefore, that supply chain managers will focus their efforts mostly on boosting efficiency rather than on growing revenue. They may also have to compensate for the slowing growth in emerging markets by capitalizing on the resiliency of the U.S. market.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.