This year’s CSCMP 2022 Gail Rutkowski Transportation Excellence Award winner, Mexpress Transportation, has dedicated the past 25 years to bypassing the traditional border clearance process between the U.S. and Mexico and improving supply chain efficiencies.
Twenty-five years ago, Mike Gamel, co-founder of Mexpress Transportation, had a vision for how he could improve cross-border transit between Mexico and the United States.
Gamel knew that cross-border trucking often got bogged down by the border-clearance process. He believed he could get around these snarls by creating a bonded road-feeder service between the U.S. and Mexico. A bonded road-feeder service involves moving cargo by truck between airports. Such a service, Gamel surmised, would allow the shipment to bypass the traditional border clearance process and instead clear customs at the airport—just as if it had been shipped by air—reducing delays and lowering costs.
It was a bold move that paid off. Mexpress currently provides full truckload (FTL) and less-than-truckload (LTL) service between the United States and 14 Mexican airports.
To honor his vision and the work Mexpress Transportation has contributed to the transportation industry, the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) awarded Mexpress the 2022 Gail Rutkowski Transportation Excellence Award (GR-TEA) this past September at its annual EDGE Conference in Nashville, Tennessee.
Created in 2021 to honor shipper, carrier representative, and consultant Gail Rutkowski for her lifetime of service to the industry, the GR-TEA award recognizes companies or individuals who have excelled in using their knowledge, connections, and industry expertise to educate, support, and create long-term impacts in transportation-related fields.
For Mexpress Transportation, the past 25 years have served as an opportunity to create a unique company—one dedicated to improving supply chain inefficiencies between the U.S. and Mexico. According to the company, its transit times between the U.S. and Mexico are comparable to deferred air freight and are more cost efficient and consistent than air.
In this conversation with Supply Chain Quarterly’s Managing Editor Diane Rand, Gamel talks about the company’s vision and what the future looks like for cross-border trade between the U.S. and Mexico.
Mexpress has a unique business model. Can you explain what a “borderless” LTL and FTL road feeder service is?
Mexpress has a special “bonded” authority that allows our trucks to cross to and from Mexico without clearing Mexican customs at the border. Instead, the freight clears at the airports with exactly the same process as air freight. All other trucking companies have to deliver the freight to the importers—Mexican brokers’ warehouses—for clearance before entering into Mexico. This creates lots of delays and extra costs, not to mention that once the freight is cleared at the border, the truck can only have one broker per truck. Mexpress bypasses this process, so we can put multiple brokers on the same truck and go directly to the destination airport for clearance by the importers’ Mexican broker upon arrival.
How did the idea of creating such a service come about? What sparked the idea?
I received a call one day from Carlos Duron, now my partner and president of Mexpress, wanting to discuss a consolidation project he was working on for a client of his in Mexico. We got to talking about the border bottlenecks and all the other issues that U.S. truckers face every day to move freight in and out of Mexico. The more we talked, the more the idea emerged. That’s when we decided to approach the Mexican government to get their input. Although it took three and a half years of meetings, here we are!
What sort of hurdles did you face in setting up such as a service?
The biggest hurdle was establishing a process for paying duties and taxes to the Mexican government. All duties and taxes must be paid electronically on each shipment moving by traditional truck before it can cross the border. With Mexpress, a shipment cannot leave the Mexican airport until these duties and taxes are paid. The second issue was security. To ensure the security of the shipments on our trucks, we have had to take certain precautions like only using the toll roads that have military security check points and using satellite-tracked equipment that are monitored 24/7 with a “kill switch” in all power units. We also use a special bolt seal issued to us by the Mexican government, which cannot be broken by anyone but Mexican customs officials at the airports.
What advice would you give to someone who is interested in setting up their own company in the logistics space?
Base the company on service and honesty, not price. Service always wins out. The other advice I would give is to remember that the employees are the key to making your vision come true. So pick wisely and take great care of them!
How has cross-border trade between Mexico and the United States changed since you started Mexpress?
When we first started, Mexico was hardly a blip on anyone’s radar. Carlos and I knew that with the issues overseas, prices of air and ocean, along with the delays associated with getting the product to the U.S./Canada market, that Mexico was going to play an important role in future growth of our economy. When we started Mexpress, Mexico wasn’t ranked high as a trading partner with the U.S. In the last two months, however, it was ranked as the No. 2 trading partner, with Canada being No. 1 and China No. 3.
Do you expect to see an increase in nearshoring to Mexico in the next five years? Why or why not?
There is no doubt! Mexico trade with the U.S. and Canada is booming and is not going to stop.
How will such a shift affect your business?
It will definitely just increase our business.
The driver shortage has been a challenge for trucking companies for many years. What steps is Mexpress taking to recruit and retain good drivers?
We have not had an issue with driver shortages, as we have done a good job taking care of our team members. We have avoided some of the pitfalls facing other companies because we’ve put the focus on our employees.
You have been very involved with industry associations such as CSCMP and NASSTRAC over the years. Why has involvement in these groups been so important to you, and what do you think your company has gained from those efforts?
Not only has our involvement with CSCMP/NASSTRAC gotten us more business through meeting companies, referrals, and learning the needs of other members, we have made friendships that will last forever. CSCMP has a super supportive team, and we are proud to be a part of the organization for more than 35 years.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”