Before it can select the right supply chain assets and tactics for handling online orders, a company must first understand its e-commerce "maturity level."
Companies continue to focus on electronic commerce as an important avenue for increased revenue and growth. As a result, enterprises are examining methods to increase online sales—for example, by pushing a broader array of products into a wider geographic footprint. Additionally, they are going to market through an increasingly complex network of e-commerce partnerships and channels (such as mobile and social commerce), which require a great deal of integration and coordination.
To succeed in this growing and complex environment, supply chain organizations face challenges in building the back-end capabilities required to support their companies' e-commerce strategies. While the e-commerce logistical challenges that each company faces are unique, there are several prevalent trends that are influencing today's supply chain organizations. These include:
Expansion into products that require special handling or packaging (for example, perishables)
Expansion into global markets that have less mature logistics services
Rising fuel and transportation costs, which are driving companies toward more regional supply chains
Customers' desire for free services (such as shipping), which require an investment without any associated revenue
Customers' desire for shipment-tracking information and accurate transit-time information that is "pushed" to them through various devices
Some of the current e-commerce capabilities that supply chain organizations are developing or leveraging in response to these trends include: expanded distribution facilities that support both online and in-store needs, outsourced facilities in markets where carriers and service providers can offer lower costs, and partnerships with parcel carriers that leverage postal networks for last-mile delivery at a reduced cost.
To meet evolving customer needs, companies are also building interfaces with their customers that provide visibility to orders, the ability to route orders for delivery either to stores or to homes, and tracking systems to monitor order delivery.
To further expand their offerings internationally, they are using shipping, brokerage, and customs management capabilities offered by carriers, customs brokers, and other supply chain partners. In these situations, the carrier supports bulk shipment from the domestic market and disbursement of parcels in the international markets (along with associated customs brokerage and related services). This allows companies to serve international markets where they do not currently have a distribution or fulfillment infrastructure.
What's your maturity level?
Before they can consider what capabilities to deploy, companies must first define the "maturity level" of their e-commerce organization. This maturity level—typically defined by their desired geographic reach and their willingness to invest in e-commerce assets, as well as by customer demands—determines the capabilities required to meet their e-commerce needs. By aligning their supply chain capabilities with these factors, they can maximize return on investment as they grow their online presence.
In working with online retailers, we have noticed four stages of maturity (see Figure 1) that most organizations move through. These include:
Initiation: This is the stage for companies that are just launching their e-commerce services and capabilities. This typically should be done through a limited product offering in a regional or domestic market. This offering is supported through a patchwork of existing distribution facilities and partnerships (for example, with warehouses or third-party logistics service providers). At this stage, the company makes limited or no investment in dedicated e-commerce infrastructure.
Product expansion: In the next stage, companies leverage existing capabilities and assets to offer a larger product portfolio to existing markets. This is accomplished through the use of dedicated e-commerce distribution assets as part of a greater investment in facilities. Companies may, for example, use dedicated e-commerce warehouses or retail-focused racking and picking solutions. At this point, they also begin to increase their focus on developing interfaces and capabilities that provide customers with order visibility, tracking, and the ability to select store or home delivery.
Market expansion: At this level, companies launch a limited product portfolio in a small number of international markets. To accomplish this, they use alternative solutions, such as bulk shipping through carriers that allow them to make shipments and accept international payment methods without having to develop their own distribution assets or capabilities.
Globalization: For the final stage, companies need to establish a global e-commerce platform and distribution assets that support their requirements worldwide. These assets can be regionally centralized (for example, one distribution facility for the European Union) or country-specific (which is sometimes necessary in regions such as Asia). Facilities may be owned or outsourced.
By identifying their companies' current level of organizational maturity, along with their near-term and long-term e-commerce goals, supply chain organizations will be able to establish the infrastructure and capabilities required to support growth and ensure the greatest return on their investments. Companies that do not align their goals with their maturity level risk overinvesting in e-commerce assets as well as failing to realize the return necessary to maintain their initiatives' momentum. Others may overextend their international growth expectations without establishing the facilities and partnerships required for success.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.