The time is ripe for a seismic change in warehouse operations and enabling software. One that will stretch far beyond traditional warehouse management system functionality to enable warehouse software that can continually sense the environment and makes decisions for itself.
Dan Gilmore is chief marketing officer at robotics software provider Roboteon. He has been a frequent writer and speaker on warehouse technologies for many years.
We have smart homes, smart highways, and even smart toothbrushes. Isn’t it about time we had smart warehouses too?
When the term “smart” is applied to various products, it usually has to do with internet connectivity. So, for example, a “smart” piece of field equipment would be able to send data on its condition and performance, allowing the manufacturer to remotely monitor maintenance needs and perhaps offer suggestions for how equipment users can improve performance.
While the smart warehouse also leverages the internet, it includes a lot more than just internet connectivity and analytics. It involves warehouse systems that are smarter, based on new levels of visibility and awareness, advanced optimization technologies, and increased system-based decision-making. It also leverages a number of supporting technologies, from the internet of things (IoT) to simulation and machine learning.
A framework for this smart warehouse is shown in Figure 1. It shows that although a warehouse management system (WMS) is necessary for achieving a smart warehouse status, it is not sufficient. Previously, thousands of companies depended on traditional warehouse management systems to drive high levels of efficiency. But there has, arguably, been only incremental progress in WMS functionality over the last 20 years. During that same time period, companies have needed to meet new throughput expectations, push back against rising costs, and enable shortened cycle times. These general business shifts are driving a new paradigm in warehouse operations and technology.
The smart, automated warehouse will be built on a number of capabilities and components beyond what can be achieved by a WMS alone. It will rely on technologies that can be flexibly deployed and combined to meet specific requirements. Critically, many of these new capabilities will be delivered by newer and complementary warehouse execution system (WES) software, which is related to but different from WMS. Below, we describe the key capability groupings and enabling technologies as shown in the smart warehouse graphic.
Core warehouse operations
The smart warehouse is built on top of core operations excellence, which will be delivered, in part, from an advanced warehouse management system. That operations excellence will also rely on pervasive use of mobile terminals and barcode scanning, system-directed activity, advanced task management, support for multiple picking and replenishment strategies, dynamic slotting, detailed labor reporting, and more.
Constraint/condition awareness
In addition to guiding core warehouse operations, the smart warehouse is always “listening” to the environment. This awareness is generally provided by a WES and happens in a way that is fundamentally different than how a traditional WMS sees the world. A WMS is generally reactive in nature, processing the work as it sequentially arrives (physically or logically) at each next step in the fulfillment process. In comparison, a WES is “always on”—aware in real time of activity and constraints that can impact decision-making.
That awareness includes granular, real-time visibility of throughput and any bottlenecks set at user-definable levels. For example, the user could choose to have visibility of the case picking area as a whole or visibility of each level of a multilevel case pick module. The smart warehouse would know what is expected in terms of throughput in each area and will send alerts if throughput falls below expectations.
But there is a lot more here: That real-time visibility can be turned into powerful dashboards that give managers and supervisors a detailed look at where things stand across the distribution center (DC)—and what they should do next.
Here’s the cool part: The WES draws upon the same data being used to power the dashboards to make decisions about the flow of goods and work. For example, if a put wall area (an increasingly popular order-picking technology) is becoming congested, the smart warehouse will either slow down upstream pick activity or, for a period of time, send picks to an alternative path, such as to a manual cart pick, until the congestion dissipates. And it does this on its own.
Now that’s very smart.
This granular visibility of activity—current and planned—can then be used by simulation technology to provide the foundation for the intelligent and dynamic allocation of labor and resources, as discussed in the “Enabling technologies” section of this article.
Advanced software-based decision-making
Here is the reality: Even with advanced warehouse management systems, most warehouse operations are highly dependent on human decision-making about what work to release when, when to change order and replenishment priorities, and more.At the center of the smart warehouse is the ability of the WES to release orders and other work autonomously, without the need for human intervention, making the process more efficient.This automated release of work is based on a variety of attributes, including order priority, inventory and resource availability, optimization opportunities, carrier cut off times, and more.
The WES will also be able to reprioritize tasks as conditions in the DC change. While it’s true that warehouse management systems have had prioritization capabilities for many years, new smart warehouse capabilities will take prioritization to new levels.
Let’s take basic cart picking as an example. In a smart warehouse, when a picker scans the cart identification, the system will dynamically assign picks to that cart, based on the cart configuration and the goal of minimizing total travel time. But what if a very “hot,” urgent order comes in? In the smart warehouse, the system will scan the environment to see if any cart pickers have orders assigned to their carts that could be replaced with the hot, priority order—typically an order that hasn’t started any picks. But it will do so in a smart way, only assigning the new order if the pick locations are in front of the picker, so they do not have to reverse direction after having already completed picks along their path.
Instrumentation and user interface
The smart warehouse will increasingly automate the tracking and measurement/monitoring of inventory, equipment, and people by using technologies such as RFID, IoT, and real-time locating systems (RTLS). For example, in many cases, the smart warehouse will support RFID as an alternative to barcode scanning. RFID can eliminate many barcode scanning activities and automatically identify and prevent errors, such as “mispicks.”
Tracking technologies such as RFID can, in turn, help empower new types of smart capabilities. For example, IoT can be used to trace a lift truck driver’s actual movements and share that information with analytic applications to identify if workers are taking the most efficient travel paths to complete their work. IoT can also be leveraged to enforce social distancing or to identify “dwell times” when product isn’t flowing as it should.
As warehouse technology becomes smarter, the user interface for that technology will become more intuitive. The smart warehouse will increasingly leverage voice technology not only to improve picking and other distribution processes but also to change how workers (especially managers and supervisors) interact with warehouse software. It will enable managers to ask questions or request data via voice, and trigger a dynamic system response, moving to a form of person-to-system dialogue. Analysts call this “conversational voice,” in contrast to the “transactional voice” that has been in place for decades for order picking and other tasks.
Already today, there are applications in which workers use voice to request information from a WMS. Examples include calling on a mobile device for an updated status on the current picking wave or requesting replenishment status for an empty location awaiting a pick.
Material handling system optimization
As noted above, there are a significant number of both traditional material handling systems (such as sortation and pick-to-light) and new generation material handling systems (such as put walls, mobile robots, and goods-to-person) available to distribution managers today. That includes technologies, such as mobile robots and put walls, that are relatively inexpensive and highly scalable, meaning companies can start small and add to them over time based on success.
Regardless of the type of automation, smart warehouse software will seamlessly integrate with and optimize the performance of these systems, both individually and as a whole. It will provide a single platform for integrating with DC automation and orchestrating the flow of goods across heterogenous materials handling systems. This integration layer can be thought of as an operating system for managing the integration and performance of any number of automation technologies. For example, this single platform could be used to direct different mobile robot types from different vendors.
This integration layer would also directly connect with systems such as voice, smart carts, pick-to-light, put walls, and mobile robots without the need for any other software. Utilizing a single platform has many advantages, including lower total costs and the ability to optimize the performance of these systems within the full context of WMS/WES information. As a result, the integration layer would eliminate the process and information siloes that occur when the WMS “throws the orders over the wall” to the picking subsystems.
This “plug and play” capability will not only ease initial integration efforts but also enable the automation systems to be included in the larger orchestration of workflows. Both automated and nonautomated processing areas could be considered as a holistic ecosystem, optimizing the flow of work and total throughput. This is very different than how warehouse software has worked in the past with automation—and it is very smart.
Enabling technologies
To achieve these capabilities, the smart warehouse will be built on the foundation of several enabling technologies. These include:
A dynamic rules engine: The smart warehouse will use a rules engine to define and dynamically execute conditional rules relative to process and flow. These rules will consider capacities and constraints and be easily adaptable over time without custom coding.
In-line analytics: The smart warehouse will be instrumented with a rich array of dashboards and analytics that are increasing “in-line”—or embedded into the warehouse technology and directly relevant to the job being done by the user. These dashboard analytics will support real-time decision-making.
Simulation: The smart warehouse will leverage simulation tools to improve resource planning, “what if” scenario analysis, system testing, and more. The WMS software, for example, could forecast expected order volumes and profiles based on history and other factors, then simulate how the default labor and resource plan for the day/shift matches up. The result would be a dynamic, time-phased plan that identifies where workers will be needed in what quantities for, say, every hour of a shift.
Artificial intelligence/machine learning: Naturally, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning will play a growing role over time in the smart warehouse. For example, companies may use artificial intelligence/machine learning together with simulation software to continuously improve labor and resource plans. Simulation software may create a work plan based on estimates of processing times, carrier schedules, and more. The timing of this automated order release will be continually improved based on machine learning.
Taken together, these new capabilities of the smart, automated warehouse will usher in a step change in warehouse technology capabilities.
Smart warehouse benefits
The smart warehouse will deliver a wide array of benefits to shippers. These include:
Significantly reduced labor costs;
Higher and more consistent DC throughput;
Reduced need for automation (for example, fewer number of diverts) or the ability to achieve more throughput from a fixed or current level of DC automation;
Improved labor planning and allocation across a shift;
Improved, automated decision-making;
Faster implementation of new automation technologies, especially picking sub-systems; and
Greater agility to add/change processes or add automation over time.
This is not small stuff. This is seismic change for warehouse operations and enabling software, representing a new era of nearly autonomous warehouse software. It will deliver competitive advantage to companies that embrace the vision before their competitors.
The smart, automated warehouse isn’t just some academic vision. While the smart warehouse paradigm should be thought of as a journey not a destination—both in terms of the overall market and at individual distribution centers—most of the capabilities described here are available today, some more complete, others more developing. But there is a lot more to come, especially through enhanced use of AI and machine learning.
With the growing availability of less expensive and more scalable technology, it seems clear that a much higher percentage of companies will embrace material handling systems than is the case today. But many of the capabilities described in this article can drive value for nonautomated or lightly automated operations as well. Whatever level of automation they adopt, it’s time for companies of all sorts to start envisioning a much smarter, automated future for distribution operations.
“The past year has been unprecedented, with extreme weather events, heightened geopolitical tension and cybercrime destabilizing supply chains throughout the world. Navigating this year’s looming risks to build a secure supply network has never been more critical,” Corey Rhodes, CEO of Everstream Analytics, said in the firm’s “2025 Annual Risk Report.”
“While some risks are unavoidable, early notice and swift action through a combination of planning, deep monitoring, and mitigation can save inventory and lives in 2025,” Rhodes said.
In its report, Everstream ranked the five categories by a “risk score metric” to help global supply chain leaders prioritize planning and mitigation efforts for coping with them. They include:
Drowning in Climate Change – 90% Risk Score. Driven by shifting climate patterns and record-high temperatures, extreme weather events are a dominant risk to the supply chain due to concerns such as flooding and elevated ocean temperatures.
Geopolitical Instability with Increased Tariff Risk – 80% Risk Score. These threats could disrupt trade networks and impact economies worldwide, including logistics, transportation, and manufacturing industries. The following major geopolitical events are likely to impact global trade: Red Sea disruptions, Russia-Ukraine conflict, Taiwan trade risks, Middle East tensions, South China Sea disputes, and proposed tariff increases.
More Backdoors for Cybercrime – 75% Risk Score. Supply chain leaders face escalating cybersecurity risks in 2025, driven by the growing reliance on AI and cloud computing within supply chains, the proliferation of IoT-connected devices, vulnerabilities in sub-tier supply chains, and a disproportionate impact on third-party logistics providers (3PLs) and the electronics industry.
Rare Metals and Minerals on Lockdown – 65% Risk Score. Between rising regulations, new tariffs, and long-term or exclusive contracts, rare minerals and metals will be harder than ever, and more expensive, to obtain.
Crackdown on Forced Labor – 60% Risk Score. A growing crackdown on forced labor across industries will increase pressure on companies who are facing scrutiny to manage and eliminate suppliers violating human rights. Anticipated risks in 2025 include a push for alternative suppliers, a cascade of legislation to address lax forced labor issues, challenges for agri-food products such as palm oil and vanilla.
Maersk’s overall view of the coming year is that the global economy is expected to grow modestly, with the possibility of higher inflation caused by lingering supply chain issues, continued geopolitical tensions, and fiscal policies such as new tariffs. Geopolitical tensions and trade disruptions could threaten global stability, climate change action will continue to shape international cooperation, and the ongoing security issue in the Red Sea is expected to continue into 2025.
Those are difficult challenges, but according to Maersk, a vital part of logistics planning is understanding where risk and weak spots might be and finding ways to dampen the impact of inevitable hurdles.
They include:
1. Build a resilient supply chain As opposed to simply maintaining traditional network designs, Maersk says it is teaming with Hapag-Lloyd to implement a new East-West network called Gemini, beginning in February, 2025. The network will use leaner mainliners and shuttles together, allowing for isolation of port disruptions, minimizing the impact of disruptions to supply chains and routes. More broadly, companies should work with an integrated logistics partner that has multiple solutions—be they by air, truck, barge or rail—allowing supply chains to adapt around issues, while still meeting consumer demands.
2. Implementing technological advances
A key component in ensuring more resilience against disruptions is working with a supply chain supplier that offers advanced real-time tracking systems and AI-powered analytics to provide comprehensive visibility across supply chains. An AI-powered dashboard of analytics can provide end-to-end visibility of shipments, tasks, and updates, enabling efficient logistics management without the need to chase down data. Also, forecasting tools can give predictive analytics to optimize inventory, reduce waste, and enhance efficiency. And incorporating Internet of Things (IoT) into digital solutions can enable live tracking of containers to monitor shipments.
3. Preparing for anything, instead of everything Contingency planning was a big theme for 2024, and remains so for 2025. That need is highlighted by geopolitical instability, climate change and volatility, and changes to tariffs and legislation. So in 2025, businesses should seek to partner with a logistics partner that offers risk and disruption navigation through pre-planned procedures, risk assessments, and alternative solutions.
4. Diversifying all aspects of the supply chain Supply chains have felt the impact of disruption throughout 2024, with the situation in the Red Sea resulting in all shipping having to avoid the Suez Canal, and instead going around the Cape of Good Hope. This has increased demand throughout the year, resulting in businesses trying to move cargo earlier to ensure they can meet customer needs, and even considering nearshoring. As regionalization has become more prevalent, businesses can use nearshoring to diversify suppliers and reduce their dependency on single sources. By ensuring that these suppliers and manufacturers are closer to the consumer market, businesses can keep production costs lower as well as have more ease of reaching markets and avoid delay-related risks from global disruptions. Utilizing options closer to market can also allow companies to better adapt to changes in consumer needs and behavior. Finally, some companies may also find it useful to stock critical materials for future, to act as a buffer against unexpected delays and/or issues relating to trade embargoes.
5. Understanding tariffs, legislation and regulations 2024 was year of customs regulations in EU. And tariffs are expected in the U.S. as well, once the new Trump Administration takes office. However, consistent with President-elect Trump’s first term, threats of increases are often used as a negotiating tool. So companies should take a wait and see approach to U.S. customs, even as they cope with the certainty that further EU customs are set to come into play.
For an island measuring a little less than 14,000 square miles (or about the size of Belgium), Taiwan plays a crucial role in global supply chains, making geopolitical concerns associated with it of keen interest to most major corporations.
Taiwan has essentially acted as an independent nation since 1949, when the nationalist government under Chiang Kai-shek retreated to the island following the communist takeover of mainland China. Yet China has made no secret of the fact that it wants to bring Taiwan back under its authority—ambitions that were brought to the fore in October when China launched military drills that simulated an attack on the island.
If China were to invade Taiwan, it could have serious political and social consequences that would ripple around the globe. And it would be particularly devastating to our supply chains, says consultant Ashray Lavsi, a principal at the global procurement and supply chain consultancy Efficio. He specializes in solving complex supply chain, operations, and procurement problems, with a special focus on resilience. Prior to joining Efficio’s London office in 2017, he worked at XPO Logistics in the U.S. and the Netherlands.
Lavsi spoke recently with David Maloney, Supply Chain Xchange’s group editorial director, about what might happen if China moves to annex Taiwan—what shortages would likely arise, the impact on shipping lanes and ocean freight costs, and what managers should be doing now to prepare for potential disruptions ahead.
It’s no secret that China has ambitions on Taiwan. If China were to attempt to seize control of Taiwan, how would that affect the world’s supply chains?
There would be wide-ranging disruptions around the world. The United States does a lot of trade with both China and Taiwan. For example, the U.S. imports about $470 billion worth of goods from China, while China imports about $124 billion from the U.S. Meanwhile, Taiwan is the No. 9 trading partner for the U.S. So all of this trade could come to a halt, depending on the level of conflict. Supplies would likely be disrupted, and trade routes could be affected, resulting in delays and higher shipping costs.
Furthermore, there would likely be disruptions to trade not just between the U.S. and China, but also across the board. It could very well be that the NATO members get involved, that South Korea gets involved, that Japan gets involved, the Philippines get involved, so it could very quickly spiral into widespread disruptions.
We’ve seen big changes in the way businesses in Hong Kong operate since Britain handed control of Hong Kong over to China nearly 30 years ago. If China were to succeed in bringing Taiwan under its authority, would we see a similar outcome?
Indeed, I would expect so. I read recently that since around 2020, foreign direct investment in Hong Kong has dropped by nearly 50%, from $105 million to $54 million. The drop was primarily because of increased regulatory oversight. There are now a lot of restrictions on freedom of speech as well as tighter control over business operations. Something similar could very well happen in Taiwan if China were to succeed in taking over the island.
As you mentioned, the United States conducts a lot of trade with both Taiwan and China, and both countries have become strategic supply chain partners. Beyond the diplomatic considerations, what would a military or economic conflict mean for the United States?
There is a lot of trade in goods like agricultural products, aircraft, electronic components, and machinery, and our access to all of those items could be cut off. On top of that, China controls 70% of the world’s rare earth minerals [which are crucial for the production of a wide variety of electronic devices]. So any conflict in the region would almost certainly result in many disruptions, particularly in critical sectors like technology and electronics—disruptions that would lead to shortages and increased costs.
Trade routes would also be affected, resulting in delays and higher shipping costs. U.S. companies would need to seek out alternative suppliers for critical materials or components they currently source in China, if they haven’t already. And if they haven’t lined up alternative suppliers, any hostilities could result in a complete halt in production.
What effect would such a move have on the global economy?
It’s been quite a few years since economies have just been localized. Any disruption now has widespread ripple effects across the world. As we discussed, any conflict between the United States and China naturally pulls in countries like Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and the NATO countries, and it can very quickly spiral out.
Look at the semiconductor, or chip, shortages. If you recall, back in 2021, those shortages led to almost a half-trillion-dollar loss for the automakers, who lost out on sales of 7.7 million vehicles because they couldn’t meet demand. We could see a repeat of that situation—maybe even on a larger scale.
I found this statistic interesting—we often talk about the semiconductor shortages during the pandemic, but if you look at true production numbers, the actual production of chips went up from 2020, to 2021, to 2022. The shortage was driven not by a drop in production, but rather, by a surge in demand for PCs from people working from home. That demand has since dwindled, but we’d still face a major semiconductor shortage if much of the production were halted. So that’s going to be a very big change, a very big disruption.
Of course, the United States, along with a number of other countries, has taken steps to reduce its exposure to risk by bringing some semiconductor production back to its own shores. But it will take time to get those operations up and running, and their output would still be just a drop in the bucket compared to what’s needed. So what would a takeover of Taiwan mean for the overall semiconductor flow?
It essentially stops, right? Let me paint a picture that illustrates the importance of the Taiwanese semiconductor industry to global manufacturing. Semiconductors go into everything from cars to military equipment to computers to data centers to microwaves—they are in everything around us. Taiwan produces 60% of the world’s semiconductors and more than 90% of the advanced chips. Just let that sink in: More than 90% of all the advanced chips produced worldwide come from Taiwan, primarily from a big fabrication company called TSMC.
So the complexity and the precision required to make advanced semiconductors, combined with the limited number of companies around the world, make Taiwan’s position unmatched. The second-largest producer after TSMC is South Korean-based Samsung, which produces 18%, so that’s the gap that we are talking about.
As you rightly said, there are efforts by governments across the world to reduce their reliance on Taiwan. For example, TSMC is building three fabrication facilities in Arizona—the third with funding from the U.S. government. The first plant is set to go live next year and the third by 2030. But even once all three plants are up and running, the production volumes won’t be close to what TSMC produces in Taiwan. It’s going to take years to reduce our reliance on production in Taiwan. If that supply is cut off, the ripple effect will be tremendous.
Setting aside the historical and political claims China has made on Taiwan, is Taiwan’s dominance in the semiconductor industry a main reason why China has set its sights on it?
It could be. China has been investing heavily in chip production—for instance, today, most, if not all, of the chips in the latest Huawei phones are locally produced in China. But China is still quite a few years behind TSMC. So that’s definitely going to be one of the big factors, right? One article that I found very interesting declared that chips are the new oil. If you control chip production, you control the global market.
Let’s talk about the implications for shipping lanes. If you take a look at the map, you realize that the Taiwan Strait is a very important shipping lane for containerized goods coming out of both China and Taiwan. If China were to institute a military blockade, how would that affect the world’s container flows?
That flow would be affected tremendously. The Taiwan Strait plays a crucial role in global shipping, particularly for goods moving between Asia and the rest of the world. It is one of the busiest shipping lanes, and any blockage would severely disrupt global container flows.
Now let me put that into perspective. Fifty percent of the world’s containerships pass through the Taiwan Strait—50%. That’s a huge number. By comparison, the Suez Canal handles about 20% of global trade. Or to use another measure: 88% of the world’s largest ships by tonnage passed through the Taiwan Strait in 2022.
I’ve been reading up on this in the past few months and it seems that a military blockage is a very likely scenario—one that would cripple Taiwan’s economy without a full-scale invasion. So instead of a mounting a full-on attack, China might just block the strait, which would lead to delays in the delivery of goods, affecting global supply chains and causing shortages across Asia and the U.S.
Given the escalating tensions between China and Taiwan, should shippers and manufacturers be preparing today for a potential conflict?
Businesses have to begin preparing today. If businesses were to say, “Okay, I’m going to wait until the conflict breaks out, and then figure out what I’ll do,” it will be too late. You’re done. Your production comes to halt. You can no longer satisfy your customer requirements. So proactive measures are an absolute requirement.
What should they do to prepare?
I would urge manufacturers and shippers to take what’s essentially a two-pronged approach.
First, you need to segment and identify your critical components, based on how crucial they are to your production operations and the risk associated with their sources, where they’re coming from. After you segment them, you list your top-priority items—the critical components that you absolutely cannot do without. You then split your supply chain into two, so that you have a much more redundant supply chain built for those critical items and then a second supply chain for everything else.
To build redundancy, you establish multiple suppliers and diversify them geographically. You also build in stringent contingency measures, which could include strategic stockpiling, nearshoring, and friendshoring, which is where you store inventory with an ally or in a friend consortium, as well as buying alternative components wherever possible. So all of those measures need to be put in place for the components that you’ve identified as absolutely critical for your production.
What is the second prong?
The second prong is the need to manage increased costs. There’s no getting away from higher costs, right? If you’re holding more inventory, you have higher inventory carrying costs. And if you’re diversifying your supply base, that means you don’t have as much leverage [with individual suppliers]. You’re also going to be managing multiple supply chains, which requires an increase in human capital because you’ll need more people to manage the more complex supply chains that you’re putting in place.
One way to manage costs could be by implementing strategic sourcing programs across the board that are aimed at mitigating some of the expenses. By taking these steps, manufacturers can safeguard their operations against potential disruptions and ensure continuity.
A lot of U.S. companies have been nearshoring to Mexico, which has now become the United States’ leading trade partner. Is that a simple solution for companies looking to reduce their reliance on Asia?
It is one of the solutions. But you won’t be able to replace your Asian supply base immediately—as with semiconductors, it may take a few years to build out that capacity.
So you need to start stockpiling essential components now—particularly if you won’t be able to find alternatives. You want to make sure that you’re holding the right amount of inventory of the components that you absolutely need. So nearshoring is an option, but you need to be careful what you move to Mexico.
Is that because moving production to Mexico will raise your costs compared to sourcing in Asia?
Yes, production costs will be higher compared to a place like Vietnam, where wages are currently lower than in Mexico. It might reduce the logistics cost, but I think there’s still a net increase overall because you’ll have higher expenses for things like regulatory compliance. Plus you’ll have the one-time cost of setting up the facilities.
Ideally, you’ll never have to face these problems we’ve been talking about, but it’s always better to be prepared.
Editor’s note:This article first appeared in the November 2024 issue of our sister publication DC Velocity.
As we look toward 2025, the logistics and transportation industry stands on the cusp of transformation. At the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), we’re committed to helping industry leaders navigate these changes with insight and strategy. Here are six trends that we believe will form the competitive landscape of tomorrow.
1. Digital transformation and data integration: Technology continues to reshape every facet of logistics. Advanced analytics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning are becoming increasingly integrated into supply chain operations, driving efficiency, reducing costs, and enabling proactive decision-making.
For companies to succeed, they must invest in technologies that enhance data accuracy and facilitate seamless information sharing. Those that do so will be able to better anticipate disruptions, optimize routes, and improve customer satisfaction.
2. Sustainability: As the global community continues to prioritize environmental responsibility, the logistics sector faces growing pressure to reduce its carbon footprint. The adoption of electric vehicles, alternative fuels, and optimized routes can reduce emissions significantly, and many organizations are setting ambitious targets to lower their environmental impact.
3. Supply chain resilience and flexibility: The capacity to pivot quickly in response to disruptions, whether due to natural disasters, geopolitical tensions, or global pandemics, is no longer a luxury but a necessity. Companies are increasingly adopting flexible supply chain models and focusing on diversification to mitigate risk.
4. Nearshoring and reshoring: Bringing manufacturing closer to home—either by relocating it back to the country of origin (reshoring) or moving it to neighboring regions (nearshoring)—not only enhances supply chain agility but also reduces transportation costs, lowers emissions, and lessens exposure to global disruptions. Companies that embrace these approaches can strengthen their competitive positioning, helping them respond more effectively to fluctuations in demand while maintaining cost efficiency and meeting sustainability goals.
5. Workforce development: The logistics industry is facing a talent shortage, particularly in skilled labor and technology-focused roles. As we advance into a more digitalized landscape, we need a workforce proficient in tech and adaptable to change. Organizations must focus on upskilling and reskilling programs to equip their teams with the necessary knowledge.
6. E-commerce and last-mile solutions: E-commerce growth shows no signs of slowing, and with it comes the challenge of meeting rising consumer expectations for fast, reliable, and sustainable delivery. Last-mile logistics remains one of the most complex and costly segments of the supply chain. Innovative solutions, such as urban microfulfillment centers, autonomous delivery vehicles, and drone deliveries, are paving the way for more efficient last-mile solutions.
Looking Ahead
The future of global logistics and transportation holds both challenges and opportunities. At CSCMP, we are committed to supporting our members through these changes, fostering collaboration and sharing insights to navigate the path forward.
The landscape of 2025 may be unpredictable, but with strategic foresight and a commitment to adaptability, we can shape a prosperous future for logistics and transportation. Together, let’s continue to lead the way forward.
Keep ReadingShow less
Attendees visit the CSCMP EDGE 2024 Resource Center.
As I assume the role of Chair of the Board of Directors for the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), I fondly reflect on the more than 10 years that I’ve had the privilege of being part of this extraordinary organization. I’ve seen firsthand the impact we have had on individuals, companies, and the entire supply chain profession.
CSCMP’s journey as an organization began back in 1963. It has since grown from a small, passionate community to the world’s premier association for supply chain professionals. Our mission—to connect, educate, and develop supply chain professionals throughout their careers—remains not only relevant, but vital in today’s world.
As we look ahead, the opportunities are vast. What stands out the most to me is simply this:We are stronger together. Every individual brings a unique perspective, and it’s through our collective wisdom and efforts that we will continue to advance the work we do. The road ahead is not one we travel alone. It’s a path we navigate as a community—one united in purpose and direction.
My vision for the year ahead centers around growth—growth in our global reach and, perhaps even more importantly, growth in how we engage and support each other. We have tremendous opportunities for international expansion, especially in Europe, the U.K., Mexico, Central and South America, and Canada. I’m happy to share that we're already seeing progress in our reach to these regions.
I'm incredibly excited about the potential for even more growth ahead. One of the initiatives I am most passionate about is our Centers of Excellence. These centers will provide members the space to engage deeply in key supply chain disciplines. I invite each of you to dive into these areas, share your experiences, and contribute to the innovative solutions we develop together. There will be plenty of opportunity to do so. These centers are not only academic spaces—they are hubs for innovation, where we can share best practices and work together to solve our industry’s biggest challenges.
Education and thought leadership will continue to be at the heart of what we do. By expanding our research capacity, we will offer cutting-edge insights that keep our members at the forefront of industry trends and innovation. Through our platforms, we will create even more opportunities for connection and collaboration—ensuring that every voice is heard. Your insights, curiosity, questions, and engagement will drive the transformation we seek. We all play a part in the advancement of our industry and our profession.
Our impact begins with membership. Expanding collaborations with public, private, and nonprofit sectors will give us new ways to drive progress. In a world where our ecosystem is even more interconnected than ever before, the ability to engage with diverse stakeholders will help us unlock new solutions and truly make a difference on a global scale. None of this would be possible without the strong foundation that has been built over the years by serving our supply chain community. Each of you holds the ability to shape the future of the supply chain, and I can’t wait to see what we will achieve together.