The growing adoption of supply chain applications in the cloud and of those offered by the big ERP vendors will have a significant impact on supply chain technology over the next three years.
For the past six years, Gartner has conducted a research study of supply chain technology use. That study asks supply chain professionals to identify their key priorities now and in the future, cite barriers to success, quantify their business challenges, and describe how they exploit technology in their businesses.
[Figure 1] Lack of functional parity limits SCM SaaS adoption, but growth continuesEnlarge this image
Growing demand for cloud services
Cloud computing is becoming a significant force in supply chain applications, and Gartner believes that by 2016 more than 40 percent of new logistics applications will be delivered via the cloud.
In this context, "the cloud" can mean several things. It can mean providing on-demand access to an application, or it can be a pure multitenant, software-as-a-service (SaaS) application where there is a single instance of the software used by multiple customers simultaneously. There are also variants on the idea of a "private cloud" hosted by either a user or a vendor and involving a single instance of the software dedicated to a single customer.
Consistent with the larger trend within the information technology (IT) market, there has been growth over the past three years in the number of supply chain solutions that are cloud-based (public or private). At the same time, Gartner has seen the preference for sourcing new applications via the traditional on-premise approach decline from a high of 70 percent in 2010 to around 55 percent in 2012.
Despite this growing interest, cloud computing within supply chain management (SCM) is still relatively nascent and has a lower level of penetration than in areas like customer relationship management (CRM) or indirect procurement offerings. However, our research finds a significant intent by companies to source SCM applications through a SaaS model in the future. The most significant driver for the increase in SaaS adoption, according to the survey, is the desire to reduce upfront investment costs.
Gartner has also found that adoption level varies depending on the process complexity, degree of process sophistication, and size of the enterprise. Large, complex enterprises continue to favor traditional on-premise applications, although interest in the cloud is developing. Some of this is driven by large companies' propensity to want high degrees of control and customization/personalization. Small and mid-size businesses (SMBs), on the other hand, have largely made the transition to the cloud. For these organizations the benefits are the perceived time to value, low upfront capital investment, and the ability to shift much of the application maintenance to the cloud provider. Growth will come from more SMBs seeking cloud offerings as well as from large organizations changing their opinions of the cloud.
In our study, Gartner was also able to stratify responses based on various factors. One of the dimensions is "information technology adoption profile." Aggressive adopters of IT tend to be innovators, relatively risk-tolerant, and the first to embrace new concepts. Mainstream companies wait for technologies to become commercially viable because they tend to be more risk-averse, and they want to see evidence of success among companies like themselves. Conservative companies tend to be late adopters of technology; they are risk avoiders and wait for markets to mature and consolidate.
Gartner found notable differences in cloud adoption levels based on a company's IT adoption profile. Conservative organizations are still reluctant to embrace the cloud, preferring on-premise and hosting options. Aggressive adopters of IT, however, are more inclined to consider various cloud delivery approaches. Finally, mainstream companies are the most likely of the three to favor multitenant SaaS applications, which, given their risk profiles, suggests that concerns with cloud viability are waning. (See Figure 1 for current adoption rates and respondents' projections for 2015.)
Rise of the "mega-suite"
The second major trend is the emerging dominance of application mega-suite vendors such as SAP, Oracle, and Infor. Our data indicates that if these vendors continue on their current growth trajectories, they will command more than half of the market for logistics applications. The mega-suite vendors continue to invest in their logistics and supply chain management capabilities. While they might not have achieved "best-of-breed" status in each SCM application category, they do offer solid and reliable capabilities across the SCM application domain. This includes warehousing, transportation, planning, manufacturing, and sourcing and procurement. This is not to say that best-of-breed vendors are all dead. Rather, it just means that those customers that need only "good enough" capabilities will likely find offerings from the mega-suite vendors to be sufficient. To survive, best-of-breed vendors will have to be thought leaders and on the forefront of innovation.
In our study, Gartner wanted to determine how willing businesses would be to adopt enterprise resource planning (ERP) suite offerings. Respondents were asked to identify the likelihood of acquiring technology from their ERP provider versus a best-of-breed provider. While many specialized vendors continue to execute well, the study showed a notable preference toward ERP suite providers today.
The study found significant interest in leveraging ERP solutions when their features and functionality are comparable to best-of-breeds or "good enough" for the needed environment. The study seems to suggest that most respondents are selecting solutions that are "good enough" or support an ERP platform strategy rather than ones that are considered to be cutting-edge.
Indeed, ERP suites are preferred by businesses that consider themselves below-average (67 percent), average (77 percent), or above-average (74 percent). Businesses that consider themselves to be leaders, however, are more likely to prefer a best-of-breed approach. Within the leaders category, 56 percent indicated that, in general, an ERP platform was their preference, while 26 percent preferred a best-of-breed approach, where the focus is on differentiation and where functionality becomes the most important factor. The remainder of the respondents were indifferent. The leaders' preference for best-of-breed vendors was close to triple that of other organizations, which is one reason these organizations are often differentiated in their industries.
Business change is pervasive, and the pace is accelerating. In previous Gartner studies, almost 90 percent of companies indicated that the impact of change was growing, and they must develop business and IT strategies that are responsive and adaptive to change. At the same time, companies continue to live under financial pressures, so they need to invest their IT resources wisely.
Both of the above trends—cloud and the growing dominance of mega-suite vendors—are driven by these demands. Cloud is proving to be a means for companies to invest in newer solutions with less upfront capital, and it allows them to shift some of the burden of application management to the vendor, which will allow them to do more with less. Similarly the mega-suite vendors are now a force in SCM applications, as they offer many organizations the opportunity to more easily enhance their supply chain management processes by extending the reach of software that they already have in place. While neither is a panacea, companies that are considering upgrading their SCM portfolios should consider both of these strategies.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.