The ratio of U.S. logistics costs as a percentage of GDP hasn't changed in two years. Costs should continue to hold steady as the economy struggles to gain momentum.
If you had to sum up the state of U.S. business logistics costs in just a few words, you might do well to borrow a phrase that was well-known to drivers of an earlier era: stuck in neutral. That's because logistics costs as a percentage of the overall U.S. economy in 2012 came in at 8.5 percent, exactly the same as in the previous year.
U.S. business logistics costs did rise in 2012, to $1.33 trillion, an increase of US $43 billion from 2011. But that increase—less than half of the increase seen in 2011—paralleled the overall growth in the sluggish economy. In other words, the freight logistics sector was growing at the same rate as the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP).
Article Figures
[Figure 1] U.S. logistics costs as a percentage of GDPEnlarge this image
[Figure 2] Calculation of 2012 logistics costs (in U.S. $ billions)Enlarge this image
That and other findings indicative of slow growth for at least the next few years prompted transportation consultant Rosalyn Wilson to choose Is This the New Normal? as the title for the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals' 24th Annual "State of Logistics Report," sponsored by Penske Logistics. The longest-running study in the field, the report provides an accepted measure for quantifying the size of the U.S. transportation market and the impact of logistics on the U.S. economy. (For more about the report, see the sidebar.)
About the "State of Logistics Report"
For more than two decades, the annual "State of Logistics Report" has quantified the size of the U.S. transportation market and the impact of logistics on the U.S. economy. The late logistics consultant Robert V. Delaney began the study in 1989 as a way to measure logistics efficiency following the deregulation of transportation in the United States. Currently the report is authored by transportation consultant Rosalyn Wilson under the auspices of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). This year's report was sponsored by Penske Logistics.
CSCMP members can download the complete 24th Annual "State of Logistics Report" at no charge from CSCMP's website. Nonmembers can purchase the report from CSCMP's online bookstore.
The report measures logistics costs against the U.S. GDP, a ratio often cited as a measurement of the supply chain's efficiency in moving the United States' output of goods. A ratio below 10 percent traditionally was viewed as a sign that the nation's logistics managers were keeping costs under control and boosting operational efficiency. Since the Great Recession of 2007-2009, however, a low ratio has signified a decline in shipping expenditures and transportation costs that correlates to sluggish economic activity. In fact, the lowest point ever recorded in the 30-year history of the report was a ratio of 7.8 percent in 2009. (The "State of Logistics Report" was first issued in 1989, but the first edition included data dating back to 1981.) Figure 1 shows logistics costs as a percentage of GDP for the most recent 10-year period.
Carrying costs, inventory up slightly
The report breaks down overall logistics expenditures into three major components: inventory carrying costs, transportation costs, and administrative costs.
Inventory carrying costs rose in 2012 to $434 billion—a 4-percent hike from 2011. Carrying costs reflect the amount of interest paid on inventory, the expenses for holding inventory in storage (taxes, obsolescence, depreciation, and insurance), and warehousing costs. (See Figure 2.)
The value of the nation's business inventories (which includes agriculture, mining, construction, services, manufacturing, and wholesale and retail trade) rose to almost $2.3 trillion last year. In her report, Wilson pointed out that U.S. business inventories rose in three out of the four quarters last year. (See Figure 3.) All three subcategories of inventory (retail, wholesale, and manufacturing) climbed in 2012. Retail inventories increased 8.3 percent, far higher than those for wholesale (3.8 percent) and manufacturing (1.3 percent).
Although inventory levels rose, interest rates did not. In fact, the interest component of carrying costs declined by 6.9 percent, according to Wilson. That's because the cost of capital, as measured by the commercial paper rate, declined. The commercial paper rate, which reflects the interest businesses pay to borrow short-term capital, reached near-historic lows, falling from .13 percent in 2011 to .11 percent in 2012. Had it not been for the low cost of capital, Wilson noted, the growth in inventory levels would have caused carrying costs to rise.
Interestingly, the retail inventory-to-sales ratio, which indicates how well retailers are balancing stock with sales, rose in the latter half of 2012. During the Great Recession in 2009, that ratio skyrocketed to 1.49. During the first four months of 2012, it stabilized at 1.26, indicating that sales and inventory were fairly well balanced, Wilson wrote. By year's end, however, flagging sales had caused it to inch up to 1.28. (See Figure 4.)
Taxes, obsolescence, depreciation, and insurance rose 2.6 percent in 2012 to reach $302 billion. Wilson said that hike was directly related to the growth in inventories.
The final component of inventory carrying costs—warehousing expenses—totaled $130 billion in 2012, up 7.6 percent from 2011. In her report, Wilson noted that lease rates for warehouses have risen, indicating a recovery in this sector. Although new construction has increased available inventory, occupancy rates for warehousing have continued to rise.
Transportation costs in check
Transportation, the second major component of U.S. logistics costs, rose only 3 percent in 2012. Transportation costs totaled $836 billion last year, up from $821 billion in 2011. Wilson said that transportation costs increased modestly because of weak and inconsistent shipment volumes and strong pressure to restrain rates. As a result, transportation accounted for 5.4 percent of overall GDP in 2012—well below the historic norm of approximately 6 percent.
Trucking costs, the largest component in the transportation sector, totaled $647 billion in 2012. Intercity motor carriage, at $445 billion, accounted for about two-thirds of that amount, while local motor freight (which includes delivery services) reached $202 billion.
Truck tonnage rose 2.3 percent, and utilization rates "are at all-time highs," Wilson noted in the report. Those are two of several factors suggesting that the trucking industry is on the brink of serious capacity problems. Another is the new Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FCSA) hours-of-service (HOS) rules, which reduce maximum weekly driving time. According to various estimates, that could potentially reduce driver capacity by 2 to 5 percent, and could cause productivity to decline by between 2 and 10 percent, Wilson said. Additional new rules on medical certifications and drug testing could further shrink the pool of eligible drivers. Put that together with difficulties in recruiting and retaining drivers, and it's estimated the industry currently needs 30,000 more drivers, she said.
Spending on rail services, the second largest component of transportation costs, amounted to $72 billion last year. That's up 4.9 percent, a modest increase compared to the 16-percent spike in 2011. Intermodal volume was the second highest on record, providing competition that helped to keep down motor carrier rates. Although intermodal fared well, bulk rail shipping did not: total carloads for the year fell 3.1 percent from 2011.
Costs for shipping by water totaled about $35 billion, with international shipping accounting for about $27.5 billion and domestic waterways $7.5 billion. Because of increased vessel capacity, ocean carriers struggled to maintain rate levels, and many engaged in a bidding war over declining cargo volumes. As a result, overall costs for water transportation declined by 0.9 percent in 2012, despite higher rates for some domestic barge shipments brought about by drought-related restrictions on traffic.
As for other transportation components, oil pipelines generated $13 billion. The airfreight industry accounted for $33 billion, an increase of 3.1 percent over 2011, but the industry continues to struggle with profitability due to "chronic overcapacity and deteriorating yields," Wilson observed. Freight forwarders, a category that also includes third-party logistics service providers, brought in $37 billion, an increase of 5.4 percent.
In addition to inventory carrying and transportation costs, two other factors figure in Wilson's computation of business logistics costs. Shipper-related costs, which include the loading and unloading of transportation equipment as well as traffic department operations, totaled $10 billion in 2012, up just 1.8 percent from 2011. Administrative expenses—which are computed by a generally accepted formula that takes the sum of inventory and transportation costs and multiplies it by 4 percent—amounted to $51 billion in 2012, up $2 billion from the prior year.
Slow growth is the "new normal"
As for the future, Wilson said the recovery from the Great Recession has been longer than most economists anticipated. In the past, consumers spurred economic recoveries, but this time consumers, who lost ground financially during the downturn, have little confidence in the economy. Most Americans are "still holding tight to their paychecks, spending most of that on necessities," she said.
Although manufacturing had been a bright spot following the Great Recession, sustaining some growth, that sector too has cooled. Manufacturing grew at 7.4 percent in 2010, then 5 percent in 2011, and last year dropped to 3 percent. Since manufacturing growth has abated, Wilson noted, there is less demand for logistics services.
Where's the U.S. economy going? In Wilson's view the economy is entering a period that could be termed the "new normal," one that's characterized by slow expansion with GDP growth hovering between 2.5 to 4 percent, high unemployment levels, and slower job creation. Given those economic conditions, she expects that both the economy as a whole and the logistics sector will be slow to regain any sustainable momentum, and that growth rates will be uneven for some time to come.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”