Logistics and supply chain management have come a long way from the old green eyeshade days. In this excerpt from Episode 8 of the "Supply Chain Pioneers" video series, Kenneth Ackerman, Donald "Dee" Biggs, John Bowersox, Mark Richards, and Thomas Speh discuss what the profession looks like today.
To get an idea of the evolution the logistics and supply chain profession has undergone over the 50 years since the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals was founded, all you have to do is look at how the group's name has changed through the decades. What we now call CSCMP began in 1963 as the National Council of Physical Distribution Management (NCPDM) and became the Council of Logistics Management (CLM) in 1985, before adopting its current moniker in 1995. Each of those names reflected the changing nature of the profession and its practitioners' responsibilities.
Where does the profession stand today? In this excerpt from the video series "Supply Chain Pioneers," five leading logistics professionals at different stages of their careers address that topic based on their experience.
Kenneth Ackerman, president of the consulting firm K.B. Ackerman Company, is a past president of CSCMP and the 1977 recipient of the group's Distinguished Service Award. He attended his first NCPDM annual conference in 1969.
Donald "Dee" Biggs is director of customer logistics at Welch Foods and has been a member of CSCMP since 1975. He served as chairman of the 2010 Annual Global Conference and on CSCMP's board of directors.
John Bowersox is responsible for business-to-business customer service for the Kohler Company. He currently sits on CSCMP's board of directors as its Young Professionals Committee chair. His father, the late Dr. Donald Bowersox, was a founder of NCPDM and the recipient of the very first Distinguished Service Award, in 1966.
Mark Richards is vice president of Associated Warehouses, Inc. He has been actively involved with CSCMP since he began his career some 34 years ago, and served as chair of the board of directors from 2006 to 2007.
Thomas Speh is director of e-Learning at the Farmer School of Business at Miami University. He previously was a professor of distribution and senior director of MBA programs at the school. A member of CSCMP since 1973, he has served as board chair and president, and received the Distinguished Service Award in 2007.
The following is an excerpt of that conversation, which was led by CSCMP President and CEO Rick Blasgen.
Who were the founding members of CSCMP?
The following individuals got together in January of 1963 in St. Louis, Missouri, to form the National Council of Physical Distribution Management (NCPDM), the forerunner of CSCMP:
William T. Beckman, traffic manager, Monsanto (NCPDM's first president)
F. Harry Bergtholdt, vice president of distribution, Del Monte
Warren Blanding, editor, Transportation & Distribution Management magazine
Donald J. Bowersox, vice president and general manager, E. F. MacDonald Stamp Company
Will Gribble, director of customer service, The Pillsbury Company
H. George Miller, director of distribution, Diamond Crystal Salt Company
E. Grosvenor Plowman, vice president, traffic, U.S. Steel
Andrew C. Price, director of distribution, Xerox
Bruce J. Riggs, general traffic manager, Behr Manning Division of the Norton Company
Charles C. Smith, traffic manager, Nabisco
George C. Smith, director of transportation, DuPont Fabrics & Finishes Division
Edward W. Smykay, professor of physical distribution management, Michigan State University
Wendell M. Stewart, vice president, A. T. Kearney Consulting
John F. Varley, vice president of distribution, Johnson & Johnson
John, you are one of the younger generation. How do you view the state of the profession at Kohler, and then fast-forward 10 years. If we are successful in doing what we set out to do, what will the state of the profession look like then? Bowersox: I think the profession right now is alive and well. We have seen a big transformation over the last 10 years around the acknowledgement of supply chain as a profession, and I believe that has presented us with a great opportunity but also with a number of challenges around how we interact with businesses in a global community.
In terms of the next 10 years, I think that the fundamentals and the framework of our industry will stay the same, but the speed at which things change—the speed at which we have to make decisions for our businesses and the pace of change—will continue to grow and be a challenge for us.
Dee, you have had a long, fruitful career in the food industry with Welch's, but you also participated in industry initiatives over the years. What is your perception of the current state of the supply chain world? Biggs: Well, I think supply chain is probably doing better than it ever has. I think all you have to do is watch TV; now we have songs about logistics! Big Brown [UPS] has got "I love logistics" all over the place. The fact that we've got people around the world talking about logistics, talking about supply chain, it's never been better. At the same time, I think the challenges are still as great as they were 50 years ago. I mean, we are still really at the beginning point of doing lots of things.
Tom, you have spent a career in academia and have mentored students who became leaders in this field. What is your view, from an academic perspective, of the profession? Speh: Well, it is exciting, because what we are seeing now is students who are so passionate about this area. I look at the crop of students that we have, the quality of these students, and the fact that half of our students in supply chain are double majors in engineering and other areas. So we are getting a terrific group of students who are coming through the pipeline. They are energized. They are qualified, and they bring, I think, a wider array of skills to the profession than we have probably seen in the past.
John, you are recruiting all the time, looking for folks to bring into Kohler. Do you see that as well? Bowersox: Yes, I would agree. I think that we are seeing a shift in our work force in terms of the need to bring in new students who have that supply chain background and understanding and can come to the table immediately, hit the ground running, and be able to make business decisions with that baseline.
You know, Mark, back in 1994 I was on a panel where part of the discussion was about how in the year 2000, we would no longer need warehouses because everything will be information-driven and we'll be able to create a product right in front of you. That didn't happen, and warehouses still perform an important function today. Richards: I am happy to say that the space continues to grow. There is going to continue to be a need for warehousing. And fortunately, 3PLs (third-party logistics service providers) have learned to be very creative in the things that they do within those four walls.
The chief logistics officer or the chief supply chain officer has to be a great salesperson inside the company. Tom, do you think we could do a better job of explaining the value that we bring to those we serve? Speh: I think we are going to see naturally some improvement in that. Almost every business school has a required course in supply chain management, so now we are getting people who may get a finance degree or a marketing degree. They come out of a business program with at least one, if not two, courses in supply chain management, which has taught them about the value that is being delivered, and about the need for integration and collaboration.
John, you have some transformational issues going on at Kohler right now in the area of supply chain. Did someone just wake up one morning and say, "Hey, I get it now?" How did that come about? Bowersox: I think it has happened in a number of different ways. For Kohler, to be candid, part of it has been the global recession of the past couple of years. It has put a greater focus on the need for our supply chain and for us as a company to be agile and flexible. As we get the opportunity to come to the table on these discussions, it is our job to present solutions and ideas—not to just present the framework and help [management] to understand the trade-offs, but to come with a value-added proposition around how the supply chain can be used to better leverage a sales initiative or marketing campaign, or whatever it may be.
Dee, how do we get those who don't understand logistics and supply chain to understand what we do and the value that we bring? Biggs: When I came to Welch's in the early '80s and started to put together a supply chain [organization], you would go out and start talking about the value to finance and the value to marketing. They would kind of look at you like, what [in the world] are you talking about? Over time we kept talking. It is an evolutionary process. I think more companies have a chief logistics officer or a chief supply chain officer than ever before. Fifteen or 20 years ago in the grocery industry it was pretty rare. Now it is very common.
Any closing comments on the current state of the profession and your thoughts about what we might do to accelerate its prominence? Speh: Well, I think unquestionably it is a great time to be in the profession. ... I really think we owe it to the profession to try to get out there and spread the word to younger children before they ever get to college.
Ackerman: I am amazed at the enthusiasm of my grandchildren's generation. Some of our oldest friends have a granddaughter who went to school at Miami University. They called me up and said their granddaughter wants to get into supply chain. This kid is working for a trucking company in Chicago. I have never met this youngster, but I gather she is intense, she is enthusiastic, and it is fun to see kids in their twenties with that enthusiasm.
Richards: I believe also that it is a great time to be in the business and the profession. Historically we have been a very humble profession. We have sat in the back and we have saved money. I think we need to step it up. If we go to the high schools and we talk about the fact that if you are in this profession, there is a good chance that you are going to get a job, especially these days, that is going to get some people to perk up and take notice.
Bowersox: I will say again that I truly believe the supply chain is a fabulous place to be right now, and it will continue to be for some time. The challenge is, how do we continue specifically with a younger generation? How do we truly help them understand what the supply chain is? People know what a doctor does. They don't necessarily know what a role in logistics or warehouse operations might be. So I think as an organization and as a community we've got to continue to help educate the general public on what it means.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.