At Intermountain Healthcare, Brent Johnson oversees a remarkably wide range of activities--everything from warehousing and transportation to sustainability and laundry services. Bringing all that and more under the supply chain umbrella, he says, leads to better service at lower cost.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a freelance writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, material handling, and international trade. She previously was Editor at CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. and Senior Editor of SCQ's sister publication, DC VELOCITY. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
As his title suggests, Brent T. Johnson, Intermountain Healthcare's vice president supply chain & support services and chief purchasing officer, oversees some areas that don't normally fall under a supply chain professional's purview. In addition to managing the company's US $1.5 billion nonlabor spend, he's responsible for a number of other functions that are pivotal to the Utah-based health-care provider's success, such as laundry and linen services, sustainability, environmental services, clinical engineering, food and nutrition, information technology asset management, and printing.
Intermountain Healthcare's senior leadership views supply chain management as strategically important for the company, and it has supported major investments in labor and facility resources that bring added value, Johnson says. In 2012, the company demonstrated its commitment to supply chain excellence by opening the US $40 million Intermountain Kem C. Gardner Supply Chain Center, a 327,000-square-foot distribution, warehouse, and office complex near Salt Lake City, Utah, that employs more than 350 people. The facility, which has qualified for Gold LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification, stocks and distributes more than 2.5 million medical items annually. The center also brings together under a single roof some of the programs and services that previously had been scattered across Intermountain's system. By so doing, the company has centralized the control of purchasing, warehousing, transportation, distribution, and other traditional supply chain functions.
To Johnson's mind there's good reason to bring all that and more under the supply chain umbrella. The nonprofit's supply chain organization, he believes, has the expertise and problem-solving skills to improve many of the processes and activities that support Intermountain Healthcare's network of hospitals, clinics, pharmacies, a health plans division, and other health services. The more efficiently and cost-effectively they are managed, the better the outcome for patient and provider alike, he says.
In this interview, Johnson—who came to the health care field from the electric utility industry—tells Managing Editor Toby Gooley how this inclusive approach and best practices he's adopting from other industries will help the company reduce the cost of providing health services while maintaining its high standard of care.
Name: Brent T. Johnson Title: Vice President Supply Chain & Support Services Organization: Intermountain Healthcare Education: Bachelor of Arts in Finance, Weber State University; Master of Business Administration, University of Utah Business Experience: Director Supply Chain at PacifiCorp; Senior Supply Chain Consultant, Denali Consulting; Director Supply Chain at ARUP Laboratories
Whom does the new supply chain center serve?
It was built to serve one company: Intermountain Healthcare. We're the largest company in Utah, with 33,000 employees, 22 hospitals, 185 clinics, and 26 retail pharmacies, plus a health plan. The distribution center will support all operations for all of the hospitals, the clinics, and our home-care service.
What functional areas does the supply chain center handle, and what makes that unusual?
The whole campus totals about 327,000 square feet of building space, but only 160,000 of that is the distribution center. The administrative building is 60,000 square feet, and there's a 40,000-square-foot materials management and logistics wing. We also have a 60,000-square-foot ancillary services building.
There are other, similarly large DCs in the health-care industry, but few are built adjacent to or combined with supply chain management functions the way ours is. Everything that's involved in managing our supply chain is in this one center: purchasing, accounts payable, sourcing, analytics, information systems, logistics—including our courier department, which has 140 people and 80 vehicles—distribution, and warehousing. We have a call center for supply chain functions and a medical-surgical recall management center. Sustainability also reports to supply chain.
We also put waste stream management, publishing services, and linen services under the supply chain function. For example, we have a central laundry that reports to me, and linen services is co-located in the same facility so that we are now cross-docking linens to hospitals. That's unique in health care, where they typically don't manage these types of activities as rigorously as other aspects of the business. Generally if health-care providers have extra money, they spend it on clinical care. They don't realize that having poor technology and processes does impact clinical care.
We evaluated 12 to 15 other programs [for possible location at the supply chain campus]. We selected whichever ones had the best business case. Some we own, and some are outsourced but we control them.
You expect savings of about $200 million over the first five years the supply chain center is in operation. Where will those savings come from?
The savings will come from a number of areas, starting with managing the contracts for and distribution of our basic medical and surgical products. This includes over 200 contracts with 7,000 products. Some of the savings will come from lower pricing. More will come from efficiencies—fewer touches—and even more will come from increased service levels that will impact patient care and remove the supply burden from the nurses. Also, from one distribution center, we intend to reduce by one-third the 15,000 road miles we put on to deliver products and equipment to our facilities. We will cross-dock many other products from other supply chains that make sense—clinical, pharmaceutical, lab, IT, linen, food, MRO [maintenance, repair, and operations], etc.
But we expect four other areas, from our ancillary services that are co-located at the supply chain center, to generate more value and savings. The first is pharmacy services. We installed a 20,000-square-foot pharmaceutical fulfillment center and invested in $8 to $10 million of robotic equipment. We buy pharmaceuticals in bulk and use the robots to break them down and prepackage orders. That way every hospital doesn't have to buy in bulk, which means that they don't have to buy more than they need. This system helps us manage expiration dates, too. We expect to reduce pharmaceuticals inventory for hospitals and our 26 retail pharmacies, many of them in our clinics, by 40 percent. We have a pharmacy call center on site, and we can take advantage of the warehouse and courier services being located together on the same campus.
Number two is printing. Before, printing was being done all over the place. Now we print 800 million pieces a year coordinated from this one location for the whole company. The supply chain function manages it, and we see lots of opportunities to reduce costs.
Third is IT asset management. We have centralized the storage and shipping of equipment, and we use our own couriers to deliver things like laptops, printers, and copiers. We ship out about 1,200 devices a month. All of the used assets come back here for asset recovery.
And fourth is our ancillary imaging equipment service program. We have 2,000 or so imaging devices in our system. Rather than outsource that, we started hiring our own technicians and are managing it ourselves. They have their own call center and space for sourcing, repair, and storage here on the supply chain campus.
We are also saving a lot of money in procurement. We have the most robust purchasing card system in health care. By implementing about 5,000 "p-cards" we removed 250,000 transactions worth $70 million a year from our system, including travel, fleet management, and asset recovery, among others.
In what other ways is Intermountain's supply chain strategy different than most in the health care industry?
We have implemented Low Unit of Measure (LUM) technology in our medical-surgical distribution operations, where we bypass our own warehouses at the hospitals and deliver standardized products in LUM totes every night to every nursing floor and clinic. To do this we have installed high-end technology conveyor systems and voice-directed picking to maximize efficiency and improve quality.
Another key to success was standardizing products across the system's 22 hospitals. This took extensive efforts working with nursing product committees. When you have to pay for the touch and inventory of every item, it becomes very important to you. Often these costs are hidden behind distributors and other supply chain partners.
Any other changes in the works?
If you look at all the operations that make up Intermountain, you will see that there are a lot of supply chains. Medical and surgical supplies are only one aspect. We also have food and nutrition, IT, clinical engineering, and others. They all have their own supply chains, and they have their own way of getting supplies and materials in and out. We've gotten very good at managing medical supplies, which represents the largest volume. Now we're looking at those other supply chains to see what value we can add by handling them.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”