At Intermountain Healthcare, Brent Johnson oversees a remarkably wide range of activities--everything from warehousing and transportation to sustainability and laundry services. Bringing all that and more under the supply chain umbrella, he says, leads to better service at lower cost.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a freelance writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, material handling, and international trade. She previously was Editor at CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. and Senior Editor of SCQ's sister publication, DC VELOCITY. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
As his title suggests, Brent T. Johnson, Intermountain Healthcare's vice president supply chain & support services and chief purchasing officer, oversees some areas that don't normally fall under a supply chain professional's purview. In addition to managing the company's US $1.5 billion nonlabor spend, he's responsible for a number of other functions that are pivotal to the Utah-based health-care provider's success, such as laundry and linen services, sustainability, environmental services, clinical engineering, food and nutrition, information technology asset management, and printing.
Intermountain Healthcare's senior leadership views supply chain management as strategically important for the company, and it has supported major investments in labor and facility resources that bring added value, Johnson says. In 2012, the company demonstrated its commitment to supply chain excellence by opening the US $40 million Intermountain Kem C. Gardner Supply Chain Center, a 327,000-square-foot distribution, warehouse, and office complex near Salt Lake City, Utah, that employs more than 350 people. The facility, which has qualified for Gold LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification, stocks and distributes more than 2.5 million medical items annually. The center also brings together under a single roof some of the programs and services that previously had been scattered across Intermountain's system. By so doing, the company has centralized the control of purchasing, warehousing, transportation, distribution, and other traditional supply chain functions.
To Johnson's mind there's good reason to bring all that and more under the supply chain umbrella. The nonprofit's supply chain organization, he believes, has the expertise and problem-solving skills to improve many of the processes and activities that support Intermountain Healthcare's network of hospitals, clinics, pharmacies, a health plans division, and other health services. The more efficiently and cost-effectively they are managed, the better the outcome for patient and provider alike, he says.
In this interview, Johnson—who came to the health care field from the electric utility industry—tells Managing Editor Toby Gooley how this inclusive approach and best practices he's adopting from other industries will help the company reduce the cost of providing health services while maintaining its high standard of care.
Name: Brent T. Johnson Title: Vice President Supply Chain & Support Services Organization: Intermountain Healthcare Education: Bachelor of Arts in Finance, Weber State University; Master of Business Administration, University of Utah Business Experience: Director Supply Chain at PacifiCorp; Senior Supply Chain Consultant, Denali Consulting; Director Supply Chain at ARUP Laboratories
Whom does the new supply chain center serve?
It was built to serve one company: Intermountain Healthcare. We're the largest company in Utah, with 33,000 employees, 22 hospitals, 185 clinics, and 26 retail pharmacies, plus a health plan. The distribution center will support all operations for all of the hospitals, the clinics, and our home-care service.
What functional areas does the supply chain center handle, and what makes that unusual?
The whole campus totals about 327,000 square feet of building space, but only 160,000 of that is the distribution center. The administrative building is 60,000 square feet, and there's a 40,000-square-foot materials management and logistics wing. We also have a 60,000-square-foot ancillary services building.
There are other, similarly large DCs in the health-care industry, but few are built adjacent to or combined with supply chain management functions the way ours is. Everything that's involved in managing our supply chain is in this one center: purchasing, accounts payable, sourcing, analytics, information systems, logistics—including our courier department, which has 140 people and 80 vehicles—distribution, and warehousing. We have a call center for supply chain functions and a medical-surgical recall management center. Sustainability also reports to supply chain.
We also put waste stream management, publishing services, and linen services under the supply chain function. For example, we have a central laundry that reports to me, and linen services is co-located in the same facility so that we are now cross-docking linens to hospitals. That's unique in health care, where they typically don't manage these types of activities as rigorously as other aspects of the business. Generally if health-care providers have extra money, they spend it on clinical care. They don't realize that having poor technology and processes does impact clinical care.
We evaluated 12 to 15 other programs [for possible location at the supply chain campus]. We selected whichever ones had the best business case. Some we own, and some are outsourced but we control them.
You expect savings of about $200 million over the first five years the supply chain center is in operation. Where will those savings come from?
The savings will come from a number of areas, starting with managing the contracts for and distribution of our basic medical and surgical products. This includes over 200 contracts with 7,000 products. Some of the savings will come from lower pricing. More will come from efficiencies—fewer touches—and even more will come from increased service levels that will impact patient care and remove the supply burden from the nurses. Also, from one distribution center, we intend to reduce by one-third the 15,000 road miles we put on to deliver products and equipment to our facilities. We will cross-dock many other products from other supply chains that make sense—clinical, pharmaceutical, lab, IT, linen, food, MRO [maintenance, repair, and operations], etc.
But we expect four other areas, from our ancillary services that are co-located at the supply chain center, to generate more value and savings. The first is pharmacy services. We installed a 20,000-square-foot pharmaceutical fulfillment center and invested in $8 to $10 million of robotic equipment. We buy pharmaceuticals in bulk and use the robots to break them down and prepackage orders. That way every hospital doesn't have to buy in bulk, which means that they don't have to buy more than they need. This system helps us manage expiration dates, too. We expect to reduce pharmaceuticals inventory for hospitals and our 26 retail pharmacies, many of them in our clinics, by 40 percent. We have a pharmacy call center on site, and we can take advantage of the warehouse and courier services being located together on the same campus.
Number two is printing. Before, printing was being done all over the place. Now we print 800 million pieces a year coordinated from this one location for the whole company. The supply chain function manages it, and we see lots of opportunities to reduce costs.
Third is IT asset management. We have centralized the storage and shipping of equipment, and we use our own couriers to deliver things like laptops, printers, and copiers. We ship out about 1,200 devices a month. All of the used assets come back here for asset recovery.
And fourth is our ancillary imaging equipment service program. We have 2,000 or so imaging devices in our system. Rather than outsource that, we started hiring our own technicians and are managing it ourselves. They have their own call center and space for sourcing, repair, and storage here on the supply chain campus.
We are also saving a lot of money in procurement. We have the most robust purchasing card system in health care. By implementing about 5,000 "p-cards" we removed 250,000 transactions worth $70 million a year from our system, including travel, fleet management, and asset recovery, among others.
In what other ways is Intermountain's supply chain strategy different than most in the health care industry?
We have implemented Low Unit of Measure (LUM) technology in our medical-surgical distribution operations, where we bypass our own warehouses at the hospitals and deliver standardized products in LUM totes every night to every nursing floor and clinic. To do this we have installed high-end technology conveyor systems and voice-directed picking to maximize efficiency and improve quality.
Another key to success was standardizing products across the system's 22 hospitals. This took extensive efforts working with nursing product committees. When you have to pay for the touch and inventory of every item, it becomes very important to you. Often these costs are hidden behind distributors and other supply chain partners.
Any other changes in the works?
If you look at all the operations that make up Intermountain, you will see that there are a lot of supply chains. Medical and surgical supplies are only one aspect. We also have food and nutrition, IT, clinical engineering, and others. They all have their own supply chains, and they have their own way of getting supplies and materials in and out. We've gotten very good at managing medical supplies, which represents the largest volume. Now we're looking at those other supply chains to see what value we can add by handling them.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”