In the United States, consumer demand drives the economy. For most supply chain managers, therefore, consumer behavior matters.
And how is the American consumer faring these days? Even in the face of uncertainty—about anticipated economic growth, expected improvements in job prospects, and growth in housing wealth and equity markets—consumers have continued to manage their household finances and spending. But when they do shop, they are less likely to spend their money at traditional brick-and-mortar stores than in the past.
More spending, less saving
Real personal consumption expenditures grew 2.6 percent (annual rate) in the final quarter of 2013—the strongest annual increase since the first quarter of 2012. That growth was not uniform across all sectors, however. Although the fourth quarter saw stronger-than-usual spending on nondurable goods and services, durable goods spending was weaker than expected. Some of the added strength in nondurables was weather-related—spending on clothing, heating oil, natural gas services, and electricity increased—because November and December were unseasonably cold.
For the full year 2013, real consumer spending growth came in at 2.0 percent, the weakest showing since 2010. Real disposable income, meanwhile, grew a measly 0.7 percent, the weakest growth since 2009. Both are shown in Figure 1. The payroll-tax cut that expired in January 2013 took 2 percentage points out of households' paychecks and approximately 1 percent out of disposable income. With less after-tax income, many Americans put less money aside, sending the savings rate down to 4.5 percent in 2013, the lowest since 2007. (See Figure 2.)
Despite the weak growth in disposable income and spending during 2013, the average monthly reading of the Reuters/University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index for the year was the highest since 2007. Indeed, consumers had some encouraging news in 2013, as the housing market gained traction, job prospects improved, and inflation remained relatively subdued.
Housing strength and consumer spending
Housing prices and sales gained significant traction in 2013, although they are still below their 2006 peaks. The relatively strong housing numbers helped boost consumer spending in two ways. First, new and existing home sales are associated with increased purchases of "white goods" (home appliances, such as refrigerators, dryers, and washers). And second, the so-called "wealth effect" also had an impact. Many economists believe that people are likely to increase their spending when they "feel" wealthier or when their actual assets (typically real estate and stock holdings) increase in value, and that appeared to be the case in 2013.
In the third quarter of 2012 household net worth surpassed its previous peak, registered in the third quarter of 2007, by US $511.5 billion. By the fourth quarter of 2010, household financial asset holdings surpassed its previous peak, also set in the third quarter of 2007. In addition, household nonfinancial asset holdings (mostly real estate) are likely to surpass their previous peak, registered in the first quarter of 2007, during the second quarter of 2014.
Then again, not all wealth is created equal. Econometric research by Nobel laureate Robert J. Shiller clearly indicates that an increase in real housing wealth has a stronger impact on consumer spending than does an increase in financial wealth. Rates of home ownership are still elevated in the United States, so gains in housing wealth are distributed more widely through the economy. Since the fourth quarter of 2012 and through the third quarter of 2013, household nonfinancial asset growth outpaced the growth of household financial assets. In fact, year-over-year quarterly growth in household nonfinancial assets was in the 9.3-percent to 10.2-percent range in every quarter of 2013. Thus, due to higher household wealth, consumer spending kept pace with 2012 despite anemic increases in disposable income.
A few other indicators suggest that consumers' prospects may be improving somewhat. For instance, wage gains have started to outpace price increases on a year-over-year basis, mostly because price increases were very modest. (See Figure 3.) This helps consumers' budgets, as they are able to maintain a certain level of purchasing power. Both job opportunities and the unemployment rate improved in 2013; however, declines in the unemployment rate were mostly attributable to many people leaving the labor force.
Lackluster holiday retail sales
Holiday retail sales—defined as not seasonally adjusted November plus December retail sales less autos, gasoline, and food services—increased 3.3 percent in 2013 compared to 2012. Any increase is a boost to the economy, but last year's growth was the weakest since 2009.
"Black Friday" week (the busy holiday shopping period immediately following Thanksgiving) was not particularly stellar on the brick-and-mortar front. In fact, many retailers experienced an inventory build-up in November due to lackluster sales. Moreover, many retailers introduced heavy price discounting in order to lure shoppers into their stores, hoping to increase revenue by bringing in more foot traffic and generating more sales even as their per-unit margins were hurt. In addition, slower growth in many emerging markets and eurozone economies has kept global commodity and import prices relatively muted. Consumer goods prices, excluding food and energy, fell on a year-over-year basis every month in the last two quarters of 2013.
Looking ahead
Retailers whose profitability took a strong hit last year are unlikely to discount as heavily in the last quarter of 2014 as they did during the holiday season of 2013. In addition, they are likely to keep inventory holdings on the low side next holiday season to minimize the risk of engaging in excessive price discounting in order to move product if sales are weak.
The outlook for online retailing is more upbeat, however. E-commerce retail sales represented 6 percent of retail trade (total retail sales less food services) in the fourth quarter of 2013 and are likely to grow to 7.0 percent of retail trade by 2016.
In sum, although retail supply chain managers should see relatively robust purchasing activity by American consumers this year, retail chains will be very cautious with their inventory stocking levels. With online sales growth expected to outpace the growth of traditional in-store sales, 2014 could turn out to be a challenging year for retail store supply chains, especially in the last two quarters of the year.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.