In the United States, consumer demand drives the economy. For most supply chain managers, therefore, consumer behavior matters.
And how is the American consumer faring these days? Even in the face of uncertainty—about anticipated economic growth, expected improvements in job prospects, and growth in housing wealth and equity markets—consumers have continued to manage their household finances and spending. But when they do shop, they are less likely to spend their money at traditional brick-and-mortar stores than in the past.
More spending, less saving
Real personal consumption expenditures grew 2.6 percent (annual rate) in the final quarter of 2013—the strongest annual increase since the first quarter of 2012. That growth was not uniform across all sectors, however. Although the fourth quarter saw stronger-than-usual spending on nondurable goods and services, durable goods spending was weaker than expected. Some of the added strength in nondurables was weather-related—spending on clothing, heating oil, natural gas services, and electricity increased—because November and December were unseasonably cold.
For the full year 2013, real consumer spending growth came in at 2.0 percent, the weakest showing since 2010. Real disposable income, meanwhile, grew a measly 0.7 percent, the weakest growth since 2009. Both are shown in Figure 1. The payroll-tax cut that expired in January 2013 took 2 percentage points out of households' paychecks and approximately 1 percent out of disposable income. With less after-tax income, many Americans put less money aside, sending the savings rate down to 4.5 percent in 2013, the lowest since 2007. (See Figure 2.)
Despite the weak growth in disposable income and spending during 2013, the average monthly reading of the Reuters/University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index for the year was the highest since 2007. Indeed, consumers had some encouraging news in 2013, as the housing market gained traction, job prospects improved, and inflation remained relatively subdued.
Housing strength and consumer spending
Housing prices and sales gained significant traction in 2013, although they are still below their 2006 peaks. The relatively strong housing numbers helped boost consumer spending in two ways. First, new and existing home sales are associated with increased purchases of "white goods" (home appliances, such as refrigerators, dryers, and washers). And second, the so-called "wealth effect" also had an impact. Many economists believe that people are likely to increase their spending when they "feel" wealthier or when their actual assets (typically real estate and stock holdings) increase in value, and that appeared to be the case in 2013.
In the third quarter of 2012 household net worth surpassed its previous peak, registered in the third quarter of 2007, by US $511.5 billion. By the fourth quarter of 2010, household financial asset holdings surpassed its previous peak, also set in the third quarter of 2007. In addition, household nonfinancial asset holdings (mostly real estate) are likely to surpass their previous peak, registered in the first quarter of 2007, during the second quarter of 2014.
Then again, not all wealth is created equal. Econometric research by Nobel laureate Robert J. Shiller clearly indicates that an increase in real housing wealth has a stronger impact on consumer spending than does an increase in financial wealth. Rates of home ownership are still elevated in the United States, so gains in housing wealth are distributed more widely through the economy. Since the fourth quarter of 2012 and through the third quarter of 2013, household nonfinancial asset growth outpaced the growth of household financial assets. In fact, year-over-year quarterly growth in household nonfinancial assets was in the 9.3-percent to 10.2-percent range in every quarter of 2013. Thus, due to higher household wealth, consumer spending kept pace with 2012 despite anemic increases in disposable income.
A few other indicators suggest that consumers' prospects may be improving somewhat. For instance, wage gains have started to outpace price increases on a year-over-year basis, mostly because price increases were very modest. (See Figure 3.) This helps consumers' budgets, as they are able to maintain a certain level of purchasing power. Both job opportunities and the unemployment rate improved in 2013; however, declines in the unemployment rate were mostly attributable to many people leaving the labor force.
Lackluster holiday retail sales
Holiday retail sales—defined as not seasonally adjusted November plus December retail sales less autos, gasoline, and food services—increased 3.3 percent in 2013 compared to 2012. Any increase is a boost to the economy, but last year's growth was the weakest since 2009.
"Black Friday" week (the busy holiday shopping period immediately following Thanksgiving) was not particularly stellar on the brick-and-mortar front. In fact, many retailers experienced an inventory build-up in November due to lackluster sales. Moreover, many retailers introduced heavy price discounting in order to lure shoppers into their stores, hoping to increase revenue by bringing in more foot traffic and generating more sales even as their per-unit margins were hurt. In addition, slower growth in many emerging markets and eurozone economies has kept global commodity and import prices relatively muted. Consumer goods prices, excluding food and energy, fell on a year-over-year basis every month in the last two quarters of 2013.
Looking ahead
Retailers whose profitability took a strong hit last year are unlikely to discount as heavily in the last quarter of 2014 as they did during the holiday season of 2013. In addition, they are likely to keep inventory holdings on the low side next holiday season to minimize the risk of engaging in excessive price discounting in order to move product if sales are weak.
The outlook for online retailing is more upbeat, however. E-commerce retail sales represented 6 percent of retail trade (total retail sales less food services) in the fourth quarter of 2013 and are likely to grow to 7.0 percent of retail trade by 2016.
In sum, although retail supply chain managers should see relatively robust purchasing activity by American consumers this year, retail chains will be very cautious with their inventory stocking levels. With online sales growth expected to outpace the growth of traditional in-store sales, 2014 could turn out to be a challenging year for retail store supply chains, especially in the last two quarters of the year.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”