Six defining challenges of omnichannel fulfillment
Retailers need to carefully craft an omnichannel strategy that effectively integrates online and offline distribution channels while complementing the company’s overall go-to-market strategy. It also needs to outline how to allocate inventory, where and when to fulfill orders, and how to handle returns.
The rapid growth of mobile technology and e-commerce continues to change the retail landscape dramatically. Although the growth in e-commerce has moderated since the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, recent forecasts from the National Retail Federation (NRF) indicate online sales continue to increase. The NRF projects that nonstore and online sales will grow between 10% and 12% year over year in 2023, to $1.41–$1.43 trillion.1 However, according to NRF, most of those sales are being driven by a multichannel or omnichannel approach with brick-and-mortar stores still remaining the primary point of purchase for 70% of retail sales. As a result, the line between traditional brick-and-mortar and pure-play e-commerce retailers is blurring. Both types of players are now omnichannel retailers in response to rising consumer demand for multiple buying channels.
This type of major shift in sales channels comes with many new challenges and opportunities. To gain a better sense of where retailers’ greatest concerns lie and how they are responding, the Omnichannel Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Transportation & Logistics (MIT CTL) conducted an online survey of U.S. retailers from October 2022 to April 2023 in collaboration with CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly’s sister publication DC Velocity.2 Of the 270 people who responded to the survey, 68% said that order fulfillment is the area of supply chain management that is most impacted by the growth in e-commerce. (See infographic on pages 12–13 for survey results.)
We believe that an effective omnichannel strategy must address the challenges of omnichannel fulfillment. Based on our research of omnichannel supply chains, including an analysis of those 270 survey responses, we have identified six omnichannel fulfillment challenges that companies must address in order to be successful in today’s continually changing retail space. The answer in many cases, we believe, will involve adopting innovative technology and processes.
Challenge #1: Align your omnichannel strategy
The first challenge is the need to revisit the company’s strategic plans. To succeed in implementing an omnichannel strategy, it must be aligned with the company’s corporate and supply chain strategies. In our survey, 54% of respondents indicated that redefining company strategy to provide a seamless omnichannel experience for customers was the number one challenge companies face when shaping omnichannel distribution strategies. However, those retail companies that do take such a strategic approach tend to be more successful.
Challenge #2: Integrate online and offline channels
To be successful in the omnichannel realm, retailers need to integrate online and offline channels to offer a seamless customer experience. Integrating these channels means using the same existing facilities (for example, stores and distribution centers) to prepare online and offline orders, or adding new facilities (for example, online distribution centers) to the network and managing the entire network as part of the same supply chain. In contrast, previous multichannel strategies like the one followed by Dell in 2000 used a separate network to fulfill and deliver products.
Sixty percent of survey respondents indicated that integrating online and offline channels was a top challenge that they faced when it came to creating an omnichannel distribution strategy. That’s not surprising as adding channels typically increases network complexity, and in most cases, retail companies need to redesign their networks, rethink the roles of stores, and add new fulfillment options. Indeed, 47% of respondents in our survey indicated that network design is one of the supply chain areas highly impacted by e-commerce.
Zara, a major player in the fast-fashion industry, is a good example of a company that implemented these changes.5 The retailer introduced online distribution centers and overflow warehouses in its existing network to fully integrate its online and offline distribution channels. Also, Zara’s flagship stores created a unified customer experience across channels by offering a larger assortment of products closer to the range of products offered online and employed stores to fulfill online orders.
Challenge #3: Decide how to allocate inventory
Once the network is redesigned, retailers must decide where and how to allocate inventory. The challenge here is keeping the right inventory level in each channel location that allows the company to meet its service level commitments without incurring excessive inventory costs. Some configurations decentralize inventory to move stock closer to the customer and to facilitate fast deliveries. Others opted for a centralized inventory model, allowing inventory pooling that typically lowers inventory volumes and stockout rates. There are pros and cons associated with each decision.
Forty-eight percent of survey respondents identified positioning the correct item at the right location as one of the top pain points when implementing omnichannel distribution strategies. And 30% indicated they are focusing on item allocation/inventory placement.
The higher the number of channels managed, the more complexity is built into the network. In the survey, 37% of respondents reported managing a wider variety of stock-keeping units (SKUs) and 12% confirmed they manage lower orders per SKU than they had previously. Both findings point to more inventory management complexity in omnichannel supply chains.
Challenge #4: Decide when to deliver
Some reports indicate that the race to provide faster delivery times is slowing down in the post-Covid era, which might offer some relief to retailers as fast shipping options typically come a high cost. However, 36% of our survey respondents indicated they are still looking into speeding up deliveries to support faster shipping.
Retailers must weigh the costs versus the benefits and decide which combinations of shipping options (such as 2-5 business days, next-day, same-day, and/or two-hour delivery) they will offer to meet their customers’ needs and the demands of different product types. Also, they must configure their inventory management strategies to support their chosen delivery offerings.
Challenge #5: Decide where to fulfill the order
More than a third of survey respondents indicated that deciding where to fulfill omnichannel orders poses a major challenge to today’s retail operations.
Different companies use different types of facilities to fulfill online orders. When order volume justifies it, some companies opt for dedicated e-fulfillment centers. Some brick-and-mortar retailers use their stores to fulfill online orders, while others employ their backroom spaces or “warerooms” for this work. Another option is to use dark stores or micro fulfillment centers.
Deciding which approach works best for their operations plays a key role in the formation of a company’s omnichannel strategy. Fulfillment cost, speed, and capacity are factors retailers must consider when deciding which solutions are the most appropriate. These varied choices are reflected in our survey findings. To fulfill online orders, respondents confirmed they are transforming existing facilities (22%), investing in more internal warehouse capacity (25%), and increasing warehouse capacity through outsourcing (19%).
Challenge #6: Manage commercial returns
As the growth of e-commerce has accelerated, the problem of how to manage product returns has grown both in complexity and scale. One study estimates that $816 billion worth of merchandise was returned in 2022, which represents 16.5% of sales on average.6 Return rates for online sales are higher than for traditional brick-and-mortar retailing (20–25% for digital sales compared to 10-15% for brick-and-mortar). Forty-six percent of respondents in our survey indicated that the growth in e-commerce highly impacts the volume of returns.
One of the reasons for this outcome is that companies use returns policies to replace the customer’s experience of being able to test a product in the store. Customers can buy items, receive and try them, and return the purchases if they are unsatisfied. This policy has made customers more willing to buy an item online that traditionally they would have been reluctant to purchase without trying it on or testing it out first. Excessive returns rates, however, are associated with multiple problems for retailers, including inflated costs for processing, shipping, handling returns as well as restocking and disposing of returned items. To continue to be successful in the online retailing world, companies will have to find an effective way to balance the customers’ need to test out products and the high cost of easy returns.
Innovation toolbox
The need to develop omnichannel fulfillment strategies that meet the demands of an unforgiving customer base represents one of the main strategic challenges retailers face today. Controlling costs while maintaining high service levels is a particularly thorny issue. Fifty-one percent of survey respondents identified higher logistics costs as their number one pain point when implementing omnichannel distribution strategies.
The good news is that retailers have a diverse set of innovative tools at their disposal to overcome these challenges. Notably, 37% of survey respondents said they are increasing levels of automation. Here are some of the innovations that retailers are deploying.
Mobile point of sale (MPOS). Retailers like Apple, Nike, and Adidas are trying to change and improve the in-store customer experience by utilizing digital tools in the brick-and-mortar store. MPOS allows customers to pay directly to store associates rather than visiting cashiers, thus avoiding lanes and wait times. The redesign of the in-store customer experience to incorporate some elements of the online customer experience can help to address challenge #1 (align your omnichannel strategy and your overall corporate strategy). For example, these changes can be made as part of an overall effort to make an organization more customer-centric.
Endless aisle. This technology brings inventory visibility to customers and staff through mobile touchpoints (for example, utilizing mobile device or touch screens located in the store to browse and order products that are not available in-store). Adidas is one company that uses this technology to display stock of available online products that can be shipped from their e-fulfillment centers. This technology enables stock visibility and allows customers to buy online from the store. The solution contributes to challenge #2 (integrate online and offline channels) by helping retailers provide customers with a seamless, integrated omnichannel experience. It also contributes to challenge #1 (redefining the company strategy), since the integration of channels should be part of the company’s supply chain strategy and business proposition.
Radio frequency identification (RFID). This technology uses electromagnetic fields to automatically identify and track tags attached to every single item. It allows retailers to improve inventory visibility and accuracy. RFID technology enables retailers to track their inventory in the store and across their supply chain networks. The technology also allows retailers to use in-store inventory to fulfill online orders, provides more timely information on product replenishment needs, and helps to reduce inventory levels.
Improved inventory visibility and inventory accuracy are issues covered in challenges #2 (integrate online and offline channels) and #3 (decide how to allocate inventory).
Augmented reality (AR) and virtual dressing rooms. This application of AR technology enhances the in-person experience, thereby reducing returns volumes, issues tackled in challenge #6 (managing returns) above. AR apps allow customers to see 3D images of products and provide better information about product fit. AR dressing rooms with RFID readers improve customers’ in-store experience (which helps to address challenge #1), increase sales, and allow retailers to offer online products to customers in-store. Implementing and rolling out this kind of real-time visibility technology takes time, requires flexible and agile processes that evolve jointly with the technology, and should be aligned with the SC strategy.
Retailers are also using technology to speed up the fulfillment of online orders. For example, in our survey, 30% of respondents confirmed they are using real-time inventory management solutions in this way. Cobots, robotic arm picking, and picking-to-light are other fulfillment solutions respondents are deploying to solve challenges #4 and #5 (deciding when and where to fulfill orders). These solutions require retailers to decide what technologies they should invest in, decisions that have a bearing on when and where orders should be fulfilled.
But our survey findings also indicate that while tech-driven fulfillment solutions are central to omnichannel strategies, they can also represent another challenge for retailers. Forty-one percent of respondents indicated that keeping up with relevant technological advances is one of the top pain points they experience when implementing omnichannel strategies.
In conclusion, customer expectations will continue to change, and supply chains must evolve and adapt to these changes. This is especially true with regard to the fast pace of technological change. AI and ML along with various automation technologies are evolving rapidly, and as users gain more experience with these innovations, new ways to apply them will emerge. It is vitally important that retail supply chain processes are flexible and agile enough to advance in synch with the advance of tech-driven innovation.
Editor's Note: This article from Dr. Eva Ponce of MIT appears in a special digital edition of CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly that looks at the retail supply chain. You can find the full issue here.
2. Conducted and analyzed by Eva Ponce and Laura Allegue at the MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics (MIT CTL), the 2023 edition of the “How is omnichannel transforming retailer’s supply chain?” survey explored the main omnichannel challenges that retailers have faced over the past 24 months. The project surveyed 270 logistics, warehousing, and supply chain professionals from a variety of industry sectors—including retailing, consulting/support services, and third-party logistics providers—from October 2022 to April 2023.
3. B. Lennox and C. Cordon, “Adidas Russia/CIS and the Russian crisis: retrench or double down—Case Study,” IMD (2016).
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.