By tailoring its supply chain strategy for specific product segments, the global beverage company reduced the risk of disruption to its growing Asian business. In the process, it gained a competitive advantage in this vast and variable market.
The vastness of Asia makes supply chain operations in that region especially susceptible to disruptions. A 2012 study by the Asian Development Bank reported that people living in the Asia-Pacific region are 25 times more likely to be affected by a natural disaster than are residents of Europe or North America. And it's not just natural disasters that can impact supply chains in that part of the world. Geopolitical upheavals, epidemics, currency fluctuations, port delays, terrorist attacks, and volatile fuel prices also can wreak havoc with Asian supply chains. Despite those risks, many companies view the Asian market as critical to their long-term growth. To succeed in that continent's diverse and far-flung markets, then, they must adopt strategies to confront such challenges.
One of those companies is Diageo plc, the global manufacturer and distributor of premium spirits, wine, and beer. Serving the Asian market is a complex undertaking for Diageo, which imports more than 60 percent of the product it sells in Asia from Scotland. That's because of country-specific differences in duties and regulations, a huge range of stock-keeping units (SKUs), the perishable nature of its products, the long lead times for transportation, and market demand volatility. All of those factors can influence inventory, warehousing costs, production flexibility, and customer service.
In order to ensure a steady supply of products to satisfy consumers throughout this diverse and challenging market, Diageo segmented both its product lines and its supply chain into three categories. The company tailored its distribution and inventory practices to each product segment, and used local manufacturing or postponement to minimize the impact of any supply chain disruption on its Asian business.
But the impact of this business model extends far beyond risk mitigation. The differentiated product/supply chain strategy also enabled Diageo to reduce its inventory holdings for certain products while still meeting consumer demand that is specific to national markets—a distinct competitive advantage.
Asia: Targeted for growth
Headquartered in London, Diageo plc is a multinational beverage company. As the world's largest producer of spirits, it owns such well-known brands as Johnnie Walker Scotch whisky, Captain Morgan rum, Smirnoff vodka, and Tanqueray gin. It's also a major producer of wine and beer, owning the Guinness label, among others. The company reported more than US $17 billion in worldwide revenue in fiscal year 2013 from sales in 180 countries.
Although North America and Western Europe accounted for 33 percent and 19 percent, respectively, of its net sales in fiscal year 2013, Diageo is looking to emerging markets for much of its future growth. The company is already well established in those markets. In 2013, South America represented 13 percent of net sales; Africa, Eastern Europe, and Turkey comprised 20 percent; and Asia and Australia 15 percent. But Diageo wants 50 percent of its business growth to come from emerging markets by 2017 and is aiming to lift Asian sales to 25 percent of overall revenue by then, says Joy Rice, Diageo's Asia-Pacific supply chain support director.
That may sound like a tough goal to meet, but the Asian market offers Diageo a tremendous opportunity to increase sales. For one thing, Rice says, Asians consume the highest volume of spirits in the world in terms of gross sales. For another, the Asia-Pacific region is home to one-third of the world's richest people, making it a target market for luxury goods like high-end beverages. But Asia-Pacific can't be viewed through a single lens, Rice says, because it includes discrete national markets with different social norms and customs, and various levels of income.
Efficient, responsive, and agile
To address those market intricacies, Diageo five years ago segmented its Asian supply chain into three categories, based on product complexity and predictability of demand. On a volume basis, most of the company's sales fall within what it terms the "efficient" supply chain category. The products in this category achieve high-volume sales, enjoy predictable demand, and don't require special packaging or treatment. They're generally made on dedicated production lines and can be shipped using the most cost-effective form of distribution. Examples of products in this category would be widely available, moderately priced brands like Johnnie Walker Black Scotch whisky or Smirnoff vodka.
The second segment—dubbed the "responsive" supply chain—includes lower-volume product with more volatile demand. To ensure supply in the face of fluctuating demand, inventory is held close to the market where it is consumed. Products in this category can also require customization, such as special packaging. An example would be Johnnie Walker Blue Scotch whisky, a higher-priced, premium blend sold in a silk-lined box with a certificate of authenticity.
The final category—the "agile supply chain"—includes product with highly unpredictable demand that must also reach the market within a critical time period. To ensure adequate supply for this product category, Diageo must have both manufacturing and distribution agility, as serving this specialty category can require production ramp-ups and even sudden exits of a product from the market. An example would be the new Johnnie Walker Explorer's Club Collection, specially packaged product that's only available in travel retail outlets and duty-free shops.
Diageo has established local production capacity for each of the three segments. The company considers manufacturing in Asia to be critical to its ability to provide Asian markets with consistent customer service and prevent supply disruptions. "It allows us to keep product closer to the market to reduce lead time," Rice explains. Moreover, local manufacturing is what makes it possible for Diageo to execute a differentiated supply chain, she adds.
At present Diageo operates 13 manufacturing facilities, either wholly owned, joint ventures, or third-party operations, in the Asia-Pacific region. Diageo's wholly owned facilities, located in Bundaberg, Queensland, and Huntingwood, New South Wales, Australia, and Incheon, South Korea, produce a wide range of products for the Asian market. Diageo also has joint-venture and third-party bottling facilities in China, Vietnam, Singapore, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, and Malaysia that produce spirits and beer, including some that are specific to local markets.
A key element of Diageo's Asian risk management strategy was the opening of a product-finishing and distribution center in Singapore in 2006. The center, which has the capacity to handle 8 million cases of liquor annually, allows Diageo to efficiently handle imported beverages. Imported product—for example, Scotch whisky, which can only be labeled as such if it is made in Scotland—is transported in bulk, in cases, and in kegs. It is held in the Singapore facility until there is a specific demand for it. The DC then applies the appropriate labels and tax stamps for the individual national markets and ships the order.
Because it can tailor products to local markets and ship them in response to changes in demand, the Singapore center supports Diageo's responsive and agile supply chain strategies. "It allows us to mitigate demand volatility," Rice says. But there have been other benefits, too. "Since its launch, we have improved customer service," she says. "The decision to finish some of our products in Singapore, rather than Scotland or elsewhere, has reduced lead time from eight to ten weeks down to one to three weeks."
In 2011 Diageo constructed a "super-premium" finishing center in Singapore, located adjacent to the first facility. The new center further supports the company's agile supply chain strategy by developing time-sensitive products for special occasions. For example, it creates special liquor packages for the Chinese New Year and Vietnam's "Tet" New Year celebrations. The center can even produce packages with special engravings on them. Performing these activities in a purpose-built facility has undeniable benefits. "Our super-premium finishing center allows for limited-edition, small-batch orders to be quickly assembled at short notice without compromising cost efficiencies and disrupting the supply chain operations for the rest of our portfolio," Rice explains.
A competitive advantage
While Diageo's approach has been very effective in mitigating supply chain risk in Asia, it has also helped Diageo better manage its costs and forward planning. For example, because the Singapore center allows Diageo to reduce long lead times for imported product, especially Scotch whisky, the company can hold less inventory in Asia and still respond quickly to local demand. "By establishing a distribution and finishing center and a super-premium center in Singapore, we're able to keep our products closer to markets in the region," Rice says. "Markets now have the option of placing orders with a shorter lead time and improved forecast accuracy."
Diageo's differentiated product strategy results in a competitive advantage in Asia, Rice says, because it gives the global manufacturer the ability to sell a range of products that meet different consumer demands, and thus capture a greater share of Asia-Pacific's various markets. Diageo's differentiated supply chain design and infrastructure, matched to specific product marketing strategies, makes all that possible. Says Rice: "Establishing differentiated capabilities in our supply chain allows us to support this strategy with speed and agility."
Documented processes and procedures are an important aspect of any successful distribution operation. Without process documentation, product gets shipped and not billed, customer orders and items get lost, and employees get upset. Distribution outfits need some form of step-by-step manuals, workflow diagrams, or digital instructions to ensure that operations run smoothly, consistently, and efficiently. However, creating and updating these documents has, historically, been time-consuming and resource-intensive.
Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI)—a subset of AI that can create content, such as text, images, videos, and other media—can help. This cutting-edge technology has the potential to streamline the process of creating documented processes and procedures. As a result, it can become a cornerstone for companies looking to optimize their distribution operations, streamline training processes, and provide a superior customer experience. What once seemed like a distant futuristic possibility is now a crucial tool for the modern distribution industry.
The cornerstone of consistency
Documented procedures standardize operations across all levels of the distribution chain, from warehouse workers to managers. When employees follow clearly defined steps, consistency in task execution becomes a given. This is especially important in large distribution centers where employees might work on similar tasks but in different shifts. Standardization helps maintain a consistent level of quality, regardless of who is performing the job. This not only enhances operational efficiency but also minimizes errors.
In addition to providing consistency, documented processes and procedures have several other benefits such as streamlining training and onboarding, enhancing knowledge retention, improving performance evaluation, aiding in continuous improvement efforts, and ensuring compliance with industry regulations.
Training and onboarding:Training new employees is a critical phase in any organization, but even more so in the distribution sector, where complex logistics and time-sensitive processes are involved. Clear, documented procedures make it easier to onboard new staff, reducing the learning curve and ensuring they can contribute effectively in a shorter amount of time. These materials are a reliable resource for employees, allowing them to refer back whenever they are uncertain about the correct procedure for a task.
In the past, training often depended on experienced employees showing new hires the ropes, which can be time-consuming and inconsistent. Well-documented processes eliminate this dependency and ensure that training is uniform across the board, leading to faster, more efficient onboarding.
Knowledge retention: One of the biggest challenges many organizations face is the loss of knowledge when experienced employees leave. A robust system of documented procedures acts as an institutional memory, preserving critical knowledge and ensuring that valuable insights and practices are not lost when staff turnover occurs. This continuity is essential for maintaining long-term operational efficiency.
Performance evaluation and continuous improvement: Standardized, documented procedures allow for more objective performance evaluations. Managers can measure employee performance against clearly defined expectations, identifying areas of strength and opportunities for improvement. In addition, these documents serve as a foundation for continuous improvement efforts. By periodically reviewing and refining procedures, businesses can adapt to changing market conditions, adopt new technologies, and optimize workflows to stay competitive.
Compliance and auditing: In today’s regulatory environment, compliance is non-negotiable. Documented procedures are vital in ensuring that a company complies with industry regulations. When processes are clearly outlined and followed, it is easier to demonstrate adherence to safety standards, labor laws, and environmental regulations. This helps avoid costly fines and simplifies the auditing process, reducing the time and resources required for internal and external audits.
The perils of unclear instructions
When warehouses operate without clear, well-documented processes, they expose themselves to risks and inefficiencies. Unclear expectations create uncertainty, which can ripple across the entire operation. Here are some common examples:
Inconsistent performance and increased error rates: Employees may interpret tasks differently without standardized guidelines, leading to inconsistent performance. Variations in completing tasks can result in some excellent but many suboptimal outcomes. For instance, one employee may prioritize speed, while another focuses on accuracy. This inconsistency affects productivity and can lead to a higher error rate in order fulfillment, inventory management, or customer service.
Even small errors can have big consequences in a fast-paced warehouse environment. Incorrectly filled orders, damaged goods, or delayed shipments can damage customer relationships and result in financial losses.
Higher training costs and reduced productivity: When processes are not clearly defined, training new employees becomes more resource-intensive. Without a formalized training program supported by documented procedures, trainers often have to spend more time demonstrating tasks and correcting mistakes. This increases the cost of training and diverts experienced staff away from their regular duties, thus lowering overall productivity.
Customer dissatisfaction: Customer experience is a key differentiator in today’s competitive marketplace. Consistency in processes directly impacts how customers perceive a brand. A positive, uniform experience across multiple interactions strengthens brand identity and fosters loyalty. Customers are more likely to become repeat buyers when they know they can rely on the distributor to deliver on its promises, whether that’s order accuracy, speed of delivery, or responsiveness to inquiries.
Inconsistent service inevitably leads to customer dissatisfaction. Customers expect a reliable and uniform experience, especially regarding delivery times, product availability, and order accuracy. A lack of clear, repeatable processes can make it more likely for a company to fail to meet customer expectations, leading to complaints, returns, and, ultimately, loss of business.
Difficulty scaling operations: Scaling operations becomes increasingly difficult when there is no standardized playbook to follow. As distribution centers grow or a company expands to new locations, replicating success becomes challenging if processes are unclear.
Scalable, consistent processes also allow companies to grow their operations while maintaining the same level of service quality. This scalability becomes a significant competitive advantage in a sector where margins are thin and efficiency is paramount. By ensuring that processes are repeatable and effective, companies can focus on expanding their reach and entering new markets without sacrificing quality.
The potential role of Gen AI
Gen AI is a game changer for distribution operations that are looking to create, update, or optimize their process documentation. Gen AI can drastically reduce the time and effort required to develop comprehensive procedural guidelines by automating and enhancing the content creation process. (Figure 1 above lists the main benefits of using Gen AI to create process documentation and procedures.)
One of the most significant advantages of Gen AI is its ability to generate content quickly. Whether creating initial drafts of process documents or updating existing procedures, AI can handle these tasks in a fraction of the time it would take a human team. AI can also customize the content for specific roles, locations, or scenarios, ensuring the documentation is relevant and applicable to various operational segments.
Gen AI can create documentation in multiple formats, including text-based manuals, visual flowcharts, and instructional videos. This flexibility allows companies to create a variety of training materials that cater to different learning styles and ensures that employees can access information in the format that works best for them. Furthermore, as procedures evolve over time, AI can easily update these documents, keeping them current and aligned with the latest operational requirements.
Best practices and considerations
While the potential benefits of Gen AI are clear, successful implementation requires careful planning and strategic execution. The following are some key considerations that companies must keep in mind as they use Gen AI tools in real-world situations:
Human oversight: AI-generated content should not replace human expertise but rather complement it. Subject matter experts must review AI-generated documents to ensure their accuracy and relevance.
Data quality: AI systems need access to high-quality data to be effective, so ensuring that your organization’s operational data is up-to-date is critical.
Ethical considerations: As with any AI system, ethical considerations must be taken into account, particularly regarding potential biases in the content.
Employee training: Companies must also invest in training their employees to use AI tools effectively, ensuring that they can access and apply the information generated by AI systems.
Security and privacy: As AI systems rely on sensitive operational data, robust security measures are necessary to protect this information.
Change management: Introducing AI significantly changes how employees access and use procedural documentation. Clear communication and training are essential to ensure smooth adoption and to help employees see AI as a tool that enhances their work rather than a threat to their jobs.
Embracing the future of distribution
The distribution sector is on the brink of a significant transformation in today's fast-paced, ever-evolving business landscape. The driving force behind this change is the rise of artificial intelligence and, more specifically, generative AI.
It’s important to realize that Gen AI is not just a tool for the future—it is a tool that can already be used today to improve distribution processes. Companies can create more consistent, efficient, and scalable operations by embracing this technology. AI is poised to revolutionize how companies document and update their distribution processes, which in turn can streamline training and onboarding and improve customer satisfaction and operational efficiency.
As the industry moves forward, those who integrate Gen AI into their operations will be better positioned to meet the demands of a dynamic marketplace. The future of distribution lies in the partnership between human expertise and AI, creating a synergy that drives innovation and sets a new standard for excellence in the field.
About the author: Steve Levy is the vice president of Enterprise Architecture for the distribution industry at Infor. Before joining Infor, he honed his skills and expertise working in the distribution industry and was the executive vice president at a wholesale paper distributor.
As the Trump Administration threatens new steps in a growing trade war, U.S. manufacturers and retailers are calling for a ceasefire, saying the crossfire caused by the new tax hikes on American businesses will raise prices for consumers and possibly trigger rising inflation.
Tariffs are taxes charged by a country on its own businesses that import goods from other nations. Until they can invest in long-term alternatives like building new factories or finding new trading partners, companies must either take those additional tax duties out of their profit margins or pass them on to consumers as higher prices.
The Trump Administration on Thursday announced it may impose “reciprocal tariffs” on any country that currently holds tariffs on the import of U.S. goods. That step followed earlier threats to apply tariffs on the import of steel and aluminum beginning March 12, another plan to charge tariffs on the import of materials from Canada and Mexico—now postponed until early March—and new round of tariffs on imports from China including a 10% blanket increase and the elimination of the “de minimis” exception for individual items under a value of $800 each.
Various industry groups say that while the Administration may have legitimate goals in ramping up a trade war—such as lowering foreign tariff and non-tariff trade barriers—applying a strategy of hiking tariffs on imports coming into America would inflict economic harm on U.S. businesses and consumers.
“This tariff-heavy approach continues to gamble with our economic prosperity and is based on incomplete thinking about the vital role ethical and fairly traded imports play in the prosperity,” Steve Lamar, president and CEO of The American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA) said in a release. “Putting America first means ensuring predictability for American businesses that create U.S. jobs; affordable options for American consumers who power our economy; opportunities for farmers who feed our families; and support for tens of millions of U.S. workers whose trade dependent jobs make our factories, our stores, our warehouses, and our offices function. Sweeping new tariffs — a possible outcome of this exercise — instead puts America last, raising costs for American manufacturers for critical inputs and materials, closing key markets for American farmers, and raising prices for hardworking American families.”
A similar message came from the National Retail Federation (NRF), whose executive vice president of government relations, David French, said: “While we support the president’s efforts to reduce trade barriers and imbalances, this scale of undertaking is massive and will be extremely disruptive to our supply chains. It will likely result in higher prices for hardworking American families and will erode household spending power. We encourage the president to seek coordination and collaboration with our trading partners and bring stability to our supply chains and family budgets.”
The logistics tech firm Körber Supply Chain Software has a common position. "The imposition of new tariffs, or the suspension of tariffs, introduces substantial challenges for businesses dependent on international supply chains. Industries such as automotive and electronics, which rely heavily on cross-border trade with Mexico and Canada, are particularly vulnerable,” Steve Blough, Chief Strategist at Körber Supply Chain Software, said in an emailed statement. “Supply chains that are doing low-value ecommerce deliveries will have their business model thrown into complete disarray. The increased costs due to tariffs, or the increased costs in processing time due to suspensions, may lead to higher consumer prices and processing times.”
And further opposition to the strategy came from the California-based IT consulting firm Bristlecone. “Tariffs or the potential for tariffs increase uncertainty throughout the supply chain, potentially stalling deals, impacting the sourcing of raw materials, and prompting higher prices for consumers,” Jen Chew, Bristlecone’s VP of Solutions & Consulting, said in a statement. “Tariffs and other protectionist economic policies reflect an overarching trend away from global sourcing and toward local sourcing and production. However, despite the perceived benefits of local operations, some resources and capabilities may simply not be available locally, prompting manufacturers to continue operations overseas, even if it means paying steep tariffs.”
Warehouse automation orders declined by 3% in 2024, according to a February report from market research firm Interact Analysis. The company said the decline was due to economic, political, and market-specific challenges, including persistently high interest rates in many regions and the residual effects of an oversupply of warehouses built during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The research also found that increasing competition from Chinese vendors is expected to drive down prices and slow revenue growth over the report’s forecast period to 2030.
Global macro-economic factors such as high interest rates, political uncertainty around elections, and the Chinese real estate crisis have “significantly impacted sales cycles, slowing the pace of orders,” according to the report.
Despite the decline, analysts said growth is expected to pick up from 2025, which they said they anticipate will mark a year of slow recovery for the sector. Pre-pandemic growth levels are expected to return in 2026, with long-term expansion projected at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8% between 2024 and 2030.
The analysis also found two market segments that are bucking the trend: durable manufacturing and food & beverage industries continued to spend on automation during the downturn. Warehouse automation revenues in food & beverage, in particular, were bolstered by cold-chain automation, as well as by large-scale projects from consumer-packaged goods (CPG) manufacturers. The sectors registered the highest growth in warehouse automation revenues between 2022 and 2024, with increases of 11% (durable manufacturing) and 10% (food & beverage), according to the research.
New Jersey is home to the most congested freight bottleneck in the country for the seventh straight year, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
ATRI’s annual list of the Top 100 Truck Bottlenecks aims to highlight the nation’s most congested highways and help local, state, and federal governments target funding to areas most in need of relief. The data show ways to reduce chokepoints, lower emissions, and drive economic growth, according to the researchers.
The 2025 Top Truck Bottleneck List measures the level of truck-involved congestion at more than 325 locations on the national highway system. The analysis is based on an extensive database of freight truck GPS data and uses several customized software applications and analysis methods, along with terabytes of data from trucking operations, to produce a congestion impact ranking for each location. The bottleneck locations detailed in the latest ATRI list represent the top 100 congested locations, although ATRI continuously monitors more than 325 freight-critical locations, the group said.
For the seventh straight year, the intersection of I-95 and State Route 4 near the George Washington Bridge in Fort Lee, New Jersey, is the top freight bottleneck in the country. The remaining top 10 bottlenecks include: Chicago, I-294 at I-290/I-88; Houston, I-45 at I-69/US 59; Atlanta, I-285 at I-85 (North); Nashville: I-24/I-40 at I-440 (East); Atlanta: I-75 at I-285 (North); Los Angeles, SR 60 at SR 57; Cincinnati, I-71 at I-75; Houston, I-10 at I-45; and Atlanta, I-20 at I-285 (West).
ATRI’s analysis, which utilized data from 2024, found that traffic conditions continue to deteriorate from recent years, partly due to work zones resulting from increased infrastructure investment. Average rush hour truck speeds were 34.2 miles per hour (MPH), down 3% from the previous year. Among the top 10 locations, average rush hour truck speeds were 29.7 MPH.
In addition to squandering time and money, these delays also waste fuel—with trucks burning an estimated 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel and producing more than 65 million metric tons of additional carbon emissions while stuck in traffic jams, according to ATRI.
On a positive note, ATRI said its analysis helps quantify the value of infrastructure investment, pointing to improvements at Chicago’s Jane Byrne Interchange as an example. Once the number one truck bottleneck in the country for three years in a row, the recently constructed interchange saw rush hour truck speeds improve by nearly 25% after construction was completed, according to the report.
“Delays inflicted on truckers by congestion are the equivalent of 436,000 drivers sitting idle for an entire year,” ATRI President and COO Rebecca Brewster said in a statement announcing the findings. “These metrics are getting worse, but the good news is that states do not need to accept the status quo. Illinois was once home to the top bottleneck in the country, but following a sustained effort to expand capacity, the Jane Byrne Interchange in Chicago no longer ranks in the top 10. This data gives policymakers a road map to reduce chokepoints, lower emissions, and drive economic growth.”
Know someone who is making a difference in the world of logistics? Then consider nominating that person as one of DC Velocity’s “Rainmakers”—professionals from all facets of the business whose achievements set them apart from the crowd. In the past, they have included practitioners, consultants, academics, vendors, and even military commanders.
To identify these achievers, DC Velocity’s editorial directors work with members of the magazine’s Editorial Advisory Board. The nomination process begins in January and concludes in April with a vote to determine which nominees will be invited to become Rainmakers.