The rail carload and intermodal segments are facing two different outlooks for 2023. Carload is performing better than expected, while intermodal is struggling to compete with trucking.
The rail industry is currently seeing two separate story lines develop as the intermodal and carload segments follow different paths. One is growing in line with the underlying economy, while the other is declining significantly on strong modal competition.
Intermodal was once thought of as the growth driver of rail volumes, and while it could return to those heights in the future, it has a steep hill to climb. The last 18 months have been ones of disappointment and uncertainty for intermodal. Both international and domestic freight volumes struggled to find their footing after a post-pandemic surge of traffic created congestion all along the supply chain. In recent quarters, intermodal has been buffeted by the tremendous uncertainty created by the lack of a labor contract for dockworkers at West Coast ports and the economic reality of lower-than-average active truck utilization.
While the International Longshore and Warehouse Union and Pacific Maritime Association tentatively agreed in June to terms for a new six-year agreement, it is less clear whether traffic will immediately start to flow back to the West Coast ports. Overall intermodal volume is expected to decline by 8% from 2022’s weak levels, before returning to modest growth in 2024.
Over the last few years, West Coast ports have lost market share to their East and Gulf Coast peers because of a combination of congestion and uncertainty over the now-resolved labor situation. The labor situation dragged on for nearly a year beyond when the West Coast port labor contract expired in July 2022, meaning many shippers diverted cargo for well over a year. In that time, they developed new relationships with drayage providers, ports, and warehousers that they may be unwilling to sever only to return to the West Coast and lose some alternative routes.
The move to East and Gulf Coast ports has eroded one of intermodal’s key advantages over trucking: length of haul. A 250-mile to 550-mile length of haul makes trucking much more competitive compared to rail intermodal than the 2,000-plus mile lengths of haul that are routine for imports from the U.S. West Coast into the interior.
At the same time, active truck utilization declined dramatically over the last few quarters and is below its long-run historical average, making truckers hungry for any and all available freight. As a result, intermodal has had to work to sell its value proposition at a time when rail service was also experiencing struggles. Lower truck rates, combined with the perceived better service reliability of trucking, has made for challenging competitive dynamics for rail intermodal as can be seen in FTR’s Intermodal Competitive Index shown in Figure 1.
That tough competitive environment is expected to remain in place until the second half of 2024, when it will ease back toward a more neutral footing over the course of the year. Until that happens, expect intermodal volumes to remain at or below five-year average levels.
Intermodal wildcard
Carriers have tried to adapt to the changing port dynamics and competitive truck market by introducing new and expanded services for intermodal containers leaving the Port of Houston, Texas. Gulf Coast ports have experienced tremendous growth in the post-pandemic period as shippers work to serve the growing Texas market. The new intermodal services, most of which started on June 1, are railroads’ attempt to capture some of this additional volume.
The wildcard when it comes to intermodal volumes is if and how flows change in response to the railway merger of Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern (CPKC) that took effect earlier this year. Mexico is expected to post its second consecutive year of double-digit percentage intermodal volume growth in 2023 before downshifting to low single-digit results. That expected downshift could be altered by the new service offerings and partnerships announced in the wake of the CPKC transaction. Not only has CPKC added several new partners and beefed up its cross-border offerings, but other railroads responded by creating their own expedited intermodal services from Mexico into the upper Midwest.
These services could cause Mexican intermodal to outperform the 2% year-over-year growth expected and help it break its traditional status as an intra-Mexico (rather than cross-border) move. It is too early to adjust the base expectation higher or to know what the magnitude of the impact will be from the new services coming out of Mexico.
Better than expected
In a marked contrast with intermodal, carload volumes are performing better than expected through the first half of 2023 and are expected to grow for the full year. Carload volumes are expected to increase by 2% this year, in line with or slightly faster than overall gross domestic product (GDP) growth.
Coal, the largest carload sector by volume, has held up better than expected through the first half of the year, despite low natural gas pricing that should be denting domestic demand. It is expected that coal volumes will weaken as the year moves along, but its first half steadiness is already enough to likely ensure it avoids a negative outcome for the full year.
Chemicals volume started 2023 essentially in line with the prior year and five-year average levels, but it has shown some weakness as the end of the second quarter nears. This is worrisome not just for carload volume levels but also for what it could mean for the overall economy, as the base chemicals produced in this sector feed a number of manufacturing and industrial processes across the economy. New chemical facilities set to come online in 2024 and 2025 should boost volumes over the longer term, but the next few quarters could be a challenge.
Crushed stone, sand, and gravel traffic remains a bright spot for loadings as it has for the last six quarters. Federal and state infrastructure dollars should keep that sector moving forward for quarters to come as additional money is disbursed.
Metals and automotive are two more sectors that appear to have a solid foundation for carload growth over the next few quarters, as automotive production remains strong to rebuild inventory and meet demand.
Forest products traffic, however, is likely to be challenged in the next few quarters as lumber copes with the machinations of the housing market and pulp and paper appears to be settling into a pattern of lower volumes for a longer period of time.
Key factor: service
In general, slow-and-steady growth is expected to rule the day moving into 2024 for carload traffic, while intermodal faces headwinds for the next year. While those competitive pressures for intermodal will abate slowly over the next year, it will be 2024 before volumes truly turn around. Indeed, the competitive situation is not expected to place intermodal on level footing with its truckload competition until late next year.
In the long run, the primary factor determining rail companies’ success—whether intermodal or carload—will ultimately be whether carriers can deliver on the service expectations of their customers.
Service levels remain an area of dispute between carriers and shippers. While progress was made early in the year for both overall velocity for intermodal shipments and dwell time, these two metrics slipped back toward historical averages at the beginning of the second quarter and held there for most of the period.
Meanwhile railcars online, which measures the total number of railcars actively hauling freight in the North American rail system, remained stubbornly high until the end of the second quarter. Typically having a high level of railcars online is good, but only if they are supporting freight growth. Over the last few years, however, shippers have been adding and keeping railcars in the fleet to compensate for poor rail service (and not growth). So in this case, as service improves and freight growth is slow, railcars should be coming out of the fleet. We did begin to see this trend in the waning weeks of the second quarter, as railcars online came to a level that is in line with its historical average and closer to the levels other metrics had been holding.
The ultimate test of the health of the rail sector going forward will be whether carriers can improve service levels, as they will have a large impact on rail’s ability to reclaim and maintain market share from trucking in the intermodal and carload realms.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.