Summer has been one for the history books as the market wrestled with UPS’ labor negotiations, FedEx’s restructuring, downshifting consumer spending, and slackening parcel demand.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly and a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
As the parcel express market moves from summer into fall, a perfect storm of carrier challenges, market shifts, an unsettled economy, and weakening demand is threatening to upend the best-laid plans of shippers—just as supply chains are beginning to normalize after two years of pandemic-induced turmoil.
Among the challenges:
A massive restructuring at FedEx designed to cut costs, consolidate ground and express parcel network operations into a new “One FedEx” organization, and ultimately shutter some 100 locations.
Slowing e-commerce volumes as consumers become more cautious, shift spending from goods to services, and return to shopping in stores.
Shippers dealing with stubbornly high rates as well as a rising tide of parcel and package surcharges and fees.
Understanding how United Parcel Service (UPS) will operate going forward and what will happen with parcel rates, now that it has secured a new five-year labor agreement for its 340,000 Teamster employees who pick up and deliver some 20 million packages a day.
Looking forward
The new Teamsters contract covering UPS workers, which Teamsters officials termed “historic” and “overwhelmingly lucrative,” raises wages for all workers, creates more full-time jobs, and includes workplace protections and improvements, according to the union.
UPS Chief Executive Officer Carol Tomé, in the company’s second-quarter earnings call, described the contract as a “win-win-win.” “Together, we reached agreements on the issues that were important to Teamster leadership, to our employees, and to UPS,” she said.
Tomé noted that the company, which moves 6% of the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) every day, did expect the negotiations to be “late and loud,” and as the noise increased through the second quarter, “we experienced more volume diversion than we anticipated.” She thanked UPS customers for their support through the negotiations, adding “for those customers who [diverted their business], we look forward to bringing you back to our network. We are now laser-focused on executing our win-back initiatives and pulling through the more than $7 billion of opportunity in our sales pipeline.”
According to the company, by the end of the new five-year contract, the average full-time UPS driver, in terms of total compensation, will make about $170,000 annually in pay and benefits. Part-time union employees who are already working at UPS will be making at least $25.75 per hour, by the end of the contract, while receiving full health care and pension benefits.
Between the labor situation, a tepid economy, and softer overall demand for package delivery services, UPS saw its second quarter 2023 revenues decline by 10.9%, to $22.1 billion. Strong cost controls, however, helped the company report $2.9 billion in operating profit.
Going forward, Tomé said UPS is focused on winning back diverted freight over time and participating in the industry’s peak shipping season, which she expects to be 21 days, “the same as last year.” “So [shipping’s] still going to pick up. It's just from a different volume level,” she notes. “And we're well prepared. ... It’s just another day with more volume.”
Meanwhile, at FedEx
In April, FedEx announced its plans to consolidate operations, which it expects to be fully implemented in June 2024. The move will bring together FedEx Express, FedEx Ground, FedEx Services, and other operating units into a single operating company under the FedEx brand, explained President and CEO Raj Subramaniam.
“Our new structure will provide a distinct focus on air and international volume, while facilitating a more holistic approach to how we move packages on the ground, utilizing both FedEx employees and contracted service providers,” he said.
Jenny Robertson, FedEx’s senior vice president of integrated marketing and communications, emphasized that the company is being deliberate and methodical, creating a more streamlined organization that will “help our customers compete through a fully integrated ground and air network.”
The plan calls for facility consolidations as well as reducing some redundant routes, including closing at least 100 facilities by 2027, although that number could change.
Robertson noted that FedEx had begun implementing some strategic consolidation initiatives before the pandemic, such as optimizing last-mile residential deliveries where FedEx Express contracted with FedEx Ground for the transport and delivery of certain shipments, but then the pandemic hit, and e-commerce-driven package volumes went through the roof.
Robertson emphasized that for FedEx as it emerges into its new, leaner form, “e-commerce and residential delivery are still the No. 1 area for growth. We see a lot of opportunity to realign our network to address and capture that growth.”
Surcharges creep up
Package volumes have clearly slowed and demand remains soft, but that hasn’t prevented parcel carriers from implementing tactics to protect yield and expand revenue per shipment, noted Micheal McDonagh, president of parcel for AFS Logistics, an audit and cost management specialist that manages over $4 billion in parcel spend annually for about 900 customers. He noted that in FedEx’s March earnings call, the company reported per-package revenue increased 11%, even with decreased volume.
“It’s interesting what is happening to yield” as well as stubbornly resilient parcel rates, he notes. Among the factors (or culprits if you are a shipper): fuel surcharges that go up quickly but don’t drop as fast when fuel prices decline; surcharges that were once instituted for weeks, but now extend for months or a full year; and late fees charged by carriers.
“[Carrier] payment terms used to be 30 days; now they want payment in seven to 15 days,” he explains. Then there are what used to be “peak” surcharges. In 2018, McDonagh recalls, peak surcharges started around Black Friday and ended around December 23.
“Now, post COVID, peak charges start in October and extend to January. And in some cases, they never go away,” he says. Large and oversized shipments are particularly vulnerable.
Another area is “remote” delivery surcharges, where the carrier charges an extra fee for rural or extended-delivery areas. “Delivery area surcharges extended during peak were $7.15. Now they are $13.25 for specific ZIP codes, and they don’t go away. No added service but an extra charge. It’s a great way [for the carrier] to increase revenue without adding cost,” he says.
As for how shippers can best protect themselves, McDonagh counsels customers to be strategic yet careful about spreading out their volumes among multiple carriers.
“Our recommendation is to have at least two carriers, but be careful,” he emphasizes. “A lot of discounts are based on revenue spend. The more you spend [with the carrier], the higher the discount. When dividing your volume among carriers, be sensitive with spend levels. If you fall down a tier, you lose the discount, and that could negate the savings you expected.”
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.