Now that inventory levels are shrinking and inflation is easing, trucking rates may have finally hit bottom. Could we be nearing the end of the freight recession?
Sean Maharaj is a vice president in the Global Transportation Practice of the management consultancy Kearney. Additionally, Maharaj is a chief commercial officer of Kearney’s Hoptek.
Balaji Guntur is a vice president in the Global Transportation Practice of the management consultancy Kearney. Additionally, Guntur is a co-founder and chief executive officer of Hoptek, a Kearney company focused on the trucking industry with a suite of software-based products.
The transportation industry has always been vulnerable to economic shocks or slowdowns, and the trucking sector has certainly seen its fair share of rough road conditions over the decades. The current cycle, however, is more severe than any that has occurred in the last two decades.
Several factors made for a perfect misalignment of supply and demand in 2022–23. Stubbornly high inventory levels and high inflation led to cooling demand for shipping. At the same time, increased trucking capacity entered the industry after the pandemic, which created a situation characterized by industry experts as a “freight recession.” Furthermore, leading up to the recent cooling off, there was a healthy run of profitability post-pandemic, which resulted in record high spot rates. As a result, the cliff from which trucking spot rates dropped was that much steeper.
However, even with more than half of the year in the rearview mirror, there’s so much more to unfold in the world of shipping and transportation in 2023. In terms of volume, the industry typically sees the busiest season beginning August through October. This period also contributes to the lion’s share of revenues. In 2023, we have seen a mixed bag of signals related to inflation, the job market, and the war in Ukraine. As a result, the jury is still out on the timing and extent of the much-touted recession.
The trucking market continues to remain “loose,” but as inventory levels shrink and inflation abates, rates are expected to recover. However, as persistently high inflation and recessionary headwinds continue, it isn’t clear if the trucking industry is out of the woods yet, so to speak.
Have truckload rates hit bottom?
According to ACT Research, spot rates bottomed out in April with May seeing a slight uptick. The transportation data analysis firm speculates that some of that upward movement was caused by a loss of labor, as approximately 50,000 jobs were purged in Q1 of 2023, potentially leading to more competitive terms.1 In fact, we could be looking toward the end of oversupply and the beginning of a recovery or transition phase in the second half of 2023. Most of 2023 thus far has been marred by tremendously low spot rates, which have pushed many smaller fleets and owner operators out of the market. That said, as hiring slows and smaller players exit, the market will see a rebalancing of supply and demand.
As evidenced by the ACT For-Hire Trucking Index in Figure 1, rates remain contracted for 2023, but May shows a slight uptick. Whether this indicates a bottoming out of rates will have to be proven beyond a sample of one data point, but many in the marketplace do believe that further rate reductions are unlikely to occur.
From a revenue perspective, the upturn in rates should help carriers forecast a little better for the remainder of the year. When the carrier “earnings party” came to an end in the third quarter of 2022, forecasting revenue for the near future became harder. For example, for Q1 2023 some carriers reported revenue as flat or only slightly up, while others saw revenue fall through the floor by double digits. It’s important to keep in mind that during the past year many carriers benefitted from heavy gains on the sale of existing assets at prices not seen before. Equipment prices, however, have been falling, and many believe they have not yet found their floor. So that revenue opportunity may not resurface again for the foreseeable future.
Much speculation exists around what will help to drive the trucking industry back to healthy territory. Financial pressures include, but are not limited to, inflation, slowing consumer demand, weakness in the technology and media sectors, and a general sentiment of market weakness across the board. However, projections of a recession happening in 2023 are confounded by a red-hot job market that is adding jobs at well above projected rates.
To get out of the current freight recession, the trucking industry will need to see volumes recover due to increased consumer spending. Meanwhile carriers are still dealing with the compounding effect of cost increases on their business, some of which are “sticky.” For example, removing fuel from consideration, some fixed costs—which include driver salaries, maintenance and equipment costs, and overall operating costs for a fleet—have risen by almost a third since 2019.
For the truckload sector, challenges will remain—no one is out of the woods by any stretch of the imagination. Initial indicators are directionally welcome, and the anecdotal feedback is turning somewhat more positive than prior months. Indeed, some organizations do seem to be anticipating better times ahead and are starting to consider investments across areas that will drive greater levels of efficiency, utilization, and execution.
LTL holds strong
In contrast to truckload, the over $80 billion less-than-truckload (LTL) sector continues to be the darling of the industry. LTL’s strong pace of growth is a result of a rapid acceleration of e-commerce trends during the pandemic years and the resulting improvements by fleets to achieve high levels of efficiency and profitability. While the industry slowed down a little at the end of 2022, it still maintains a healthy position. Thanks to industry leaders like UPS and FedEx, LTL players have adjusted pricing and business models that reflect strength across the industry. In fact, LTL carriers have even managed to fend off price erosion when demand softens. “The LTL carriers seem to have figured it out,” says Bob Costello, chief economist at the American Trucking Associations.
LTL carriers are less fragmented compared to their truckload counterparts, with the top 25 LTL carriers owning 80% of the market.2 In addition, existing providers also benefit from the sector’s intricate hub-and-spoke organizational structure, which is hard to replicate, creating a high barrier of entry and limiting new competitors. As a result, providers have the scale and ability to manage the industry forces currently at work.For example, at the start of 2023, some LTL carriers implemented general rate increases to account for changes in business costs and other related network factors directed at maintaining critical customer services levels in key lanes.
With the above in mind, we expect LTL rates to increase steadily for the remainder of the year, and potentially rise by single digits in 2024, especially as the effects of the recent bankruptcy of Yellow, the nation’s third largest LTL carrier, is already starting to be felt. While the industry is not immune to geopolitical factors, many experts project a positive outlook for LTL carriers.
Technology’s helping hand
Regardless of market conditions, carriers have an opportunity to improve their profitability by increasing their focus on technology and innovation. By harnessing real-time data, such as truck location and driver hours of service, carriers can improve their visibility into the state of their network. Artificial intelligence (AI) and real-time optimization can help them increase efficiency and utilization, lower operating ratio (OR), improve driver retention, and increase return on assets, while also meeting customer demands. Better data literacy and AI have also helped leaders to improve decision-making by addressing chronic challenges related to manual effort, tribal knowledge, and human judgement.
Those carriers that have embraced AI, real-time optimization, and digital freight search have seen a 20-point improvement in OR and a 70% reduction in driver turnover, while achieving up to 2,500 revenue miles per week. These statistics show that even though economic cycles in trucking are inevitable, carriers have an opportunity to leverage data and technology to ride through them and deliver consistently better performance and financial results.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”