The highs and lows of e-commerce shopping and fulfillment in the United States were on full display during the 2013 holiday season. Consumers hoping to avoid the congestion and chaos in brick-and-mortar stores increased their online purchases to US $69.2 billion for the fourth quarter of 2013, up 15.7 percent compared with the same period in 2012, according to U.S. Bureau of the Census figures. That growth in online sales, together with a surge in last-minute orders and an unusually short shopping season, made it difficult for U.S. shippers and the top two parcel carriers, UPS and FedEx, to fulfill e-commerce orders. Consumer outrage over late shipments forced a number of retailers, including Amazon and Kohl's, to respond by offering refunds and other financial concessions to affected customers.
While the events of the 2013 holiday season are now history, the challenges facing retailers and shippers are not over. In the high-growth, constantly changing e-commerce environment, every touch-point—from shopping, to purchasing, to fulfillment—presents an opportunity to either create a truly customer-centric experience or to cause customer dissatisfaction.
Keeping up with the consumer
To succeed in e-commerce fulfillment, retailers must find ways to meet consumers' increasingly high expectations. Online buyers desire a retail experience that combines the simplicity and security of online shopping with the ease and familiarity of in-store interaction. They expect their orders to be delivered within one to two days, and they want free or discounted shipping.
Consumers also demand a flexible store policy that allows for various combinations of purchases and returns, in-store or from home. Increasingly, they expect a unified and personalized shopping experience provided through a retailer's online/mobile app or by a knowledgeable in-store associate.
Developing the capabilities that are necessary to execute a desirable e-commerce strategy will require retailers to reassess and optimize their current services and operations. This will be challenging in an environment where changing consumer preferences continually alter business models. And it will only get harder as omnichannel expectations continue to rise and retailers are pushed to offer additional products and services, both online and in-store.
Innovation despite constraints
Retailers are continuing to innovate in response to market demand, but they're doing so within the bounds of several constraints. The biggest, perhaps, involves shipping capacity. The problems with shipping reliability in 2013, for instance, caused many to wonder whether capacity issues will persist as e-commerce continues to grow. It seems likely that the large retailers will continue to stretch parcel carriers' capacity during peak periods, forcing other retailers to develop alternative strategies. Additionally, recently announced plans by FedEx and UPS to institute volumetric pricing for all ground parcel shipments have major implications for retailers. Volumetric pricing is a response to the increase in e-commerce shipments—the lower ratios of package weight to package dimensions mean less cargo is carried in the same amount of space. Carriers hope that in response to their new rate policies, shippers will optimize their packaging and shipping practices by paying more attention to efficiency and weight.
Meanwhile, Amazon, the largest e-commerce entity in the United States, is rapidly and boldly developing a host of new services that are designed to improve its customers' experiences and give the company greater ownership of its supply chain. To limit its dependence on carriers, for instance, Amazon is developing an in-house fulfillment service that includes a private fleet that will handle some of its same-day and expedited shipments. In addition, it is piloting warehousing and logistics partnerships with manufacturers to reduce the cost and time required to get products to its customers. Amazon is also looking to utilize regional carriers in some areas and the U.S. Postal Service for less populated markets and Sunday deliveries. All of these moves circumvent much of the national footprints of UPS and FedEx.
While Amazon may have price and distribution advantages in online commerce, traditional brick-and-mortar retailers are seeking a competitive edge by developing capabilities that leverage their storefronts and online presence to create truly omnichannel experiences. In the white paper Are You Ready? How to Create an Always-On, Always-Open Shopping Experience, Capgemini Consulting identified four key capabilities that retailers must possess if they are to effectively compete in this increasingly important area:
Inventory visibility—systems and processes to accurately track and manage inventory in their networks
Web-ready products—improved information about products and services sold online, and reduced time and labor required for retailers to bring items to market
Predictive customer analytics—information utilized to anticipate customers' needs based on past behaviors, in an effort to enhance the continuity of the omnichannel experience
Fulfillment strategy—revision of processes, modernization of technologies, and updating of physical infrastructure to support the omnichannel experience
Retailers that are investing in their supply chains to support these four capabilities are making it possible to provide omnichannel experiences for their customers. With these capabilities in place, they are achieving increased sales through alternate channels, improvements in productivity and inventory accuracy, reduced shrinkage, and faster fulfillment of customer demand.
The new e-commerce landscape
A new e-commerce landscape is emerging as a result of the trends and developments mentioned above. Within this environment, retailers, online leaders, shipping leaders, regional carriers, and the U.S. Postal Service can all succeed by occupying different niches (summarized in Figure 1).
First, retailers should focus on developing omnichannel capabilities as a means of competing against Amazon, which has advantages in price, fulfillment capability, and speed. Meanwhile, online leaders, such as Amazon and Wal-Mart, will continue to leverage their size to invest in capabilities that allow them to lead the market on price and speed. On the shipping side, leaders such as FedEx and UPS should continue to invest in infrastructure and e-commerce-specific capabilities. If, however, Amazon develops transportation and delivery capability for itself, it will likely look to offer that as a service and could become a major competitor to the parcel carriers. Regional carriers and logistics service providers should consider partnerships with larger retailers and online leaders, build capabilities in niche markets, and examine methods for shipping products with specialized shipping needs (such as beverages, for example). And finally, the U.S. Postal Service should try to capitalize on its "last mile" scale and capability, positioning itself as an asset that can support other carriers and retailers that want to increase their delivery reach.
Companies seeking to navigate this emerging e-commerce landscape would be wise to determine whether or not their existing facilities can support the increasing consumer demand for omnichannel fulfillment. They should also understand what supplemental warehousing and fulfillment capacity and capabilities will be needed, and how retail models that allow for in-store pickup and return of online orders will need to be supported by warehousing and fulfillment operations. Both retailers and carriers should evaluate increased partnership with 3PL providers and other supply chain specialists to ensure they possess the capabilities required to handle expedited fulfillment and satisfy increasingly complex customer demands. Evaluating these areas will allow retailers and carriers to determine their strategic options, current operational readiness, and whether investment in new infrastructure will be needed to support their e-commerce business.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.