Health-care providers face extraordinary cost pressures today, due in large part to declining reimbursements for services. As a result, they are seeking opportunities to reduce costs without diminishing the quality of patient care. Medical devices are prime targets for these cost-cutting measures, and health-care providers are asking manufacturers for significant price reductions. What can manufacturers do to meet those demands?
They can start by eliminating significant waste and inefficiencies in the medical-device supply chain. To do this, medical-device manufacturers will have to make seven key improvements in their supply chains. The first three are operational improvements, and the last four are "cultural" shifts in how manufacturers and logistics service providers think about the medical-device supply chain.
On the operational side, the supply chain needs to be more streamlined, reducing the number of touch points so that there is less product handling. Next, there needs to be more transparency, so companies can better track products as they travel from the manufacturing plant to the patient; this will require a significant investment in technology in order to see a product's entire path through the supply chain. Third, companies will need to provide more resources for compliance to meet growing regulatory requirements. Deep expertise in health-care logistics is key to staying ahead of increasingly complex and critical regulatory changes—changes that are happening very quickly. In just the last five years, for example, our third-party logistics (3PL) business has seen a 300 percent increase in regulatory inspections of medical warehouses.
The next four adjustments relate to changing the culture of the medical-device supply chain so it will be better aligned to meet the new and growing challenges in health care. To begin with, the supply chain must be more flexible in its network design, to create new solutions that accommodate the growing shift in care from the hospital to more cost-effective locations, including patients' homes. Next, supply chain decisions must be more insightful, making better use of technology to establish clear demand signals that optimize inventory levels. Supply chain partners should be more collaborative, working together to create more effective shared warehousing and transportation strategies. Finally, all organizations in the medical-device supply chain need to be more nimble to manage the constant change in product complexity, regulatory compliance, transportation, warehousing, and points of care.
Implementing any one of these improvements will be difficult, and combining all seven into a cohesive strategy will be extremely challenging. But it is possible, and indeed will be essential to success in the new and fast-changing world of health-care delivery.
A three-part prescription
To implement the operational improvements mentioned earlier, creating new efficiencies and cost savings, medical-device manufacturers will need to take three actions.
1. Consolidate freight across manufacturers to improve efficiency. Based on our experience, approximately 65 percent of freight in health care today is transported via less-than-truckload (LTL) services. While the remaining 35 percent is transported as full truckloads (FTL), the trucks themselves are rarely full to capacity. In our experience, trucks typically operate about three-quarters full. Manufacturers that ship in truckloads do gain some time and cost savings compared to LTL, but significantly less than would be achieved if the trucks were running at full capacity. The most effective way to run at full capacity is to combine shipments from multiple manufacturers whose products are bound for the same destinations.
In addition to greater efficiency and cost savings, consolidation offers other important benefits. Because there are fewer product touches than in a traditional LTL approach, there's less opportunity for potential damage and claims, resulting in fewer shortages and losses. Plus, driving full trucks reduces transportation's impact on the environment. Fewer aggregate miles are driven, requiring less fuel and lowering greenhouse gas emissions.
2. Take advantage of multitenant warehouses to further improve efficiency. Traditionally, the warehousing of medical devices has been fraught with waste and inefficiency. In essence, each manufacturer creates its own supply chain infrastructure, building warehouses that typically have excess capacity from the start. These warehouses may only be 60-70 percent full at any given time, yet 100 percent of the infrastructure cost has to be maintained.
In fact, I have seen two manufacturers located side-by-side in the same industrial park, each with half-full warehouses. I've also seen a manufacturer with two full warehouses situated just a few miles apart. Neither scenario has ever made sense. In today's environment of relentless cost pressures, it's unsustainable.
As with transportation, the answer for warehousing is consolidation—in this case, combining inventory from multiple manufacturers in the same, shared facility. Doing so eliminates redundant expenses. This is especially important when it comes to the highest-cost services in health-care logistics, such as regulatory expertise. Medical-device regulations change constantly; rather than maintain their own experts, manufacturers that store products in the same facilities can share the regulatory costs with others. The same holds true for information technology (IT), which is another critical and high-cost function that manufacturers can share when they utilize a common warehousing infrastructure.
3. Eliminate excess inventory. Inefficient transportation and warehousing both lead to a common problem in health care: too much inventory sitting on the shelves instead of taking care of patients. Stories abound of nurses who hoard supplies on the hospital floors to make sure they never run out. Now magnify that to the warehouse level, and it becomes clear just how big the excess inventory challenge really is.
No wonder low inventory turns are a chronic problem in health care. For comparison, consider inventory turn rates in industries where supply chains operate far more efficiently. In consumer electronics, for example, the average inventory turn is 44. In the automotive industry, it's 10, and in consumer packaged goods, six. But in medical devices, the average inventory turn is just over two.
It's no surprise that maintaining excess inventory is rampant in health care. After all, patients' lives depend on these products, so health-care providers require high fill rates.
But there's a better way to achieve the necessary level of inventory availability than carrying the needless costs of hoarding products. It starts by creating full visibility and tracking of products, from one end of the supply chain to the other. In order to be able to take meaningful action based on your field inventory data, it is critical to get visibility at point of use. Finally, it's essential to build a warehousing and transportation infrastructure that can quickly act on this data, always maintaining the most efficient levels of inventory and then being ready to deliver products quickly, efficiently, safely, and cost-effectively to the point of care.
Driving success by the numbers
Building efficient supply chains can help medical-device makers save a significant amount of money in the changing world of health care. For example, by implementing best practices such as those outlined in this article, our company helped one medical-device manufacturer save more than US $2 million in transportation costs and $250,000 in regulatory costs in just 24 months. Another manufacturer achieved a total cost reduction of $550,000 over a 16-month period—with near-zero freight claims, a 5 percent decrease in transit times, and a reduction of variability within its supply chain.
For medical-device makers, achieving such dramatic cost improvements will not be easy. They will have to undertake the operational changes—becoming more streamlined, gaining more transparency, and focusing more resources on compliance—discussed earlier, as well as make the cultural improvements—becoming more flexible, more insightful, more collaborative, and more nimble—required to support those operational changes.
In the long term, it will be well worth the effort. As medical-device manufacturers come under increasing pressure from health-care providers to reduce costs, the supply chain can become a greater, more reliable source of new efficiencies and savings. Just as important: Improving health-care logistics can be a key not only to lowering costs, but also to improving the care of patients. Dollars saved today in the health-care supply chain can be redirected to research and development to improve or develop new medical devices tomorrow.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.