Four industry experts weigh in on what changes need to occur to achieve stability in the transportation market in this thought leadership panel discussion.
The past year has certainly been a challenging one for the transportation sector. Many companies have been hit hard by the freight recession as evidenced by the high-profile bankruptcies of trucking company Yellow and digital freight brokerage Convoy. In this exclusive discussion, four logistics and transportation executives address the current slowdowns in shipping, how inflation is affecting investments, and what they see is needed in infrastructure and legislation for improving our transportation systems.
Participants include: Rob Haddock, advisor consultant with the consulting company Albedo Logistics Solutions; Mitch Luciano, chief executive officer of freight service company Trailer Bridge; Allan Miner, chief executive officer of third-party logistics provider CT Logistics; and Chad Provencher, vice president of sales and strategic development for TranzAct Technologies Inc.
Rob Haddock
Mitch Luciano
Allan Miner
Chad Provencher
Q: What is the current state of the logistics market in which you serve?
Rob Haddock: The U.S. domestic truckload ground transportation market remains the softest I have seen since pre-ELD [electronic logging devices], as American consumers almost overnight transitioned their spending from goods to services, which require fewer trucks. The strong demand for goods due to the pandemic, partially funded by government stimulus, drove up the demand for transportation. Each shipper experienced their own levels of payload density degradation, with some seeing as little as a 5% decline, while others were shipping half truckloads just to get the product onto a customer’s shelf. As supply eventually caught up in late 2022 and early 2023, shipment payload levels improved at the same time consumers were ready to hit the road and travel. The result has been a significant swing in supply exceeding demand.
Mitch Luciano: We are currently in a tough logistics market with an imbalance of capacity and freight significantly impacting rates. The market is being driven by service—everyone’s rates are pretty much the same, so the differentiator is your commitment to service. It really comes down to how you have showed up for your customers throughout the COVID years. Did you provide excellent service? Do you have a strong relationship with your customer? How you have served your customers in the past few years is definitely influencing your success today.
Allan Miner: Shippers need to expand their carrier base, due to reduced LTL [less-than-truckload] and TL [truckload] capacity in North America because of mergers and acquisitions, whereby redundancy is being looked at for elimination of unprofitable lanes and segments for those regional LTL and TL carriers.
Chad Provencher: The logistics market has been lingering in a state where supply exceeds demand in most areas. We saw demand spike during the pandemic and then recede to normal levels while the expanded capacity continued to be available and put downward pressure on rates. The LTL market has been an exception due to the loss of capacity, which has impacted some areas more than others and resulted in a variety of outcomes. Predictions that rates would rise around the summer of 2023 came and went, and we’re now seeing estimates that a rebound will take place around the summer of 2024.
Q: Has recent spending on infrastructure improved supply chains?
Chad Provencher: So far, we haven’t seen any major impact from infrastructure investment. We see this largely as a preventative measure that will make major disruptions less likely in the future. In the short term, it could lead to increased competition for drivers as hiring for construction increases. The biggest possible change could come from the $7.5 billion allocation for building out a national electric vehicle infrastructure. While this probably wouldn’t impact freight patterns much, it could spur adoption of electric trucks and convert fuel surcharges to a more stable energy surcharge.
Allan Miner: Improvement in the technology and capacity of U.S. ports on all coasts has enabled the operations to absorb the increasing seasonal volumes of imports and exports.
Rob Haddock: Honestly, I am still waiting to see any results from infrastructure spending as the ATRI [American Transportation Research Institute] Top 100 bottlenecks are unchanged and the cost to the economy continues to rise. I was fortunate enough to be part of different state advisory shipper groups, and they are struggling with how to get ahead of the growing populations, especially in the southeastern states. I have been asked repeatedly about whether the ATRI report is reviewed by those allocating the infrastructure funds to ensure money is channeled to the pinch points most in need, and I am still waiting for a response.
Mitch Luciano: Infrastructure spending related to roadway improvement is essential. Another area that we’ve seen a direct positive impact from is deep-water ports. Here in Jacksonville, Florida, we’ve experienced this first hand where funding has supported the deepening of our waterway, allowing for more cargo to flow through the ports and creating opportunity for our business.
Q: What is the biggest single factor stifling potential growth in transportation markets?
Mitch Luciano: Right now, the biggest single factor impacting growth within our industry—and really in our world in general—are the current interest rates. Our customers aren’t able to get the funding needed to invest in their business because the cost is too high.
Chad Provencher: The downward pressure on rates is a major factor preventing growth. This climate contributed to the collapse of companies such as Yellow and Convoy. Given these conditions, fewer investments are being made from outside.
Rob Haddock: Fragmentation and the immense scale of the $800 billion U.S. transportation market are monumental factors slowing the efficiency and growth of the transportation ecosystem. The market is basic supply versus demand and currently there is an abundance of supply even with the inefficiencies of dwell time and empty miles. Over the next decade, as more drivers age out of the industry and fewer drivers enroll to offset their departure, the ecosystem will have no choice but to either achieve greater efficiencies or face the greater demand than supply cost and service implications.
Allan Miner: U.S. consumers and firms are weary of investing in new tractor, trailers, and warehouses because sentiment and demand are at a 5-year low. Thus, no positive return on investment for the cost to deploy new transportation assets.
Q: Is artificial intelligence impacting your supply chain processes, and if so, how is it being applied?
Rob Haddock: It’s the next hype, or buzz for the industry. … Currently AI is all talk, and I’ve yet to see a use case benefiting the management of transportation. What if there was a supply chain “Jarvis”? Some leaders of the transportation team could interact with it to gain knowledge versus today’s data mining expeditions. We as a culture ask “Alexa” or “Siri” questions all day long enriching our minds on senseless fun facts. What if we had a logistics assistant whose task was to perpetually make us smarter? Can’t wait for the future to get here.
Allan Miner: Yes, we are using AI to help provide direction to our IT software platform so we can meet the needs of the specific vertical marketplaces as required and requested from our clients.
Mitch Luciano: AI is here to stay—how it impacts our industry is still to be seen. We are in the beginning stages of knowing how AI supports our logistics operations. One example we have seen is the ability of the technology to assess where a driver is and then suggest the next load based on their location, driver requirements, hours of availability, etc.
Q: What pending or needed legislation would you like to see passed to benefit your area of transportation?
Chad Provencher: In general, legislation that enhances the safety of supply chains can have a positive impact in multiple ways, such as preventing disruptions and keeping insurance costs in check. Since logistics is a highly competitive industry where customers can easily change providers to find better rates, it’s important that legislation be used to impose safety standards across the board. At the same time, excessive legislation could be damaging, especially in the current market.
Allan Miner: HOS (hours of service) rules and regulations are negatively impacting the productivity of the tractor, trailer, and over-the-road driver capacity. Expand the HOS to allow for more pickups and deliveries in a given week with one driver.
Rob Haddock: My asking would be that the U.S. and state departments of transportation (DOTs) begin to collaborate to face the growing issues with congestion. Based on 2021’s data, congestion’s cost to the U.S. economy was at almost $100 billion. That is about 12% of the overall $800 billion in U.S. transportation spend. Can we start with the top 10 worst bottlenecks, figure out what they are currently costing the U.S. consumer, and take some of the infrastructure funding and clean up the mess?
Q: What will it take to return to a more balanced transportation market in 2024?
Rob Haddock: A correction is imminent. Consumers will eventually return to goods consumption, although the level of consumer debt is concerning. In the short term, carrier bankruptcies will continue to rise as many who entered the market in pursuit of riches will exit, returning the number of operating authorities to pre-pandemic levels. Both shippers and carriers know a correction is on the horizon, and I would advocate that now is the time for all parties to review their current technologies and figure out how to close any people and process gaps with enabling technology. “Balance” may be a Utopian vision, although I would agree that less dramatic peaks and valleys should be the ultimate goal of the industry.
Mitch Luciano: Lower interest rates and domestic oil production.
Chad Provencher: Economic growth could help capacity catch up with demand and the market to become balanced again. Alternatively, companies exiting the market could achieve that balance. In the truckload market, the large number of players add a high level of variability, and many of these are staying around longer than expected, likely due to high earnings during the pandemic. Other areas, such as the LTL market, operate with more stability and predictability. We’ll be watching closely as the industry continues to issue surprises.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.