Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

NRF: Retailers chip away at online return rate, but fraud continues to grow

Stores say some customers abuse e-commerce return policies, while others use explicit scams like returning shoplifted merchandise or claiming they never received an online order.

NRF Screen Shot 2023-12-29 at 12.26.37 PM.png

Retailers saw some success in 2023 on their efforts to mitigate the volume and cost of product returns by shoppers, knocking the total return rate for 2023 down to 14.5% as a percentage of sales, from roughly 17% the previous two years, according to reports from the National Retail Federation (NRF).

However, a year-end report from NRF and Appriss Retail shows that the portion of those returns due to fraud and abuse has continued to climb. Total returns for the industry amounted to $743 billion in merchandise in 2023, including 17.6% for online sales and 10.02% for pure bricks-and-mortar returns (excluding online orders that are returned in-store, known as BORIS). Of that total, return fraud contributed $101 billion in overall losses for retailers, meaning that for every $100 in returned merchandise, retailers will lose $13.70 to return fraud, the report said.


Among the types of return fraud retailers say they have experienced in the past year, nearly half (49%) cited returns of used, non-defective merchandise, also known as wardrobing, and 44% cited the return of shoplifted or stolen merchandise. Over one-third (37%) said they experienced returns of merchandise purchased on fraudulent or stolen tender (such as stolen credit cards) and one-fifth (20%) said they have experienced return fraud from organized retail crime groups.

However, the question of NRF’s own estimates of the prevalence of organized retail crime has been a fraught issue in recent months, as the group recently retracted its published statistics on that cause of fraud, saying it has been growing but is difficult to quantify.

Other variables are also tough to track, since the NRF and Appriss report said its fraud count also included common retail practices such bracketing—when consumers buy multiple units of the same or similar items, have them shipped, keep one, and return the rest—and wardrobing—when a shopper buys an expensive item, wears it, and then returns it.

The question of exactly how to measure fraud in product returns shows the difficult balance that retailers are trying to strike between clamping down on abuse and pleasing customers to boost shopper loyalty. Still, as concerns around return fraud continue to grow, retailers are bolstering their efforts to mitigate the related losses. 

With increases in both in-store and digital traffic, many retailers are testing in-store policy changes and limiting the flexibility of online returns, the report said. For example, in 2022, retailers allowed 22.1% of returns to be accepted without a receipt, but in 2023 that number has dropped by half. That’s because NRF survey data estimates that 17% of non-receipted returns are fraudulent, an increase from 14% in 2022.

But as retailers implement “no-receipt, no-return” policies, fraudulent actors turn to other tactics, like counterfeit returns. Specifically, shoppers are using counterfeit online purchase confirmations (digital receipts) at an increasing rate to commit return fraud in stores. And other scammers are abusing retailers’ claims and appeasements policies by asking for a store credit of some kind to compensate them for online orders that were allegedly not received, were received damaged, or have another type of defect.

“Retailers continue to test and implement new ways to minimize losses from returns, particularly those that are fraudulent, while at the same time optimizing the shopping experience for their customers,” NRF Executive Director of Research Mark Mathews said in a release. “Retailer’s efforts include providing greater detailed descriptions on sizing and fit of products for online purchases and requiring a receipt with returned items. As a whole, the industry is prioritizing efforts to reduce the amount of merchandise returned in stores and online.”
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

Recent

More Stories

pie chart of business challenges in 2025

DHL: small businesses wary of uncertain times in 2025

As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.

However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

image of earth from space

Maersk offers 5 steps to make your supply chain “antifragile”

Companies worldwide faced waves of business disruptions throughout the past year, but as 2025 is predicted to be just as complex as 2024, global cargo carrier Maersk has listed five steps for making supply chains “antifragile.”

Maersk’s overall view of the coming year is that the global economy is expected to grow modestly, with the possibility of higher inflation caused by lingering supply chain issues, continued geopolitical tensions, and fiscal policies such as new tariffs. Geopolitical tensions and trade disruptions could threaten global stability, climate change action will continue to shape international cooperation, and the ongoing security issue in the Red Sea is expected to continue into 2025.

Keep ReadingShow less
attendees at the EDGE resource center

Attendees visit the CSCMP EDGE 2024 Resource Center.

Lean into your supply chain community

As I assume the role of Chair of the Board of Directors for the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), I fondly reflect on the more than 10 years that I’ve had the privilege of being part of this extraordinary organization. I’ve seen firsthand the impact we have had on individuals, companies, and the entire supply chain profession.

CSCMP’s journey as an organization began back in 1963. It has since grown from a small, passionate community to the world’s premier association for supply chain professionals. Our mission—to connect, educate, and develop supply chain professionals throughout their careers—remains not only relevant, but vital in today’s world.

Keep ReadingShow less
illustration of two people working together with the help of a neutral party

The standing neutral: An innovative approach for managing supplier conflict

Editor’s Note:This article serves as a follow-up to “Avoiding supplier conflict and disputes before they begin,” which appeared in the July/August 2024 issue of Supply Chain Xchange.

The concept of using a neutral third party to resolve conflicts between suppliers and customers is not new. Mediation and arbitration have long been considered as more efficient and less costly ways to resolve contractual disputes than litigation. In fact, 2025 marks the 100th anniversary of the Federal Arbitration Act, which allows for contract disputes to be resolved through a private resolution process instead of going to court.

Keep ReadingShow less

Idea in action: EY case study

The global consulting firm EY was looking to outsource the food services, cleaning services, and maintenance at its facilities to the provider Integrated Service Solutions (ISS). But the company wanted to do so in a way that was completely different from how it had approached outsourcing workplace services in the past. EY and ISS wanted to create an outsourcing agreement that was highly collaborative and beneficial for both parties.

To do so, they incorporated a standing neutral in the contracting process from the outset. Together the parties selected one standing neutral—Erik Linnarsson, a lawyer from Cirio Law Firm—as a deal facilitator. Linnarsson was trained as a certified deal architect (CDA) to craft complex outsourcing agreements.

Keep ReadingShow less