Companies can no longer think of warehouses solely as brick-and-mortar structures with an abundance of truck docks, material handling equipment, and pickers and packers. These traditional facilities are being augmented by new, nontraditional warehouses that in some cases may be difficult to think of as warehouses at all.
Nontraditional warehouses may take various forms. They may not even be buildings but still perform order assembly. They may be facilities that add a step to the supply chain while improving its overall efficiency. Or they may blur the distinctions among warehouses, retailers, and users. Many companies are finding that these unconventional warehouses fit well into flexible supply chains that have different customers, different order sizes, and different delivery paths and requirements.
The traditional supply chain flows product from manufacturers to fabricators to wholesalers/distributors to retailers and, finally, to the end user. (See Figure 1.) For this discussion, we define manufacturers as those who convert raw material, such as ore or crude oil or similar substances, into a manufacturing commodity. Fabricators turn the commodity into a product, and wholesalers/distributors buy large lots and sell in smaller quantities. Between each of these organizations lies a transportation element.
There are many variations on this structure. Often, fabricators sell to other fabricators, and wholesalers may do assembly or delayed customizations that are similar in some ways to what fabricators do. And for some products, the end user may be someone within the supply chain.
Fabricators typically have a receiving warehouse and a shipping warehouse with a production operation in between. "Lean" manufacturing, just-in-time (JIT), and similar concepts have reduced the size of fabricators' and wholesaler/distributors' warehouses, but the functions they perform are still necessary. Product is received from several sources, stored for some limited time period, and eventually delivered to a customer. This process may require some level of customization of the product for individual customers. Manufacturers, fabricators, and retailers may also have warehouses that perform the same internal functions.
If this is the traditional model for a warehouse, what does a nontraditional warehouse look like, and what will be its impact on the supply chain? The following examples provide some clues to the answer.
Music: The PC as warehouse
To the user, the music business is all about content— the songs that we want to hear. The "product," however, has always been a physical object, whether it was sheet music, a vinyl record, an 8-track tape, or a compact disc (CD).
The supply chain for the music industry traditionally has looked as shown in Figure 2. The fabricators buy the media (for example, the physical CD), the packaging material (the case and wrapper), and the items that are specific to the stock-keeping unit (SKU), such as the cover art and labels. These materials are all shipped to the component warehouse. To produce the SKU, warehouse workers pick the component pieces and bring them to the production line, where the digital content is imprinted on the media and the package is assembled. The SKU then travels to the finished-goods warehouse, where it is picked as part of an order for shipment to a distributor. The distributor receives titles from many producers and later picks the SKU as part of an order for shipment to a retailer. Finally, the end user goes to the retailer—in person, by phone, or over the Internet—and selects the CD.
The large number of steps combined with the short lifecycle of these products puts a strain on the supply chain. To be successful, the product must be in the retailers' hands on the day of release or a sale may be lost to a competitor.
One of the early attempts to streamline the supply chain for digital products was the "music kiosk." The kiosk functioned as a nontraditional warehouse that engaged in delayed customization. The supply chain was altered so that common, standard components went to many different kiosks. Rather than preprinted cover art, for example, only blank paper would be sent to the kiosk. The kiosk itself was a CD recorder that was connected via a high-speed data link to a content server, which contained a digital copy of both the music and the cover art. The end user could shop at any kiosk on the day the product was released, select the item, and have the kiosk record the product to the media while a printer created and inserted the cover art. The kiosk would then insert the recorded media and dispense it to the user. The kiosk had become, in effect, the CD producer, eliminating late deliveries and lost sales. The resultant supply chain is shown in Figure 3.
But the music kiosk was quickly relegated to a footnote in the annals of supply chain history. The very technology that made the kiosk possible—the digital recorders and printers inside—caused its death. Once every personal computer (PC) included a CD recorder, the market was ready for the next paradigm shift. This largely user-driven shift has fundamentally changed how music is delivered to customers.
Thanks to music sellers such as iTunes, the buyer no longer sees the unit of purchase as a physical object like an album or CD. The unit of purchase is now a single piece of music, or track, in digital form. The listener can now create a CD composed of tracks from several artists, and the cover art may be created from images downloaded from sources outside the music business. The new music "warehouse" is the PC, and the new supply chain must deliver all of the components to the new producer, the end user. (See Figure 4.)
More recently, the music business has been shifting even farther from the traditional model as music CDs are replaced by iPods and other MP3 players that use the PC hard drive as the archival storage method. If the CD were ever completely eliminated, the music supply chain would become entirely electronic, with no physical transportation and storage required.
Spare parts: Doing more costs less
Another example of a nontraditional warehouse can be found in capital-intensive manufacturing industries such as refining, petrochemicals, metals, and paper. The traditional raw-materials and finishedproduct warehouses in these fields are disappearing as companies employ supply chain technologies to enable JIT delivery of raw materials and to schedule production only for those goods that have already been ordered. Manufacturers in these industries are using production warehouses as temporary locations for materials that accumulate due to customers' lateterm supply chain adjustments. Build-to-stock is becoming a dying practice at these companies.
The nature of production in these capital-intensive industries has also changed. Automation has made many production workers' positions unnecessary. A glance at the organization chart of one of these companies will confirm that the maintenance staff outnumbers the production staff; that's because machinery must be running nearly 100 percent of the time to achieve the maximum return on investment.
Enter the nontraditional warehouse with nontraditional goals. Instead of storing high-turnover product, this warehouse handles "archival storage" of spare parts that management hopes will never be used.
These parts are being stored only because they are unique and are no longer available, or because they have a lead time of perhaps 18 months or longer. They are kept in case there is a catastrophic failure of a key part on the production line. There is no need for rapid delivery of spare parts because removal of a broken part may take hours or days.
In the past, the responsibility for ensuring that parts were available fell to the maintenance organization. Procurement decisions were based on available budgets as well as on the maintenance staff's experience of the need for specific parts in different areas of the plant. There was little communication between manufacturing and the tradespeople, such as plumbers and machinists, about the purchase of parts. There also was limited visibility of the parts that were available within a plant, and there was no contact between the various plants within the company. As a result, the number of standard parts held in stock for a single plant proliferated. At the same time, it was common for one department to "borrow" parts from another one—sometimes without informing the other department that it had taken the parts for its own use. Furthermore, because inventory management was not a core function, obsolete parts were not purged after equipment was upgraded.
Storage conditions also became an issue. The maintenance organization frequently was located adjacent to the production machines, even though such areas were usually dusty, greasy, and subject to vibration from large production equipment. Limited space within the production building often led companies to store equipment outside, where large parts, including electric motors or parts with machined surfaces or bearings, would be subjected to temperature extremes, rain, and snow. The supply chain often looked as shown in Figure 5.
The new, nontraditional spare-parts warehouse is a smart addition to any organization that has been charged with optimizing the cost of keeping machines running 100 percent of the time by increasing the availability of spare parts. While some of the tools used—racks, forklifts, and data-collection terminals—are common to traditional warehouses, the key functions performed are vastly different.
The first priority often is the development and implementation of a common parts-identification system that is based on a functional description of the parts rather than on the manufacturer's part numbers or the location where the part is used. Providing a dry, dust-free, vibration-free environment without temperature extremes is another important change for this new parts warehouse. Velocity-based slotting is superseded by the clustering of products based on which trade (plumbing, electrical, etc.) will use it; where in the plant the equipment is located; or physical characteristics of the part that limit where it can be stored, such as in a humidity-controlled environment, an area with fire protection, or an area with a high-capacity overhead crane.
Although some traditional supply chain tools (for example, economic order quantity, minimum/maximum rules, and cycle counts) may be applied in order to control inventory, "just-in-case" is a more common philosophy in these circumstances than "justin-time" is. The new spare-parts supply chain may add a warehouse and its functions, but it also streamlines the flow of spare parts and greatly enhances their visibility. (See Figure 6.)
Companies that have implemented this type of nontraditional warehouse have reduced their parts inventory. They also have increased production-line uptime by improving the visibility of spare-parts inventory and ensuring that available parts will be in working condition. These changes can improve profits by millions of dollars.
Retail: Picking in the aisles
The retail store represents the last step before the consumer. The consumer enters the store, browses, finds what he or she is looking for, takes it to the register, pays, and takes it home. That's how most of our consumer-driven world works. But some supermarkets have returned to the old-fashioned practice of picking and delivering orders directly to customers—and they're not picking from a general warehouse or a specialized consumer-order warehouse. Instead, order pickers walk the supermarket aisles with a printed pick list or a radio frequency (RF) terminal and pick orders into carts or totes, which will then be loaded onto a delivery truck for a scheduled delivery.
Turning a supermarket aisle into a pick line is about as nontraditional as a warehouse can get. It can work, but there are potential problems. The "slotting" methods used in supermarkets, for instance, are in many ways the antithesis of good pick-line design. Most supermarkets are laid out so that the first thing the customer sees is the fresh-produce section. The purpose of this type of design is to market the store as a place to buy fresh, healthy products. The consumer then must walk to the back of the store to find items that are purchased most often, such as fresh meat and milk. The store layout also purposely forces the consumer to pass as many product displays as possible, thereby encouraging spontaneous purchases. Item placement on shelves, moreover, is not driven by product velocity. Instead, product location is determined by the manufacturers' desire to promote certain wares to consumers and by the fees that the manufacturers are willing to pay to the supermarket for prime locations. These factors contradict every principle involved in designing an efficient picking operation.
Will the supermarket change into a warehouse, with velocity-based slotting and order pickers strolling the aisles with multiple-order RF pick carts? Will the supermarket disappear completely and remove one link in the supply chain? The latter is unlikely but not impossible. In either case, the supermarket will have to revamp its layout to take into account both marketing considerations and warehouse- style efficiency.
Approach with caution
As the examples in this article illustrate, nontraditional warehouses represent attempts by companies to increase revenue or reduce costs. They are manifestations of the experimentation with business models that is going on today.
Not all will succeed, however. Some may remember Kozmo.com, whose business model was to provide a free delivery service in large cities for videos, pizzas, and small consumables using bicycle messengers operating after normal work hours. Small warehouses and messenger depots were located in residential areas throughout a city. The company was supposed to generate income in two ways: by charging merchants for the deliveries and from markups on the warehoused items. There are many reasons why the company failed, but the case provides an example of how even a nontraditional warehouse that provides a market advantage over the traditional supply chain can prove unsuccessful, and why any potential paradigm shift should be approached with caution.
We will most likely see more business failures as companies pilot new types of nontraditional warehousing. One thing is certain, though: The assumption that warehouses are merely places of storage doesn't hold true any longer. Nontraditional warehouses are a new type of link in the flexible, agile supply chain that companies are fashioning to reduce inventory, improve customer service, and/or boost profits. They will force companies to rethink their supply chain structure and design them to ensure that product flow matches demand.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.