Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Report: Retailers likely to take a hit from Suez, Panama disruptions

Delays and higher freight costs pose earnings risk for U.S., European companies importing from Asia.

gartner-Screenshot-2024-02-20-at-2.01.09-PM.png

Shipping disruptions at the Suez and Panama Canals may end up costing retailers big, according to a report from Moody’s Investors Service, released this week.


Since mid-December, attacks in the Red Sea have caused delays and disruptions through the Suez Canal, affecting trade routes between Asia and the West, particularly Europe and U.S. East Coast ports. At the same time, severe drought conditions in the Panama Canal have reduced transit times in the Americas, adding to global supply chain woes.

Conditions in both areas have led to reduced cargo volume, delivery delays, and higher freight costs, all of which could take a bite out of retailers’ profitability in the months ahead. European retail and apparel companies that rely on maritime Asian imports are most at risk, but extended delays could affect companies that rely on timely deliveries of seasonal goods in both the U.S. and Europe, according to the report.

Rising freight rates are among the biggest concerns. Container spot prices have risen more than 114% since last December and are up more than 130% compared to 2019, according to the Moody’s report. Those higher costs could negatively affect retailers’ profits by the end of this year.

“Prices also reflect recent seasonal volume increases ahead of the Chinese New Year as importers try to secure product ahead of slower manufacturing activity,” the report’s authors wrote. “Should freight rates remain elevated, retailers will be forced to absorb associated higher costs—which is a looming risk because contract rates are typically reset annually.”

The situation is less dire for U.S.-based retailers, who can divert deliveries from the East and Gulf coasts—the port of call for ships through the Suez and Panama Canals—to West Coast ports. Many retailers pivoted in the reverse direction two years ago amid dockworker contract negotiations at West Coast ports “without pushing costs much higher,” according to the report.

Still, risk remains high for all retailers as long as the delays continue.

“The longer this shipping crisis persists, the greater the potential earnings hit that retailers importing from Asia will face,” the authors wrote. “Higher inventory levels and lower consumer demand will buffer some of the immediate pain despite some added costs relative to rerouting.”

Recent

More Stories

pie chart of business challenges in 2025

DHL: small businesses wary of uncertain times in 2025

As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.

However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

image of earth from space

Maersk offers 5 steps to make your supply chain “antifragile”

Companies worldwide faced waves of business disruptions throughout the past year, but as 2025 is predicted to be just as complex as 2024, global cargo carrier Maersk has listed five steps for making supply chains “antifragile.”

Maersk’s overall view of the coming year is that the global economy is expected to grow modestly, with the possibility of higher inflation caused by lingering supply chain issues, continued geopolitical tensions, and fiscal policies such as new tariffs. Geopolitical tensions and trade disruptions could threaten global stability, climate change action will continue to shape international cooperation, and the ongoing security issue in the Red Sea is expected to continue into 2025.

Keep ReadingShow less
attendees at the EDGE resource center

Attendees visit the CSCMP EDGE 2024 Resource Center.

Lean into your supply chain community

As I assume the role of Chair of the Board of Directors for the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), I fondly reflect on the more than 10 years that I’ve had the privilege of being part of this extraordinary organization. I’ve seen firsthand the impact we have had on individuals, companies, and the entire supply chain profession.

CSCMP’s journey as an organization began back in 1963. It has since grown from a small, passionate community to the world’s premier association for supply chain professionals. Our mission—to connect, educate, and develop supply chain professionals throughout their careers—remains not only relevant, but vital in today’s world.

Keep ReadingShow less
illustration of two people working together with the help of a neutral party

The standing neutral: An innovative approach for managing supplier conflict

Editor’s Note:This article serves as a follow-up to “Avoiding supplier conflict and disputes before they begin,” which appeared in the July/August 2024 issue of Supply Chain Xchange.

The concept of using a neutral third party to resolve conflicts between suppliers and customers is not new. Mediation and arbitration have long been considered as more efficient and less costly ways to resolve contractual disputes than litigation. In fact, 2025 marks the 100th anniversary of the Federal Arbitration Act, which allows for contract disputes to be resolved through a private resolution process instead of going to court.

Keep ReadingShow less

Idea in action: EY case study

The global consulting firm EY was looking to outsource the food services, cleaning services, and maintenance at its facilities to the provider Integrated Service Solutions (ISS). But the company wanted to do so in a way that was completely different from how it had approached outsourcing workplace services in the past. EY and ISS wanted to create an outsourcing agreement that was highly collaborative and beneficial for both parties.

To do so, they incorporated a standing neutral in the contracting process from the outset. Together the parties selected one standing neutral—Erik Linnarsson, a lawyer from Cirio Law Firm—as a deal facilitator. Linnarsson was trained as a certified deal architect (CDA) to craft complex outsourcing agreements.

Keep ReadingShow less