Humanoid robots are increasingly being tested in warehousing and logistics facilities around the world, most notably by retail titan Amazon, but will they be a common sight in the future?
Ash Sharma is the managing director of Interact Analysis and lead for the Robotics and Warehouse Automation Division. He brings 20 years of experience to the table in sectors ranging from industrial automation and smart manufacturing to drones, robotics, and medical technology.
Last October’s announcement by online retail behemoth Amazon that it is testing Agility Robotics’ humanoid robot, Digit, in its warehouses caused a stir in the global media, sparking numerous news articles and debate about the ethics of using robots to replace human workers. But does Amazon’s announcement point to a rapid adoption of bipedal robots in the near future?
The concept of humanoid robots is not new. In fact they date back at least as far as Ancient Greece, with the mechanical Servant of Philon1, a humanoid automaton that could pour and mix wine and water. However, there has been a sharp rise in recent years in the number of companies developing and trialing humanoid robots, particularly within the warehouse sector. Digit, which can grasp and lift objects, is going to start by moving empty tote boxes as part of Amazon’s efforts to automate its warehouse operations. Similarly, Figure and Boston Dynamicsare prototyping humanoid robots for use in distribution centers. Tesla’s Optimus Robot also looks promising for warehouse applications, as it can self-calibrate its arms and legs and has the capability to sort objects fully autonomously. Additionally, the commercial launch of Apollo by tech startup Apptronik is expected to take place in late 2024, and videos have already shown it walking, case picking, palletizing, and unloading trailers.
Yet, in spite of the current chatter around the technology and the flurry of pilots and prototypes, change is unlikely to happen overnight. Most pilot projects take months or even years to reach completion, and rollouts tend to happen in incremental stages. Furthermore, our feeling is that, although we are already starting to see humanoid robots appear in warehouses, some obstacles still exist, particularly in regard to acceptance of humanoid robots by their human co-workers.
Are bipedal robots inevitable?
Warehouse automation solutions in general have been in place for decades, carrying out many physically demanding, menial jobs. For example, automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS) are already widely used alongside human workers to deliver much faster rates of order picking and to increase throughput. Furthermore, over the past five years, there has been a steady rise in the development and adoption of mobile automation solutions for the warehouse, such as automated guided vehicles (AGVs) and autonomous mobile robots (AMRs).
This surge in demand has been in part fueled by the ongoing labor and skills shortages blighting the industry. Research by Interact Analysis shows scarcity of labor remains the biggest driver of demand for mobile robots and the impact of shortages is becoming more acute. As a result of this and other drivers for mobile automation (such as increasing labor costs, e-commerce growth, and the shift to flexible manufacturing), Interact Analysis forecasts shipments of mobile robots will continue growing at an annual rate of approximately 50% until 2027.2 (See Figure 1.)
Similar to AMRs and AS/RS, humanoid robots may simply be another evolutionary stage in the development of technology for the industry. Because of their ability to move and interact with their environment in a similar way to an actual person, humanoid robots have the potential to meet some very specific needs of the modern warehouse while also offering a very different value proposition to traditional robots. Warehousing involves repetitive and physically demanding menial work that often has seasonal peaks in demand. This work often involves interacting with a variety of different products that lack standardization and a uniform shape and size. While traditional robots are very good at doing the same repetitive work over and over again, humanoid robots can be more adaptable (in a similar way to humans) and therefore can be applied to multiple different tasks throughout a warehouse.
Early applications for bipedal robots are likely to include trailer unloading, which is simple, physically demanding, and repetitive, but difficult to complete using traditional robots. While they tend to operate at a slower pace than traditional robots, humanoid robots also offer the potential to be introduced to the workforce during peak periods without requiring substantial operational changes to warehouse workflows or alterations to the layout of the warehouse. In this way, humanoid robots offer greater flexibility than other materials handling solutions, as they can be dropped into existing supply chains alongside human workers. Humanoid robots are able to take on jobs that are unappealing and take a toll on the human body (such as trailer loading/unloading), freeing up employees for more complex, less physically demanding, and more interesting tasks. Additionally, unlike traditional robots, humanoid robots possess a level of mobility and dexterity that allows them to take on multiple different tasks across facilities, workflows, and applications, and to handle the variety of objects found in a typical warehouse.
Given these potential benefits, will humanoid robots see the same sort of growth rate as AMRs and other robotics solutions? That depends on how well they are able to overcome the barriers to adoption. The largest barrier is the high cost of humanoid robots, which means businesses will currently have to wait a long time to achieve a return on their investment. However, another significant barrier is the “uncanny valley” effect, or the feeling of unease or revulsion people feel when they encounter a human-like robot, and the personification of role replacement humanoid robots represent.
Is our unease surmountable?
At the time of Amazon’s announcement, concerns were raised about humanoid robots displacing human workers.3 Similar concerns have been raised in the past about other robotic technology, such as AMRs. But anecdotal evidence indicates people like working alongside AMRs, where the robot carries out menial, physically demanding work, while they act in a supervisory capacity.
However, the very reasons humanoid robots are capable of working so well alongside human workers are also one of the biggest stumbling blocks for their rapid and widespread adoption: their ability to move and function similarly to a human. From the automaton in ETA Hoffman’s nihilistic 1815 short story “The Sandman” to movies and TV shows such as Terminator, Avengers: Age of Ultron, Blade Runner, and Westworld, humanoid robots have been depicted as problematic and, in some cases, apocalyptically so. Coupled with this, humanoid robots appear to cause greater resentment than other forms of autonomous mobile robots because they are role replacement personified. After all, few humans want to be outpaced, outlifted, and outperformed by a robot that looks like a person.
Responding to concerns about job losses, Amazon has emphasized the “hundreds of thousands of new jobs” that have been created as a result of its use of robotic systems, including “700 categories of new job types in skilled roles,” with robots being used to replace the most “menial, mundane, and repetitive” tasks.
Ultimately, companies are unlikely to be deterred from deploying humanoid robots by their appearance. Although Digit walks on two legs and is capable of lifting and moving objects with its arms, we are far from a dystopic future in which sentient robots blend seamlessly into the human population. The bipedal robot has been designed specifically for warehouse automation where the focus is on increasing throughput and filling labor gaps, rather than the complexities of human thought and movement. Indeed, Amazon describes Digit as “a mobile manipulator solution,” and Tye Brady, chief technologist at Amazon Robotics, told reporters in Seattle that people are “irreplaceable” to the company because of their “ability to think at a higher level, the ability to diagnose problems.”
Promising but still some way off
At Interact Analysis, we have charted the steep rise in demand for warehouse automation technology. Many facilities are still operating manually, but companies worldwide plan to increase investment in automation over the coming years. Skills and labor shortages are showing no signs of stopping within the materials handling industry, and mobile robots are being utilized already in a range of different settings. They often provide a solution to repetitive, physically demanding, uncomfortable, and dangerous jobs.
In addition to this, our research indicates the scalability and flexibility to use humanoid robots within existing warehouse operations alongside human workers could provide a unique answer to ongoing skills and labor gaps. There will always be inertia to change regardless of what the automation solution looks like, and it is too early to tell whether in the long-term bipedal robots will become widely used in warehouses. However, it is certainly a possibility. It will be dependent on the success of early pilots, whether ethical concerns can be overcome, and whether other robotics technology is found to be better suited to specific tasks. Amazon has always been a leader in its use of robotics, with the rest of the industry tending to follow (or fail!), so this pilot could be the catalyst for the wider rollout of humanoid robots in the future. Although competition to develop affordable and effective models is growing, the widespread use of humanoid robots in warehousing, if it happens, is clearly some way off.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”