Faced with shifting order patterns and a fast-moving technology landscape, leaders at Scholastic Canada needed to make bold changes in their warehouse automation strategy. Robotics-as-a-service was the answer.
Victoria Kickham, an editor at large for Supply Chain Quarterly, started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for Supply Chain Quarterly's sister publication, DC Velocity.
E-commerce has changed the way just about every warehouse or distribution facility fills orders, but for Toronto-based publisher Scholastic Canada, the need to accommodate online ordering and other market shifts has sparked a sea change in its approach to warehouse automation. The Canadian arm of Scholastic, the more than 100-year-old multinational publisher of children’s books and educational media, the company has boosted productivity and reduced costs in its schools-based business since replacing an infrastructure-heavy automated warehouse system with a subscription-based mobile robotics solution that can adapt to shifting market demands. The system’s flexibility and its subscription-based pricing model are just what the company needed to address those changes and give operations managers the freedom to grow in a tough economy.
“The ability to lift and shift was crucial for us. We needed a system that we could easily move to a new facility,” explains Chad MacGillivray, Scholastic Canada’s vice president of distribution operations. He emphasizes rising industrial rents and the risks of investing in high-priced equipment in a fast-changing technology environment. “We didn’t want to invest a lot of [capital] to own anything that could become obsolete while it was still depreciating on our books.”
Thus the change in strategy. Scholastic Canada decided to partner with robotics-as-a-service (RaaS) provider inVia Robotics to develop a system that could accommodate the company’s growing need to fill orders from a wider range of inventory as customers gravitated to online shopping. The system pairs inVia’s warehouse automation software with autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) at Scholastic’s Markham, Ontario, distribution center (DC), just outside Toronto. The partners started by automating the facility’s picking process and then branched out to replenishment and cycle counting. The system went live about a year ago, and now the partners are expanding it to other business units in the DC—and preparing to “lift and shift” to a new facility next year.
As MacGillivray explains: “This, for us, was phase one—and it was really just the beginning.”
FROM FLYERS TO WEBSITES
Scholastic Canada’s business was steadily changing as e-commerce took hold, but the 2020 pandemic shifted things into high gear. Its schools-based business has long been rooted in book fairs and those familiar paper flyers delivered to classrooms. But when schools closed and switched to online instruction, the company’s order profile quickly changed. Instead of sending one large box to a classroom, the facility was filling 10 or 12 smaller boxes and delivering them to residential addresses, for instance. What’s more, online ordering gave customers access to a much broader range of stock-keeping units (SKUs), essentially allowing them to order from the full breadth of Scholastic Canada’s inventory, which can reach nearly 10,000 SKUs during peak season. The facility’s existing fulfillment solution included a traditional automated storage and retrieval system (AS/RS) and a network of conveyors that could divert items to various pick areas, where associates used pick-to-light or voice technology to fill orders. But as business needs shifted, the system couldn’t keep up with demand.
“Our previous system served us really well in the school market for a long time. We could build a zone, the conveyor would divert [boxes] to that zone, and [associates] could pick the order right there,” explains MacGillivray. “As we moved into e-commerce and online ordering, customers were ordering from the whole breadth of SKUs. Our pick area kept expanding, the walk area was larger, and it took longer to pick orders. We were looking for a solution [that would] reduce the walking and make it easier for us to pick the orders in a more dense way.”
They were also looking to reduce their reliance on warehouse labor, which was getting increasingly costly and difficult to find in the Toronto area—especially during peak shipping season. On top of that, rising real estate costs argued for a flexible system that would be easy to move if necessary.
KEEPING THE TRAFFIC FLOWING
InVia’s RaaS solution was the answer, and picking was the logical place to begin. As a first step, inVia reconfigured Scholastic Canada’s fulfillment workflows and created a digital twin of the facility to test them. Next, it implemented its inVia Logic warehouse automation software, an AI (artificial intelligence)-driven warehouse execution system (WES) that analyzes daily service-level agreements (SLAs) and builds a plan to execute and synchronize all fulfillment tasks to meet those needs. Essentially, the software orchestrates all of the resources in the facility so that orders are filled quickly and accurately.
The idea is to find the most efficient way to get orders out the door in an increasingly complex fulfillment landscape, explains inVia’s CEO, Lior Elazary.
“We offer a complete software suite that helps you manage resources inside the warehouse—forklift drivers, pickers, and pack out,” he explains. “[The system tells those resources] what to do, when to do it, and where inventory should be located.
“The warehouse is a huge traffic management problem,” he adds. “If you don’t do it right, it just jams up.”
InVia’s AMRs help keep the traffic flowing: All orders move from Scholastic Canada’s warehouse management software system (WMS) to inVia’s WES, which determines the orders to pick and when to pick them. The AMRs then take over, retrieving products from a designated set of storage shelves known as the “robotic grid.” Guided by a vision system and equipped with a shelf, a scissor lift that extends eight and a half feet high, and suction cups for gripping, the AMRs travel through the grid, grabbing the appropriate containers from the shelves and delivering them to inVia’s “Picker Wall,” a two-sided, dynamic pick/put wall. Associates take it from there, picking items from the wall to fill the day’s orders.
Elazary explains that the system optimizes both the robotic and human labor in the warehouse: The robots work nonstop overnight or early in the morning, stocking the PickerWall—which is essentially a long, open shelf—with containers of products needed for the day’s orders. Associates work on the other side of the wall, picking from the containers and depositing items for orders into designated boxes—all from a fixed location, and with the ability to take a break or shift to other tasks without holding up the fulfillment process. The strategy eliminates the friction that can occur when robots and humans interact, Elazary says.
“The system is already preparing the wall with all the containers the person has to pick from. So pickers come in and they’re not running around—and they’re not waiting on the robots,” he says. “We built this buffer to help alleviate that kind of contention.”
Elazary says the result is a faster, smoother-running system. And the results at the Markham DC back that up. From February 2023 through this past holiday peak season, MacGillivray says the facility experienced no sustained downtime—a feat that stands in stark contrast to a year earlier.
“In our [2022] peak, we had a total of 27 hours of sustained downtime,” he says. “That’s a lot of units you didn’t ship when you should have.”
InVia’s AMRs travel to other areas of the warehouse as well, delivering items to replenishment or discarding empty boxes. And they work within Scholastic Canada’s existing system—there was no special shelving or other infrastructure required to make the system work. The setup has allowed Scholastic Canada to double its pick rates using existing floor space and without having to add labor.
“We saw this as an opportunity to offset the challenge of finding people to hire,” explains MacGillivray. “It’s a natural effect of a more efficient system, [and we have] reduced our headcount through attrition more than anything else.”
FROM STATIC TO DYNAMIC
Scholastic Canada and inVia moved to phase two of their partnership last fall, extending the robotic fulfillment process to the facility’s trade business, which serves large retailers like Amazon, Canadian bookseller Indigo, and Walmart. The flexibility of the system and the freedom of the subscription-based model were the primary drivers behind the expansion, according to MacGillivray.
“I beat the drum over and over about [the value] of not owning anything right now,” he says, adding that the inVia partnership is not the only one through which the Markham DC is leasing equipment or AI-based software used in the building. “The technology is moving too fast. Not owning anything right now is really smart for operations leaders. You need to make sure you generate projects that you can shift and move to other areas as the technology [changes].”
Elazary agrees, explaining that inVia’s model includes continual upgrades and enhancements to both the software and hardware. Beyond that, inVia continuously optimizes the robots to integrate with each facility’s fulfillment processes. Pricing is based on the productivity of the entire system, rather than the number of units deployed. For instance, Scholastic Canada’s monthly subscription fee is based on the number of actions per hour (APH) the robots perform in order to meet the facility’s throughput needs.
“Our customers care about productivity, so we’re constantly upgrading the robots and the software,” Elazary says. “If we make [the robots] faster, it helps everybody. We are a robotics company. We know how to optimize the equipment. That, in a sense, is what our software does.”
Leaders at Scholastic Canada are preparing to put the system’s flexibility to the test in the year ahead with a move to a newly built facility in the Toronto area. MacGillivray says he expects to begin shipping orders from the new DC sometime in 2025—adding that it’s time to “take the lift-and-shift portion of this project and put it to work.”
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.