Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

REFLECTIONS

Najlla’s story and America’s shame

The withdrawal from Afghanistan was a logistics disaster, and one that put a friend in harm’s way.

Najlla Habibyar


Image Courtesy of The New York Times

“I am a U.S green card holder, and I have been left behind.”


On Tuesday, August 31, President Biden stood before the world and said, “Last night in Kabul, the United States ended 20 years of war in Afghanistan—the longest war in American history. We completed one of the biggest airlifts in history, with more than 120,000 people evacuated to safety.”

Forgive the skepticism, but this opening to the President’s speech merits a fact check. The U.S. exit did not end the war, just Western involvement in the war. People are still dying every day from government-sanctioned executions, in factional battles with an ISIS insurgent group, and from illness and malnutrition.

The U.S.-led evacuation was a monumental logistics failure. Consider Bagram Air Base, found 30 miles north of Kabul. Heavily fortified, accessible, and defensible, the base served as the center of activity for the U.S.-led military coalition during its two-decade long involvement in Afghanistan. With two huge runways, Bagram could handle any size aircraft, including the C-5 Hercules. It would seem to be a good location to stage a large-scale evacuation.

The U.S. chose to abandoned Bagram Air Base on July 1, 2021. The last remaining U.S. troops left the base by shutting off the electricity and slipping away in the night, without even notifying the Afghan Armed Forces, our partners in protecting the base. On August 15, Afghan troops surrendered the airfield—now looted—to the Taliban.

Apparently, U.S. decision makers instead opted for a politically driven decision to evacuate from the capital of Kabul, not Bagram. The choice to evacuate from a congested urban environment instead of a defendable airfield, however, led to chaos. Clearly logistics success was not the primary intent of the exit plan, and, as a result, we left people behind, including U.S. citizens, U.S. green card holders, coalition allies, and Afghan citizens who had risked their lives and partnered with us. Some of those abandoned are now dead.

One of those who was left behind is a friend of mine. Her name is Najlla Habibyar.

Trailblazer, target, entrepreneur

From 2014 to 2017, Najlla served as one of the highest-ranking women in the administration of the last president of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Ashraf Ghani. While in that role, she also started “Pink Taxi,” six cabs driven by women for women passengers. Pink Taxi was a sensible precaution for women needing transport in Kabul.

But risks mounted for Najlla, and she began receiving death threats because of her refusal to accept bribes in her governmental role. As a result, she resigned from her position and fled the country, going into exile in Washington, D.C. A year later, she returned to continue her work to build a new Afghanistan. She became the chief of party for the Kabul Carpet Export Center, an initiative sponsored by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Protected by the envelope of coalition support, Najlla rolled up her sleeves and got back to work.

“No matter how many times this country has been destroyed, we all have loved it unconditionally,” Najlla explained.

But when the Taliban regained control of Kabul, staying in the country was no longer safe for Najlla and her family. They repeatedly fought their way through the chaos and mobs gathered at the gates outside of Kabul International Airport only to be turned back time and time again. Najlla—a U.S. green card holder —and her family made five attempts to get through the checkpoints and into the airport. They tried the North Gate. They tried the Abbey Gate. They tried the Annex Gate. Each time, they failed. On August 30, the last U.S. military flight departed, leaving behind Najlla and thousands of others who had put their faith in us and needed our help.

After the collapse and being abandoned by the U.S. government, Najlla went into hiding with her family and began a logistical cat-and-mouse game. Things looked bleak. Her family was informed that she was on a target list, and she was hunted by the new government, moving seven times over the course of two weeks. 

A new Dunkirk

Najlla ultimately found help not from the State Department or USAID, but through “Digital Dunkirk,” a volunteer effort run by ex-U.S. military officers that created an underground network to rescue Afghans who had helped Americans. (The name is a reference to the Dunkirk evacuation during World War II, which relied heavily on civilian volunteers using their own boats to rescue Allied troops trapped in France.) While Digital Dunkirk included well-established groups like No One Left Behind, which has worked for years to bring military translators back to the U.S., it also relied heavily on ad hoc coalitions of veterans that were formed during the chaos of the official evacuation efforts and used social media apps for communication. These groups worked outside of the oversight of the U.S. government to facilitate exits for those at risk of being left behind.

“It was not the Biden administration that got us out. It was Digital Dunkirk, ex-military volunteers,” Najlla reported in a video journal posted by The New York Times.

Digital Dunkirk figured out how to do what the U.S. government could not. They found funding, gathered intelligence, set up virtual operations centers, coordinated stakeholders, synchronized logistics, and slipped directly into the theater to escort Afghans out. As reported by Laura Keenan of the Modern War Institute, “The sum of their efforts created a modern-day Underground Railroad moving evacuees from location to location.”

Digital Dunkirk told Najlla and her family to head north to Mazar-i-Sharif and wait for a chartered flight out. Then on September 23, Najlla received the call from Digital Dunkirk, “This is the time. Get ready.” After passing through five checkpoints, Najlla and her family were finally able to board a plane to Abu Dhabi.

Today Najlla and the 20 family members who left with her are in Emirate Humanitarian City, a refugee camp in the United Arab Emirates. They are waiting. They are hoping. They should not be abandoned by us.

Author’s note: You can learn more of Najlla’s ordeal in a video diary published by The New York Times, “My toxic Afghan love story” at https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000008007152/afghanistan-taliban-women-exile.html. Najlla Habibyar can be reached by email at n.habibyar@gmail.com. Please drop her a note of encouragement, to let her know she is not forgotten.

 

Recent

More Stories

Transforming maintenance strategies for high-velocity distribution facilities

Walk into any high-velocity distribution facility and you'll immediately grasp the complexity: dozens of forklifts move in orchestrated patterns while automated systems hum along conveyor lines, all working to meet demanding throughput targets. Yet what remains invisible to the casual observer is how maintenance challenges can bring this carefully choreographed dance to a halt.

For facilities moving millions of pieces weekly, maintenance demands fundamentally different solutions. The traditional approach to material handling maintenance that works for smaller operations isn't just constraining productivity—it's holding back your entire operation.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

Three ways to elevate your empty miles strategy

Reducing empty miles—or the distance traveled with no load or cargo—can have multiple benefits, including increased cost savings and streamlined operations. But at its core, it’s about making smarter, more sustainable choices while transporting goods. Here are three components to craft and execute a successful empty miles program, keeping collaboration in mind at each stop along the way.

Keep ReadingShow less
Navigating supply chain dynamics

Navigating supply chain dynamics

In an era of rapid geopolitical change, supply chains have evolved from operational necessities to strategic assets. Trade tensions, regional conflicts, and localization-focused economic policies are reshaping global supply chain strategies, with significant implications for the United States and other regions. This shift demands a holistic approach that balances cost efficiency with resilience.

This report integrates insights from various regions to provide a US-centric perspective on the evolving supply chain landscape while examining the interplay between American strategies and global trends.

Keep ReadingShow less
AI-generated image of a containership at a port.

Securing supply chain resilience requires a common vocabulary and vision

The Biden Administration started sounding the alarm about America’s supply chains just weeks after taking office in 2021 with an Executive Order, followed by the launch of the Council on Supply Chain Resilience in 2023 and additional instructions in 2024. While progress has been made on strengthening the resilience of supply chains, other gains are being left on the table. One reason why: The public and private sectors do not use a common vocabulary, leading to incomplete or misaligned incentives, priorities, and perspectives. It’s time for a common vocabulary and vision. Fortunately, the inaugural Quadrennial Supply Chain Review of December 2024 lays the groundwork for an “enduring vision” for the incoming administration and for a truly common vocabulary and vision.

Let’s define terms. In its simplest form, resilience is the ability to bounce back from large-scale disruption, according to supply chain expert and MIT professor Yossi Sheffi. On that much, the private sector and government agree.

Keep ReadingShow less
A photo of the inside of a retail store. In the foreground is a sign that says "Pick up online orders here." In the background is two women at a cash register in a checkout lane.

Retailers should take advantage of their brick-and-mortar locations not only to satisfy the growing demand for “buy online pickup in store” but also to support microfulfillment efforts for e-commerce.

By Wallpaper via Adobe Stock art

Build the store of the future with “buy online, pick up in store” and microfulfillment

Retailers are increasingly looking to cut costs, become more efficient, and meet ever-changing consumer demands. But how can they do so? The answer is updating their fulfillment strategy to keep pace with evolving customer expectations. As e-commerce continues to dominate the retail space and same-day delivery has become the norm, retailers must look to strengthen their “buy online pick up in store” (BOPIS) and microfulfillment strategies to stay ahead.

BOPIS allows customers to order online and pick up items at the retailers' brick-and-mortar location, and microfulfillment involves housing a retailer’s products closer to the consumer to improve delivery times. While these strategies each serve different purposes, both are centered around getting the product closer to the consumer to ensure faster fulfillment. By combining the two, retailers will be primed to meet customers’ needs—now and in the future.

Keep ReadingShow less