Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

REFLECTIONS

Najlla’s story and America’s shame

The withdrawal from Afghanistan was a logistics disaster, and one that put a friend in harm’s way.

Najlla Habibyar


Image Courtesy of The New York Times

“I am a U.S green card holder, and I have been left behind.”


On Tuesday, August 31, President Biden stood before the world and said, “Last night in Kabul, the United States ended 20 years of war in Afghanistan—the longest war in American history. We completed one of the biggest airlifts in history, with more than 120,000 people evacuated to safety.”

Forgive the skepticism, but this opening to the President’s speech merits a fact check. The U.S. exit did not end the war, just Western involvement in the war. People are still dying every day from government-sanctioned executions, in factional battles with an ISIS insurgent group, and from illness and malnutrition.

The U.S.-led evacuation was a monumental logistics failure. Consider Bagram Air Base, found 30 miles north of Kabul. Heavily fortified, accessible, and defensible, the base served as the center of activity for the U.S.-led military coalition during its two-decade long involvement in Afghanistan. With two huge runways, Bagram could handle any size aircraft, including the C-5 Hercules. It would seem to be a good location to stage a large-scale evacuation.

The U.S. chose to abandoned Bagram Air Base on July 1, 2021. The last remaining U.S. troops left the base by shutting off the electricity and slipping away in the night, without even notifying the Afghan Armed Forces, our partners in protecting the base. On August 15, Afghan troops surrendered the airfield—now looted—to the Taliban.

Apparently, U.S. decision makers instead opted for a politically driven decision to evacuate from the capital of Kabul, not Bagram. The choice to evacuate from a congested urban environment instead of a defendable airfield, however, led to chaos. Clearly logistics success was not the primary intent of the exit plan, and, as a result, we left people behind, including U.S. citizens, U.S. green card holders, coalition allies, and Afghan citizens who had risked their lives and partnered with us. Some of those abandoned are now dead.

One of those who was left behind is a friend of mine. Her name is Najlla Habibyar.

Trailblazer, target, entrepreneur

From 2014 to 2017, Najlla served as one of the highest-ranking women in the administration of the last president of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Ashraf Ghani. While in that role, she also started “Pink Taxi,” six cabs driven by women for women passengers. Pink Taxi was a sensible precaution for women needing transport in Kabul.

But risks mounted for Najlla, and she began receiving death threats because of her refusal to accept bribes in her governmental role. As a result, she resigned from her position and fled the country, going into exile in Washington, D.C. A year later, she returned to continue her work to build a new Afghanistan. She became the chief of party for the Kabul Carpet Export Center, an initiative sponsored by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Protected by the envelope of coalition support, Najlla rolled up her sleeves and got back to work.

“No matter how many times this country has been destroyed, we all have loved it unconditionally,” Najlla explained.

But when the Taliban regained control of Kabul, staying in the country was no longer safe for Najlla and her family. They repeatedly fought their way through the chaos and mobs gathered at the gates outside of Kabul International Airport only to be turned back time and time again. Najlla—a U.S. green card holder —and her family made five attempts to get through the checkpoints and into the airport. They tried the North Gate. They tried the Abbey Gate. They tried the Annex Gate. Each time, they failed. On August 30, the last U.S. military flight departed, leaving behind Najlla and thousands of others who had put their faith in us and needed our help.

After the collapse and being abandoned by the U.S. government, Najlla went into hiding with her family and began a logistical cat-and-mouse game. Things looked bleak. Her family was informed that she was on a target list, and she was hunted by the new government, moving seven times over the course of two weeks. 

A new Dunkirk

Najlla ultimately found help not from the State Department or USAID, but through “Digital Dunkirk,” a volunteer effort run by ex-U.S. military officers that created an underground network to rescue Afghans who had helped Americans. (The name is a reference to the Dunkirk evacuation during World War II, which relied heavily on civilian volunteers using their own boats to rescue Allied troops trapped in France.) While Digital Dunkirk included well-established groups like No One Left Behind, which has worked for years to bring military translators back to the U.S., it also relied heavily on ad hoc coalitions of veterans that were formed during the chaos of the official evacuation efforts and used social media apps for communication. These groups worked outside of the oversight of the U.S. government to facilitate exits for those at risk of being left behind.

“It was not the Biden administration that got us out. It was Digital Dunkirk, ex-military volunteers,” Najlla reported in a video journal posted by The New York Times.

Digital Dunkirk figured out how to do what the U.S. government could not. They found funding, gathered intelligence, set up virtual operations centers, coordinated stakeholders, synchronized logistics, and slipped directly into the theater to escort Afghans out. As reported by Laura Keenan of the Modern War Institute, “The sum of their efforts created a modern-day Underground Railroad moving evacuees from location to location.”

Digital Dunkirk told Najlla and her family to head north to Mazar-i-Sharif and wait for a chartered flight out. Then on September 23, Najlla received the call from Digital Dunkirk, “This is the time. Get ready.” After passing through five checkpoints, Najlla and her family were finally able to board a plane to Abu Dhabi.

Today Najlla and the 20 family members who left with her are in Emirate Humanitarian City, a refugee camp in the United Arab Emirates. They are waiting. They are hoping. They should not be abandoned by us.

Author’s note: You can learn more of Najlla’s ordeal in a video diary published by The New York Times, “My toxic Afghan love story” at https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000008007152/afghanistan-taliban-women-exile.html. Najlla Habibyar can be reached by email at n.habibyar@gmail.com. Please drop her a note of encouragement, to let her know she is not forgotten.

 

Recent

More Stories

Navigating supply chain dynamics

Navigating supply chain dynamics

In an era of rapid geopolitical change, supply chains have evolved from operational necessities to strategic assets. Trade tensions, regional conflicts, and localization-focused economic policies are reshaping global supply chain strategies, with significant implications for the United States and other regions. This shift demands a holistic approach that balances cost efficiency with resilience.

This report integrates insights from various regions to provide a US-centric perspective on the evolving supply chain landscape while examining the interplay between American strategies and global trends.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

A photo of the inside of a retail store. In the foreground is a sign that says "Pick up online orders here." In the background is two women at a cash register in a checkout lane.

Retailers should take advantage of their brick-and-mortar locations not only to satisfy the growing demand for “buy online pickup in store” but also to support microfulfillment efforts for e-commerce.

By Wallpaper via Adobe Stock art

Build the store of the future with “buy online, pick up in store” and microfulfillment

Retailers are increasingly looking to cut costs, become more efficient, and meet ever-changing consumer demands. But how can they do so? The answer is updating their fulfillment strategy to keep pace with evolving customer expectations. As e-commerce continues to dominate the retail space and same-day delivery has become the norm, retailers must look to strengthen their “buy online pick up in store” (BOPIS) and microfulfillment strategies to stay ahead.

BOPIS allows customers to order online and pick up items at the retailers' brick-and-mortar location, and microfulfillment involves housing a retailer’s products closer to the consumer to improve delivery times. While these strategies each serve different purposes, both are centered around getting the product closer to the consumer to ensure faster fulfillment. By combining the two, retailers will be primed to meet customers’ needs—now and in the future.

Keep ReadingShow less
digital chain links

How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

Keep ReadingShow less
A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

“Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of five trucks connected by lines and hubs to give the appearance of a network.

An advanced transportation management system can help with route optimization, real-time tracking, multimodal management, and predicting potential supply chain challenges.

Georgii courtesy of Adobe Stock

How an advanced TMS optimizes supply chain performance

A transportation management system (TMS) is a critical tool for all supply chain and logistics practitioners. It provides shippers, third-party logistics companies (3PLs), and fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs) with the visibility they need to manage the supply chain and optimize the movement of products and goods. There are various types of transportation management systems, and while using a basic TMS is better than no TMS at all, advanced transportation management systems offer enhanced functionality and can scale with you as your business grows.

Getting the right TMS in place can have considerable benefits, as a TMS helps with planning and executing the movement of goods on a comprehensive level, which aids in reducing the risks of disruptions at every point in the supply chain. Companies that better manage risk will see significant savings. Data from the supply chain risk intelligence company Interos found that of the organizations they surveyed in 2021, the average organization lost $184 million in global supply chain disruptions. Similarly, a McKinsey study found that, within 10 years, the cost of supply chain disruptions adds up to nearly half of a company’s profits.


Keep ReadingShow less