Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

REFLECTIONS

It’s a mad, mad, mad world

Once considered a rare possibility, “black swan” events are sending global supply chains into chaos.

As I look around at what is going on in global supply chains today, all I can think about is the 1963 film It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World.

Black swan events—which MacMillan Dictionary defines as “an event that is extremely rare and unexpected but has very significant consequences”—are popping up across the globe.


Consider the tensions brewing in the Ukraine. We are all now dealing with the resultant impact on energy prices and the related impact on our supply chains.

Most of us in the private sector did not foresee the events happening in the Ukraine. The U.S. military, however, saw the possibilities and implemented contingency plans many years ago. As a result, American troops are now moving into U.S.-built facilities located inside Romanian bases. Romania consigned these facilities to the U.S. in bilateral agreements, some dating back over a decade. The consigned facilities, the U.S. equipment pre-positioned in them, and troops deployed there remain under American command and control. The preparation needed to lay in the infrastructure in advance of current events shows that some saw the potential for this black swan event and planned their supply chains accordingly.

A flock of black swans

The pandemic is another black swan event that few were ready for. International flows¾both trade and human¾went sideways. The United States’ once declining trade deficit with China hit a run rate of over $300 billion dollars a year in 2021. The surge in cargo arriving at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach created a continuing backlog, with a fleet of containerships waiting offshore to unload. Just like the ripple effects bouncing around the global supply chain due to Ukraine, we have a set of disruptions rippling through supply chains linked to trans-Pacific trade.

While black swan events in a particular context are rare, black swan events as a class are not. We have seen demand for semiconductor chips for automobiles overrun the capacity of the chip manufacturers¾most notably in Taiwan¾resulting in a constrained supply of new cars. Nobody saw that one coming.

A similar black swan event with a wide ripple effect may also be building with magnetite supply. Refiners transform magnetite ore to produce magnesium and magnesium alloys, which are used to build many aircraft and automobiles. An estimated 65% of magnesia ore reserves are in Russia, China, and North Korea. China alone accounts for 69% of global magnetite. Magnetite is a black swan that could take flight at any time, especially now during a period of increasing tension with China.

Reduce your risk

There are steps that supply chain managers can take to reduce the risks of black swan events. An article on the Russia Briefing website provided a nice synopsis of research conducted by the Dutch bank Rabobank that listed actions that companies and governments could take to mitigate the impact of current geopolitical tensions:

  • Shift from long supply chains to shorter ones.
  • Move toward onshoring, as the semiconductor industry is now doing.
  • Decouple from Russian and mainland China suppliers.
  • Strive for assured access to and control of key raw materials sourced offshore, particularly from sources in China’s orbit.

These changes will, of course, come with a price, but effective supply chains are ones that deliver “best value”—a calculation based on a whole “market basket” of attributes, not just lowest cost. That market basket should now include risk mitigation as well as more traditional cost factors. And once you start adding the increased likelihood of black swan events into your “best value” calculation, the case for reshoring portions of your supply chain becomes stronger every day.

Recent

More Stories

digital chain links

How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

“Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of five trucks connected by lines and hubs to give the appearance of a network.

An advanced transportation management system can help with route optimization, real-time tracking, multimodal management, and predicting potential supply chain challenges.

Georgii courtesy of Adobe Stock

How an advanced TMS optimizes supply chain performance

A transportation management system (TMS) is a critical tool for all supply chain and logistics practitioners. It provides shippers, third-party logistics companies (3PLs), and fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs) with the visibility they need to manage the supply chain and optimize the movement of products and goods. There are various types of transportation management systems, and while using a basic TMS is better than no TMS at all, advanced transportation management systems offer enhanced functionality and can scale with you as your business grows.

Getting the right TMS in place can have considerable benefits, as a TMS helps with planning and executing the movement of goods on a comprehensive level, which aids in reducing the risks of disruptions at every point in the supply chain. Companies that better manage risk will see significant savings. Data from the supply chain risk intelligence company Interos found that of the organizations they surveyed in 2021, the average organization lost $184 million in global supply chain disruptions. Similarly, a McKinsey study found that, within 10 years, the cost of supply chain disruptions adds up to nearly half of a company’s profits.


Keep ReadingShow less
A rusty blue chain crosses in front of blue, red, and yellow containers.

Labor strikes can stop supply chains in their tracks unless companies take steps to build up resiliency.

huntspy via Adobe Stock

Strikes and labor negotiations highlight need for resilient supply chains

Strikes and potential strikes have plagued the supply chain over the last few years. An analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Economics Policy Institute concluded that the number of workers involved in major strike activity increased by 280% in 2023 from 2022. Currently, the U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports are facing the threat of another dockworker strike after they return to the negotiating table in January to attempt to resolve the remaining wage and automation issues. Similarly, Boeing is continuing to contend with a machinists strike.

Strikes, or even the threat of a strike, can cause significant disruptions across the global supply chain and have a massive economic impact. For example, when U.S. railroads were facing the threat of a strike in 2022, many companies redirected their cargo to avoid work stoppages and unhappy customers. If the strike had occurred, it would have had a massive economic impact. The Association of American Railroads (AAR), estimated that the economic impact of a railroad strike could be $2 billion per day.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a campaign button that says, "Supply Chain Issues" lays on top of a U.S. flag.

Supply chain professionals should be aware of how the different policies proposed by the U.S. presidential candidates would affect supply chain operations.

Jon Anders Wiken via Adobe Stock

Assessing the U.S. election impact on supply chain policy

For both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the revival of domestic manufacturing is a key campaign theme and centerpiece in their respective proposals for economic growth and national security. Amid the electioneering and campaign pledges, however, the centrality of supply chain policy is being lost in the shuffle. While both candidates want to make the supply chain less dependent on China and to rebuild the American industrial base, their approaches will impact manufacturing, allied sectors, and global supply chains much differently despite the common overlay of protectionist industrial policy.

Both Trump’s “America First” and Harris’ “Opportunity Economy” policies call for moving home parts of supply chains, like those that bring to market critical products like semiconductors, pharmaceutical products, and medical supplies, and strengthening long-term supply chain resilience by discouraging offshoring. Harris’ economic plan, dubbed the “New Way Forward,” aims to close tax loopholes, strengthen labor rights, and provide government support to high-priority sectors, such as semiconductors and green energy technologies. Trump’s economic plan, dubbed “New American Industrialism,” emphasizes tariffs, corporate tax cuts, and easing of regulations.

Keep ReadingShow less