Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

The high cost of fuel

Diesel has become a greater component of freight cost and carrier profits across all modes.

The topic of fuel prices has been on the forefront of most people’s mind lately. We have seen historic highs in fuel prices recently and this expense effects not only our daily lives by eating into discretionary income – but as the second largest cost – it affects the transportation industry profoundly. Diesel has become a greater component of freight cost and carrier profits across all modes.  

Chart, line chart\n\nDescription automatically generated


Since February of this year, the price of fuel has continually been rising, resulting in record high numbers. Looking back to just last June, the average price of fuel was $3.16 whereas this June hit $5.03 - although we have experienced some relief in July with the average of $4.67 per gallon. What does this mean for the shipper?

For the shipper this means that the overall cost of logistics and transportation has increased greatly and without the ability to predict increases. Additionally, it means that shippers should become increasingly wary of carriers that use fuel as a profit source. While companies might have budgeted for the anticipated annual increases that occur, most have not prepared themselves for the drastic and unpredictable increases the industry has experienced in the past year.

Most ground carriers base their fuel surcharges on the weekly national average diesel price that is supplied by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Each carrier has their own fuel surcharge tariff and many carriers have made changes to their fuel tariffs this year. In today’s LTL market, more than 1/3 of a basic invoice is the cost of the fuel surcharge. In fact, LTL carriers rely heavily on fuel as the primary source of profits. In Truckload about half of the invoice will be driven by fuel. Ground parcel fuel surcharge more than doubled YOY for both carriers, 131% and 116% increase for FedEx and UPS respectively, rising far faster than the indices. 

Air services too have seen big changes. In April of this year, FedEx changed their fuel surcharge for the second time since late last year and UPS followed immediately. In the graph below, the red line shows the actual air fuel surcharge FedEx implemented. If FedEx had chosen to not make these changes, the fuel surcharge shippers would pay today would be the orange dotted line, 3.5% lower than what it is currently. 

Chart, histogram\n\nDescription automatically generated  

As gas prices increased, carriers have found it to be justifiable to raise their own fuel surcharge. Along with the General Rate Increases and other surcharge increases (yes, fuel surcharge applies to other parcel surcharges too), this could become a significant unplanned issue in a shipper’s budget.     

So, what can a shipper do to “soften the blow”? They will first need to know their spend and understand how it changes overtime. The best advice is to seek help from experts on this matter who can help model and mitigate the increases before it breaks your business model.

Recent

More Stories

Transforming maintenance strategies for high-velocity distribution facilities

Walk into any high-velocity distribution facility and you'll immediately grasp the complexity: dozens of forklifts move in orchestrated patterns while automated systems hum along conveyor lines, all working to meet demanding throughput targets. Yet what remains invisible to the casual observer is how maintenance challenges can bring this carefully choreographed dance to a halt.

For facilities moving millions of pieces weekly, maintenance demands fundamentally different solutions. The traditional approach to material handling maintenance that works for smaller operations isn't just constraining productivity—it's holding back your entire operation.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

Three ways to elevate your empty miles strategy

Reducing empty miles—or the distance traveled with no load or cargo—can have multiple benefits, including increased cost savings and streamlined operations. But at its core, it’s about making smarter, more sustainable choices while transporting goods. Here are three components to craft and execute a successful empty miles program, keeping collaboration in mind at each stop along the way.

Keep ReadingShow less
Navigating supply chain dynamics

Navigating supply chain dynamics

In an era of rapid geopolitical change, supply chains have evolved from operational necessities to strategic assets. Trade tensions, regional conflicts, and localization-focused economic policies are reshaping global supply chain strategies, with significant implications for the United States and other regions. This shift demands a holistic approach that balances cost efficiency with resilience.

This report integrates insights from various regions to provide a US-centric perspective on the evolving supply chain landscape while examining the interplay between American strategies and global trends.

Keep ReadingShow less
AI-generated image of a containership at a port.

Securing supply chain resilience requires a common vocabulary and vision

The Biden Administration started sounding the alarm about America’s supply chains just weeks after taking office in 2021 with an Executive Order, followed by the launch of the Council on Supply Chain Resilience in 2023 and additional instructions in 2024. While progress has been made on strengthening the resilience of supply chains, other gains are being left on the table. One reason why: The public and private sectors do not use a common vocabulary, leading to incomplete or misaligned incentives, priorities, and perspectives. It’s time for a common vocabulary and vision. Fortunately, the inaugural Quadrennial Supply Chain Review of December 2024 lays the groundwork for an “enduring vision” for the incoming administration and for a truly common vocabulary and vision.

Let’s define terms. In its simplest form, resilience is the ability to bounce back from large-scale disruption, according to supply chain expert and MIT professor Yossi Sheffi. On that much, the private sector and government agree.

Keep ReadingShow less
A photo of the inside of a retail store. In the foreground is a sign that says "Pick up online orders here." In the background is two women at a cash register in a checkout lane.

Retailers should take advantage of their brick-and-mortar locations not only to satisfy the growing demand for “buy online pickup in store” but also to support microfulfillment efforts for e-commerce.

By Wallpaper via Adobe Stock art

Build the store of the future with “buy online, pick up in store” and microfulfillment

Retailers are increasingly looking to cut costs, become more efficient, and meet ever-changing consumer demands. But how can they do so? The answer is updating their fulfillment strategy to keep pace with evolving customer expectations. As e-commerce continues to dominate the retail space and same-day delivery has become the norm, retailers must look to strengthen their “buy online pick up in store” (BOPIS) and microfulfillment strategies to stay ahead.

BOPIS allows customers to order online and pick up items at the retailers' brick-and-mortar location, and microfulfillment involves housing a retailer’s products closer to the consumer to improve delivery times. While these strategies each serve different purposes, both are centered around getting the product closer to the consumer to ensure faster fulfillment. By combining the two, retailers will be primed to meet customers’ needs—now and in the future.

Keep ReadingShow less