Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Retail store closures: What it means for in-store returns

While retailers may benefit from reduced overhead costs and expanded market reach when they close physical stores, they must be prepared to manage the challenges that come with fewer locations.

SCQ_blog_stores_closing.jpg

An increasing number of retailers are choosing to close their physical stores. A recent article reveals that more than 800 stores will be closing across the U.S. in 2023, including major retail chains like Amazon, Bath & Body Works, Macy's, Walmart, and Big Lots. Store closures represent a significant challenge to retailers that have already been struggling to adapt to the changing retail landscape. There are several reasons why retailers are closing brick-and-mortar stores:

  • Increased competition from online retailers: In 2022, total eCommerce sales were estimated at $1.03 billion, an increase of 7.7 percent from 2021. This growing sector puts pressure on brick-and-mortar retailers to rationalize their physical retail footprint.
  • Changing consumer habits: Consumers are increasingly shopping in new ways, such as using mobile devices, which has made it easier to compare prices, suggest items, and purchase goods from anywhere. Social shopping is expected to swell to nearly $80 billion by 2025, and make up 5 percent of total U.S. e-commerce.
  • High operating costs: Maintaining physical retail stores can be expensive, especially as rents and wages continue to rise. Retail rents increased by over 3.9 percent from mid-2021 through mid-2022 - the highest they have ever been. By closing stores, retailers can reduce their operating costs and allocate resources to other areas of their business.
  • Poor store performance: Some brick-and-mortar stores simply aren't performing well due to factors such as location, competition, and changing consumer preferences. In these cases, retailers may choose to close underperforming stores and invest more in profitable locations.

Impact on the Customer 


While this trend may be good news for retailers looking to cut costs and improve their bottom line, it can have significant ripple effects for consumers. As the economy recovers and consumers become more comfortable returning to physical stores, retailers that have closed stores may find themselves at a disadvantage. For sales, brick-and-mortar retail stores offer unique advantages such as the ability to see and touch products, immediate gratification, customer service and a personalized shopping experience. For returns, it is more beneficial for a consumer to return an item to the store instead of online for several reasons:

  • Positive Customer Experience: When a customer returns an item to a physical store, it provides an opportunity for the retailer to interact with the customer face-to-face, potentially resolving any issues and creating a positive customer experience. This can lead to increased customer loyalty and repeat business, in fact, 96 percent of customers will buy again from a business that offers an “easy” or “very easy” return experience.
  • Speed and Ease: In-store returns can result in a faster and more efficient return process, with the customer receiving a refund or exchange on the spot. An instant refund is among the top returns priority for consumers, with 39 percent telling goTRG they expect their refund within 24-hours.
  • Reduced Costs: The high cost of processing e-commerce returns is a major challenge for retailers. In addition to the expense of shipping and handling, retailers must also process returned items, restock them, and sometimes dispose of them. This can be a time-consuming and expensive process, with many returns resulting in a total net loss for retailers. In-store returns can help retailers avoid shipping, labor, and restocking fees associated with online returns. 
  • Fraud Prevention: For every $100 in returned merchandise accepted, retailers lose $10.40 to return fraud. Physically receiving an item from a customer helps verify that the returned item is in fact the one that was purchased thereby reducing instances of fraud, which can be more difficult to detect in an e-commerce environment. 

In addition to these customer-facing impacts, store closures can also have broader economic and social impacts. When a store closes, it can lead to job losses for employees who worked atand supported the store. This can have a ripple effect on the local economy, as those employees may be less likely to spend money at other local businesses. In some cases, store closures can even contribute to the decline of entire neighborhoods or commercial areas.

Where to go Next?

So, how can retailers continue to encourage in-store returns in the face of store closures? One potential solution is to partner with other retailers to offer consolidated returns drop-off points. By working together, retailers can create a network of convenient returns locations that are easily accessible to customers.

For example, a customer who needs to return an item purchased from a clothing retailer could drop off their item at a participating grocery store or drugstore where consumers visit frequently. This would allow the clothing retailer to save money on shipping and handling fees while also offering the consumer a convenient returns option.

The benefits of consolidated returns drop off points extend beyond cost savings. By working together, retailers can offer customers a more seamless returns experience. Instead of having to navigate multiple returns processes, customers could simply drop off their items at a single location. This could help to reduce confusion and ultimately lead to higher customer satisfaction and loyalty.

Of course, there are some challenges associated with implementing a consolidated returns drop off network. Retailers would need to agree on the terms of the partnership, including how returns would be processed and who would be responsible for handling the items. They would also need to invest in the necessary infrastructure, such as signage and technology, to ensure that customers are aware of the program and can easily drop off their items.

Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of a consolidated returns drop off point network are significant. By working together, retailers can reduce the high cost of processing e-commerce returns while also offering customers a convenient and seamless returns experience. As the retail industry continues to evolve, it will be important for retailers to explore innovative solutions like this to remain competitive and meet the changing needs of their customers.

Ultimately, the closure of physical stores is a complex issue with far-reaching effects throughout the retail supply chain. While retailers may benefit from reduced overhead costs and expanded market reach, they must also be prepared to manage the challenges that come with fewer locations. This includes developing new strategies for managing in-store returns at surviving stores, investing in new technology and infrastructure to streamline the returns process, and even partnering with unlikely allies to provide a seamless and personalized service to customers, even in the absence of physical stores.

Recent

More Stories

digital chain links

How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

“Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of five trucks connected by lines and hubs to give the appearance of a network.

An advanced transportation management system can help with route optimization, real-time tracking, multimodal management, and predicting potential supply chain challenges.

Georgii courtesy of Adobe Stock

How an advanced TMS optimizes supply chain performance

A transportation management system (TMS) is a critical tool for all supply chain and logistics practitioners. It provides shippers, third-party logistics companies (3PLs), and fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs) with the visibility they need to manage the supply chain and optimize the movement of products and goods. There are various types of transportation management systems, and while using a basic TMS is better than no TMS at all, advanced transportation management systems offer enhanced functionality and can scale with you as your business grows.

Getting the right TMS in place can have considerable benefits, as a TMS helps with planning and executing the movement of goods on a comprehensive level, which aids in reducing the risks of disruptions at every point in the supply chain. Companies that better manage risk will see significant savings. Data from the supply chain risk intelligence company Interos found that of the organizations they surveyed in 2021, the average organization lost $184 million in global supply chain disruptions. Similarly, a McKinsey study found that, within 10 years, the cost of supply chain disruptions adds up to nearly half of a company’s profits.


Keep ReadingShow less
A rusty blue chain crosses in front of blue, red, and yellow containers.

Labor strikes can stop supply chains in their tracks unless companies take steps to build up resiliency.

huntspy via Adobe Stock

Strikes and labor negotiations highlight need for resilient supply chains

Strikes and potential strikes have plagued the supply chain over the last few years. An analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Economics Policy Institute concluded that the number of workers involved in major strike activity increased by 280% in 2023 from 2022. Currently, the U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports are facing the threat of another dockworker strike after they return to the negotiating table in January to attempt to resolve the remaining wage and automation issues. Similarly, Boeing is continuing to contend with a machinists strike.

Strikes, or even the threat of a strike, can cause significant disruptions across the global supply chain and have a massive economic impact. For example, when U.S. railroads were facing the threat of a strike in 2022, many companies redirected their cargo to avoid work stoppages and unhappy customers. If the strike had occurred, it would have had a massive economic impact. The Association of American Railroads (AAR), estimated that the economic impact of a railroad strike could be $2 billion per day.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a campaign button that says, "Supply Chain Issues" lays on top of a U.S. flag.

Supply chain professionals should be aware of how the different policies proposed by the U.S. presidential candidates would affect supply chain operations.

Jon Anders Wiken via Adobe Stock

Assessing the U.S. election impact on supply chain policy

For both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the revival of domestic manufacturing is a key campaign theme and centerpiece in their respective proposals for economic growth and national security. Amid the electioneering and campaign pledges, however, the centrality of supply chain policy is being lost in the shuffle. While both candidates want to make the supply chain less dependent on China and to rebuild the American industrial base, their approaches will impact manufacturing, allied sectors, and global supply chains much differently despite the common overlay of protectionist industrial policy.

Both Trump’s “America First” and Harris’ “Opportunity Economy” policies call for moving home parts of supply chains, like those that bring to market critical products like semiconductors, pharmaceutical products, and medical supplies, and strengthening long-term supply chain resilience by discouraging offshoring. Harris’ economic plan, dubbed the “New Way Forward,” aims to close tax loopholes, strengthen labor rights, and provide government support to high-priority sectors, such as semiconductors and green energy technologies. Trump’s economic plan, dubbed “New American Industrialism,” emphasizes tariffs, corporate tax cuts, and easing of regulations.

Keep ReadingShow less