Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Contract logistics providers enable organizations to future-proof their supply chains against inevitable future shocks

Logistics already looks vastly different than it did five years ago. And the rate of change is only increasing. Here’s why the path to future-proofed supply chains increasingly runs through third-party contract logistics providers.

SCX_blog_DP_World_Canada_1200x800.jpg

In the past few years alone, organizations across North America have weathered a pandemic, political instability in far flung countries critical to their supply chains, labour disruptions and labour cost increases, the rise of friend-shoring, and the onset of a new age of innovation, automation, and AI.

It’s hard to argue that change is coming more rapidly and unpredictably than ever before. 


For many organizations, these changes and disruptions are making their supply chains increasingly complex and unwieldly. That’s why so many companies are outsourcing their logistics work to expert contract logistics providers. 

Contract logistics providers offer a number of benefits to companies, including reducing their costs, improving operational efficiencies, and optimizing their inventory levels – all while providing access to best-in-class services and innovations.

By choosing contract logistics providers, organizations are acknowledging a dawning reality about the future: they’d rather focus on their core competencies – product development, manufacturing, marketing, and sales – instead of trying to put their arms around the ever-changing world of logistics.

“Many new and rapidly growing companies, notably in technology and fast fashion, never had in-house logistics capabilities to begin with,” said Mike Valentine, Chief Commercial Officer, USA/Mexico at DP World. 

“For those that do, the equation may be shifting. Is it smarter to develop innovative capacity in artificial intelligence and automation and build distribution centres across the continent, or outsource those costs and risks to contract logistics providers?”

Here are some of the trends that are making the answer to that question increasingly obvious.

5 logistics trends that will shape the future of supply chains.

1. Innovation, automation, and AI.

Efficiencies and ROI can now come faster than ever before. As we enter the age of AI, and as warehouses are increasingly populated by robotics, the opportunity for organizations to drive efficiencies and reduce costs has never been greater. 

But the price of entry for that is also higher than ever before. 

Competing for in-demand talent, investing in innovation, and maintaining that capability over time – that’s challenging for organizations to do themselves. The smarter play for these companies is usually to leverage the investments made by companies like DP World – which now hires software developers as much as it does industrial and electrical engineers. Organizations get all the benefits of technology without the risks and exposure that come along with it.

2. Faster deliveries from more distribution centers.

    Consumers and organizations have become accustomed to next-day and same-day deliveries. But they aren’t possible for most organizations that have just a single (or even two or three) distribution centres in North America. That might have worked twenty years ago. But everyone’s expectations have changed. 

    Of course, not every organization is focused on improving lead times to customers. B2B-oriented organizations may be less concerned. But for companies that are feeling pressure to deliver faster, accessing additional distribution centres through contract logistics providers offers additional (and scalable) capacity without the equivalent upfront capital investment. 

    3. Friend-shoring. Multi-sourcing.

      By now, the concept of friend-shoring is well established. But what makes more sense – building a corporate footprint from scratch in a near-shore country like Mexico or working with contract logistics providers that already operate there effectively and efficiently?

      Now add another layer: the post-pandemic trend towards multi-source suppliers rather than just single suppliers. What if the move away from a less stable single jurisdiction now means opening up operations in two new countries? If you’re Canada or US based, are you willing to invest not just in Mexico but India as well? Or do you want to hire a firm that’s already there?

      4. Labour costs and talent availability.

      The recent rise of labour movements, the war for talent, and the costs associated with both have some companies rethinking whether they want to keep those costs on their books or outsource that to contract logistics providers so they can focus on hiring, retaining, and paying the core talent for their core business.

      5. Sustainability.

      As organizations make more public and quantifiable commitments to sustainability and supply chains are more sharply scrutinized for their climate impacts, sustainability will drive more logistics decisions. For example, in the past, goods that come in from the Port of Long Beach, CA might have ended up shipped by rail to a single distribution centre in Memphis… and then trucked right back to California. The solution here is a west coast distribution centre. But as noted above, building it may not make sense for most companies.  

      Contract logistics future-proofs supply chains and enables core business focus.

      Contract logistics providers are a relief valve for companies. They remove the pressure of trying to manage an unmanageable global economic, political, environmental, and technological landscape. 

      With that pressure gone, companies can focus their resources on the core things that make them great – their products and their brands. At the same time, they lose nothing when it comes to futureproofing. In fact, by working with global contract logistics experts, companies reduce risk, access innovation, and strengthen their supply chains, no matter what shocks may come next.

      “We hear it every day from across industries,” said Tabare Dominguez, Vice President Commercial at DP World Canada. “Complexity is increasing. Change is accelerating. Companies aren’t just looking for partners that can help them make smart decisions about logistics. They want to outsource that function.” 

      Recent

      More Stories

      A photo of the inside of a retail store. In the foreground is a sign that says "Pick up online orders here." In the background is two women at a cash register in a checkout lane.

      Retailers should take advantage of their brick-and-mortar locations not only to satisfy the growing demand for “buy online pickup in store” but also to support microfulfillment efforts for e-commerce.

      By Wallpaper via Adobe Stock art

      Build the store of the future with “buy online, pick up in store” and microfulfillment

      Retailers are increasingly looking to cut costs, become more efficient, and meet ever-changing consumer demands. But how can they do so? The answer is updating their fulfillment strategy to keep pace with evolving customer expectations. As e-commerce continues to dominate the retail space and same-day delivery has become the norm, retailers must look to strengthen their “buy online pick up in store” (BOPIS) and microfulfillment strategies to stay ahead.

      BOPIS allows customers to order online and pick up items at the retailers' brick-and-mortar location, and microfulfillment involves housing a retailer’s products closer to the consumer to improve delivery times. While these strategies each serve different purposes, both are centered around getting the product closer to the consumer to ensure faster fulfillment. By combining the two, retailers will be primed to meet customers’ needs—now and in the future.

      Keep ReadingShow less

      Featured

      digital chain links

      How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

      In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

      Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

      Keep ReadingShow less
      A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

      Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

      Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

      “Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

      Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

      In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.

      Keep ReadingShow less
      An illustration of five trucks connected by lines and hubs to give the appearance of a network.

      An advanced transportation management system can help with route optimization, real-time tracking, multimodal management, and predicting potential supply chain challenges.

      Georgii courtesy of Adobe Stock

      How an advanced TMS optimizes supply chain performance

      A transportation management system (TMS) is a critical tool for all supply chain and logistics practitioners. It provides shippers, third-party logistics companies (3PLs), and fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs) with the visibility they need to manage the supply chain and optimize the movement of products and goods. There are various types of transportation management systems, and while using a basic TMS is better than no TMS at all, advanced transportation management systems offer enhanced functionality and can scale with you as your business grows.

      Getting the right TMS in place can have considerable benefits, as a TMS helps with planning and executing the movement of goods on a comprehensive level, which aids in reducing the risks of disruptions at every point in the supply chain. Companies that better manage risk will see significant savings. Data from the supply chain risk intelligence company Interos found that of the organizations they surveyed in 2021, the average organization lost $184 million in global supply chain disruptions. Similarly, a McKinsey study found that, within 10 years, the cost of supply chain disruptions adds up to nearly half of a company’s profits.


      Keep ReadingShow less
      A rusty blue chain crosses in front of blue, red, and yellow containers.

      Labor strikes can stop supply chains in their tracks unless companies take steps to build up resiliency.

      huntspy via Adobe Stock

      Strikes and labor negotiations highlight need for resilient supply chains

      Strikes and potential strikes have plagued the supply chain over the last few years. An analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Economics Policy Institute concluded that the number of workers involved in major strike activity increased by 280% in 2023 from 2022. Currently, the U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports are facing the threat of another dockworker strike after they return to the negotiating table in January to attempt to resolve the remaining wage and automation issues. Similarly, Boeing is continuing to contend with a machinists strike.

      Strikes, or even the threat of a strike, can cause significant disruptions across the global supply chain and have a massive economic impact. For example, when U.S. railroads were facing the threat of a strike in 2022, many companies redirected their cargo to avoid work stoppages and unhappy customers. If the strike had occurred, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) estimated that the economic impact of a railroad strike could have been $2 billion per day.

      Keep ReadingShow less