Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Commentary

Navigating supply concentration risks from the Hamas–Israel conflict

How will a prolonged Israeli-Hamas war impact global supply chains and manufacturing?

A world still reeling from the ongoing Russia–Ukraine war and a U.S.–China trade war is now grappling with uncertainty in the Middle East. How will a prolonged Israeli-Hamas war impact global supply chains and manufacturing?

The Middle East supplies much of the world’s energy. It transports it through several strategically important shipping passageways such as the Suez Canal, the Red Sea, the Persian Gulf, and the Strait of Hormuz. If the conflict remains localized and doesn’t expand to other countries, there may be minimal impact on oil prices, gross domestic product (GDP), and inflation. However, if the conflict escalates into a regional affair, the most obvious effects center around a long-term threat to global trade that might send a fragile economy into recession. Oil prices could jump as much as 75%. At the center of it all is the global supply chain, with huge risk factors centered around vendor concentration in one region of the world. 


Global industries feeling the impact of supplier concentration

When we consider “supply chain concentration risk,” we are looking at the risks incurred when relying on a limited number of suppliers or geographies for specific parts and/or services. If ignored, organizations can experience unplanned service outages, production disruption, reputational damage, costly transition to new suppliers, and ultimately higher costs.

For example, in 2022 a primary Toyota supplier faced a cyberattack that forced Toyota to shut down 14 factories for at least a week until the supplier got back online and could start shipping parts again. While larger suppliers may have robust cybersecurity in place, smaller suppliers may not.

You don’t need to look very long to find examples of increased supply chain concentration risk as a result of the Hamas–Israel conflict.

Although Israel is a small country, it plays a significant role in the global semiconductor chip industry. It has a reputation as a hot spot of innovation possessing many talented technology entrepreneurs that major tech firms are frequently courting. Now many of these tech entrepreneurs have been called into military service, abandoning their roles as tech leaders and taking up arms. That’s why the Hamas–Israel conflict threatens to disrupt the semiconductor industry and could lead to global chip delays.

For example, Intel, NVIDIA, and Apple all run production facilities in the country. Intel operates five major facilities in Israel, working on artificial intelligence (AI) and self-driving cars. Intel’s Haifa facility provides input into the company’s processors, which run the lion’s share of PCs and servers. Tower Semiconductor has a few factories in Israel mainly focused on the automotive industry, and Intel has plans to build a new factory in 2027 in Gaza. Even if facilities within Israel remain secure, they may not have the workforce to operate. Many major tech companies report losing many workers to the draft.

Intel has been working to reduce the fragility that comes with concentrating manufacturing in a single region. Its goal is to create 50% of the world’s semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. and the EU by 2030. However, for now, Israel’s semiconductor industry may become a bottleneck if organizations have concentrated suppliers within the country. And supply concentration isn’t just a concern within the chip industry.

Already, India is experiencing pressure on its diamond supply chains because it gets its raw materials from Israel and sells the processed diamonds back to Israel. This has global implications as the natural diamond cutting and polishing industries in India have a 90% global market share. Because Israel acts as a hub for diamonds, it concentrates diamond imports and exports. With the conflict, this concentration went from convenience to bottleneck. India is now having to explore importing directly from diamond sources in places such as Africa. It may eventually find more competitive prices and higher profit margins. However, it took a conflict to start moving the industry toward diversifying suppliers and end markets.

Israel is also a major importer and exporter of integrated circuits and the products that use them. This means that products such as telecom network equipment, aerospace equipment, medical instruments, and other measuring instruments might experience significant disruptions. According to Hellenic Shipping News, Israel accounts for 14% of the EU’s imported processors.

Avoiding concentration risk with an adaptive supply chain

If there’s one thing the world has learned since the pandemic, it’s that ongoing supply shocks have become the norm rather than the exception. International labor movements, natural disasters, growing geopolitical unrest, a U.S.–China trade war, and a global economic slowdown create complexity and uncertainty in the supply chain. That’s why, increasingly, risks from supply concentrations are growing and causing disruptions. It’s no longer adequate to base supplier decisions solely on cost. Part of developing resilient supply chains amid disruption means looking at how adaptive your supply chain can become as the next supply shock arrives. Otherwise, any cost-savings will quickly evaporate as a concentrated supply base disappears, and procurement teams are left in “reaction mode” as they rush to find alternatives—sometimes no matter the cost.

It doesn’t have to play out that way. Procurement teams can offset concentration risks and avoid major disruptions. However, agility isn’t going to come from a better spreadsheet. Developing resilient supply chains means embracing digitalization. Digitalization taps into data and technology to improve visibility into everything from supplier health and part cost-savings opportunities to emerging risks and even supplier communications. AI and predictive analytics create incredible new efficiencies. In fact, it is difficult to imagine how procurement teams can succeed through so much uncertainty without the insights made possible by AI.

Because AI processes massive amounts of disparate data, teams gain insights they couldn’t dream of getting from a spreadsheet. Automated alerts help teams anticipate supply concentration risks and quickly find alternatives before a disruption occurs. Through systemic change and integration of digital platforms, any organization can better identify untapped cost savings, so even when cost isn’t the key driver, teams can balance risk and cost with a few clicks.

The supply chain has never faced so much ongoing disruption. The Hamas–Israel conflict is just the latest event highlighting the supply concentration risk many industries find themselves facing.

Recent

More Stories

digital chain links

How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

“Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of five trucks connected by lines and hubs to give the appearance of a network.

An advanced transportation management system can help with route optimization, real-time tracking, multimodal management, and predicting potential supply chain challenges.

Georgii courtesy of Adobe Stock

How an advanced TMS optimizes supply chain performance

A transportation management system (TMS) is a critical tool for all supply chain and logistics practitioners. It provides shippers, third-party logistics companies (3PLs), and fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs) with the visibility they need to manage the supply chain and optimize the movement of products and goods. There are various types of transportation management systems, and while using a basic TMS is better than no TMS at all, advanced transportation management systems offer enhanced functionality and can scale with you as your business grows.

Getting the right TMS in place can have considerable benefits, as a TMS helps with planning and executing the movement of goods on a comprehensive level, which aids in reducing the risks of disruptions at every point in the supply chain. Companies that better manage risk will see significant savings. Data from the supply chain risk intelligence company Interos found that of the organizations they surveyed in 2021, the average organization lost $184 million in global supply chain disruptions. Similarly, a McKinsey study found that, within 10 years, the cost of supply chain disruptions adds up to nearly half of a company’s profits.


Keep ReadingShow less
A rusty blue chain crosses in front of blue, red, and yellow containers.

Labor strikes can stop supply chains in their tracks unless companies take steps to build up resiliency.

huntspy via Adobe Stock

Strikes and labor negotiations highlight need for resilient supply chains

Strikes and potential strikes have plagued the supply chain over the last few years. An analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Economics Policy Institute concluded that the number of workers involved in major strike activity increased by 280% in 2023 from 2022. Currently, the U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports are facing the threat of another dockworker strike after they return to the negotiating table in January to attempt to resolve the remaining wage and automation issues. Similarly, Boeing is continuing to contend with a machinists strike.

Strikes, or even the threat of a strike, can cause significant disruptions across the global supply chain and have a massive economic impact. For example, when U.S. railroads were facing the threat of a strike in 2022, many companies redirected their cargo to avoid work stoppages and unhappy customers. If the strike had occurred, it would have had a massive economic impact. The Association of American Railroads (AAR), estimated that the economic impact of a railroad strike could be $2 billion per day.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a campaign button that says, "Supply Chain Issues" lays on top of a U.S. flag.

Supply chain professionals should be aware of how the different policies proposed by the U.S. presidential candidates would affect supply chain operations.

Jon Anders Wiken via Adobe Stock

Assessing the U.S. election impact on supply chain policy

For both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the revival of domestic manufacturing is a key campaign theme and centerpiece in their respective proposals for economic growth and national security. Amid the electioneering and campaign pledges, however, the centrality of supply chain policy is being lost in the shuffle. While both candidates want to make the supply chain less dependent on China and to rebuild the American industrial base, their approaches will impact manufacturing, allied sectors, and global supply chains much differently despite the common overlay of protectionist industrial policy.

Both Trump’s “America First” and Harris’ “Opportunity Economy” policies call for moving home parts of supply chains, like those that bring to market critical products like semiconductors, pharmaceutical products, and medical supplies, and strengthening long-term supply chain resilience by discouraging offshoring. Harris’ economic plan, dubbed the “New Way Forward,” aims to close tax loopholes, strengthen labor rights, and provide government support to high-priority sectors, such as semiconductors and green energy technologies. Trump’s economic plan, dubbed “New American Industrialism,” emphasizes tariffs, corporate tax cuts, and easing of regulations.

Keep ReadingShow less